Fahran's all new RD Game
Fahran the Runabout
Many of you (well I *am* an optimist) will remember a little game we
played last year where you had to second guess everyone else's answers
to the questions. Well, the game is back!
For those who weren't around back then or need a little reminder, here's
how it works. I pose you 10 Red Dwarf and atvrd related questions. You
then email me your answers. I compile all the answers and then post the
results in a week or so. Your score depends on how many people give the
same answer as you. The more people that say the same as you, the higher
your score. So the idea is to figure out what the most popular answer
will be and say that.
For example, if the category is "A colour of the rainbow" and I get 8
answers of "red", 3 answers of "blue", 1 answer of "indigo", 1 answer of
"violet" and 1 answer of "black", then everyone who answered "red"
scores 8 points, everyone who answered "blue" scores 3 points and those
who answered "indigo", "violet" and "black" get 1 point each. There are
no wrong answers in this quiz. That's why "black" still counts.
All answers should be emailed to me at fah...@fahran.com and not posted
on the ng. I got a great response last time, so get out your thinking
caps folks. OK, here are the categories:
(1) An episode from Series II
(2) Something eaten by Lister
(3) An animal that has appeared in the show
(4) Something Rimmer has called Kryten
(5) A regular American poster to atvrd
(6) A member of the Holoship crew
(7) One of Kryten's groinal attachments
(8) Something the Polymorph changed into
(9) A future echo
(10) Someone's atvrd sig
Remember, send your responses to fah...@fahran.com.
Oh, and have fun.
Fahran
--
Runabout, Runabout,
The Infinite Guild;
The Citadel bids, the Citadel finds
The conjured fare in garrisoned hands.
David St. Hubbins
i'm still trying to figure out "shut your gob you tit"
Ell Jay
"David St. Hubbins" wrote:
> how about, What is the smeg to gimboid ratio of the first series?
>
> i'm still trying to figure out "shut your gob you tit"
"What do you want? Don't give me that you snotty-faced pile of parrot
droppings. Shut you're festering gob, you tit! You're kind really
makes me puke, you vaccuos, toffy-nosed, malodourous, perverts!"
Kender Rhea
>
> how about, What is the smeg to gimboid ratio of the first series?
>
> i'm still trying to figure out "shut your gob you tit"
It means the same thing as "Shut your pie-hole, you twit!"
Hmmm... There could be money to be made in a U.K. to U.S. translation
guide... ;)
--
"Oh, wonderful. A squeezy mop! Just what I've always wanted."
KenderRhea on AOL Instant Messenger
95023979 on ICQ
Kryten
"Kender Rhea" <ken...@texas.net> wrote in message
news:3A5E62C4...@texas.net...
> > i'm still trying to figure out "shut your gob you tit"
>
> It means the same thing as "Shut your pie-hole, you twit!"
>
> Hmmm... There could be money to be made in a U.K. to U.S. translation
> guide... ;)
It's already been done..... it's remastering :oP
Kryten
--
Danger, danger vomit at 12oclock...... and 1o'clock.... oh yeah and
2,3,4,5..... well you get the idea.
Kender Rhea
>
> > Hmmm... There could be money to be made in a U.K. to U.S. translation
> > guide... ;)
>
> It's already been done..... it's remastering :oP
Ah, but "translation" is a good thing. So there's a difference.
I actually managed to get *non*-remastered copies of Series I, tape 2;
Series II, tape 1; and Series III, tape 2. I *still* don't see what was
s o terrible about them that had to be "fixed." But then again, I was
happy with the original "Star Wars," too; and I feel that "remastering"
ruined *that*.
David St. Hubbins
: ruined *that*.
amen the only thing i noticed was the standard force ring when the death
star blew (every space show has to use the force ring explosion in space i
dont get it)
Ell Jay
I first saw it in "ST: Generations", where it was supposed to represent a
shockwave.
Kryten
"Ell Jay" <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3A661425...@sk.sympatico.ca...
The effect was first used in Star Trek VI when the Klingon moon blew up,
since then it's been used in every Sci-Fi film/show when something in space
blows up.
Kryten
--
AIM: HecklerUK
ICQ: 76291392
Ell Jay
In ST-VI, it actually had a purpose and explanation, though.
Gavin Clayton
>I first saw it in "ST: Generations", where it was supposed to represent a
>shockwave.
The effect was invented by Star Trek 6, when the Klingon moon thingy
blew up. It was a shockwave, yeah. Now a LOT of SF movies have used
the same effect for a shockwave. I personally don't like it, because
it's unrealistic. A shockwave wouldn't be so visible, and it wouldn't
be flat and travel just horizontally or vertically.
ST: Generations actually did better shockwaves... when the sun
exploded, a spherical shockwave expanded from the explosion. This was
better in all ways -- more realistic, and it gave a shockwave "wall"
heading right towards them that they had to escape from.
