In article <33eb1dc4.1199...@news.pipeline.com>, "Leslie E. Packer, PhD"
<lpac...@pipeline.com> writes
>>Peter <Pe
...@brentano.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>In article <macabrus-ya02408000R0608971353270...@news.concentric.net>,
>>Phoenix <macab...@aol.REMOVEME.com> writes
>[both wrote a lot of interesting comments on the Bard's aliases].
>Are you guys gonna be upset when I tell you that I came across two
>more a while ago (have to reconstruct some of my files for something
>I'm working on, Peter, if you get my meaning)?
<G> [Innocent whistling sounds] One must of course examine all options?
Upset? Never! I have high hopes that Bard will have the longest,
longest, longest, tallest, tallest, tallest alias list in the history of
usenet.
Why, if he can't have a penis, he can certainly have a massive
phall^HA^HA^HA^HA^HA^HA^lias list.
>Here are the headers, so get ready to flex, march, update, whatever
><g>...
Well, I'll do a proper update when we next have a significant batch.
Meanwhiles, all contributions to this Bard's list of plublished authors
will be gratefully received, "Dear Readers".
No contributor will be turned away; the only qualification is that the
aliarse is a geniune one. All offerings will elicit a carefully crafted
and tailored response, as befits the offered aliarse.
Please remember that Professor Pustulent has a distinctive style of
prose <excuse for>, in keeping with his status as a plublished Bard.
He is easy to detect, no need to contact SETI.
>-------------------
>Subject: "Ans. to FAQs": Info. and Precautions for "Therapy"
>Clients (Post 2 of 2)
>From: anon-11
...@anon.twwells.com (Cognitee)
>Date: 1997/01/15
>Message-Id: <anon-11494-1501971551320
...@cnc047033.concentric.net>
>----------------
>BTW, His Royal Jesness signed that post:
>> -- b jesness, APA member, psychology and counseling instructor
Ah. I have a problem with this one as I have;
Cognitee <anon-11...@anon.twwells.com>
and to include
<anon-11...@anon.twwells.com> Cognitee
might be seen as a cheat by Bardie-poos, even though he's trying to have
more aliarses than there are diagnostic categories in DSM IV.
As you know, he so much /wants/ our list of his aliarsing around to be,
errrrrm, "fair". Or must we be slavishly "Cruel to be kind"? Should I
include it in the side salad? As an hors d'oeuvre? An after 8 mint? The
cheese dish? Coffee and brandy? The cigars and cigarettes afterward?
Or is this simply his entry pass and invite to KoTM? Buggering up his
own false identity? An honour for consistently stupid services to
kookery?
>Of course, he's not a full member of the APA, so this is an attempt to
>mislead the public (and it's not the only time he misrepresented his
>membership status in the APA).
Ffffuuuuhhhhh. I had wondered about this tendency of his penislessness
and will consult the Great Search-Master of Archives, the Lord High
Grepwin, who will doubtless turnover more dubious references to
membership...
...yes, there are more. Please note the subject, in this salacious
example of his shameful denigration of you:
[ Section: 1/1 File: twit1.txt Encoder: Turnpike Version 3.03b ]
begin 644 twit1.txt
<encoded_portion_removed>
end
sum -r/size 61653/1652 section (from "begin" to "end")
sum -r/size 55423/1179 entire input file
"He shall have science where ever he goes"... ...please note the sig in
this next example, and his caustic <jealous?> reference to the
possibility that there may be Cogs other than Cognitee, Cognito, & etc.:
[ Section: 1/1 File: twit2.txt Encoder: Turnpike Version 3.03b ]
begin 644 twit2.txt
<encoded_portion_removed>
end
sum -r/size 6316/4300 section (from "begin" to "end")
sum -r/size 57872/3101 entire input file
However, not content with ethics, he looped the loop, did a barrel roll
and then nose-dived into the sewers whence he originated. Plodge.
Shluppp. Ppphhhhhllllllluuur.
Bleh.
Bard has a status problem, errm, ploblem. <Plobrem?> It comes from
having no dick, I think. At least, "That's what I heard". Perhaps this
is why he says that he is a member? If he can't have one he must _be_
one.
>Phoenix, you probably wouldn't know
>this not being in psychology professionally, but the APA won't accept
>you for full membership unless you have a doctoral degree in
>psychology. Since Mr. Jesness doesn't have a doctorate, all he can
>get is associate membership status.
