So fascinating, this partial comment above and another exceptionally intolerant comment appear in response to Whoopi Goldberg going on about intolerance and racism.
Such hypocrisy! Such ironic comedy!
I will qualify my couple hundred articles at Women on the Web were carefully crafted to be professional, polite, firm but fair yet very powerful in wording. I also made a point to present a very realistic viewpoint about life, from a common peoples' stance.
My articles there at WoW were exceptionally tame compared to what I write here in our group, where we support our notion of Freedom of Speech, and I do appreciate this; I am able to write freely and you boys respect this whether you agree or disagree.
Today, all my articles are removed to prevent the public from reading my well written comments about a variety of topics related to ordinary people.
Also removed are a good number of my story telling comments which are delightful and enjoyable evidenced by many positive and supportive comments by participants who sincerely appreciate my reflections on life. Even one of those participants who dislikes me the most and is quite open about her dislike, even she indicates an appreciation for my writings about life.
Other words, those famous elite women are covering up truth, are whitewashing their website, are working at protecting their elitist social status as the cost of their dignity.
As you boys know, my dignity has no price tag.
Women on the Web is a carefully crafted website to present a perfect image, or they think. Drop in an English professor who really knows how to write, and their charade falls apart.
This is a great demonstration of the very powerful nature of our English language, and the even greater power of mastery of our English language.
Problem here is all those famous women are hardcore Obama supporters and routinely bash Republicans. This is a dire disservice for our America; they are working at brainwashing daytime television watching women into some twisted fantasy Obama is the Black Messiah and his democrat cohorts are his disciples.
I really do not care, I am wise enough to know Obama might prove a good president or prove another Bush. I am also wise enough to know not to craft a Golden Calf.
Those women are also working at creating a false facade for themselves as being liberal minded tolerant girls performing a patriotic service for America.
This is, until an English professor drops in, whom they assume to be a poorly educated Okie Indian girl, until a truly tolerant and fair minded person appears.
Then wham! Their iron fist censorship hits the table.
You boys have a look the long line of famous women appearing across the top of the WoW website. These are very famous women, most of whom I now believe to be intolerant arrogant elitists.
...until powerful words send them into a feminine panic which has their expensive Victoria's Secret panties in a knot.
Does this motivate you boys to become true masters of our English language?
Truth is found in words just as deceit is found in words.
"Words are powerful, dangerous, even fatal"
- Okpulot Taha
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
> So fascinating, this partial comment above > and another exceptionally intolerant comment > appear in response to Whoopi Goldberg going > on about intolerance and racism.
Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen.
Maybe Joe Biden does know something he is not telling us.
Where do you think this will happen? Washington, D.C. maybe, perhaps London? The Vatican? Yeah, probably the Vatican which is a soft and easy target of high impact. This will prove Allah to be a more powerful god than our Anglican god.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chances of a terror attack on a major city somewhere in the world using weapons of mass destruction are better than even, according to a task force mandated by the U.S. Congress, The Washington Post reported in its Tuesday edition.
A draft study by the panel warns of growing threats from rogue states, nuclear smuggling rings and the spread of atomic information in the developing world, the newspaper reported.
This is, however, not the important news.
I scanned a good number of media sources reporting this news. There are two words carefully avoided: "Islamic" and "Muslim".
Obama will not allow Muslim women to be photographed with him, although he is the Black Messiah. This does not bother me, we know Obama is a hypocrite.
What bothers me is we must genuflect before political correctness.
Do not you dare use those words "Islamic" and "Muslim" no, no, NO!
How is this we have arrived at such a sorry state of censorship because of political correctness?
We are not allowed to write nor say, "Those Muslim murderous lunatics are planning to nuke us and probably will."
My word! Forbid such truth in language. This is not politically correct. We good leftist elite would never use such language.
Strikes me Americans, all peoples, should know who, more specifically what group of people, are working at slaughtering hundreds of thousands of us, maybe a million of us, and give millions more fatal cancers through radiation poisoning for centuries to come.
Allah is a merciful god. Might turn out Muslims will only slaughter us with a small pox bomb or an anthrax bomb. How many of our children are vaccinated against small pox these days? Close to none?
Might not be a bomb. Might just simply be a dozen Muslim suicide small pox carriers walking and breathing in big cities.
Well gosh darn, there I go again using the taboo "Muslim" word.
How quick are left elitist to push the 9-11 horror out of mind.
Damn Islamic nutcases.
Oh crap, I am being politically incorrect again.
Upon Muslims nuking our nation's capitol, political correctness censorship will go up in a mushroom cloud, or will be forgotten as fatal pox skin eruptions appear, or political correctness will be washed away by our tears for our dead children.
For today, though, do not you dare use "Islamic" nor "Muslim" in language; this is very wrongful to name those who intend to slaughter us by the millions.
This is the harsh reality of our new Obama world; extremist political correctness or else.
