--
"I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
"It's not within who we are as Marines."
>--
>"I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
>type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
>organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
>"It's not within who we are as Marines."
>--
>"I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
>type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
>organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
>"It's not within who we are as Marines."
On Feb 9, 3:12 pm, Marius Hancu <marius.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello:
> --
> "I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
> type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
> organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
> "It's not within who we are as Marines."
> On Feb 9, 3:12 pm, Marius Hancu <marius.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello:
> > --
> > "I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
> > type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
> > organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
> > "It's not within who we are as Marines."
On Feb 9, 5:19 pm, Jerry Friedman <jerry_fried...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > --
> > "I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
> > type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
> > organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
> > "It's not within who we are as Marines."
Jerry Friedman <jerry_fried...@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Feb 9, 3:12 pm, Marius Hancu <marius.ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello:
>> --
>> "I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any
>> type of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal
>> organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said.
>> "It's not within who we are as Marines."
> Yes, although not graceful, in my opinion. It means "It's not within
> our identity as Marines."
Grammatically, one may parse the substantival clause "who we are" as
the object of the preposition "within".
However, the spokesperson would have had my admiration & gratitude if
he had eschewed identityese & said "in line with our honor (or
principles, or whatever he meant) as Marines".
-- --- Joe Fineman jo...@verizon.net
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:12:02 -0800, Marius Hancu wrote:
> "I don't believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any type
> of symbol associated the Nazi Germany military criminal organization
> that committed mass atrocities in WWII," Chapin said. "It's not within
> who we are as Marines."
> Is this "not within who we are" OK?
That depends on how much slack one is willing to cut extemporaneous speech. I wouldn't court-martial him for it.