Hitler's mother may have time travled to the future and had her baby in New
Jersey in a snowed in cabin, and she named the baby Advance Scout. Then
that mother and baby went back to the past and the child became Hitler.
When the bunker was being attacked, Hitler and Eva Braun went into the other
room and jumped into the time machine and went forward to new Jersey. There
they killed a couple in a home and sent them back to the bunker making it
look like they committed suicide. Now they reside in New Jersey living a
reaonably normal life except for an occasional demented time travel musing:
"What if you went back in time and killed Hitler?" Like we're going to bite
on that one Schicklgruber!
Why the hate? Scout's a nice enough guy.
Natalie
--
"Wicked little doll, you have no soul"
(David Byrne, 1997)
http://www.supernaturalusa.net
you're one sick inglorious basterd
There is something familiar about her eyes:
http://dawsr.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/klara-hitler.jpg
Not sure where I've seen an eerily similar piercing gaze... oh wait.
Not hate -- he was razzing me a few days back for wasting time on the forum.
Haha -- Natalie thinks I'm serious!
http://dawsr.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/klara-hitler.jpg
*Oh yeah -- the eyes of Adolf for sure.
Ah. Context is everything.
Yeah but my waste of time is... thought provoking... your waste of time
is .... well... just a waste of time. ;)
Lets see now "snapping baby Hitlers neck" vs. "top 25 smallville episodes".
Well, since the Hitler one was the time-waster I *answered*....
Unfortunately- Hitler was real. And just as unfortunately, I've never
seen a real Man from Krypton.
--
Jim Gysin
Waukesha, WI
those new jersey people got the colorado storm, good
you are
good for you
your a dick
idiot face
I believe our history indicates that Himmler was the person that urged
Hitler to conduct the Holocaust. Himmler had the nutty ideas of racial
purity and sent people around the world to find aryan connections to all
races. They were especially interested in Tibet. He wanted to prove that
all the races descended or were bastardizations of the ayran race. Hitler
said that it was foolish to point out that the Romans were descended from
the Germans because the Romans were building aquaducts when the Germans were
living in mud huts. Himmler also connected Hitler and the Teutonic Knights.
From the Wiki on Himmler: In Himmler's 20's -- "During this time he was
again obsessed with the idea of becoming a soldier. He wrote that if Germany
did not soon go to war, he would go to another country to seek battle."
So if Hitler was removed an alternate reality may have had Himmler become
the leader and he was not incompetent like Hitler. Hitler wanted the Me262
to be a bomber. Hitler didn't like the assault rifle that became the
pattern for the Russian AK47 and so their infantry had bolt action rifles.
Hitler's armies were largely horse drawn. Tv likes to show us mechanized
armor but my father said they used horses to pull supply carts and wagons.
Basically Hitler had a WWI mind. Himmler was more dangerous. Killing baby
Hitler may have given them a victory.
idiot face
*Idiot ass.
good for you
*Have another helping of stool.
your a dick
*I was going to say you're an ass but we know that can't be.
oy-
Thats the end of this conversation
jacka=off
Go eat posion
i'm an ass & i know it, Not. i'm not one cause your a ass
fuck off. Old Fart
Haha -- I put something to that effect in parents but took it out to see
your reply. :-)
I also see you are taking some tips from Jeremy -- no periods.
Reading one of your stories is the same.
You mixed up your period and comma.
This must be your feminine side. YOU started this hypothetical ABSTRACT
discussion and now that I have given you another ABSTRACT idea, we see the
"limits" of your abstract reasoning. To understand what I'm saying you have
to remove yourself and experince from the reasoning.
I met people 30 years ago that HAD NEVER HEARD OF HITLER! And there are
many more of them today. To them the history and reality of Hitler is just a
story, and to some, a myth. REALLY. So my saying that is not without
foundation or example -- it is just a part of our reality.
So, what you're saying is that Godwin's Law has to be reformulated?
Couldn't resist taking a shot at women, even though you're not speaking
with one at the moment, could you?
