Message from discussion The Ant saga continues
Received: by 10.66.77.101 with SMTP id r5mr213033paw.27.1343369915102;
Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Newell <w.new...@invalid.invalid>
Subject: Re: The Ant saga continues
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cf81dfb0b1f3182a0189e9d03da060ea";
logging-data="2062"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19VJH6yyL6/sgwcj5VKfQ9A"
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:13:01 -0700, Ant wrote:
> On 7/25/2012 11:25 PM PT, Wes Newell typed:
>>> The CM 4228HD a fine antenna for UHF but I thought you were in the LA
>>> area. What do you do about channels 7,9,11 and 13?
>> It also picks up high vhf channels quite well. When we had a channel 5
>> here, the original 4228 even picked it up pretty good. The 4228HD was
>> redesigned to pick up high vhf better. I'm about 40+miles from the
>> towers and get high vhf without any problems, 8, 9, and 11. 11 also
>> broadcast on 19, so I blocked it from the lineup.
> Why did you block 11?
Because it was the exact same broadcast and I didn't want both showing up
in my guide and I get a stronger signal from uhf 19. And UHF is not as
susceptible to interferences.