"Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode # 2.1) 21 September 2005
Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
Age 44? Unless there's some sort of time speed-up going on, that doesn't seem too likely. Of course, that could be how they're going to deal with Walt aging too.
> "Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode > # 2.1) 21 September 2005
> Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying > that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina > Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added > to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement > that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
If this true, it's a huge mistake.
Tina from Survivor is too tongue-in-cheek. And who knows if she can act or not.
Sam Jackson is one of the best in the business, but I think he's too much of a big star for this role. On the other hand, it could turn out to be the best casting decision they make.
Tina still sucks though. Maybe Colby and Richard Hatch will have cameos as well?
> "Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode > # 2.1) 21 September 2005
> Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying > that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina > Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added > to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement > that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But I've proven my point! LOL!
>> "Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode >> # 2.1) 21 September 2005
>> Don't know if someone here was the source, but I recall a post saying >> that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina >> Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added >> to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement >> that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But >I've proven my point! LOL!
So it was YOU who added that! Lol - yes, you proved your point. Tina Wesson looks too old to play someone her own age so this header really made me wonder.
Good experiment. Point well taken. But it still may be possible that Samuel Jackson will guest appear, because 1) both he and Michelle Rodriguez appeared in the movie SWAT together (so they clearly know the same production people) and 2) Samuel is not shy about asking to be in projects that he is also a fan of (i.e., Star Wars).
"Melroseman" <melrose...@yahooNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>> "Lost" playing "Alex Rousseau" in episode: "Genesis: Part 1" (episode >> # 2.1) 21 September 2005 Don't know if someone here was the source, but I >> recall a post saying >> that the woman on the boat looked like former Survivor winner Tina >> Wesson (age 44). With that substantiation that anything can be added >> to the imdb listings, I think it safe to disregard the announcement >> that Samuel L. Jackson will play Rose's husband, Bernard.
> Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But > I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But >>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>Please don't do that again.
> I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking > it as gospel.
Just as they're taking the info on Oceanic Air's site as gospel. The difference is, no one is jumping down those webmasters' throats telling them to quit it. In fact, people seem to grasp onto any crummy excuse in order to defend that site's info. And that's all I'm going to say about this topic.
>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But >>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>Please don't do that again.
>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking >it as gospel.
I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it - Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else" (to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I think that was your something else. :)
>> I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, >> and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it >> either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it >> - Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
>> Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else" >> (to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I >> think that was your something else. :)
>Someone's paying attention! Good going Kate! Now if you could solve >some of Lost's mysteries, we'd really appreciate it. :)
I don't read many of these posts since the finale, but of course I always pay attention to your posts. <g> As far as Lost's mysteries, I give up. Thinking about them makes my brain hurt too much.
Kate wrote: > I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, > and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it > either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it > - Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
> Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else" > (to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I > think that was your something else. :)
Someone's paying attention! Good going Kate! Now if you could solve some of Lost's mysteries, we'd really appreciate it. :)
>Kate <welle...@hotmail.com> wrote: >I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, >and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it >either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it >- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
As well as being about three times the age of the missing girl, Tina Wesson isn't an actress.
Melroseman, now that you've proven your point, how about removing that information from imdb? Even with its flaws, the website is a valuable resource. Hopefully it's as easy to take away this prank listing as it was to add.
>>>> Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. >>>> But I've proven my point! LOL!
>>> Please don't do that again.
>> I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking >> it as gospel.
> Just as they're taking the info on Oceanic Air's site as gospel. The > difference is, no one is jumping down those webmasters' throats telling > them to quit it. In fact, people seem to grasp onto any crummy excuse in > order to defend that site's info. And that's all I'm going to say about > this topic.
You may be embarrassing Tina Wesson by using her name for an experiment like you did. I'm sure she wouldn't appreciate it if she found out about it.
-- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlit...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
From the Collected Witterings of Maureen Goldman, volume 23:
> Melroseman, now that you've proven your point, how about removing that > information from imdb? Even with its flaws, the website is a valuable > resource. Hopefully it's as easy to take away this prank listing as > it was to add.
It takes time. I've already asked them to remove the info and sent them links to his dumbass postings here, so it should soon be taken down and the problem won't arise again.
No, he's just showing that anyone can add anything to the IMDB and that it is NEVER to be taken as the gosepl for ANYTHING. The fact that Samuel Jackson's name has now been removed only reinforces this fact. I've seen so much bullshit on IMDB over the years that even the stuff I'm sure is right- mostly the technical aspects- I question and try and find two other sources to support it.
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:51:46 -0700, Kate <welle...@hotmail.com> wrote: >On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 10:25:04 -0700, J. Anthony Crumpton ><tony_crump...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But >>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>Please don't do that again.
>>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking >>it as gospel.
>I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, >and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it >either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it >- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
Actually, it spawned a brand new theory -- "they're aging" -- over at The Fuselage!
>Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else" >(to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I >think that was your something else. :)
Apparently... :-)
-- J. Anthony Crumpton
"A good friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
>>>>>Haaaaaaahahaahahahaaaaa! I never thought they would actually add it. But >>>>>I've proven my point! LOL!
>>>>Please don't do that again.
>>>I agree. The info has spread to other boards; people are now taking >>>it as gospel.
>>I wouldn't worry about it. Most people will see it for what it is, >>and the people who are taking it as gospel probably don't believe it >>either, they're just discussing it because it's so odd. Think about it >>- Tina Wesson as a 16 year old?
>Actually, it spawned a brand new theory -- "they're aging" -- over at >The Fuselage!
Seriously? I don't know about that Fuselage bunch over there.... Abrams is probably happy because anything that keeps the fans talking is all good.
>>Actually, Anthony - Melroseman did say he would do "something else" >>(to prove his point) when you challenged him to make that web page. I >>think that was your something else. :)
>Apparently... :-)
I still don't know what everyone got so excited about. The good part is that now when anybody says something is gospel because they read it on IMDB, we can just point them to that thread.
|
