Received: by 10.66.84.38 with SMTP id v6mr1703762pay.7.1343316738093;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: b9ni61666166pbl.0!nntp.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!novia!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed.x-privat.org!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: CDB <bellemar...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: "-t" versus "-ed"
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 04:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <f68c6911-6e33-43ec-a624-161fa039d21e@googlegroups.com>
References: <d47af577-31b7-4843-b7cf-0bff6bae6a0a@8g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
 <59b5c509-0bde-4537-99bf-d95115ccc58b@googlegroups.com> <fa6553ea-319a-406c-9da3-a04f6ef8bdc7@8g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
 <ef032c64-f48e-4ce0-bf89-e679e2bff8c0@googlegroups.com> <xNadneFhZv-g-ZbNnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.246.126.109
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1342955570 20008 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2012 11:12:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:12:50 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <xNadneFhZv-g-ZbNnZ2dnUVZ8u6dnZ2d@westnet.com.au>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=99.246.126.109;
 posting-account=qNiLbgoAAAAKzwwp_-rFz8uiGgyEhRws
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Bytes: 2013
X-Original-Bytes: 1887
X-Received-Bytes: 2132
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:23:54 PM UTC-4, Peter Moylan wrote:
> On 21/07/12 21:29, CDB wrote:

>> [link to image-search results]

> That sort of search causes my browser to go into disk-thrashing mode.
> Worse, closing the tab still leaves me with an obscenely large swap
> file. Is there any way to tell Google to limit the number of results per
> page.
> 
My bad.  The cure would be to limit posted links to those giving single results, and I undertake to do this from now on, or else to post a warning with the link.