:-P
So you're saying that what I said was negative? Are you denying that all us
have male and female sides? I think that is a given.
Godwin's law doesn't really apply to the thread since Ms. Scout's original
post was about time travel and killing Hitler. Godwin's Law as I understand
it, says that ANY discussion will devolve into a Nazi/Hitler comparison.
This (thread) doesn't apply.
However as far as numbers of people not hearing of Hitler and assuming that
those numbers will increase, then I'd say "yes" to a reformulation. The
conversations of those that haven't heard of him can't devolve as Godwin
describes. So ipso facto Godwin's isn't really a law.
How about the ATS Axiom of Canon City Cursing......
"During any period of time where new episodes of Smallville are not
broadcast, all discussions on alt.tv.smallville will eventually be visited
by the non-sensical, non sequitaric ramblings of the man without an anus."
He's taking shots at everyone.
> :-P
>
> Natalie
That law seems to hold up to the test of time. I would only add that his
ravings are one continuous thread, since he never uses a period.
Fortunately we get a few breaks during his periods of solitary confinement.
(visual = Hannibal Lecter holding doody bag)
Speaking of shots -- anyone had the H1N1 shot or found them anywhere? None
here.
You (again) implied women lack abstract reasoning - we're ruled by
emotions. Men are too, just in a different way, and usually with the
more aggressive emotions. I doubt any major wars were started because
it was our time of the month.
Deal with it.
:-P
Sure, that's what he does - and I often like it, but he's back on that
emotions-rule-women's-shit, for which I will continue to smack his ass
when he does this.
*sigh*
I'm ragging on you for insinuating that it must be Scout's "feminine"
side that rejected your abstract. Again sir, I say, bull, and might I
add, shit.
exactly so- I love my feminine side. It's the best part of me. He's a
self loathing egotistical fascist male jerk.
> Natalie
oooh- will you smack my ass instead? How bout this Nat... everytime
BC gets nasty... you smack my ass.
>
> Natalie
BC must admire former presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, who ran
against the elder George Bush. Dukakis was opposed to the death
penalty, and that was an issue in one of their debates. The moderator
asked Dukakis, in the abstract, would he still oppose the death
penalty for a criminal who had raped and murdered his own wife and
daughter.
True to BC's preferred "masculine" form, Dukakis showed no emotion.
Keeping it an abstraction, he calmly explained that no, he would not
support the death penalty even for the rapist/murderer of his own wife
and daughter. BC, for one, probably praised the "manly" Dukakis for
his logical and reasoned consideration of the hypothetical.
Almost everyone else, however, was turned off by Dukakis' cold and
bloodless response. They wondered, does he have any normal human
passion, any love for his family? Far from being "masculine" his
utter detachment just seemed weak, the reaction of someone who just
lacked the capacity for strong feelings about anything. But the
purely logical "real men," like Mr. Spock and BC, probably thought
Dukakis was right on. Millions of voters thought otherwise.
But the
> purely logical "real men," like Mr. Spock and BC, probably thought
> Dukakis was right on. Millions of voters thought otherwise.
>
>
>
>
Now why do you have to insult my good friend... Mr. Spock like that.
I know for a fact that Spock wouldn't have voted for Dukakis. First of
all Spock voted for T'Pau in the general election (vote sent via
subspace radio)... secondly on Vulcan the name Dukakis means "two
gangrened trouser snouts", which is a very bad omen... especially on Vulcan.
Wickeddoll wrote:
> Advance Scout wrote:
>> Wickeddoll wrote:
> Sure, that's what he does - and I often like it, but he's back on that
> emotions-rule-women's-shit, for which I will continue to smack his ass
> when he does this.
>
I don't have to, Fucker
My Stories Rock & your a fuck
Like i care moronic tard
Bastard
Buzz the hell off
*BC liked elder Bush -- you always have me pegged wrong.
True to BC's preferred "masculine" form, Dukakis showed no emotion.