Gavin Clayton
Kryten
"Gavin Clayton" <gav...@eidosnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:uold6tc2vk7r1kkg0...@4ax.com...
> The effect was invented by Star Trek 6, when the Klingon moon thingy
> blew up. It was a shockwave, yeah. Now a LOT of SF movies have used
> the same effect for a shockwave. I personally don't like it, because
> it's unrealistic. A shockwave wouldn't be so visible, and it wouldn't
> be flat and travel just horizontally or vertically.
Actually the shockwave was very accurate. That's exactly how explosions send
a shockwave out. It's to do with the focus of the blast, to create a
spherical shockwave you'd need a focused explosion that was equal in all
directions, this just doesn't happen. I remember seeing footage of a
chemical plant exploding in the US, the footage was taken from a few miles
away as the area had been cordoned off because of the danger. When it
exploded it was with such force that you could visibly see a large shockwave
roll across the surrounding countryside.... quite spectacular.
> ST: Generations actually did better shockwaves... when the sun
> exploded, a spherical shockwave expanded from the explosion. This was
> better in all ways -- more realistic, and it gave a shockwave "wall"
> heading right towards them that they had to escape from.
See above, it might seem more realistic but it's not.
Kryten
Domus
>This is what Ell Jay <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca> just wrote:
>
>>I first saw it in "ST: Generations", where it was supposed to represent a
>>shockwave.
>
>The effect was invented by Star Trek 6, when the Klingon moon thingy
>blew up. It was a shockwave, yeah. Now a LOT of SF movies have used
>the same effect for a shockwave. I personally don't like it, because
>it's unrealistic. A shockwave wouldn't be so visible, and it wouldn't
>be flat and travel just horizontally or vertically.
Yeah, I also am surprised this is the main way now. They have to edit
everything to make it 'cooler' than reality. Why is CGI so hot? If it's
done correctly, the idea is that you don't notice it's there. Yet a lot of
spacy-type shows use it when it's not needed. I understand they want to make
the explosion something different, something that hasn't been seen before,
but there's a point when it's just silly. I won't even get into the fact
that space explosions tend to go 'boom' in the movies, when there's nothing
for the sound waves to travel through...
-Domus
--
-I don't just have issues, I've got a whole subscription-
If birds go to heaven, do they get an extra pair of wings with their halo?
Peter Chant
"Kryten" <kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> writes:
>
> Actually the shockwave was very accurate. That's exactly how explosions send
> a shockwave out. It's to do with the focus of the blast, to create a
> spherical shockwave you'd need a focused explosion that was equal in all
> directions, this just doesn't happen. I remember seeing footage of a
> chemical plant exploding in the US, the footage was taken from a few miles
> away as the area had been cordoned off because of the danger. When it
> exploded it was with such force that you could visibly see a large shockwave
> roll across the surrounding countryside.... quite spectacular.
You only saw it where the shockwave hit the ground shaking the dust up I
expect.
--
Garth-o-meter: www.petezilla.co.uk/red-dwarf/stats.html
As recommened by alt.tv.red-dwarf's own Jake Bullet
Peter Chant
do...@junior.apk.net (Domus) writes:
>
> Yeah, I also am surprised this is the main way now. They have to edit
> everything to make it 'cooler' than reality. Why is CGI so hot? If it's
> done correctly, the idea is that you don't notice it's there. Yet a lot of
> spacy-type shows use it when it's not needed. I understand they want to make
> the explosion something different, something that hasn't been seen before,
> but there's a point when it's just silly. I won't even get into the fact
> that space explosions tend to go 'boom' in the movies, when there's nothing
> for the sound waves to travel through...
IMHO Babylon 5 works with all CGI as the sets and the models are made to
match, there is so much CGI it is deamed 'normal' and you can suspend your
disbeleif. RD on the otherhand is stacked full of handbuilt models and sets
which make the CGI stick out like a sore thumb.
Daff
>You only saw it where the shockwave hit the ground shaking the dust up I
>expect.
Shockwave was cool, An evil logical purple dude who changed into a big
gun, what more could you want?
Anyone who says sex will be shot :P
Daff
--
<Lister_> I need help
www.daff.net
Kryten
"Peter Chant" <pe...@petezilla.co.uk> wrote in message
news:947d1a$hlj$3...@phoenix.fire...
> You only saw it where the shockwave hit the ground shaking the dust up I
> expect.
As with any explosion you can see the effect as the air is displaced, and
debris is thrown out along with it. It's like a wall of air and heat, and
just as you get a heat haze on hot days you get a similar effect. Yeah
there's some dust thrown up, but that's only a small part of it. I don't
have the full explanation at my fingertips, but some of the guys I used to
chat with can work out how much energy is needed and how much of a shockwave
can be produced very accurately. I know a few people who worked out almost
exactly how much energy was required to blow up a planet in Star Wars.
