How I LOVE to REBOOT Star Trek !!!

[YurV...@ja.com]

Every time I go to Wal-Mart and see the Star Trek 2009 remake on the
Blu-Ray shelf, I love to look around, drop it, and kick the fuck out
of the piece of shit. Warp 10, Captain!

How I love to reboot Star Trek!

Boy Howdy how that feels good!!!

What's next for Rebooted Hollywood? Having entire movies with cutouts
of the older classic stars?

Sockpuppets?

Teletubbies: The Motion Picture Rebooted?

Because Hollywood only has to be one brain fart smarter than the
retarded kids who pay for this pablum.

[Graeme]

On Feb 15, 4:25 pm, YurVel...@ja.com wrote:
> Every time I go to Wal-Mart and see the Star Trek 2009 remake on the
> Blu-Ray shelf, I love to look around, drop it, and kick the fuck out
> of the piece of shit.

Uh huh. What did you like about the original Trek, anyway? The
miniskirts?

[Wiseguy]

Graeme <graem...@aol.com> wrote in news:0c9a2524-585a-4967-9cab-
001a86...@t24g2000yqj.googlegroups.com:

Another "Agree with me or you're a moron" idiot heard from.

[Will Dockery]

I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.

--
Music & poetry of Will Dockery & Friends:
http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery

[Duggy]

On Feb 16, 8:25 am, YurVel...@ja.com wrote:
> Every time I go to Wal-Mart and see the Star Trek 2009 remake on the
> Blu-Ray shelf, I love to look around, drop it, and kick the fuck out
> of the piece of shit.  Warp 10, Captain!
>
> How I love to reboot Star Trek!

So you acknowledge that the 2009 film is actually Star Trek?

===
= DUG.
===

[MITO MINISTER]

She is Spock's physical and willing lover.

[MITO MINISTER]

You are a moron. Your opinions are worthless.

[Will Dockery]

Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams
alternate reality ignore all the Pon Far details?

[robertva]

On 2/18/2012 3:38 PM, Will Dockery wrote:
> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme<graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Uh huh. What did you like about the original Trek, anyway? The
>>>> miniskirts?
>>
>>> I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>>
>>> --

>>> Music& poetry of Will Dockery& Friends:

> http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>>
>> She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
>
> Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams
> alternate reality ignore all the Pon Far details?

As far as we know Spock is the first Vulcan/Human hybrid. His needs and
desires might not match either Vulcan or Human patterns.

The ancestors of the emotional Romulans only emigrated from Vulcan a few
thousand years ago. Other than some technological and philoiisophical
differences how many physical differances are they likely to have?
Probably no more than the differences between Asians and native Americans

[Bast]

He's pretty much ignored everything else, so why should something REAL TREK
devoted a whole episode to, worry anyone now.

....You better just hope he hasn't read any of TPM's K/S posts.

[Bast]

I kind of like that idea of kicking every copy of "2009 Star Wreck" under
the coke machines.
<ROTFLMAO>

[Duggy]

What details?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Feb 19, 5:44 pm, "Bast" <faken...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> I kind of like that idea of kicking every copy of "2009 Star Wreck" under
> the coke machines.

I've never heard of "2009 Star Wreck" what is it?

===
= DUG.
===

[YurV...@ja.com]

Sounds like YOU have been personally rebooted many, many times with
those very words, Polly Parrot.

Bless Your Heart

[Will Dockery]

On Feb 19, 6:53 am, Duggy <Paul.Dug...@jcu.edu.au> wrote:

> On Feb 19, 6:38 am, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery <will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme <graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Uh huh.  What did you like about the original Trek, anyway?  The
> > > > > miniskirts?
>
> > > > I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Music & poetry of Will Dockery & Friends:
>
> >http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>
> > She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
> > Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams

> > alternate reality ignore all the Pon Farr details?
>
> What details?

All that stuff in "Amok Time".

> ===
> = DUG.
> ===

[Will Dockery]

On Feb 19, 6:53 am, Duggy <Paul.Dug...@jcu.edu.au> wrote:

> On Feb 19, 6:38 am, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery <will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme <graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Uh huh.  What did you like about the original Trek, anyway?  The
> > > > > miniskirts?
>
> > > > I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Music & poetry of Will Dockery & Friends:
>
> >http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>
> > She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
> > Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams

[MITO MINISTER]

What if it does? Meh!

[MITO MINISTER]

> ....You better just hope he hasn't read any of TPM's K/S posts.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

He can ignore what he wishes, as long as he comes with profitable
PRODUCT. Please grow up!

