Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
From: t...@euronet.nl (Donna Richoux)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:08:44 +0100
Local: Mon, Dec 8 2003 2:08 pm
Subject: Re: let alone
John Hall <wweexxsseesss...@telus.net> wrote: No, I didn't. I had "intact/in tact/in tack/in tacked," but that's > t...@euronet.nl (Donna Richoux) wrote: > >That's a good one. You got me to start updating my list of those sort of > does your list have: > 'tact' for 'tack' ("We'll try another tact") different. > 'interm' for 'interim', though 'interm' may have become acceptable in I'm hunting for evidence that that is used. I found a great many hits > some circles (not mine) by now for "interm," but they seem to be academic terms, short for "intermediate" or they're used in financial circles (I can't be sure if those mean "intermediate" or something else). Oh, wait, here are some, found by searching on "in the interm": This means that you will not have any build options, but this TMN standards can take too long. in the interm proprietary After six years Marine Service and having assumed family ---- All right, let me finish pasting the list together. As I said, I don't another tack/another tact ------ My thanks to everyone who has contributed over the years. Things I'm not putting on this list: Dictionary-accepted spelling variants. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||