Kryten
Covert Badger
>Shockwave was cool, An evil logical purple dude who changed into a big
>gun, what more could you want?
>
>Anyone who says sex will be shot :P
I thought you already *were* talking about sex. Or is there more than
one purple dude who turns into a biggun (sorry, I meant big gun)?
OK, I'm going.
CB
--
A Rendezvous With Rama film directed by David Fincher?
Pinch me! 2003 can't come quickly enough...
Gavin Clayton
>Actually the shockwave was very accurate. That's exactly how explosions send
>a shockwave out.
Um... no. I'm sure you're wrong.
Shockwaves are not flat. The shockwaves in Star Trek 6 and other SF
films are like flat rings... like those flat throwing-ring frisbees.
That can't possibly be the shape of a shockwave. If you were hit by a
shockwave like that, it would cut you in half because it would be
flat. That doesn't happen. Shockwaves may be many shapes, but I'm sure
they are not totally flat on one plane.
They may be egg-shaped, they may not always be perfect spheres. But
shockwaves expand in all directions... outward, spherical. Shockwaves
cannot possibly be sharp and flat, travelling only on a sharp narrow
horizontal plane. Shockwaves are 3-dimensional, not 2-dimensional.
They expand like a sphere, not like a ring.
If I'm wrong... well. I might be. But I think flat-ring shockwaves are
invented by Star Trek 6, and not realistic at all.
Gavin Clayton
Ell Jay
The ST:VI one was a shockwave on a galctic scale, and therefore followed the
galactic plane.
Covert Badger
<gav...@eidosnet.co.uk> wrote:
>Shockwaves are not flat. The shockwaves in Star Trek 6 and other SF
>films are like flat rings... like those flat throwing-ring frisbees.
>That can't possibly be the shape of a shockwave. If you were hit by a
>shockwave like that, it would cut you in half because it would be
>flat. That doesn't happen. Shockwaves may be many shapes, but I'm sure
>they are not totally flat on one plane.
The shockwave in those films isn't necessarily *completely* flat (I've
not seen all the films mentioned, BTW) - for example, at the end of
the remastered Return Of The Jedi when the Death Star blows up,
remember it's on a near-planetary scale so even if the wave looks flat
it might be miles thick. But, yes, still mainly on a single plane.
>They may be egg-shaped, they may not always be perfect spheres. But
>shockwaves expand in all directions... outward, spherical. Shockwaves
>cannot possibly be sharp and flat, travelling only on a sharp narrow
>horizontal plane. Shockwaves are 3-dimensional, not 2-dimensional.
>They expand like a sphere, not like a ring.
As Kryten said, it depends on how the blast is focused. If a blast is
directed outwards and no energy is directed upwards, then the
shockwave will look flat. If the blast is focused in one direction,
the wave can't be spherical because there's no energy to take the
shock in all directions. Imagine standing in a snowstorm, holding a
flame thrower. If you fire the flame thrower straight forward, the
snow in front of you will be melted as it falls, but the snow flakes
to the side and behind you will not. If you spin on your heels with
the thrower activated, you'll clear all the snow around you, but not
the snow beneath your feet or above your head, because the energy
isn't directed that way. Thus your flame 'shockwave' will be flat.
If anyone's wondering where I got the weird analogy from, well it's
snowing outside and I'm feeling inspired :-)
Raul C. Beltizer
<gav...@eidosnet.co.uk> wrote:
You are correct, Gavin.
Raul C. Beltizer
How do you direct a blast outward and not upward, in space? The answer
is that you can't. Stars explode all the time and their blasts go
every which way. When rapidly rotating stars explode, much of the
blast goes out in a flattened pattern but a ton of star shit blows
upward and downward as well. The only way you could achieve a blast
pattern that is being talked about would be to have the exploding
thing neatly surrounded by a perfect circle of identically massive
black holes, which are definitely not in the scripts of the places you
saw this cgi effect. By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
Ell Jay
> By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
Talkie Toaster
I think you just gave one.
--
This is a stickier situation than when Sticky the Stick Insect got stuck on
a sticky bun.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
Domus
>On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:20:23 +0000, Gavin Clayton
><gav...@eidosnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>This is what "Kryten" <kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> just wrote:
>>
>>>Actually the shockwave was very accurate. That's exactly how explosions send
>>>a shockwave out.
>>
>>invented by Star Trek 6, and not realistic at all.
>>
>>Gavin Clayton
>
>You are correct, Gavin.
*looks left*
*looks right*
No sarcastic comments? No mention of sex? Ok, who are you, and what have you
done with our Raul?
Raul C. Beltizer
>>>If I'm wrong... well. I might be. But I think flat-ring shockwaves are
>>>invented by Star Trek 6, and not realistic at all.
>>>
>>>Gavin Clayton
>>
>>You are correct, Gavin.
