Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Polar bears and Emporer penguins?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Don Aitken  
View profile  
 More options Feb 8 2009, 6:50 pm
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
From: Don Aitken <don-ait...@freeuk.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:50:12 +0000
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: Polar bears and Emporer penguins?
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:26:04 -0000, "Alain Dekker"

<abdek...@NOSPAM.fsmail.net> wrote:
>I'm not sure how to ask this question, but you know how you watch a movie
>about, say, the Ancient Eqyptians and one of the characters is wearing a
>wristwatch. There's a word for that faux pas, which is, I think
>"anachronism".

>My question is, lets say you are watching a movie about polar bears and they
>show you, or talk about, polar bears catching and eating Emporer penguins.

>Now polar bears are strictly North Pole and Emporer penguins are strictly
>South Pole. This cannot happen.

>What is the term, if there is one, for this, please?

There is no generally understood word for this, although several have
been suggested. I quite like "anatopism".

--
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.