In article <
1krlwbo.1s33z9gnhiuk9N%tr...@euronet.nl>,
Donna Richoux <
tr...@euronet.nl> wrote:
>Guy Barry <
guy....@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> Is that an eggcorn or just a spelling mistake?
>
>It is my understanding that there is no way to tell the difference. I
>wish the people who started the category had stated what the defining
>characteristics are.
They did. An eggcorn is a reanalysis of an existing word or idiom,
but it must make its own internal sense. As the Eggcorn Database puts
it:
The criteria of how to identify eggcorns have also been
clarified. Not every homophone substitution is an eggcorn. The
crucial element is that the new form makes sense: for anyone
except lexicographers or other people trained in etymology,
more sense than the original form in many cases. The more
brazen among the eggcorn users may eloquently defend and
explain the underlying semantics (metaphors, metonymies,
convincing but erroneous accounts of the supposed
history). Thus, thumbs down for _definately_ and _they?re /
there house_ (not eggcorns, just phonetic misspellings: the
non-standard versions don?t make any more sense than, or
reinterpret the meaning of the standard versions), but thumbs
up for _for all intensive purposes_.
(Chris Waigl)
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft
wol...@bimajority.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program
Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption
my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993