2001
Neral Hendrickx
fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
Helen & Bob
"David B." wrote:
> Helen & Bob wrote:
> >
> > "David B." wrote:
> >
> > > Benji wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
> > > > > fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
> > > >
> > > > The downside will be all those gimmick-obsessed citizens that decide to
> > > > rent out all the copies of 2001: A Space Oddysey.
> > >
> > > I wonder if 2001 will be rereleased in the theaters next year.
> >
> > I have heard yes it will, to BIG screen theaters, Cinerama and anything else that
> > will handle 70MM film. I am looking forward to seeing it. I think the nearest
> > screen to me is in San Francisco. about a 160 mile round trip. Well worth it to
> > see 2001 on a big screen. Incredible film.
> > Bob
>
> I sa it at the Cinerama dome when it was rereleased years ago. It's a
> must see on the big screen. Too bad we don't have any space stations
> like the one in the movie today.
In what city?? I saw it in Hollywood. The Cinerama dome had not yet been built, in
H'wood.
Bob
Helen & Bob
Benji
David B.
I wonder if 2001 will be rereleased in the theaters next year.
David B.
>
> "David B." wrote:
>
> will handle 70MM film. I am looking forward to seeing it. I think the nearest
> screen to me is in San Francisco. about a 160 mile round trip. Well worth it to
> see 2001 on a big screen. Incredible film.
> Bob
I sa it at the Cinerama dome when it was rereleased years ago. It's a
David B.
> H'wood.
I don't remember. I was just a kid then.
Terry
TMA2!!!
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!
Neral Hendrickx
would be thanksgiving of 2001. See interview ; www.section31.com
Greetings , Neral
Brian Barjenbruch schreef:
> > 2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
> > fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
>
> You sure the 10th film will be out by then?
>
> Personally, my attachment to the concept of '2001' is...well, just look
> at my sig. :)
>
> --
> "Its origin and purpose, still a total mystery."
> - Dr. Heywood Floyd, "2001: A Space Odyssey"
.
<mar...@pandora.be> writes
>2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
>fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
>
It is also the start of the post-DS9 book series. I am so much looking
forward to it!
I don`t share your optimism but I am at least hoping that the 10th movie
will be better than "Insurrection" and the fifth ST TV series will be
better than Voyager.
Baerbel Haddrell
lurker@home
David B. wrote in message <395ADB0D...@hotmail.com>...
>Benji wrote:
>>
>> > 2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
>> > fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
>>
to
>> rent out all the copies of 2001: A Space Oddysey.
>
>I wonder if 2001 will be rereleased in the theaters next year.
It's too sad to release.....I almost hope they don't. It's a poignant
reminder of where we could be, but aren't.
We can't even go to the moon now, because we've lost the technology -- let
it all lapse. If we started today, it would take almost as long to
re-develop the infrastructure and build the vehicle as the first moon
mission took.
But we've got great social programs.
Helen & Bob
"lurker@home" wrote:
>
>
> We can't even go to the moon now, because we've lost the technology -- let
> it all lapse. If we started today, it would take almost as long to
> re-develop the infrastructure and build the vehicle as the first moon
> mission took.
>
> But we've got great social programs.
I worked in the manned spaceflight business for 15 years. You are completely
correct in your statement about having to rebuild the infrastructure.
For this we can thank :
Mr. Nixon
Mr. Ford
Mr. Carter
Mr. Reagan
Mr. Bush
Mr. Clinton
and every other politician, be it Republican or Democrat, who voted against
space research.
Bob
Melvyn the Trill
"Helen & Bob" <chil...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:395B5D2E...@ix.netcom.com...
Perhaps humanity, through social and economic problems, has lost it's will
to explore; the drive that sent ancient mariners out into uncharted waters
in search of then mythological new continents has been driven out of people.
But especially out of the nation leaders, who spend more time tying to save
their political careers than driving mankind forward. Sometimes I am sure I
can here Columbus turning in his grave because of our very introspective
outlook on the universe.