We must deny the Islamic intend to kill us. We must always be politically correct, no matter the cost, such as the lives of our children of the world.
Well, you must be politically correct. I do not have to stress over this, I am comfortable with being truthful.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
>> So fascinating, this partial comment above >> and another exceptionally intolerant comment >> appear in response to Whoopi Goldberg going >> on about intolerance and racism.
> Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists > will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here > in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen.
What? You mean the U.S. cannot just bully the world and slaughter innocents without fear of retribution? Who'd have thought?
> Maybe Joe Biden does know something he is not telling us.
Lots of things you don't know, obviously. Maybe if you'd stayed in school past sixth grade.
<snip PG's delusional ravings>
--Jeff
-- I learned that ... the most grinding poverty is a trifling evil compared with the inequality of classes. --William Morris
Jeffrey Turner wrote: > Purl Gurl wrote: >> Purl Gurl wrote: >> (snipped) >>> So fascinating, this partial comment above >>> and another exceptionally intolerant comment >>> appear in response to Whoopi Goldberg going >>> on about intolerance and racism. >> Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists >> will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here >> in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen. > What? You mean the U.S. cannot just bully the world and slaughter > innocents without fear of retribution? Who'd have thought?
You remind me of the famous elitist girls over at Women of the Web! You also remind me of mindless daytime television watching groupies over there.
"Muslims are not at fault, America is at fault!"
Oh yes! The Obama family minister of twenty years is quite correct, "God damn America!"
We know, with significant simplicity, Muslims would not be sawing off the heads of nuns, would not be pouring blistering acid over little school girls, would not be blowing up school children in Russia, would not be blowing up trains in Spain, would not be killing the British riding buses, would not be hijacking aeroplanes to use as missiles to kill thousands, would not be... well, no need for me to continue about this.
Yes, God damn America! Our country, we people of America are both at fault and the root cause of millions of Muslims killing and slaughtering people around our world for hundreds of years, even back before our country was created.
I am curious, Jeffery. Who will you blame when you look out your kitchen window then see a mushroom cloud roaring up into our blue skies, a mushroom cloud with "ISLAM" written across its terrifying face?
Will you blame America when your children die of smallpox given to them by Muslims?
> Lots of things you don't know, obviously. Maybe if you'd stayed in > school past sixth grade.
* Deliverance Banjo Music *
Yes, sir, I am an illiterate toothless hick whose best line is, "Squeal like a pig!"
God damn America for creating people like me!
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
>> So fascinating, this partial comment above >> and another exceptionally intolerant comment >> appear in response to Whoopi Goldberg going >> on about intolerance and racism.
>Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists >will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here >in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen.
>Maybe Joe Biden does know something he is not telling us.
>Where do you think this will happen? Washington, D.C. maybe, >perhaps London? The Vatican? Yeah, probably the Vatican >which is a soft and easy target of high impact. This will >prove Allah to be a more powerful god than our Anglican god.
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chances of a terror > attack on a major city somewhere in the world > using weapons of mass destruction are better > than even, according to a task force mandated > by the U.S. Congress, The Washington Post reported > in its Tuesday edition.
> A draft study by the panel warns of growing threats > from rogue states, nuclear smuggling rings and the > spread of atomic information in the developing world, > the newspaper reported.
>This is, however, not the important news.
>I scanned a good number of media sources reporting this news. >There are two words carefully avoided: "Islamic" and "Muslim".
>Obama will not allow Muslim women to be photographed with him, >although he is the Black Messiah. This does not bother me, >we know Obama is a hypocrite.
>What bothers me is we must genuflect before political correctness.
>Do not you dare use those words "Islamic" and "Muslim" no, no, NO!
>How is this we have arrived at such a sorry state of censorship >because of political correctness?
>We are not allowed to write nor say, "Those Muslim murderous lunatics >are planning to nuke us and probably will."
>My word! Forbid such truth in language. This is not politically correct. >We good leftist elite would never use such language.
>Strikes me Americans, all peoples, should know who, more specifically >what group of people, are working at slaughtering hundreds of thousands >of us, maybe a million of us, and give millions more fatal cancers through >radiation poisoning for centuries to come.
>Allah is a merciful god. Might turn out Muslims will only slaughter >us with a small pox bomb or an anthrax bomb. How many of our children >are vaccinated against small pox these days? Close to none?
>Might not be a bomb. Might just simply be a dozen Muslim suicide >small pox carriers walking and breathing in big cities.
>Well gosh darn, there I go again using the taboo "Muslim" word.
>How quick are left elitist to push the 9-11 horror out of mind.
>Damn Islamic nutcases.
>Oh crap, I am being politically incorrect again.
>Upon Muslims nuking our nation's capitol, political correctness >censorship will go up in a mushroom cloud, or will be forgotten >as fatal pox skin eruptions appear, or political correctness will >be washed away by our tears for our dead children.