As a matter of fact, Phoenix, he _***HATES***_ Ph.D.s, more especially
if they do not have the same gender as him. His personal gender problem
notwithstanding, of course.
In the UK a _Ph.D._ is insufficient to gain chartered and thus full
membership status. I wonder how he'd take to that, nose pressed up
against the window, begging to be let in so he can ABUSE, SPAM, DEFAME
TROLL, AND KOOK the BPS?
>But he tries, sometimes, to
>pretend that it's "member" instead of "associate member." That is,
>when he's not busy accusing the APA of killing children or calling all
>credentialled psychologists and therapists unethical, lying hacks,
>thugs, etc. etc....
Why would he want to be associated with a society of "child killers", I
ask? Never mind membership, although member-envy has interesting
connotations since the date when he told us that you'd cruelly deprived
him of his prideful manhood. <g>
>On to the next one.....
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Subject: Re: Revision of Further Evidence on Brad
>From: AllThingsConsidered <Incog
...@aol.com>
>Date: 1996/02/21
>Message-Id: <4ge5ci$
...@stratus.skypoint.net>
>Newsgroups:
>sci.psychology.personality,sci.psychology.misc,sci.psychology.theory,alt.p sycho
>l
>ogy.personality,sci.psychology.psychotherapy
>[More Headers]
>But Paul,
> Thanks again. When people know my credentials, they may be more
>likely to take notice than they were before. Oh, and I have taught an
>Individual Counseling course recently-- b jesness, M.A.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, this is a _good_ one. This is in the bag. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. Bard
is now up to 151! I have no doubt at all that the great Bard Jesness
will soon be the commander of a Legion, which typically consists of
3,000 to 6,000 infantry troops and 100 to 200 cavalry.
"My name is Legion, for we are many" <Marvel>
Sadly we no longer use horse in modern combat. Thus I imagine, given his
former christian name <Bradley is now Bard, right?>, he will rightly
demand that his MBT is the Sherman Tank? >;->
[Well, there isn't an Omar Tank in cockney rhyming slang.] >;->
Notice how he "taught [...] recently", in 1996?
>Note the distribution list on the above.... and then read:
[Noted]
>>Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy
>>Subject: Re: "Ans. to FAQs": Info. and Precautions for "Therapy" Clients (Post
>1 of 2)
>>From: xx571
...@anon.penet.fi (Cognitee)
>>Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 16:10:32 -0600
>>Dear Dan,
>> I participate in less than 10 newsgroups and do not cross-post to more
>>than 4 at a time . All I cross-post is appropriate for that purpose
>>--THOUGH THE STATUS QUO DOES NOT LIKE IT. Tough cookies. Freedom is
>>hardest for the corrupt !!!
>No more than four at a time, huh? Gee, I counted 5 in the post above
>it....
[I think that his crown was slipping over his star-struck eyes...]
>and what about:
>>Subject: The Amer. Psychol. Assoc. Should Be SUED and Could Be
>>From: "Cognitee" <good_b...@hotmail.com>
>>Date: 1997/07/15
>>Message-Id: <good_brad-1507971205570...@dial014.future.net>
>>Newsgroups: sci.psychology.psychotherapy,sci.psychology.misc,sci.psychology.
>t
>heory,alt.society.mental-health,alt.support,alt.psychology.help,alt.psycho logy
>>[More Headers]
>Apparently, he cross-posts to more than 4 but just can't count past
>4???
One, two, three, four... ...MANY? This must account for his problem with
Ns and DFs?
>I wonder if we should bother.... nah...
sci.psychology.personality,sci.psychology.misc,sci.psychology.theory,
sci.psychology.psychotherapy,alt.psychology.personality,alt.society.ment
al-health,alt.support,alt.psychology.help?
Are you suggesting that we canvass for his election in these parishes?
Can an onlooker please explain to me the ethics of crossposting a fwd of
the CFV for KoTM?
>Leslie
>------
>"[...] If you wish to adress the issue of **ME** further (EVEN WITH
>"EVIDENCE") , will you please explain to all of us (to the entire world)
>how this is appropriate. Let me put it to readers this way:
>Pretend I am of bad character. Hell, pretend I am an ax murderer. Fine."
> --- from Bard Jesness, 7/26/97
As well as murdering the truth and butchering English, he specialises in
adults then?
--
Peter
In article <4q802v$
...@stratus.skypoint.net>, Cognito2 <Cogni
...@aol.com> writes
>One of you assholes let me know how it turns out
If you are successful, we will, Bard, we will. Cross plublishingly. #;-(+)
|
