Received: by 10.66.77.101 with SMTP id r5mr213033paw.27.1343369915102;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: b9ni70047621pbl.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Wes Newell <w.new...@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv
Subject: Re: The Ant saga continues
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <jutbrq$20e$2@dont-email.me>
References: <juopmd$ot7$1@dont-email.me>
	<Z42dnU6rhdLhbpLNnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<f30b8304-d499-4ef4-a6c0-ff9749790155@googlegroups.com>
	<juqnsr$j2l$1@dont-email.me>
	<aKmdnRUqLqjRqYzNnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cf81dfb0b1f3182a0189e9d03da060ea";
	logging-data="2062"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VJH6yyL6/sgwcj5VKfQ9A"
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bi9Yj6NhXa6Cp5yAgPONzDPEJSM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:13:01 -0700, Ant wrote:

> On 7/25/2012 11:25 PM PT, Wes Newell typed:
> 
>>> The CM 4228HD a fine antenna for UHF but I thought you were in the LA
>>> area. What do you do about channels 7,9,11 and 13?
>>
>> It also picks up high vhf channels quite well. When we had a channel 5
>> here, the original 4228 even picked it up pretty good. The 4228HD was
>> redesigned to pick up high vhf better. I'm about 40+miles from the
>> towers and get high vhf without any problems, 8, 9, and 11. 11 also
>> broadcast on 19, so I blocked it from the lineup.
> 
> Why did you block 11?

Because it was the exact same broadcast and I didn't want both showing up 
in my guide and I get a stronger signal from uhf 19. And UHF is not as 
susceptible to interferences.