>
>*looks left*
>*looks right*
>
>No sarcastic comments? No mention of sex? Ok, who are you, and what have you
>done with our Raul?
>
>-Domus
Hey Domus, if there is one thing that can get my mind off of sex, it
is flat-ring shockwaves. But only briefly. How often do you
masturbate? I'm writing a paper.
Talkie Toaster
Good thing you didn't ask Bad Zeb. You'd run out of paper
Covert Badger
<raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>How do you direct a blast outward and not upward, in space? The answer
>is that you can't. Stars explode all the time and their blasts go
>every which way. When rapidly rotating stars explode, much of the
>blast goes out in a flattened pattern but a ton of star shit blows
>upward and downward as well. The only way you could achieve a blast
>pattern that is being talked about would be to have the exploding
>thing neatly surrounded by a perfect circle of identically massive
>black holes, which are definitely not in the scripts of the places you
>saw this cgi effect. By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
>or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
Depends where the blast originates from, dunnit? For example (and I'm
just using this as an example, not as evidence for my argument) when the
Death Star was destroyed in Star Wars, the core was reached by firing
down a long ventilation thingy (sorry, memory fails). If the energy from
the exploding core shot back up this shaft and out into the trench that
encircles the DS, then it would be prevented from spreading into a
sphere shape by the walls of the trench, and would be directed into
space when it reaches the 'horizon'. If the DS is spinning, this'll give
a garden sprinkler type effect and create the 'ring' shape. When the
Death Star actually completely explodes it explodes in all directions,
as can be seen in the film, but the initial release of energy could be
shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
Talkie Toaster
:
: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
to muddy the issue.
--
The hoards of The Spoon are among us. You must be strong and denounce the
ways of the Noodlessness, join the Armies of The Fellowship of the Full and
spread the joy of The Pot Noodle
Covert Badger
wrote:
>: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
>: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
>
>Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
>to muddy the issue.
Bastard. :-)
Talkie Toaster
: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 23:28:37 +1100, "Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org>
: wrote:
:
: >: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
: >: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
: >
: >Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud
hole
: >to muddy the issue.
:
: Bastard. :-)
Ah, my entry in "Who's Who"
Richard Street
Talkie Toaster <bo...@clown.org> wrote in message
news:5wfa6.1142$cF2....@ozemail.com.au...
> Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> :
> : shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
> : blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
>
> Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
> to muddy the issue.
A *mud* hole?
--
Richard Street - stre...@btinternet.com
Flight From The Evil Toecutter / Dazed Goose / The Nightriders Rave / The
Crazing Of Johnny The Boy / Foreboding In The Vast Landscape. VCD-47144.
Peter Chant
"Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org> writes:
>
> Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
> to muddy the issue.
A mud hole?
Ell Jay
Look, I'm just trying to add my opinion to the discussion. When did
*I* make a remark about "seeing radio"?????? I was correcting AJ!!!!
Get at least a couple good reasons before you make accusations!
Ell Jay
> In article <5wfa6.1142$cF2....@ozemail.com.au>,
> "Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org> writes:
> >
> > Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
> > to muddy the issue.
>
> A mud hole?
So what is it?
RickC
> : >No sarcastic comments? No mention of sex? Ok, who are you, and what
have
> you
> : >done with our Raul?
> : >
> : >-Domus
> :
> : Hey Domus, if there is one thing that can get my mind off of sex, it
> : is flat-ring shockwaves. But only briefly. How often do you
> : masturbate? I'm writing a paper.
>
> Good thing you didn't ask Bad Zeb. You'd run out of paper
Illustrations?
--
Peanut, son of Jif, cousin of Skippy, evil "inner gay man" twin of:
Rick Carlson
Author of "The Adventures of Danger Dave, Galactic Hero"
http://www.danger-dave.com mailto:redd...@danger-dave.com
Peter Chant
"Richard Street" <Stre...@btinternet.com> writes:
>
> A *mud* hole?
Can I point out that we are not twins separated at birth.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
I just asked a question, EJ. As to the radio thing, what were you
explaining?
Raul C. Beltizer
Ok.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>:
>: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
>: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
>
>Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
>to muddy the issue.
"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>Peter Chant wrote:
You had to say it.
AndyW
news:slsh6t0f3vphb5agi...@4ax.com...
> >> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
> >
> >Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
>
> Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
2 points here Raul.
First we don't have planes that fly intergalaticly yet so how could they
explode and second if you can't see the radio how would you switch it on?
See Ell Jay isn't as dumb as he sounds.
:)
AndyW
Col
> Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> :
> : shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
> : blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
>
> Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
> to muddy the issue.
>
A *mud* hole?
Col-Someone has to say it, it might as well be me.
--
I went to Africa.
I behaved very oddly there.