2001: A Space Odyssey is a great film - one of my all time favourites. If it
is to get remastered, I hope the urge to add little "refinements" (a la Star
Wars...) is strongly resisted. In my opinion, as humble as it it, 2001
stands not so much as a pointer to what we have *not* acheived, but as a
tribute to the optimism of a generation who really though we would be living
on Mars by the year 2000. And the hope inspired on millions (billions?) of
people who watched in awe as Neil Armstrong stepped out onto the moon,
having gotten there using less computing power than is in some of todays
pocket calculators.
--
Melvyn the Trill
Neral Hendrickx
is a big question mark. I hope it is not a teenager-show , like Voyager. I'm
34 , so especially DS9 was my favorite star-trek-serie. (from season 4
anyway)
"." schreef:
> In article <395A7EF6...@pandora.be>, Neral Hendrickx
> <mar...@pandora.be> writes
> >2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
> >fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
> >
>
Merrick Baldelli
wrote:
>2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
>fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
I expect to puke with great gusto at the atrocities created
under the banner of Star Trek.
--
-=-=-/ )=*=-='=-.-'-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_( (_ , '_ * . Merrick Baldelli
(((\ \> /_1 ` UIN#: 788639
(\\\\ \_/ /
-=-\ /-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
\ _/
/ /
Helen & Bob
Melvyn the Trill wrote:
The REASON computers have the power they have today is that the onboard computer
on Apollo 11 could not handle the situation, and Armstrong had to take over and
PILOT the ship down to a safe landing. It was a close thing. 30 seconds more,
and they would have had to abort the landing. That's when the effort started to
make core smaller. In '69, 256K core was HUGE.
Bob
Helen & Bob
"David B." wrote:
> Helen & Bob wrote:
> >
> > "lurker@home" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > We can't even go to the moon now, because we've lost the technology -- let
> > > it all lapse. If we started today, it would take almost as long to
> > > re-develop the infrastructure and build the vehicle as the first moon
> > > mission took.
> > >
> > > But we've got great social programs.
> >
> > I worked in the manned spaceflight business for 15 years. You are completely
> > correct in your statement about having to rebuild the infrastructure.
> > For this we can thank :
> > Mr. Nixon
> > Mr. Ford
> > Mr. Carter
> > Mr. Reagan
> > Mr. Bush
> > Mr. Clinton
> > and every other politician, be it Republican or Democrat, who voted against
> > space research.
> > Bob
>
> That sucks.
True. It does suck. Sometimes, the facts suck.
Bob
David B.
>
> And also the Year we send the spaceship Discovery to Jupiter to find
> TMA2!!!
> LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!
WOW...amazing.
David B.
Mirror Spock
>
> "David B." wrote:
>
> Bob
It's too bad that private concerns don't want to pick up the
government's slack on that one. I'd like to retire to the moon fer
crying out loud. It'd be good for my then-aged system to live in 1/6
gravity.
* Robinson
--
"No one questions the assassination of a Captain who disobeys prime
orders of the Empire."
-- Ensign Pavel Chekov, "Mirror, Mirror"
EvilBill[AGQx]
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:40:55 GMT, Neral Hendrickx <mar...@pandora.be>
> wrote:
>
> >2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager , the start of the
> >fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will be a exciting time.
>
> I expect to puke with great gusto at the atrocities created
> under the banner of Star Trek.
>
I expect to be waiting three or four more years to actually see
aforementioned atrocities, thanks to the way the BBC treat science fiction.
--
* EvilBill and Chloë forever...
ICQ: 37464244
Remove NOSPAM to reply by e-mail.
Ta'Teria
David B. <both...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:395EA1AA...@hotmail.com...
> "EvilBill[AGQx]" wrote:
> >
> > "Merrick Baldelli" <mbal...@mindspring.com> wrote in
message
> > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 22:40:55 GMT, Neral Hendrickx
<mar...@pandora.be>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >2001 wil be a great year! The return home of voyager
, the start of the
> > > >fifth serie and the 10th star-trek-movie. That will
be a exciting time.
> > >
> > > I expect to puke with great gusto at the atrocities
created
> > > under the banner of Star Trek.
> > >
> >
> > I expect to be waiting three or four more years to
actually see
> > aforementioned atrocities, thanks to the way the BBC
treat science fiction.
>
Britain (other than its women, altho that wouldnt be too bad
:-)) Sucks.
David B.
