Message from discussion
square meters Re: Olympic question(s)
Received: by 10.66.88.231 with SMTP id bj7mr6042816pab.45.1349915391413;
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: s9ni316pbb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ctbis...@earthlink.net (Charles Bishop)
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,sci.lang
Subject: Re: square meters Re: Olympic question(s)
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 09:17:52 -0800
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <ctbishop-0710120917530001@global-66-81-255-38.dialup.o1.com>
References: <87k3v8oe9z.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> <6a5d316e-ddd4-4b76-93ae-921d19a34148@h4g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <rrnm68975aq0jimg1dqiucv1vjtmr9salo@4ax.com> <e841d716-6c1c-4f33-9011-81a68297608e@c2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <87pq50m4cs.fsf@temporary-address.org.uk> <4a233355-baa9-4ef7-99aa-f5263ef86359@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <bogus-C865AF.14141003102012@four.schnuerpel.eu> <cb98aeb2-1f01-4608-8012-ac9a962b6cb9@x14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <04lo689aa3dknd193bfchq7737hg24qgqq@4ax.com> <RPgbs.1$By3.0@newsfe01.iad> <fad35ca4-2e3d-4822-aa4b-ba157d7c55af@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <4sGbs.1152$nQ6.683@newsfe15.iad> <05a102e6-e21f-4e0a-9fcf-bd1b3879c8b6@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <AMPbs.258$hh5.170@newsfe03.iad> <bogus-C81FCE.22183606102012@four.schnuerpel.eu> <cd84dfee-80de-4b73-9a46-ac88a803fbf4@c2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
X-Trace: individual.net usEFq9NEhfIzRUUVAVpiVwPy+6uSrEFio4Uvun1NJ2L65n+f97
X-Orig-Path: global-66-81-255-38.dialup.o1.com!user
Cancel-Lock: sha1:13fT1las5fsn2380harM8O5/1Ow=
User-Agent: NewsWatcher 2.2.2
Bytes: 3008
In article
<cd84dfee-80de-4b73-9a46-ac88a803f...@c2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, "Peter
T. Daniels" <gramma...@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Oct 6, 5:18=A0pm, Jack Campin <bo...@purr.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> [meaning *outside* caterers here]
>>
>> >>> caterers, no matter how good their product, are, and are
>> >>> supposed to be, invisible.
>> >> What gives you the idea?
>> > They are servants. Servants do their job behind the scenes.
>> > If they must appear in public they must be inconspicuous.
>> > They must not make eye contact with the guests.
>>
>> In the UK (somewhat less class-ridden than the US) it doesn't
>> usually work like that. =A0Many outside catering businesses are
>> one- or two-person firms, and they need all the contacts they
>> can get. =A0They'll make a point of getting the guests to try
>> their signature dishes and making sure they take a business
>> card.
>
>At parties to which the public is invited (as opposed to private
>affairs), the caterer will discreetly leave a tray of their business
>cards where the interested can find it.
I think this is more likely rather than asking people if they would like a
business card. However, it depends on the situation. If a guest, having
tried a signature dish, begins a conversation, I don't think it would be
untoward for a caterer to ask if they would like a card.
charles, take a card, any card