AJ Rimmer
"Richard Street" <Stre...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:94c6pe$tq1$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
> Talkie Toaster <bo...@clown.org> wrote in message
> news:5wfa6.1142$cF2....@ozemail.com.au...
> > Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > :
> > : shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
> > : blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
> >
> > Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud
hole
> > to muddy the issue.
>
> A *mud* hole?
>
AJ
----
I'm evil...pure and simple, from the 8th dimension
AJ Rimmer
"AndyW" <an...@homeeng.swinternet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:94cm7u$cdpi8$1...@ID-30615.news.dfncis.de...
Uhm, except in the post I wrote, I had said I'd not seen them on the radio
in a long time. Then Ell Jay said, "you can't watch a radio". or some such
drivel. And I said what if you had flashing lights that moved. You could
watch the radio then. So Ell Jay could be as dumb as he sounds.
AJ
Ang
>
>A *mud* hole?
>
>Col-Someone has to say it, it might as well be me.
as did pete, as did Richard, and then El Jay and AJ followed up with
the so what is it line, so.
Somebody punch them *all* out!
Ang :)
Richard Street
Ang <a...@ermitang.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3a69f115...@news.CIS.DFN.DE...
> "Mines a pint of Large"said "Col" <Reddw...@btinternet.com> writing:
>
> >
> >A *mud* hole?
> >
> >Col-Someone has to say it, it might as well be me.
>
> as did pete, as did Richard, and then El Jay and AJ followed up with
> the so what is it line, so.
Could I just make the point that if someone else had already posted the "mud
hole" line, I would not have done so.
--
Richard Street - stre...@btinternet.com
Hamara Haath - Terere Obande - Iye Oyeha - Safari Ya Bamba
Daff
>Can I point out that we are not twins separated at birth.
You're siamese twins?
Daff
--
Plomp
www.daff.net
Ell Jay
AJ said something about it being even longer since she's seen the radio
episodes, and I pointed that out to her.
Steve B
<raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
<snip>
>"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
"Steven Hawking sucks!", Black hole
--
Track the Skuttergram:
Ell Jay
Thank you, Andy.
Ell Jay
I'm not going to say anything more about that conversation unless you take back
the black card you gave me regarding it.
Ell Jay
Yes, how observant, Mr. Beltizer.
Ell Jay
Yeah, but I was first with the "so what is it?", AFAIK.
ken...@texas.net
>
> > A *mud* hole?
> >
> So what is it?
Well, basically it's a hole... in the mud... hence, the name "mud hole."
--
"Oh, wonderful. A squeezy mop! Just what I've always wanted."
KenderRhea on AOL Instant Messenger
95023979 on ICQ
Kryten
"Steve B" <jakeb...@primary.net> wrote in message
news:dpuj6to8r4f4gbtob...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:41:30 -0500, Raul C. Beltizer
> <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
>
> <snip>
>
> >"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
>
> "Steven Hawking sucks!", Black hole
Steven Hawking and Black hole in bizarre goat ménage a trois - Kryten
Kryten
Domus
>On 20 Jan 2001 02:50:08 GMT, do...@junior.apk.net (Domus) wrote:
>
>>>>If I'm wrong... well. I might be. But I think flat-ring shockwaves are
>>>>invented by Star Trek 6, and not realistic at all.
>>>>
>>>>Gavin Clayton
>>>
>>>You are correct, Gavin.
>>
>>*looks left*
>>*looks right*
>>
>>No sarcastic comments? No mention of sex? Ok, who are you, and what have you
>>done with our Raul?
>>
>>-Domus
>
>Hey Domus, if there is one thing that can get my mind off of sex, it
>is flat-ring shockwaves. But only briefly. How often do you
>masturbate? I'm writing a paper.
On masturbation? Hmm, I'll tell you in an e-mail, if you can give me the
insect related euphamisms for jerking off. A guy called Partridge wrote
something on it in 1974, which I'm dying to see. It includes phrases such as
'to box the Jesuit and get cockroaches' and 'to gallop one's maggot'.
-Domus
--
-I don't just have issues, I've got a whole subscription-
If birds go to heaven, do they get an extra pair of wings with their halo?
AJ Rimmer
Oi! we don't need to be pu....
/me slumps to the floor after being punched out.
AJ
--
Ow! That really hurt!
AJ Rimmer
"Ell Jay" <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3A69FBD4...@sk.sympatico.ca...
> AJ Rimmer wrote:
> > Uhm, except in the post I wrote, I had said I'd not seen them on the
radio
> > in a long time. Then Ell Jay said, "you can't watch a radio". or some
such
> > drivel. And I said what if you had flashing lights that moved. You
could
> > watch the radio then. So Ell Jay could be as dumb as he sounds.
>
> I'm not going to say anything more about that conversation unless you take
back
> the black card you gave me regarding it.
>
Can't. It was a remastered conversation so it was a remastered black card.