Keeping it an abstraction, he calmly explained that no, he would not
support the death penalty even for the rapist/murderer of his own wife
and daughter. BC, for one, probably praised the "manly" Dukakis for
his logical and reasoned consideration of the hypothetical.
*I have no idea what the hell you are talking about -- insane-o.
Almost everyone else, however, was turned off by Dukakis' cold and
bloodless response. They wondered, does he have any normal human
passion, any love for his family? Far from being "masculine" his
utter detachment just seemed weak, the reaction of someone who just
lacked the capacity for strong feelings about anything. But the
purely logical "real men," like Mr. Spock and BC, probably thought
Dukakis was right on. Millions of voters thought otherwise.
*I repeat -- old man Bush was ok in my book because he said the crazies of
the repubs supported Reaganomics -- a policy he called "voodoo economics".
I agreed with him. I was also with him on the Gulf War. Your problem is in
thinking that I'm a tree-hugging liberal -- I'm not. I support the right to
have a gun, I don't like abortion, and I also realize that change sometimes
means that we have to kill the snail-darter.
*You're just pissed that I label your form of politics as "Nazi" which it
is. And what the hell is the bug in your ass with Dukakis? I couldn't even
remember his name the other day let alone his running mate -- that I still
don't remember -- woman I think.
You communicate emotionally and why must you jump up at every fucking thing
that you don't understand? And STOP sending me your private family emails
and asking for my help, two face. I think you're bi-polar.
Your head is a rock and they suck. Get a clue and a life. Put that doody
bag on a stick and go outside for a change.
The lower case "I" is appropriate for you.
Didn't say that you dislike old Bush -- no need for you to have a
hormonal hissy fit.
>
> True to BC's preferred "masculine" form, Dukakis showed no emotion.
> Keeping it an abstraction, he calmly explained that no, he would not
> support the death penalty even for the rapist/murderer of his own wife
> and daughter. BC, for one, probably praised the "manly" Dukakis for
> his logical and reasoned consideration of the hypothetical.
>
> *I have no idea what the hell you are talking about -- insane-o.
Not sure if you're insane-o, or just not reading for comprehension.
>
> Almost everyone else, however, was turned off by Dukakis' cold and
> bloodless response. They wondered, does he have any normal human
> passion, any love for his family? Far from being "masculine" his
> utter detachment just seemed weak, the reaction of someone who just
> lacked the capacity for strong feelings about anything. But the
> purely logical "real men," like Mr. Spock and BC, probably thought
> Dukakis was right on. Millions of voters thought otherwise.
>
> *I repeat -- old man Bush was ok in my book because he said the crazies of
> the repubs supported Reaganomics -- a policy he called "voodoo economics".
> I agreed with him. I was also with him on the Gulf War. Your problem is in
> thinking that I'm a tree-hugging liberal -- I'm not. I support the right to
> have a gun, I don't like abortion, and I also realize that change sometimes
> means that we have to kill the snail-darter.
>
> *You're just pissed that I label your form of politics as "Nazi" which it
> is. And what the hell is the bug in your ass with Dukakis? I couldn't even
> remember his name the other day let alone his running mate -- that I still
> don't remember -- woman I think.
>
You managed to miss my point completely, perhaps on purpose. This has
nothing to do with liberal/conservative, pro or anti death penalty. I
was talking purely about *how* Dukakis addressed the question,
separating himself and his emotions from the abstract issue of capital
punishment.
And her name was Geraldine Ferraro, will you forget Sarah Palin too?
Seems that your memory is "going rogue" at an accelerating pace.
Translation: if you want to be my "friend" you will always agree with
me. Almost a totalitarian personality trait, Adolf is that you?
And that is what I say cannot be applied to women in general. You, me,
and everyone see different types of personalities in the world. I can
assure you, nobody I know is afraid to say "I was wrong" or "I don't
think you're right" instead of "I don't want to discuss it anymore"
because they don't have a response. Sometimes, especially with you and
a few others on the NGs, we end up going round and round, which is a
waste of everyone's time, so I'll say, "Let's agree to disagree" or
something like that. It doesn't even mean you're wrong - it just means
*I* believe you're wrong, and you just as stubbornly believe you're right.