>For today, though, do not you dare use "Islamic" nor "Muslim" >in language; this is very wrongful to name those who intend >to slaughter us by the millions.
>This is the harsh reality of our new Obama world; extremist >political correctness or else.
>We must deny the Islamic intend to kill us. We must always >be politically correct, no matter the cost, such as the lives >of our children of the world.
>Well, you must be politically correct. I do not have to stress >over this, I am comfortable with being truthful.
A nuclear attack, if only one bomb was involved, might not be all it is cracked up to be. What I mean is, it wouldn't mean the end of the world, nor would the event necessarily be as serious as global warming, the scariest scenario man has ever faced. We'd survive a nuclear bomb attack, just as Japan survived two of them, whoever the "we" may be. --
>> Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists >> will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here >> in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen.
[...]
>> Well, you must be politically correct. I do not have to stress >> over this, I am comfortable with being truthful. > A nuclear attack, if only one bomb was involved, might not be all it > is cracked up to be. What I mean is, it wouldn't mean the end of the > world, nor would the event necessarily be as serious as global > warming, the scariest scenario man has ever faced. We'd survive a > nuclear bomb attack, just as Japan survived two of them, whoever the > "we" may be.
Detonation of a nuclear weapon or biological weapon on or near Capitol Hill would behead our country, create a power vacuum and would certainly have our military forces carpet bombing the entire Mideast, if not raining down nuclear weapons of our own.
A single weapon of this type detonated by Muslims to slaughter people would plunge our world into very dark days of worldwide warfare. This would prove to be a metaphorical "end of the world".
However, this is not my point. My objection is all this political correctness censorship which forbids us from simply being truthful, as well displayed by heavy handed censorship at Women of the Web.
We are allowed to discuss "extremists" and discuss "religious fanatics" and similar notions while we are not allowed to label those people; we are not allowed to use "Islamic" nor "Muslim" for fear of offending whomever.
This political correctness is both hypocritical and very dangerous. The elite politically correct of our society are demanding we are not to speak bluntly truthful rather to speak with cleverly crafted deceitful diplomatic political correctness.
These elite and famous people are demanding we whitewash all this Islamic terrorism taking place around our world. These are arrogant self-righteous people who would have us forget our 9-11 horror which slaughtered thousands.
Censorship, when unreasonable, is wrongful and very dangerous. This lulls our people into a false sense of security. Those famous and elite are placing our peoples in grave danger.
Typically, we do not associate censorship of language, notions and thinking with danger. We simply are annoyed we are not to use select words in everyday life. People do not consider censorship is a suppression of truth which leads to very dangerous circumstances.
Here we are faced with a very high chance horrible weapons of mass destruction will be used to slaughter innocent people, especially children, yet the elite demand we not speak truthfully, not speak of "Islam" being the force behind this slaughtering.
This is no different than our school textbooks and our history books carefully avoiding mention of our American forefathers, of our Anglican ancestors, committing the most abhorrent genocide of history against my peoples; my ancestors were slaughtered by the tens of millions. Political correctness demands we never mention this, demands we whitewash.
Muslims by the tens of millions are bent on killing us but we are not to mention "Muslim" in our dialog.
This is about as stupid and wrongful as can be.
Political correctness censorship is killing us.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
>>> Good news! Chances are now better than 50-50 terrorists >>> will detonate an atomic bomb or biological weapon here >>> in America, maybe Britain. Other words, this will happen.
>[...]
>>> Well, you must be politically correct. I do not have to stress >>> over this, I am comfortable with being truthful.
>> A nuclear attack, if only one bomb was involved, might not be all it >> is cracked up to be. What I mean is, it wouldn't mean the end of the >> world, nor would the event necessarily be as serious as global >> warming, the scariest scenario man has ever faced. We'd survive a >> nuclear bomb attack, just as Japan survived two of them, whoever the >> "we" may be.
>Detonation of a nuclear weapon or biological weapon >on or near Capitol Hill would behead our country, >create a power vacuum and would certainly have our >military forces carpet bombing the entire Mideast, >if not raining down nuclear weapons of our own.
>A single weapon of this type detonated by Muslims >to slaughter people would plunge our world into >very dark days of worldwide warfare. This would >prove to be a metaphorical "end of the world".
Yes, but only metaphorical. My point yesterday was that we can't allow fear of attack to paralyze us into inaction. Even nuclear and biological skirmishes are winnable, for they certainly needn't be worldwide. Let us hope such horrors never descend on us. Of course, saying that is like saying we love Mom and apple pie. To reiterate, to not plan for unthinkable contingencies is foolish.
>However, this is not my point. My objection is all >this political correctness censorship which forbids >us from simply being truthful, as well displayed by >heavy handed censorship at Women of the Web.
>We are allowed to discuss "extremists" and discuss >"religious fanatics" and similar notions while we >are not allowed to label those people; we are not >allowed to use "Islamic" nor "Muslim" for fear of >offending whomever.