They've gone and hidden the original one so this is an entirely new
remastered black carded conversation.
AJ
--
I think I hurt my head.
AJ Rimmer
<ken...@texas.net> wrote in message news:3A69A754...@texas.net...
> AJ Rimmer wrote:
> >
> > > A *mud* hole?
> > >
> > So what is it?
>
> Well, basically it's a hole... in the mud... hence, the name "mud hole."
You don't know what it is do you? You're just reading from the copy of
Junior Encyclopedia Of Space. It's the only one that has pictures. The one
you nicked from me. It wasn't even mine to let it get nicked. I had nicked
it from someone else. :^)
AJ
--
AJRimmerBSS on AIM
I for get ICQ's thingy
AJ Rimmer
"Kryten" <kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> wrote in message
news:Uana6.5828$vH6.1...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...
Dearie, does this mean the goats name was Kryten? Or that you are a goat
named Kryten who is in a ménage a trois with a Black hole and Steve Hawking?
AJ
--
You really are into it good aren't ya?
Ell Jay
> --
> I think I hurt my head.
You're not the only one...
Ang
writing:
>Could I just make the point that if someone else had already posted the "mud
>hole" line, I would not have done so.
Erm, you could, but it wouldn't make any difference to my punch them
out line :)
Ang
AndyW
news:Wela6.2041$ip.1...@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net...
> > > >
> > > >> By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
> > > >> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
> > > >
> > > >Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
> > >
> > > Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
> >
> > 2 points here Raul.
> > First we don't have planes that fly intergalaticly yet so how could they
> > explode and second if you can't see the radio how would you switch it
on?
> >
> > See Ell Jay isn't as dumb as he sounds.
> >
> > :)
> > AndyW
>
> Uhm, except in the post I wrote, I had said I'd not seen them on the radio
> in a long time. Then Ell Jay said, "you can't watch a radio". or some
such
> drivel. And I said what if you had flashing lights that moved. You could
> watch the radio then. So Ell Jay could be as dumb as he sounds.
Yes, I know who said what :)
I was being humourous you see :)
AndyW
Ang
writing:
>Yes, I know who said what :)
>I was being humourous you see :)
>AndyW
I wouldn't go trying such a dangerous manouvre as that around here!
Ang
AJ Rimmer
for a bit then flew right back out again.
AJ
---
Could have been Holly in another life. If I dumbed it down a bit.
Steve B
<kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> wrote in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
"I'll take two copies of that video, please!" -Steve
Kryten
> >> >"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
> >>
> >> "Steven Hawking sucks!", Black hole
> >
> >Steven Hawking and Black hole in bizarre goat ménage a trois - Kryten
>
> "I'll take two copies of that video, please!" -Steve
>
Certainly sir, that will be £2,000 please - Dodgy video shop keeper
Kryten
Daff
<kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> wrote:
>
>Certainly sir, that will be £2,000 please - Dodgy video shop keeper
>
Heh, did you see that in the news where this guy got fined £2000 cos
his videos weren't hardcore enough?
Daff
--
Bet the trading standards loved sampling them
www.daff.net
Kryten
"Daff" <da...@beer.com> wrote in message
news:knbk6tokdkfsug5s4...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 00:15:48 -0000, "Kryten"
> <kryte...@ntlworld.comunderpants> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> Heh, did you see that in the news where this guy got fined Ł2000 cos
> his videos weren't hardcore enough?
What did they have a cum quota or something?
'M'lud I was expecting a pint per scene and I quite clearly only saw a
quarter'
Kryten
Talkie Toaster
news:dqmj6tsq753uqneba...@4ax.com...
: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 23:28:37 +1100, "Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org>
: wrote:
:
: >Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: >:
: >: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
: >: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
: >
: >Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud
hole
: >to muddy the issue.
: "Black holes suck Steven Hawking"
Do Black Holes swallow though?
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
Do you think it is possible she was being clever when she said that,
EJ? Anyhow, I am now assuming you have been spoofing us and that you
are not as dumb as you seem. Are we pals again?
Raul C. Beltizer
<an...@homeeng.swinternet.co.uk> wrote:
>Raul C. Beltizer <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:slsh6t0f3vphb5agi...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:45:06 GMT, Ell Jay <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca>
>> >
>> >> By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
>> >> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
>> >
>> >Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
>>
>> Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
>
>2 points here Raul.
>First we don't have planes that fly intergalaticly yet so how could they
>explode and second if you can't see the radio how would you switch it on?
>
>See Ell Jay isn't as dumb as he sounds.
>
>:)
>AndyW
>
Crap! I hadn't thought of that. I must seem really dumb.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>
>"AndyW" <an...@homeeng.swinternet.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:94cm7u$cdpi8$1...@ID-30615.news.dfncis.de...
>> Raul C. Beltizer <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:slsh6t0f3vphb5agi...@4ax.com...