You and Hawk have issues with each other, but I have no issues with
either of you, *except* when you generalize women as needing an
emotional crutch for every reaction. That's just unfair.
BC, your snark is the main thing I like about you, but you really do
generalize a lot of negative things when it comes to women. Are we
faultless? Hell no, but to keep saying an action or reaction you think
is feminine, therefore emotional is really insulting. Makes us sound
like the female characters of 1940s movies. Those silly bitches were
helpless, clueless, and were often slapped - which was considered
appropriate at the time.
We really aren't that helpless; so while we'll certainly cry much more
easily than a man, it doesn't mean we can't control our emotions to make
smart decisions and function well in business or other serious
situations, just as men do.
*sigh*
My reaction there is emotional, in that it annoys the hell outta me -
but my complaint is that you said Scout's reaction was feminine. That's
saying men don't have the same emotions we have, and react the way we
do. They most certainly do indeed, but often mask said emotions with
aggression.
Are you the Carl from NJ? And I don't have hormones -- my last whore got
them in the divorce settlement.
>
>
>>
>> True to BC's preferred "masculine" form, Dukakis showed no emotion.
>> Keeping it an abstraction, he calmly explained that no, he would not
>> support the death penalty even for the rapist/murderer of his own wife
>> and daughter. BC, for one, probably praised the "manly" Dukakis for
>> his logical and reasoned consideration of the hypothetical.
>>
>> *I have no idea what the hell you are talking about -- insane-o.
>
>
> Not sure if you're insane-o, or just not reading for comprehension.
Not sure Dukakis has a lot of bearing on any discussion here --maybe that is
the reformulation of Godwin's Law -- that all internet threads devolve into
a discussion about Dukakis.
>
>
>>
>> Almost everyone else, however, was turned off by Dukakis' cold and
>> bloodless response. They wondered, does he have any normal human
>> passion, any love for his family? Far from being "masculine" his
>> utter detachment just seemed weak, the reaction of someone who just
>> lacked the capacity for strong feelings about anything. But the
>> purely logical "real men," like Mr. Spock and BC, probably thought
>> Dukakis was right on. Millions of voters thought otherwise.
>>
>> *I repeat -- old man Bush was ok in my book because he said the crazies
>> of the repubs supported Reaganomics -- a policy he called "voodoo
>> economics". I agreed with him. I was also with him on the Gulf War.
>> Your problem is in thinking that I'm a tree-hugging liberal -- I'm not.
>> I support the right to have a gun, I don't like abortion, and I also
>> realize that change sometimes means that we have to kill the
>> snail-darter.
>>
>> *You're just pissed that I label your form of politics as "Nazi" which it
>> is. And what the hell is the bug in your ass with Dukakis? I couldn't
>> even remember his name the other day let alone his running mate -- that I
>> still don't remember -- woman I think.
>>
>
> You managed to miss my point completely, perhaps on purpose. This has
> nothing to do with liberal/conservative, pro or anti death penalty. I was
> talking purely about *how* Dukakis addressed the question, separating
> himself and his emotions from the abstract issue of capital punishment.
I told you I couldn't remember his name a while back -- so how can I
remember what he said or did? I'm serious -- I didn't think he was
memorable when he ran. You must be assuming I cared about that -- I don't.
Spock was written to be "logical" but also "unemotional and without
compassion" which you have forgotten. I try to be logical and who wants to
be illogical? But I have emotion and compassion too -- so your comparison
falls flat mostly because you have no idea of what you are talking about
since you confuse logic with a lack of compassion.
>
> And her name was Geraldine Ferraro, will you forget Sarah Palin too? Seems
> that your memory is "going rogue" at an accelerating pace.