I believe that talking to the enemy is preferable to shooting him or bombing his civilians with soon-to-be-illegal cluster bombs, not that America has signed that treaty yet.
>This political correctness is both hypocritical >and very dangerous. The elite politically correct >of our society are demanding we are not to speak >bluntly truthful rather to speak with cleverly >crafted deceitful diplomatic political correctness.
Crafty diplomacy is not, I agree, any sort of solution. We must be open and truthful, especially if there is to be the creation of a new Palestine, which there must be.
>These elite and famous people are demanding we >whitewash all this Islamic terrorism taking >place around our world. These are arrogant >self-righteous people who would have us forget >our 9-11 horror which slaughtered thousands.
How many more American will have to die in Afghanistan finding those responsible? We're headed for another Vietnam, especially since Obama supports the escalation of that Afghan war.
>Censorship, when unreasonable, is wrongful and >very dangerous. This lulls our people into a >false sense of security. Those famous and elite >are placing our peoples in grave danger.
>Typically, we do not associate censorship of >language, notions and thinking with danger. We >simply are annoyed we are not to use select >words in everyday life. People do not consider >censorship is a suppression of truth which leads >to very dangerous circumstances.
>Here we are faced with a very high chance horrible >weapons of mass destruction will be used to slaughter >innocent people, especially children, yet the elite >demand we not speak truthfully, not speak of "Islam" >being the force behind this slaughtering.
How do weapons of mass destruction, assuming anyone is going to use them, single out children?
>This is no different than our school textbooks and >our history books carefully avoiding mention of our >American forefathers, of our Anglican ancestors, >committing the most abhorrent genocide of history >against my peoples; my ancestors were slaughtered >by the tens of millions. Political correctness >demands we never mention this, demands we whitewash.
The white man has faced up to the atrocities. What was done can't be undone, not that I'm proud of what happened, Kira.
>Muslims by the tens of millions are bent on killing >us but we are not to mention "Muslim" in our dialog.
>This is about as stupid and wrongful as can be.
>Political correctness censorship is killing us.
Let's give the Obama admin a chance. Perhaps he and his crew will be honest with the American people. --
>> However, this is not my point. My objection is all >> this political correctness censorship which forbids >> us from simply being truthful, as well displayed by >> heavy handed censorship at Women of the Web.
[...]
>> This political correctness is both hypocritical >> and very dangerous. The elite politically correct >> of our society are demanding we are not to speak >> bluntly truthful rather to speak with cleverly >> crafted deceitful diplomatic political correctness. > Crafty diplomacy is not, I agree, any sort of solution. We must be > open and truthful, especially if there is to be the creation of a new > Palestine, which there must be.
Precisely. I must continue my rant about people like those found at Women of the Web. Censorship and intolerance does not allow for open and honest discussion.
Most logical approach is what you suggest, discussions.
However, when have people like Whoopi Goldberg, Leslie Stahl, Joni Evans, Candice Bergen, Lily Tomlin, Cynthia McFadden and others of power and influence, when we have people like this shaping and molding the minds of Americans through Orwellian like Newspeak, this is extremely dangerous.
Women of the Web, as with the Nation of Islam and the Aryan Nation, are attacking and undermining our American ideals, especially our Freedom of Speech. Women of the Web is the polar opposite of the Aryan Nation yet both are equally destructive.
Within today's America, political correctness is an ongoing attack upon both our English language and our Freedom of Speech. This is leading our peoples to slaughter like leading sheep to slaughter.
We cannot practice Iron Fist censorship and expect to remain a free and democratic society.
[...]
>> Here we are faced with a very high chance horrible >> weapons of mass destruction will be used to slaughter >> innocent people, especially children, yet the elite >> demand we not speak truthfully, not speak of "Islam" >> being the force behind this slaughtering. > How do weapons of mass destruction, assuming anyone is going to use > them, single out children?
Muslims specialize in slaughtering women and children. Muslims behead nuns in Malaysia, blow up school children in Russia, poor blistering acid on young school girls, stone women to death, shoot women in their heads....
Of great hypocrisy, quite damaging, Women of the Web periodically publish articles about mistreatment of women and children by the Islamic yet censor and banish those who dare to blame the Islamic for these atrocities such as are taking place around our world.
A weapon of mass destruction cannot, in itself, target children but Muslims can use such a weapon to target children.
Muslims specialize in slaughtering women and children.
[...]
> Let's give the Obama admin a chance. Perhaps he and his crew will be > honest with the American people.
Obama is already telling all kinds of lies to America. Obama is a Women of the Web type; a left liberal who punishes those who refuse to genuflect before politically correct censorship.
To close, Chuck, Women of the Web, organizations like this, Obama, many of the left liberal elite are effecting a policy of Iron Fist censorship of our peoples. These are people who are effecting an agenda of censorship of our English language. These are people who are sticking duct tape over our mouths and breaking our typing fingers.
