Re: Tiger Woods OT
whodunit
> "Your Name" <your...@isp.com> found these unused words:
>
>> "Onkel Petey" <pa25n...@cornell.edu> wrote in message
>> news:hf6ppu$g99$1...@ruby.cit.cornell.edu...
>>> Tim Bruening wrote:
>>>> Tiger Woods recently slow crashed into a hydrant and a pole while sober
>>>> at 2 am. I gather that some believe that he was arguing with his wife
>>>> shortly before hand. This makes sense, since the aftermath of an
>>>> argument would have occupied his mind, distracting him from his driving.
>>> It was a domestic dispute. The last thing his wife yelled to him was,
>>> "FORE!"
>> Welll, according to the News, there are three "other women" and his wife, so
>> that is indeed fore. ;-)
>>
> Tee, he !
> Too much grass and not enough green?
>
Did you see the article about their prenup? Divorce=Elin gets $300 MILLION.
Doesn't seem as much money as it did before Obama started spending
*trillions* like a drunken sailor loose in the red light district of DC!
Still, nothing to sneeze at!
spi...@freenet.co.uk
> Doesn't seem as much money as it did before Obama started spending
> *trillions* like a drunken sailor loose in the red light district of DC!
>
> Still, nothing to sneeze at!
No matter WHAT the subject matter, whodunnit just can't help taking digs at
obama. Pitiful.
--
| spi...@freenet.co.uk | |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | "ARSE! GERLS!! DRINK! DRINK! DRINK!!!" |
| in | "THAT WOULD BE AN ECUMENICAL MATTER!...FECK!!!! |
| Computer Science | - Father Jack in "Father Ted" |
sctvguy1
Wonder who gets the Jupiter Island home, ocean to Intracoastal? I live
one mile from there, and have seen Tiger every so often, usually driving
a Buick SUV, wonder why the Escalade?
Dillon Pyron
Buick dumped him a couple of years ago.
--
- dillon I am not invalid
Money can't buy happiness.
But you can rent it.
Tim Bruening
sctvguy1 wrote:
Did you ever seen any indications of problems between Tiger and his wife?
Jette Goldie
Is it any of your business?
--
Jette Goldie
jette....@gmail.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wolfette/
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://wolfette.livejournal.com/
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)
Tim Bruening
Jette Goldie wrote:
The curiosity over what distracted Tiger to the point of crashing his car is
driving me bonkers.
Your Name
"Tim Bruening" <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:4B1A562D...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
His wife chasing him and smashing a nine iron through the window might have
been a "slight distraction". :-)
Latest news: He's now changing his name from Tiger to Cheetah. ;-)
Your Name
"Sir F. A. Rien" <jaS...@gbr.online.com> wrote in message
news:gnvlh55gu5b0j2o79...@4ax.com...
> >>
> >>
> >> Onkel Petey wrote:
> >>
> >> > Tim Bruening wrote:
> >> > > Tiger Woods recently slow crashed into a hydrant and a pole while
> >sober
> >> > > at 2 am. I gather that some believe that he was arguing with his
wife
> >> > > shortly before hand. This makes sense, since the aftermath of an
> >> > > argument would have occupied his mind, distracting him from his
> >driving.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > It was a domestic dispute. The last thing his wife yelled to him was,
> >> > "FORE!"
> >>
Evidently,
> >> their negotiations got so heated that he stormed out, got into his SUV,
> >and
> >> crashed because he wasn't concentrating on his driving!
> >
> >The original pre-nup said his wife would get the SUV, that's why he
crashed
> >it. ;-)
>
> Lot easier to run it off a cliff than be inside and hit a tree.
Maybe he wasn't inside when it crashed. He could have pushed it down a
slight hill, then got in to escape his wife swinging the golf club at him
(after she got a couple of good shots first). ;-)
> Woods would driver crazy
Well, he may have only had a sand-wedge for lunch. ;-)
Dillon Pyron
It works kind of like this, in my mind. You're a what, CPA, nurse's
aid, tile layer? Someone who has not choosen to present himself in
front of the world. Tiger could have picked another line of work, but
instead he picked one that knowingly places him "in the limelight".
Let's say I called you a child rapist. That would be libel if printed
or slander is I spoke it publicly. But the law holds a higher
standard for "persons of public interest" (wording my vary by state).
Even if you were to be buggering a half a dozen kids, for me to say it
would be defamation of character (lible or slander). Now that's only
a civil tort. If a prosecuter were to say it, we're in a different
realm, which I don't plan to get into because I have not the least
idea how that works.
But if I were to say (before he came out and admitted it) that Tiger
was having an affair, he would not only have to prove that it was
intended to defame him, but also that it was untrue. This being a
civil matter, I would have to present evidence to outweigh that claim.
