Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Google buys Sapir-Whorf
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mike L  
View profile  
 More options Jun 29 2012, 3:35 pm
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english, sci.lang
From: Mike L <n...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:35:37 +0100
Local: Fri, Jun 29 2012 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: Google buys Sapir-Whorf
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT), "Peter T. Daniels"

<gramma...@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Jun 29, 3:41 am, Robert Bannister <robb...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> On 29/06/12 1:50 AM, R H Draney wrote:
>> > Whiskers filted:

>> >> I think it's pretty well established that human eye and brain physical
>> >> responses to colour are within close limits, apart from individuals with
>> >> damaged or malformed eyes or brains - and the 'colour blind' variations
>> >> which were largely unknown until John Dalton investigated his own vision
>> >> in the late 18th century.  There are simple tests for most forms of
>> >> colour blindness - but as language has to mediate the tests, it's
>> >> intriguing to wonder if (eg) the Himbra would be able to cope with such
>> >> tests designed by (eg) Germans.

>> > Or by Russians, who have one word for "blue" and a different word for "light
>> > blue"...or the Japanese, who use the same word for "blue", "green" and
>> > "sallow"...or Homer, who used the same word to describe the color of the sea, of
>> > wine, and of what we'd call a "chestnut" horse....r

>> Perhaps the Red Sea was a different colour too back then.

>Yeah -- it was "reed" color. Yam ha-Suf.

Isn't that only a suggestion?* I don't know of any other language in
which the epithet isn't the word for "red".

*I believe it's popular with Biblical fundamentalists.

--
Mike.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.