>once again all the evidence found by the cops is thrown out by the judge.
As it should have been. Of all the specious justifications for a
warrant, what drunk did they get to sign off on it?
when it happens every week so that the Lawyers can then solve the crime
becomes a bit tedious.
Lupo and Bernard must be the most incompetent detectives ever.
>
>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>news:oaq9f5df3oh8162gb...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:32:54 -0500, "Ray O'Hara"
>> <raymon...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>once again all the evidence found by the cops is thrown out by the judge.
>>
>> As it should have been. Of all the specious justifications for a
>> warrant, what drunk did they get to sign off on it?
>
> when it happens every week
It doesn't happen every week. I think the last (current) mothership
episode I watched was the one with the abortion doctor, and the judge
didn't throw out any evidence from it.
> David Johnston <da...@block.net> wrote:
> > Ray O'Hara <raymon...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> once again all the evidence found by the cops is thrown out by the judge.
> >
> > As it should have been. Of all the specious justifications for a
> > warrant, what drunk did they get to sign off on it?
>
> when it happens every week so that the Lawyers can then solve the crime
> becomes a bit tedious.
> Lupo and Bernard must be the most incompetent detectives ever.
It didn't happen with the second ep last night, when the woman was doped
and got into a fiery crash.
--
D.F. Manno | dfm...@mail.com
"I don't trust organized anything: teams, religions, corporations. People
in enterprise together consistently do two things: promulgate the enterprise,
no matter what, and protect miscreants in their midst." (Alfred Lubrano, author)
But they did seem to get yelled at a little by Van Buren when they
were yakking about what happened in her office.
Maybe she's just impatient because of her illness? But I'd think the
MJ would help with that a little.
Theget
What I did find idiotic is the legal statues going back and forth in
treating young murder suspects as adults and as minors when
convenient. Old enough to face life without parole but yet his
parents could dismiss the lawyer of his choice for example? I am not
saying not to punish the kid, just be consistent. That kid was a
victim as well as a perpetrator but the law was prepared to send the
kid up for the rest of his life. You can't expect the same
culpability from a young adolescent than you can from adult.
--
----->Hunter
"No man in the wrong can stand up against
a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."
-----William J. McDonald
Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907