Our world, our peoples, can never move forward, can never solve these problems which plague us while Women of the Web types silence us.
Our English language is under attack. This angers me, greatly.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
You boys know I frequently bash dumb boys here in our newsgroup. My ongoing rant about this laughable Women of the Web outfit clearly exemplifies I am equally quick to bash dumb girls.
You are to make a mental note of this for the future.
Problem here is there are a lot more dumb boys than there are dumb girls.
* demure smile *
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
> Muslims specialize in slaughtering women and children.
[more ugly little rant snippage]
The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and crazed Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political goals in the mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to discern, isn't it?
>> Muslims specialize in slaughtering women and children. > The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and crazed > Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political goals in the > mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to discern, isn't it?
You are engaging in stereotypical leftist elitist Slippery Semantics deceit. You are a right funny boy!
You, Obama, Women of the Web, other deceitful elitists would have us believe there are only a "handful" of Islamic extremists inflicting Islamic terrorism.
All of you know you are lying through your teeth.
A simple quick glance at logistics evidences your deceit.
This recent Islamic terrorism over in India cost millions of dollars. There must be support groups, an infrastructure, transportation, lodging, food, on and on. This was not an operation effected by a "dozen" terrorists. This was an operation effected by thousands of terrorists.
Our 9-11 horror. What cost? I would estimate millions of dollars to effect the 9-11 Islamic terrorist attack. Smuggling of terrorists into America is an expensive task. Forged documents, bribes, equipment, lodging, clothing, food, cars, training to fly at flight schools, aeroplane tickets, cellphones, infrastructure, support groups. This and more cost millions of dollars.
Do explain away those costs.
This millions and millions of dollars provided to effect Islamic terrorism, for decades, derives mostly from Muslims, not just a few wealthy Muslims, no, millions of Muslims around our world who are knowingly giving money to support Islamic terrorism. Those people providing money for terrorism, are terrorists.
Returning the our tragic 9-11 terrorist attack, millions of us watched tens of thousands of Muslims in Palestine celebrating in the streets when they learned of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Celebrations like this took place all around our world. Right there, millions of Muslim terrorists celebrating our deaths.
When cartoons were drawn of Mohammed, tens of millions of Muslims took to the streets to riot, loot, burn and murder. Those tens of millions are all terrorists.
Over in Iraq, Afghanistan, millions of Muslims, Sunni, Shiite, Taliban, other sects, are killing each other by the tens of thousands through terrorist acts. Those Muslims are terrorists.
Radioactive material, a suitcase nuke, how much would either cost on the black market? Maybe ten-million, maybe fifty-million? Where does this money derive? From tens of millions of Muslims who are giving money to fund Islamic terrorism.
Logistics of Islamic terrorism demand hundreds of millions of Muslims participate, directly or indirectly, and those hundreds of millions are all terrorists. This worldwide Islamic terrorism requires, must have, an infrastructure manned, operated and supported by hundreds of millions of Muslims, directly and indirectly.
This Islamic terrorist infrastructure is growing by the day.
Sure there are law abiding Muslims. Those who are law abiding represent a minority of Muslims. However, I sure do not witness many Muslims taking to the streets to protest terrorism by their own. This strongly suggests they are passive-aggressive.
You, Obama, Women of the Web, leftist elitists, you continue on with your excuse making for Islamic terrorism. All you are doing is enabling and facilitating Islamic terrorism through your deep denial of truth, through your deceitful words. You are helping Islam to slaughter innocent people, mostly children.
You just go right ahead with your political correctness censorship and I will just go right ahead and call you out for your lying to our world, for your being patsies for Islamic terrorists.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
Purl Gurl wrote: > alan wrote: >> Purl Gurl wrote:
(lots snipped)
>> The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and >> crazed Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political goals >> in the mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to discern, >> isn't it? > You, Obama, Women of the Web, other deceitful elitists > would have us believe there are only a "handful" of > Islamic extremists inflicting Islamic terrorism. > A simple quick glance at logistics evidences your deceit. > This recent Islamic terrorism over in India cost millions....
NEW DELHI, Dec. 3 (UPI) -- U.S. intelligence agencies believe former Pakistani Army officers and its intelligence agency helped the Mumbai attackers....
(Digital Journal, Canada) -- ...Pranab Mukherjee said that the perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attack are in Pakistan. “I informed Dr. Rice there is no doubt that the terrorist attack in Mumbai were perpetrated by individuals who came from Pakistan and whose controllers are in Pakistan”, he added....
New Delhi, India (AHN) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday Pakistan has to act strongly against terrorists inside its territory even if they are stateless....
Just a handful of Islamic terrorists hiding behind "the mantle of Islam"?
I am more terrified by those who are excuse makers for Islam than those who perpetrate Islamic terrorism upon our world.
Once again, political correctness is killing us just as excuse makers for Islamic terrorism are killing us. We are at war, we must acknowledge who is our enemy. This is Islam.