[Will Dockery]

On Feb 21, 6:59 am, MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Feb 19, 5:38 am, Will Dockery wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery <will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme <graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Uh huh.  What did you like about the original Trek, anyway?  The
> > > > > miniskirts?
>
> > > > I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>
> > > > --
> > > > Music & poetry of Will Dockery & Friends:
>
> >http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>
> > > She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
>
> > Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams

> > alternate reality ignore all the Pon Farr details?

>
> What if it does? Meh!

Well, if Uhura is really Spock's physical and willing lover is must be
ignoring them already?

[SparkoHeaps]

To be fair, Spock did indicate in the Cloud Minders that Vulcans are
capable of mating outside of Pon Farr. It is just that they are
biologically forced to mate during Pon Farr. So the movie didn't move
away from Canon in that respect.

[Duggy]

How so?

===
= DUG.
===

[MITO MINISTER]

> ignoring them already?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Is the above a sentence?

[Duggy]

Yes.

===
= DUG.
===

[Bast]

I do not recall Spock admitting that,....and he never showed us anything
more than "intrigue" about droxana in the soliloquy.
But that never even went as far as holding her hand
And that it even came up, was to verify the obviously publicly accepted fact
that vulcans only "do it" every seven years.

Of course, that every planet in the galaxy goes by earth years has always
been a bit of a plot hole.
As well as the Ardonan's history including,calling their cave people by an
ancient "earth term variant".
Or that Vana's evil twin also stole spocks brain.
"Canon" doesn't always make sense,...but it must be consistent

But "Star trek 2009" is now admitted by abrams to be nothing more than a
bastardization freak show that will go on as long as it makes fools part
with their money.
....Kind of like the Kardashians, or Lady Gaga.

[Duggy]

On Feb 22, 3:27 pm, "Bast" <faken...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> And that it even came up, was to verify the obviously publicly accepted fact
> that vulcans only "do it" every seven years.

In The Search for Spock, Spook went through Pon Farr a couple of times
and Saavik there for him. Are you saying that coincidentally it was
Pon Farr for her, too?

===
= DUG.
===

[Daryl]

On 2/21/2012 10:27 PM, Bast wrote:
> SparkoHeaps wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On
>>> Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme<graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Uh huh. What did you like about the original Trek, anyway? The
>>>>>> miniskirts?
>>>
>>>>> I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>>>
>>>>> --

>>>>> Music& poetry of Will Dockery& Friends:

>>>
>>> http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
>>>
>>> Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams
>>> alternate reality ignore all the Pon Far details?
>>
>> To be fair, Spock did indicate in the Cloud Minders that Vulcans are
>> capable of mating outside of Pon Farr. It is just that they are
>> biologically forced to mate during Pon Farr. So the movie didn't move
>> away from Canon in that respect.
>
>
>
>
> I do not recall Spock admitting that,....and he never showed us anything
> more than "intrigue" about droxana in the soliloquy.
> But that never even went as far as holding her hand
> And that it even came up, was to verify the obviously publicly accepted fact
> that vulcans only "do it" every seven years.
>
> Of course, that every planet in the galaxy goes by earth years has always
> been a bit of a plot hole.
> As well as the Ardonan's history including,calling their cave people by an
> ancient "earth term variant".
> Or that Vana's evil twin also stole spocks brain.
> "Canon" doesn't always make sense,...but it must be consistent
>
> But "Star trek 2009" is now admitted by abrams to be nothing more than a
> bastardization freak show that will go on as long as it makes fools part
> with their money.
> ....Kind of like the Kardashians,


>or Lady Gaga.

Wrong on this one, right on the others. Lady Gaga, when you
remove the hype and the etc. can actually sing and do a great
performance.



--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

[dx...@albury.nospam.net.au]

Duggy wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2:30 pm, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 11:21 pm, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 21, 6:59 am, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 19, 5:38 am, Will Dockery wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme<graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Uh huh. What did you like about the original Trek, anyway? The
>>>>>>>> miniskirts?
>>
>>>>>>> I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>>
>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Music& poetry of Will Dockery& Friends:

>>
>>>>> http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>>
>>>>>> She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
>>
>>>>> Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams
>>>>> alternate reality ignore all the Pon Farr details?
>>
>>>> What if it does? Meh!
>>
>>> Well, if Uhura is really Spock's physical and willing lover is must be
>>> ignoring them already?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Is the above a sentence?
>
> "- Show quoted text -"
>
> Yes.
>
> ===
> = DUG.
> ===

For what its worth, I would think "Yes" if the second "is" were replaced
with "it", as in "the J. J. Abrams alternate reality"!

Daniel

[dx...@albury.nospam.net.au]

Bast wrote:
> SparkoHeaps wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 1:38 pm, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 7:00 am, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:> On
>>> Feb 17, 9:54 am, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme<graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>

<Snip>

> Of course, that every planet in the galaxy goes by earth years has always
> been a bit of a plot hole.