Who wouldn't want to forget the stupid shit that's written here? Even basic
training couldn't cough up more nutty dumbasses than this group. And yeah,
I'd like to forget Palin -- God wants to forget her.
Turns out I am Bill Clinton's first cousin - surprised? No actually
just getting new settings down to try out Mozilla Thunderbird and AIOE
instead of Google. T-Bird goes along with the latest Firefox browser
which I really like for its blazing speed.
I Rock. I Love your Mothers Tits. Your mother is a bitch for not
raising you right
Fuck you. Your father & bitch mother must be proud. That they rasied a
fuckin loser
I'm really shocked and hurt by this - we've been in much worse
arguments, yet he took this one way more personally. I've actually gone
back and read my posts, and still don't see where I was particularly
offensive to him. *shrug*
I do think you and Scout were kind of hard on him, but that was between
you guys, not me, so I stayed out of it - maybe that's what set him off.
I honestly don't know.
I also was quite surprised at his response to you, who did not deserve
that at all. Not surprised by his response to me -- he has called me
a moron, a Nazi, a lunatic many times before so that is par for the
course. I take it as joking online banter, but his words to you were
harsh and seem quite different in tone... it's kind of sad.
We all got a Hillbilly Bone. Inside. Imbrass it
We all got a Hillbilly Bone. Inside. Imbrass it
Thanks - I'm still dazed by it. It doesn't sound like him at all to me
- at least the persona I've seen all this time. I'm stunned, and more
than a little hurt by his slam, but like any of us, he has the right to
his feelings.
Huh?
Never mind...I just want to forget the whole thing.
:-P
> Never mind...I just want to forget the whole thing.
Just like a chick! (ducks and runs)
--
Tiger Woods has just been named "Athlete of the Decade"
His chosen event? The Broad Jump.
> You and Hawk have issues with each other, but I have no issues with
> either of you, *except* when you generalize women as needing an
> emotional crutch for every reaction. That's just unfair.
I agree Nat- I suspect BC is one of the founding fathers of the He Man
Woman Hater club
heres BC's picture when he was a chubby little kid
http://www.he-manwomanhatersclub.net/images/277_he_mans_wowan_haters_club.JPG
>
> Natalie
In fact heres the t-shirt he designed as a kid
http://images7.cafepress.com/product/87998097v4_480x480_Front_Color-White.jpg
Heres BC's house before his mother made him move back into her house
last year
http://photoshopfaceoff.com/img/ptsyNKfv7.jpg
Kind of hard on him? What exactly did I say that was hard on him? I
know I said "oy vey... this conversation is finished" when I found what
he said to be offensive. Other than that, I cant recall... Please
quote me.
As I have said before- I love my feminine side.
That's
> saying men don't have the same emotions we have, and react the way we
> do. They most certainly do indeed, but often mask said emotions with
> aggression.
>
Actually its my fem side thats aggressive.
> Natalie
LOL Rather than keep rehashing it? You bet!
:-D
You guys are gonna wear out my arm with the fwappings.
You're gonna make me re-read it? Please, no - it's too painful. I
don't even want to keep responding to this thread, so I'm dropping it.
Not mad at you, Scout, BC or anyone, I just think we've reached the end
of a thread that had started out light-heartedly, then drifted into
flame territory. I hate that.
Actually no- my fem side LOVES my male side - if you get my drift.
But does your right hand know what your left hand is doing?
Ladies hate Morons & they rather love country boys like me
Ladies love country boys vs Dumbass, City folk
====================
Any lady that would give you the time of the day is a saint... but, trust
me, it ain't love.
> ====================
> Any lady that would give you the time of the day is a saint... but, trust
> me, it ain't love.
It's (with any luck) the next YouTube hit !
===========
...Lady Latex's Big Adventure!
I Love This Message Board & I love Girls who love whiskey
Go SUck it
Oh you Joker you, your such a hoot.
So they have to be drunk, then? ..... And you're stll a virgin? Guess
there's not enough whiskey in the world then.
They're available on base and at some outlets here in Vegas.