Censorship of truth, like exercised at Women of the Web, serves only to play into the hands of Islamic terrorists.
Unwarranted censorship is extremely dangerous.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:48:50 -0800, Purl Gurl <purlg...@purlgurl.net> wrote:
<snip>
>To close, Chuck, Women of the Web, organizations like this, Obama, >many of the left liberal elite are effecting a policy of Iron Fist >censorship of our peoples. These are people who are effecting an >agenda of censorship of our English language. These are people who >are sticking duct tape over our mouths and breaking our typing fingers.
>Our world, our peoples, can never move forward, can never solve these >problems which plague us while Women of the Web types silence us.
>Our English language is under attack. This angers me, greatly.
There is only one way I know of to combat censorship and that is to keep open as many lanes of information as possible. What worries me from exchanges with Americans is how uninformed they are. We are lucky in Ireland in that, in addition to the Internet sources everyone who isn't too lazy to find them has, we have easy access to high quality newspapers and to excellent BBC and RTE news and documentaries on television. American television hardly compares in quality to what can be found in the British Isles, IMO. The several outstanding American newspapers are available on the Internet at no charge, so I try to read through the main articles in them every day, too. --
>You boys know I frequently bash dumb boys here in >our newsgroup. My ongoing rant about this laughable >Women of the Web outfit clearly exemplifies I am >equally quick to bash dumb girls.
>You are to make a mental note of this for the future.
>Problem here is there are a lot more dumb boys than >there are dumb girls.
That may be true, but the smartest of the boys are smarter than the smartest of the girls. That is why, historically speaking, women lag far behind in virtually every discipline you can name, save child rearing.
>>> Muslims specialize in slaughtering women and children.
>> The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and crazed >> Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political goals in the >> mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to discern, isn't it?
>You are engaging in stereotypical leftist elitist >Slippery Semantics deceit. You are a right funny boy!
>You, Obama, Women of the Web, other deceitful elitists >would have us believe there are only a "handful" of >Islamic extremists inflicting Islamic terrorism.
>All of you know you are lying through your teeth.
>A simple quick glance at logistics evidences your deceit.
>This recent Islamic terrorism over in India cost millions >of dollars. There must be support groups, an infrastructure, >transportation, lodging, food, on and on. This was not an >operation effected by a "dozen" terrorists. This was an >operation effected by thousands of terrorists.
>Our 9-11 horror. What cost? I would estimate millions of >dollars to effect the 9-11 Islamic terrorist attack. Smuggling >of terrorists into America is an expensive task. Forged documents, >bribes, equipment, lodging, clothing, food, cars, training to fly >at flight schools, aeroplane tickets, cellphones, infrastructure, >support groups. This and more cost millions of dollars.
>Do explain away those costs.
>This millions and millions of dollars provided to effect Islamic >terrorism, for decades, derives mostly from Muslims, not just a >few wealthy Muslims, no, millions of Muslims around our world who >are knowingly giving money to support Islamic terrorism. Those >people providing money for terrorism, are terrorists.
>Returning the our tragic 9-11 terrorist attack, millions of us >watched tens of thousands of Muslims in Palestine celebrating >in the streets when they learned of the 9-11 terrorist attacks. >Celebrations like this took place all around our world. Right >there, millions of Muslim terrorists celebrating our deaths.
>When cartoons were drawn of Mohammed, tens of millions of Muslims >took to the streets to riot, loot, burn and murder. Those tens >of millions are all terrorists.
>Over in Iraq, Afghanistan, millions of Muslims, Sunni, Shiite, >Taliban, other sects, are killing each other by the tens of >thousands through terrorist acts. Those Muslims are terrorists.
>Radioactive material, a suitcase nuke, how much would either >cost on the black market? Maybe ten-million, maybe fifty-million? >Where does this money derive? From tens of millions of Muslims >who are giving money to fund Islamic terrorism.
>Logistics of Islamic terrorism demand hundreds of millions of >Muslims participate, directly or indirectly, and those hundreds >of millions are all terrorists. This worldwide Islamic terrorism >requires, must have, an infrastructure manned, operated and supported >by hundreds of millions of Muslims, directly and indirectly.
>This Islamic terrorist infrastructure is growing by the day.
>Sure there are law abiding Muslims. Those who are law abiding >represent a minority of Muslims. However, I sure do not witness >many Muslims taking to the streets to protest terrorism by their >own. This strongly suggests they are passive-aggressive.
>You, Obama, Women of the Web, leftist elitists, you continue >on with your excuse making for Islamic terrorism. All you are >doing is enabling and facilitating Islamic terrorism through >your deep denial of truth, through your deceitful words. You >are helping Islam to slaughter innocent people, mostly children.
>You just go right ahead with your political correctness censorship >and I will just go right ahead and call you out for your lying to >our world, for your being patsies for Islamic terrorists.