EvilBill[AGQx]
>
> Britain (other than its women, altho that wouldnt be too bad
> :-)) Sucks.
>
At least our daytime temperature isn't 95 fahrenheit in the shade! :-P
--
* Has anyone seen my planet-killer? I'm sure I left it around here
somewhere...
EvilBill[AGQx]
news:395EA1AA...@hotmail.com...
> "EvilBill[AGQx]" wrote:
> >
> > aforementioned atrocities, thanks to the way the BBC treat science
fiction.
>
> BBC sucks.
The only thing the BBC has going for it is the lack of commercial breaks.
Merrick Baldelli
<evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>> I expect to puke with great gusto at the atrocities created
>> under the banner of Star Trek.
>
>I expect to be waiting three or four more years to actually see
>aforementioned atrocities, thanks to the way the BBC treat science fiction.
Look on the bright side. You have that much longer to work up
a resistance.
Merrick Baldelli
<evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>"Ta'Teria" <tat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Uix75.316$t6.4271@news-
>>
>> Britain (other than its women, altho that wouldnt be too bad
>> :-)) Sucks.
>
>At least our daytime temperature isn't 95 fahrenheit in the shade! :-P
It was 107 with Heat Index a couple of years ago. This seems
a relatively cool summer this year.
Helen & Bob
Merrick Baldelli wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:28:23 +0100, "EvilBill[AGQx]"
> <evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>
> >"Ta'Teria" <tat...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Uix75.316$t6.4271@news-
> >>
> >> Britain (other than its women, altho that wouldnt be too bad
> >> :-)) Sucks.
> >
> >At least our daytime temperature isn't 95 fahrenheit in the shade! :-P
>
> It was 107 with Heat Index a couple of years ago. This seems
> a relatively cool summer this year.
>
Au Contraire, Mon Ami. Perhaps in the East, 'tis cool. On June 16, San
Francisco had a 103 day. (Same day, my house, 108). Now, that is a bit warm for
June, but common in July/August, and even into September, with 90+ sometimes
occurring in October. But, one adjusts, and has cooling devices for those with
problems. By the way, just to tell you that it can be done (for Evilbill),
California has around 29 million inhabitants, most of them who live in these
temps. I have been in Los Angeles (2d largest city in the US) when it was 111.
Humidity was at 7%. Really not too bad. I was wearing a suit and vest at the
time, and survived quite nicely.
Bob
EvilBill[AGQx]
> <evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
> >
> >I expect to be waiting three or four more years to actually see
> >aforementioned atrocities, thanks to the way the BBC treat science
fiction.
>
> Look on the bright side. You have that much longer to work up
> a resistance.
>
Isn't resistance futile?
--
* You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
EvilBill[AGQx]
> <evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
> >
> >At least our daytime temperature isn't 95 fahrenheit in the shade! :-P
>
> It was 107 with Heat Index a couple of years ago. This seems
> a relatively cool summer this year.
>
*shudder*
I'd, quite literally, be dead in those kind of temperatures.
--
* Chloë Emmott is the sexiest girl in the known universe
Helen & Bob
"EvilBill[AGQx]" wrote:
> "Merrick Baldelli" <mbal...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:28:23 +0100, "EvilBill[AGQx]"
> > <evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >At least our daytime temperature isn't 95 fahrenheit in the shade! :-P
> >
> > It was 107 with Heat Index a couple of years ago. This seems
> > a relatively cool summer this year.
> >
>
> *shudder*
> I'd, quite literally, be dead in those kind of temperatures.
>
I know you believe that, but remember, this country was established and
settled by people from Britain. Unless you have Ectodermal Dysplasia or the
like, you would survive. Perhaps not in comfort, for a while, but you would
survive.
Bob
Merrick Baldelli
<evilbill...@freeuk.com> wrote:
>> Look on the bright side. You have that much longer to work up
>> a resistance.
>
>Isn't resistance futile?
Seems that resistance is thriving quite well in spite of that
rumor.
Masked Man
<chil...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
|Really not too bad. I was wearing a suit and vest at the
|time, and survived quite nicely.
Masked Man---->Then you're made of sterner stuff than I am. Give me
Indiana in January any day over Tucson in July.
--
Who was that masked man?