>> > On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:45:06 GMT, Ell Jay <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca>
>> > >
>> > >> By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
>> > >> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
>> > >
>> > >Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
>> >
>> > Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
>>
>> 2 points here Raul.
>> First we don't have planes that fly intergalaticly yet so how could they
>> explode and second if you can't see the radio how would you switch it on?
>>
>> See Ell Jay isn't as dumb as he sounds.
>>
>> :)
>> AndyW
>
>Uhm, except in the post I wrote, I had said I'd not seen them on the radio
>in a long time. Then Ell Jay said, "you can't watch a radio". or some such
>drivel. And I said what if you had flashing lights that moved. You could
>watch the radio then. So Ell Jay could be as dumb as he sounds.
>
>AJ
>
Yeah, that was what first raised the question in my mind. But do we
really want to know? I'm sorry I asked, now.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>
I know something you could do that would be very relaxing and would
take your mind off of your head, AJ.
Raul C. Beltizer
Jeeze, what is happening to us?
Raul C. Beltizer
I think our brains have turned into cold molasses. Better do something
to heat up the old synapses.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>AndyW wrote:
>
>> Raul C. Beltizer <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:slsh6t0f3vphb5agi...@4ax.com...
>> > On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:45:06 GMT, Ell Jay <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca>
>> > >
>> > >> By the way, Ell Jay, are you as dumb as you seem
>> > >> or are you spoofing us? No offense meant.
>> > >
>> > >Give me an example of what you mean, and I'll tell you.
>> >
>> > Explosions along the galactic plane, seeing the radio.
>>
>> 2 points here Raul.
>> First we don't have planes that fly intergalaticly yet so how could they
>> explode and second if you can't see the radio how would you switch it on?
>>
>> See Ell Jay isn't as dumb as he sounds.
>
>Thank you, Andy.
Ell Jay, you should probably stop talking for a while. The issue is
becoming less and less about how dumb you might actually be.
Raul C. Beltizer
>AJ Rimmer wrote:
>>
>> > A *mud* hole?
>> >
>> So what is it?
>
>Well, basically it's a hole... in the mud... hence, the name "mud hole."
Does it have any other names? Like, is there a special Texas name for
it or anything?
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>
If the "M" section is all messed up, it might have been mine.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>"Raul C. Beltizer" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 16:22:33 GMT, Ell Jay <cot...@sk.sympatico.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Peter Chant wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <5wfa6.1142$cF2....@ozemail.com.au>,
>> >> "Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org> writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud hole
>> >> > to muddy the issue.
>> >>
>> >> A mud hole?
>> >
>> >So what is it?
>>
>> You had to say it.
>
>Yes, how observant, Mr. Beltizer.
Why thank you, Mr. Jay. I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger
today.
AJ Rimmer
<raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:chmk6tsumo00ooade...@4ax.com...
> >
> >Can't. It was a remastered conversation so it was a remastered black
card.
> >They've gone and hidden the original one so this is an entirely new
> >remastered black carded conversation.
> >
> >AJ
> >--
> >I think I hurt my head.
> >
>
> I know something you could do that would be very relaxing and would
> take your mind off of your head, AJ.
I can't possibly guess what that could be Raul.
AJ
--
Look - a meat mirage.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:41:30 -0500, Raul C. Beltizer
><raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
>
><snip>
>
>>"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
>
>"Steven Hawking sucks!", Black hole
"Black holes suck!", Jesse Jackson, 2001
Raul C. Beltizer
>
>"Steve B" <jakeb...@primary.net> wrote in message
>news:dpuj6to8r4f4gbtob...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:41:30 -0500, Raul C. Beltizer
>> <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >"Black holes suck!", Steven Hawking
>>
>> "Steven Hawking sucks!", Black hole
>
>Steven Hawking and Black hole in bizarre goat ménage a trois - Kryten
>
Sounds pretty hard on the goat.
Raul C. Beltizer
That's exactly what we need! A cum quota! What should it be?
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>Raul C. Beltizer <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:dqmj6tsq753uqneba...@4ax.com...
>: On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 23:28:37 +1100, "Talkie Toaster" <bo...@clown.org>
>: wrote:
>:
>: >Covert Badger <covert...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>: >:
>: >: shaped by its environment. This is what I meant by the 'focus' of the
>: >: blast. Bringing black holes into it just muddies the issue.
>: >
>: >Actually, it would suck the issue into itself. You'd be wanting a mud
>hole
>: >to muddy the issue.
>:
>: "Black holes suck Steven Hawking"
>
>Do Black Holes swallow though?
Does anybody really care about that?
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>Ang wrote:
>
>> "Mines a pint of Large"said "Col" <Reddw...@btinternet.com> writing:
>>
>> >
>> >A *mud* hole?
>> >
>> >Col-Someone has to say it, it might as well be me.