Excellent, Kira. Why not apply for a job at the Homeland Security Office, if I have the name right? I noticed a few weeks ago they had a number of openings for technical people at the GS-11 and GS-12 levels, with advancement possibilities, which pay quite well. You'd probably have to move to Washington, D.C., which might not suit you, but I can assure you that working for the government has its perks. --
>> You just go right ahead with your political correctness censorship >> and I will just go right ahead and call you out for your lying to >> our world, for your being patsies for Islamic terrorists. > Excellent, Kira. > Why not apply for a job at the Homeland Security Office, if I have the > name right? I noticed a few weeks ago they had a number of openings > for technical people at the GS-11 and GS-12 levels, with advancement > possibilities, which pay quite well. You'd probably have to move to > Washington, D.C., which might not suit you, but I can assure you that > working for the government has its perks.
Perks such as kneeling under a big fancy desk in an Oval Office?
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
Chuck Riggs wrote: > Purl Gurl wrote: >> Purl Gurl wrote: >>> Chuck Riggs wrote: >>(weapon of mass disturbance snip) >> Reminds me of a notion, not a story, a notion. >> You boys know I frequently bash dumb boys here in >> our newsgroup. My ongoing rant about this laughable >> Women of the Web outfit clearly exemplifies I am >> equally quick to bash dumb girls. >> You are to make a mental note of this for the future. >> Problem here is there are a lot more dumb boys than >> there are dumb girls. > That may be true, but the smartest of the boys are smarter than the > smartest of the girls. That is why, historically speaking, women lag > far behind in virtually every discipline you can name, save child > rearing.
* bumps her head on a masculine glass ceiling *
OUCH! That hurts! I suppose this will smarten me up.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
<chri...@eircom.net> wrote: >There is only one way I know of to combat censorship and that is to >keep open as many lanes of information as possible. >What worries me from exchanges with Americans is how uninformed they >are. We are lucky in Ireland in that, in addition to the Internet >sources everyone who isn't too lazy to find them has, we have easy >access to high quality newspapers and to excellent BBC and RTE news >and documentaries on television. American television hardly compares >in quality to what can be found in the British Isles, IMO. The several >outstanding American newspapers are available on the Internet at no >charge, so I try to read through the main articles in them every day, >too.
I should think the doings of, say, the EU are of considerably more interest to the Irish than to Americans and it shouldn't be surprising that they know more about the world immediately around them than Americans know about that world. But I suspect that the average Irish resident isn't as knowledgable as the the well-read poster to a newsgroup called "alt.usage.english" would be. Americans also have access to high quality newspapers and to BBC news and documentaries on television. The public broadcasting stations play them a lot, as does BBC America on the cable, and such cable channels as the Discovery group.
American television "hardly compares" on the average because there's so much of it. Refine American television down to the "qualtiy" channles, Like the PBS network or the documentary cable channels and you have something else. On the other hand, the high-qulity BBC seems to enjoy presenting Americans with Graham Norton and such high class fare as "Coupling" (which I rather enjoy but I do hope is not presented as some of your high quality programming). On Satuday evenings our local PBS station presents us with a series of programs of such high class British fare as "Are You Being Served" and the like. At one time Benny Hill was available, which I confess I found hilarious at times.
On the other hand, I daresay the average resident of southern Arizona knows a lot more about the goings-on in Mexico than any Irishman and I susect we Arizonans and your Irish are more or less equally ignorant as to goings on in Uzbekistan.
The amount of ignorance I've seen regarding the USA by Europeans in this group is pretty disappointing to me and the knowledge of Europeans in general seems to be largely based on Hollywood movies and American television programs. Recent discussions here about the presidential electoral process are pretty indicative.
-- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatu...@cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:41:37 -0800, Purl Gurl <purlg...@purlgurl.net> wrote:
>Perks such as kneeling under a big fancy desk >in an Oval Office?
If you do do that be careful to see who is in the room with you. The fancy chair at the big fancy desk might be occupied by H R Clinton trying the chair for size and dreaming about the future.
Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote: > Purl Gurl wrote: >> Perks such as kneeling under a big fancy desk >> in an Oval Office? > If you do do that be careful to see who is in the room with you. The fancy > chair at the big fancy desk might be occupied by H R Clinton trying the chair > for size and dreaming about the future.
No problem. I am bisexual and Hillary wears pant suits.
However, there is a need to be careful of that woman who wore a black widow dress on election victory night.
>>> The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and crazed >>> Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political goals in the >>> mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to discern, isn't it?
>> You, Obama, Women of the Web, other deceitful elitists >> would have us believe there are only a "handful" of >> Islamic extremists inflicting Islamic terrorism.
>> A simple quick glance at logistics evidences your deceit.
>> This recent Islamic terrorism over in India cost millions....
> NEW DELHI, Dec. 3 (UPI) -- U.S. intelligence agencies believe > former Pakistani Army officers and its intelligence agency helped > the Mumbai attackers....
