Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Lawrence: woooorrhh...or WHHOOOWRRHHH!!!! (REPOST)

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Guy Barry

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:40:10 AM10/24/12
to


"fabzorba" wrote in message
news:6d922880-283d-4e4e...@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> So it is only left for me to thank those who have helped me become who
> I am here, that estimable panel of virtues, Laura, Athel, Tony Poole,
> Steve Hayes and the rest, whose implacable opposition to everything I
> have ever said has done more to rally this man's spirits,

Who's Tony Poole? I see you've mentioned him before:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usage.english/msg/5468bfb021982a09

I've only been on the group three years so perhaps he was before my time.
Or maybe he posts under an alias.

--
Guy Barry

fabzorba

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 8:07:07 PM10/24/12
to
Whoops my error. I meant Tony Cooper. How the hell did I get Poole?
Perhaps, coopers makes barrels. Barrels can hold water. Water makes
pools.

myles [we'll just pretend that didn't happen, won't we?] paulsen

tony cooper

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 8:53:30 PM10/24/12
to
Thank you for clarifying this. Not being on your enemies list made me
think I was being a slacker.

I strongly deny, though, implacably opposing everything you have said.
I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
losing interest. I may be in total agreement with things said in the
second through ninth paragraphs.


--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

R H Draney

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:12:58 PM10/24/12
to
fabzorba filted:
>
>Whoops my error. I meant Tony Cooper. How the hell did I get Poole?
>Perhaps, coopers makes barrels. Barrels can hold water. Water makes
>pools.

Nice contrivance...reminds me of the logic I use to explain why I spend so much
time at MENSA events talking to Mike Waters...Waters, Draney...allasamee
samee....r


--
Me? Sarcastic?
Yeah, right.

fabzorba

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:41:22 PM10/24/12
to
And of course, water goes down drains...They I suppose that this
particular association is not the most pleasing.

fabzorba

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 10:26:52 PM10/24/12
to
losing interest." Hold it right there. That's about as classic an
indication of reading difficulties, prob associated with ADD, as I
have seen for some time. I won't say ADHD, coz you are about as
hyperactive as a garden slug.

R H Draney

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 5:53:31 AM10/25/12
to
fabzorba filted:
>
>On Oct 25, 12:13=A0pm, R H Draney <dadoc...@spamcop.net> wrote:
>> fabzorba filted:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Whoops my error. I meant Tony Cooper. How the hell did I get Poole?
>> >Perhaps, coopers makes barrels. Barrels can hold water. Water makes
>> >pools.
>>
>> Nice contrivance...reminds me of the logic I use to explain why I spend s=
>o much
>> time at MENSA events talking to Mike Waters...Waters, Draney...allasamee
>> samee....r
>>
>And of course, water goes down drains...They I suppose that this
>particular association is not the most pleasing.

Dude, my father was a plumber...and Mike Waters spent several years of his life
sailing a small craft all around the world...our associations with things
aquatic do not begin and end with one another's names....r

Harrison Hill

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 7:25:17 AM10/25/12
to
> indication of reading difficulties, prob associated with ADD...

If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.

R H Draney

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 3:57:16 PM10/25/12
to
Harrison Hill filted:
>
>On Oct 25, 3:26=A0am, fabzorba <myles.abzo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
>> losing interest." Hold it right there. That's about as classic an
>> indication of reading difficulties, prob associated with ADD...
>
>If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
>haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
>time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
>Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.

I'm trying to decide whether I should be offended at bozo's response to my
recent link to the history of "filted"...at a certain point " i politely ignored
it cuz it failed to provide any origin or providence for the term" shades off
into "I can't read that many words at one time"....r

Guy Barry

unread,
Oct 26, 2012, 5:00:45 AM10/26/12
to


"R H Draney" wrote in message news:k6c5i...@drn.newsguy.com...

> Harrison Hill filted:

> >If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
> >haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
> >time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
> >Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.

I'm just wondering why you haven't got time to read The Times. It's a
pretty lightweight paper these days compared with what it was in the days
before Murdoch took it over. I wouldn't say it's any more challenging than
the Daily Mail.

--
Guy Barry

fabzorba

unread,
Oct 26, 2012, 7:54:13 PM10/26/12
to
No insult intended. I'm just writing a piece on nominal detererminism,
and you might end up as an example. Also, it features non-nominal
deterministic examples, for example: Karen Carpenter was not into
woodwork, and if she had been, who knows.....

fabzorba

unread,
Oct 26, 2012, 7:59:01 PM10/26/12
to
On 25 Oct, 22:25, Harrison Hill <harrisonhill2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Thank you for clarifying this.  Not being on your enemies list made me
> > > think I was being a slacker.
>
> > > I strongly deny, though, implacably opposing everything you have said.
> > > I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
> > > losing interest.  I may be in total agreement with things said in the
> > > second through ninth paragraphs.
>
> > "I seldom read more than the first line or so of your posts before
> > losing interest." Hold it right there. That's about as classic an
> > indication of reading difficulties, prob associated with ADD...
>
> If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
> haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
> time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
> Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.->

Are you comparing my stuff to "Shakespeare or the Times"? I can't see
how you are not in this context. So thanks, Harrison. Although, if you
see "Shakespeare or the Times as just "text droning away into the
distance", then I suppose that it DOES reflect on you in some way. Not
in rec. super.hotrods.wooh, but HERE in this froup, well it just
might, a little...

Guy Barry

unread,
Oct 27, 2012, 3:09:01 AM10/27/12
to


"fabzorba" wrote in message
news:e5dfd6a2-cc33-4eba...@o5g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...

> On 25 Oct, 22:25, Harrison Hill <harrisonhill2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > If I see heaps of text droning away into the distance, I think "I
> > haven't got time for all that!", in the same way that I haven't got
> > time to read Shakespeare or The Times. It doesn't reflect on
> > Shakespeare or The Times, and it doesn't reflect on you or on me.->

> Are you comparing my stuff to "Shakespeare or the Times"? I can't see
> how you are not in this context. So thanks, Harrison.

Being compared to the Times is nothing to be proud of.

--
Guy Barry

0 new messages