> She was never given credit, to my knowledge. Who did it?
Hmm, may be in the FAQ or the QAQ if anyone knows where they got to. I
can't remember the status of the fish list either.
Pete
Peter Chant <pe...@petezilla.co.uk> wrote:
> satyr wrote:
>
>> She was never given credit, to my knowledge. Who did it?
>
> Hmm, may be in the FAQ or the QAQ if anyone knows where they got to. I
> can't remember the status of the fish list either.
>
> Pete
Wasn't this Hattie Hayfield? Or whoever was the lady that
played Hilly/Holly?
BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyk...@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyk...@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF5ImGyBkZmuMZ8L8RAl9GAJ0SQYt2daZE5tOObpIHo67GM6/FLwCePcLr
vC4hKr5Md0DZ3PkNmGKW5+w=
=HRYK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
For info on Red Dwarf theme see:
http://www.howardgoodall.co.uk/tvthemes/reddwarfpage.htm
(it was Jenna Russell)
Excuse me but your sig is too long!
That was for Steve so it feels more like old times
--
Starbugaboo
> Excuse me but your sig is too long!
>
> That was for Steve so it feels more like old times
>
>
Please reduce it to four lines or less...
;-)
Fewer!!!! :p
>On 13 Mar, 23:37, Peter Chant <p...@petezilla.co.uk> wrote:
<snip>
>> Please reduce it to four lines or less...
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> --http://www.petezilla.co.uk
>
>Fewer!!!! :p
Damn, you beat me to it!
-Steve
You did it wrong. You said "excuse me" at the beginning of your
sentence and that *never* would have happened 5 years ago!
:)
-Steve
Oh yeah... I must be getting soft in my old age!
--
Starbugaboo
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:37:21 +0000, Peter Chant wrote:
>
>> Please reduce it to four lines or less...
>
> :-(
>
> Bring back FidoNet. That's what I say. A four line sig, and a two line
> tag were acceptable there. Leave one line of "excess" quoted text though,
> and you'd be flamed to Hades. And ask a question that was in the FAQ, or
> answered in the manual; Be prepared for death threats.
Ah ha - but you missed the obvious, and I mean _really_ obvious invitation
to flame me in my reply. In fact you quoted the offending item and it is
still included in this post. We had endless flames here on that topic.
Can anyone guess what it is?
:-)
It should, of course, be "four lines or under"... right? :)
Ooh, new twist to the argument.
--
Starbugaboo
>
> It should, of course, be "four lines or under"... right? :)
>
> Ooh, new twist to the argument.
>
For the programmer, please decrement your sig to a number smaller than 5?
>> --http://www.petezilla.co.uk
>
> Fewer!!!! :p
Buy that man an eyebrow.
Agatha Christie.
--
Hercule Platini
"If you want my opinion, they all did it."