> (Digital Journal, Canada) -- ...Pranab Mukherjee said that the > perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attack are in Pakistan. “I > informed Dr. Rice there is no doubt that the terrorist attack > in Mumbai were perpetrated by individuals who came from Pakistan > and whose controllers are in Pakistan”, he added....
> New Delhi, India (AHN) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice > said Wednesday Pakistan has to act strongly against terrorists inside > its territory even if they are stateless....
> Just a handful of Islamic terrorists hiding behind "the mantle of Islam"?
Oh yes, there you go ---- proof positive that that "majority" of Muslims are in on the terrorist conspiracy --- we all know that the majority of Muslims are "former Pakistani Army officers" and members of Pakistan's "intelligence agency". With facts like yours, who needs wild speculation?
[...]
>We are at war, we must acknowledge > who is our enemy. This is Islam.
Your poisonous racist garbage doesn't surprise me at all, as you've shown yourself to be a raving, ranting bigot in the past. What does disappoint me, however, is that you seem to be treated almost affectionately as a kind of harmless nitwit mascot of this group. When you come up with statements like "Those who are law abiding represent a minority of Muslims", I would have expected that at least half a dozen folks would have called you on your venomous bullshit. You come up with poisonous, racist crap like that and you **dare** to take offense at someone who stereotyped Native Americans as fat-cat casino owners?
>>>> The distinction between normal, everyday, law-abiding Muslims and >>>> crazed Muslim fundamentalist fanatics who cloak their political >>>> goals in the mantle of Islam is just too fine a line for you to >>>> discern, isn't it? >>> You, Obama, Women of the Web, other deceitful elitists >>> would have us believe there are only a "handful" of >>> Islamic extremists inflicting Islamic terrorism. >>> A simple quick glance at logistics evidences your deceit. >>> This recent Islamic terrorism over in India cost millions.... >> NEW DELHI, Dec. 3 (UPI) -- U.S. intelligence agencies believe >> former Pakistani Army officers and its intelligence agency helped.... >> (Digital Journal, Canada) -- ...Pranab Mukherjee said that the >> perpetrators of the Mumbai terror attack are in Pakistan.... >> New Delhi, India (AHN) - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice >> said Wednesday Pakistan has to act strongly against terrorists.... >> Just a handful of Islamic terrorists hiding behind "the mantle of Islam"? > Oh yes, there you go ---- proof positive that that "majority" of Muslims > are in on the terrorist conspiracy --- we all know that the majority of > Muslims are "former Pakistani Army officers" and members of Pakistan's > "intelligence agency". With facts like yours, who needs wild speculation? > [...] >> We are at war, we must acknowledge >> who is our enemy. This is Islam. > Your poisonous racist garbage doesn't surprise me at all, as you've > shown yourself to be a raving, ranting bigot in the past. What does > disappoint me, however, is that you seem to be treated almost > affectionately as a kind of harmless nitwit mascot of this group. When > you come up with statements like "Those who are law abiding represent a > minority of Muslims", I would have expected that at least half a dozen > folks would have called you on your venomous bullshit.
Oh my! You are such an excitable boy! Reads to me I had you piddle your pants.
> You come up with poisonous, racist crap like that and you **dare** to > take offense at someone who stereotyped Native Americans as fat-cat > casino owners?
Ah ha! You have been reading the Queen of Diamonds, four times married Margo Howard, daughter of Ann Landers. Boy howdy, I sure pissed off that red headed city slicker, Margo. Probably pissed her off as much as I piss you off.
Amusing Margo demanded I be "kicked off the island" -- her island.
-- Purl Gurl -- So many are stumped by what slips right off the top of my mind like a man's bad fitting hairpiece.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:15:03 -0800, "alan" <in_flagra...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>What does disappoint >me, however, is that you seem to be treated almost affectionately as a kind >of harmless nitwit mascot of this group.
Most of us have her killfiled and don't see her posts unless someone quotes them; indeed, some also kill any threads started by her or including her. Lack of response, therefore, is no sign of approval or affection.
--
Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
>On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:15:03 -0800, "alan" <in_flagra...@hotmail.com> >wrote:
>>What does disappoint >>me, however, is that you seem to be treated almost affectionately as a kind >>of harmless nitwit mascot of this group.
>Most of us have her killfiled and don't see her posts unless someone >quotes them; indeed, some also kill any threads started by her or >including her. Lack of response, therefore, is no sign of approval or >affection.
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:55:58 +0000, Chuck Riggs <chri...@eircom.net> wrote:
>>Problem here is there are a lot more dumb boys than >>there are dumb girls.
>That may be true, but the smartest of the boys are smarter than the >smartest of the girls. That is why, historically speaking, women lag >far behind in virtually every discipline you can name, save child >rearing.
You have been nominated for the Lawrence H. Summers Award.
|
