Received: by 10.224.111.140 with SMTP id s12mr9673561qap.5.1352894780300; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.175.73 with SMTP id by9mr138430vdc.1.1352894780264; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:06:20 -0800 (PST) Path: gf5ni57984567qab.0!nntp.google.com!u2no1811484qal.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: alt.usage.english Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 04:06:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=109.152.167.7; posting-account=n7oCtQoAAACNS6CgW2a2eDoP2d9IRGfY NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.152.167.7 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: By appointment to Her Majesty the Queen From: bert Injection-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:06:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, 14 November 2012 04:32:52 UTC, Peter T. Daniels wrote: > On Nov 13, 8:13=A0pm, Harold Johanssen wrote: > > In the label of many British products one can read the words > > =A0 =A0By appointment to Her Majesty the Queen > > But, what is being appointed? Who is appointing it? Why "to". not > > "by" the Queen? > This is more a question for alt.usage.english. Occasionally, one sees the amplified form: By appointment, suppliers of to Her Majesty ... --=20