Could it just be a "Universal Translator" thing??

Alien says he is 624 kilobuctums old. UT knows that a kilobuctum is
about three weeks long, so Kirk hears "36 years old" from the universal
translator.

Daniel

[Bast]

Not sure what "search for spock" has to do with this, other than someone
already recognized the Pon Farr thing was canon for vulcans

No never even implied that Droxana's people had it too,....but maybe they
did, however she should have known more about it if that was the case.

She obviously had heard that Vulcans only do it once every seven years.
So if that rumor was floating from planet to planet, and no one had
disproved it,....well,....then it very likely is true.

But I guess Abrams and the 4 year olds who wrote the screenplay, were
graduates of the the Bermen Braga skoohl of gooder trek learnin'.

[Will Dockery]

MITO MINISTER <cigarmanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Will Dockery wrote:

> >MITO MINISTER wrote:
>>> On Feb 16, 8:27 am, Graeme <graemec...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Uh huh.  What did you like about the original Trek, anyway?  The
> > > > > > > miniskirts?
>
> > > > > > I for one loved the miniskirts, and btw the new Uhura is gorgeous.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Music & poetry of Will Dockery & Friends:
>
> > > >http://www.reverbnation.com/willdockery
>
> > > > > She is Spock's physical and willing lover.
>
> > > > Yeah, and as I wondered in the last post, will the J.J. Abrams
> > > > alternate reality ignore all the Pon Farr details?
>
> > > What if it does? Meh!
>
> > Well, if Uhura is really Spock's physical and willing lover is must be
> > ignoring them already?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Is the above a sentence?

It was supposed to be...

[Duggy]

On Feb 22, 8:12 pm, "Danie...@teranews.com"

<d...@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote:
> Duggy wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 2:30 pm, MITO MINISTER<cigarmanw...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Feb 21, 11:21 pm, Will Dockery<will.dock...@gmail.com>  wrote:

> >>> - Show quoted text -

> >> Is the above a sentence?

> > "- Show quoted text -"

> > Yes.

> For what its worth, I would think "Yes" if the second "is" were replaced
> with "it", as in "the J. J. Abrams alternate reality"!

Huh?

===
= DUG.
===

[Duggy]

On Feb 22, 8:38 pm, "Bast" <faken...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> Duggy wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 3:27 pm, "Bast" <faken...@nomail.invalid> wrote:
> >> And that it even came up, was to verify the obviously publicly
> >> accepted fact that vulcans only "do it" every seven years.
>
> > In The Search for Spock, Spook went through Pon Farr a couple of times
> > and Saavik there for him.  Are you saying that coincidentally it was
> > Pon Farr for her, too?

> Not sure what "search for spock" has to do with this, other than someone
> already recognized the Pon Farr thing was canon for vulcans

Saavik had sex when it wasn't Pon Farr for her.

===
= DUG.
===

[MITO MINISTER]

> ....Kind of like the Kardashians, or Lady Gaga.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Abrams has admitted nothing of the sort, you moron.

[MITO MINISTER]

Somebody wrote: "Well, if Uhura is really Spock's physical and willing

lover is must be
ignoring them already?"

Mito asked: "Is the above quotation a sentence?"

Doug replied: " Yes."

Mito retorted: "Uh, no."

[MITO MINISTER]

On Feb 22, 7:12 pm, "Danie...@teranews.com"

> Daniel- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

"Yes, if" means no, you piece of shit!

[MITO MINISTER]

Abrams and the scripters are now living in luxury sipping cocktails by
the pool.

[Duggy]

There is no Doug.

===
= DUG.
===

[dx...@albury.nospam.net.au]

Gee!! I'm so glad my opinion means sooooo much to you!!

(When I clicked on "Send", my spellchecker got as far as "MITO" and
offered "OMIT" as the correction......seems about right!!)

Daniel

[Bast]

So do I, since I saved the box office admission price and never bought the
DVD or blu-ray

[Bast]

He did,...he just didn't tell YOU.

[Duggy]

Just you, eh?

===
= DUG.
===

[Bast]

I bet you would understand if I posted,....

"Srar trek 2009 are a pices of shitte, and U R a mowronto like it"

See, just a little patience, and even a few typos can still get the message
across.

[Will Dockery]

> > Well, if Uhura is really Spock's physical and willing lover he must be

> > ignoring them already?
>
> How so?

Okay, maybe not, but I still miss Nurse Chapel, always ready to take
Spock on...

[Duggy]

On Mar 4, 2:53 am, Will Dockery <will.dock...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, maybe not, but I still miss Nurse Chapel, always ready to take
> Spock on...

Future film love-triangle.

===
= DUG.
===

[MITO MINISTER]

If Spock makes love to Nurse Chapel, it can only mean one thing. He's
GAY!