On 25 Oct, 22:25, Harrison Hill <
harrisonhill2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thank you for clarifying this. Not being on your enemies list made me
> > > think I was being a slacker.
>
> > > I strongly deny, though, implacably opposing everything you have said.
> > > I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
> > > losing interest. I may be in total agreement with things said in the
> > > second through ninth paragraphs.
>
> > "I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
> > losing interest." Hold it right there. That's about as classic an
> > indication of reading difficulties, prob associated with ADD...
>
> If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
> haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
> time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
> Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.->
Are you comparing my stuff to "Shakespeare or the Times"? I can't see
how you are not in this context. So thanks, Harrison. Although, if you
see "Shakespeare or the Times as just "text droning away into the
distance", then I suppose that it DOES reflect on you in some way. Not
in rec. super.hotrods.wooh, but HERE in this froup, well it just
might, a little...