>>
>> as did pete, as did Richard, and then El Jay and AJ followed up with
>> the so what is it line, so.
>>
>> Somebody punch them *all* out!
>
>Yeah, but I was first with the "so what is it?", AFAIK.
Ell Jay, think before you talk, man.
Raul C. Beltizer
>In article <hc6i6tgipudqefqgr...@4ax.com>, Raul C. Beltizer wrote:
>>On 20 Jan 2001 02:50:08 GMT, do...@junior.apk.net (Domus) wrote:
>>
>>>>>If I'm wrong... well. I might be. But I think flat-ring shockwaves are
>>>>>invented by Star Trek 6, and not realistic at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>Gavin Clayton
>>>>
>>>>You are correct, Gavin.
>>>
>>>*looks left*
>>>*looks right*
>>>
>>>No sarcastic comments? No mention of sex? Ok, who are you, and what have you
>>>done with our Raul?
>>>
>>>-Domus
>>
>>Hey Domus, if there is one thing that can get my mind off of sex, it
>>is flat-ring shockwaves. But only briefly. How often do you
>>masturbate? I'm writing a paper.
>
>On masturbation? Hmm, I'll tell you in an e-mail, if you can give me the
>insect related euphamisms for jerking off. A guy called Partridge wrote
>something on it in 1974, which I'm dying to see. It includes phrases such as
>'to box the Jesuit and get cockroaches' and 'to gallop one's maggot'.
>
>-Domus
Whoa, Domus! That is a writing that I just *have* to have! I will do
some research ASAP and get us a copy. In the meantime, can I e-mail
you some that I make up?
AJ Rimmer
And so it was...Kender you might wanna return it to Raul when your done.
AJ
CatheB (alleger)
yes, austin.
CatheB, going to her room, as ordered.
Steve B
in alt.tv.red-dwarf:
>In his infinite wisdom our great leader "Raul C. Beltizer"
><raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
<snip>
>> I know something you could do that would be very relaxing and would
>> take your mind off of your head, AJ.
>
>I can't possibly guess what that could be Raul.
My guess is that it would probably involve paying quite a bit of
attention to *his* head.
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>AJ
>--
>Look - a meat mirage.
>
What is a meat mirage? Some kind of protein hallucination?
Raul C. Beltizer
Just who is giving the orders around here? What are you going to do in
your room, by the way?
AJ Rimmer
It's a line from a commercial. A gnome is riding in the back of a pickup,
and they pass by a herd of cows. It's hot out and it's got heat waves
showing. You hear the gnome say..."Look...a meat mirage."
I'll go now.
AJ
Raul C. Beltizer
wrote:
>
>"Raul C. Beltizer" <raul_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6qtk6tkrlv1cg7prk...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 03:52:58 GMT, "AJ Rimmer" <res0...@gte.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >AJ
>> >--
>> >Look - a meat mirage.
>> >
>> What is a meat mirage? Some kind of protein hallucination?
>
>It's a line from a commercial. A gnome is riding in the back of a pickup,
>and they pass by a herd of cows. It's hot out and it's got heat waves
>showing. You hear the gnome say..."Look...a meat mirage."
>I'll go now.
>
>AJ
>
You made that up, right?
AJ Rimmer
No it's a Toyota commercial. He also asks the guy to turn on the air
conditioning because it's hot outside while he's standing on the load in the
back..."Bob...remember that time you carried me around in your arm pit?
It's that hot."
Domus
>On 20 Jan 2001 21:16:57 GMT, do...@junior.apk.net (Domus) wrote:
>>>Hey Domus, if there is one thing that can get my mind off of sex, it
>>>is flat-ring shockwaves. But only briefly. How often do you
>>>masturbate? I'm writing a paper.
>>
>>On masturbation? Hmm, I'll tell you in an e-mail, if you can give me the
>>insect related euphamisms for jerking off. A guy called Partridge wrote
>>something on it in 1974, which I'm dying to see. It includes phrases such as
>>'to box the Jesuit and get cockroaches' and 'to gallop one's maggot'.
>
>some research ASAP and get us a copy. In the meantime, can I e-mail
>you some that I make up?
Erm, I don't know. It's pretty easy to make those up. Pratically anything
can be one. For instance, 'making one's self 'up''. I just want the paper
because a female humorist/entemologist said that was one of the few things
she decided was beyond the normal relm of taste. She's written some pretty
funny things on somewhat tasteless subjects, so I was wondering how bad it
would have to be for her not to go there.
-Domus
--
-I don't just have issues, I've got a whole subscription-
If birds go to heaven, do they get an extra pair of wings with their halo?
Peter Chant
Olnly joking.
--
Garth-o-meter: www.petezilla.co.uk/red-dwarf/stats.html
As recommened by alt.tv.red-dwarf's own Jake Bullet