Not "prove" that he was cheating, just enough to repudiate his claim.
Of course juries like to see things in black & white so I'd really
need to have pictures of him boinking a couple of chicks, or them
describing certain unique features of his "personal anatomy" (straight
from the transcripts from the releaed portions of Monica's
deposition).
--
- dillon I am not invalid
I love my country, It's my government I fear.
Hey, turnabout's fair play.
Anim8rFSK
Dillon Pyron <invalid...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> Even if you were to be buggering a half a dozen kids, for me to say it
> would be defamation of character (lible or slander). Now that's only
> a civil tort. If a prosecuter were to say it, we're in a different
> realm, which I don't plan to get into because I have not the least
> idea how that works.
Prosecuters generally have immunity for just about anything they say;
they pretty much have to. Hopefully we'll see that broken for Nyfong
and he'll spend the rest of his life in debt; he should be spending it
in prison as well.
--
Happy 30th Anniversary
STAR TREK THE MOTION PICTURE
http://www.onedigitallife.com/images/star-trek-the-motion-picture.jpg
"The Human Adventure Is Just Beginning"
Tim Bruening
sctvguy1 wrote:
Did you ever see him with a woman other than his wife in that SUV, or at his
home? Its my understanding that he sometimes brought his mistress(es) to his
very home when his wife was away!
AllYou!
Sir F. A. Rien <jaS...@gbr.online.com> mused:
> "AllYou!" <ida...@conversent.net> found these unused words:
>
>> In news:4B301A04...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us,
>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> mused:
>>> "AllYou!" <ida...@conversent.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> In
>>>> news:81bd25dd-459c-45b4...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com,
>>>> Michaela Mackenzie <michaelamack...@yahoo.com>
>>>> mused:
>>>>> On Dec 15, 1:39 am, "Your Name" <your.n...@isp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheating on your partner is a lowly, cowardly, selfish,
>>>>>> dispicable thing to do. There is nothing to understand or be
>>>>>> tolerant of - the guy is a moron, plain and simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever thought of the word, prejudice? Funny how it starts with
>>>>> the three letters
>>>>> "pre", innit?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ever thought that for all his fame, skill and what-have-you,
>>>>> he may be unhappy
>>>>> within himself and searching for happiness.
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, perhaps --unlike you-- he doesn't realise that
>>>>> happiness is a decision one
>>>>> makes inside?
>>>>
>>>> That might all be true, and it might be a perfectly good
>>>> reason to seek happiness elsewhere. But it's no excuse to
>>>> lie to your life's partner, and no reason to humiliate her,
>>>
>>> Tiger's wife is now demanding 100% custody of the kids, and
>>> half of Tiger Wood's wealth, nullifying their prenup. I
>>> predict that she will subpoena all of Tiger's alleged
>>> mistresses and also the tabloids, to show that the prenup
>>> should be nullified due to Tiger's extreme betrayal of her, as
>>> demonstrated by the 10 plus mistresses the tabloids say he has
>>> had. In rebuttal, Tiger will now have no choice but to list
>>> each and every mistress he has had during the course of the
>>> marriage, to show that he has had far fewer than 10 mistresses
>>> and that therefore, his betrayal was not extreme enough to
>>> cost him half his wealth.
>>
>> What a mess he's made.
>>
> Takes TWO ...
Not in this case, unless you're counting one of the mistresses.
Your Name
"AllYou!" <ida...@conversent.net> wrote in message
news:Jb6dnWnPVY4WbK3W...@posted.choiceonecommunications...
In which case it would be more like "takes 15 and still counting".
AllYou!
Jette Goldie
it's never just about the mistresses, or the man. An affair is usually
a symptom of something wrong in the marriage, not the sole cause of
the breakdown.
it takes two.
AllYou!
Sir F. A. Rien <jaS...@gbr.online.com> mused:
> "AllYou!" <ida...@conversent.net> found these unused words:
>
>> Tim Bruening <tsbr...@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> mused:
>>> "AllYou!" wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> What a mess he's made.
>>>
>>> list of his mistresses, then holding a news conference to
>>> release that list. Once that is done, the tabloids won't have
>>> anything more to report, so will have to move on to some new
>>> scandal.
>>
>> Nah. First, he might name gals who'll deny it, and then sue
>> him for slander, but more significantly, there will still be
>> loads of bimbos who'll come out of the woodwork to claim they
>> did, even if they didn't, and so the confusion would continue.
>> That's the thing with lying repeatedly. You lose credibility.
>>
> Butt you still believe in ol' Timmee ...
Who's ol' Timmee?