Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

10/29: National Nielsen Ratings for The Simpsons and King of the Hill

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Joseph Baldwin

unread,
Oct 31, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/31/97
to

In
<Pine.LNX.3.95.97102...@lombard.dialup.cyberverse.com>
Ondre Lombard <olom...@lombard.cyberverse.com> writes:
>
>
> The Simpsons got its highest ratings in 41 weeks with the 5F02
>episode. This week, switching places with King of the Hill, it
outranked King
>of the Hill. The interesting thing is that the last time The Simpsons
scored
>such a high rating was when "The Springfield Files" aired, and it
aired again
>the night of 10/26.
>
> Fox posted its highest ratings in 26 weeks for the A18-49
demographic
>and was number 2 behind Game 7 of the World Series. King of the Hill
>outperformed Game 7 of the World Series in the A18-34 demographic, as
well.
>The actual results (Households, no demographics):
>
>7 PM - The Simpsons ([3G01]: "The Springfield Files"): 7.9/12
>7:30 - The Simpsons ([4F02]: "Treehouse Of Horror VII"): 9.7/15
>8 PM - The Simpsons ([5F02]: "Treehouse Of Horror VIII"): 11.2/16
>8:30 - King of the Hill ([5E06]: "Hilloween"): 10.6/15
>9 PM - The X-Files ([4X24]: "Gethsmane"): 9.0/13
>
> By the fact The X-Files gained its highest rating for a rerun
since
>this particular rerun aired (in May), there's a rather strong chance
The
>X-Files will return to its position as Fox's highest rated show (in
lieu of
>The Simpsons and/or King of the Hill). It will probably return to the
top 10
>rankings, as well.
>
> Here are the ratings for the past Treehouse of Horrors in
comparison
>to this year's:
>
>Treehouse of Horror VI (1995): 11.5 (Ranked 31st out of 111 shows.)
>Treehouse of Horror VII (1996): 10.5 (Ranked 32nd out of 108 shows.)
>Treehouse of Horror VIII (1997): 11.2 (Ranked 18th out of 109 shows.)
>


YES!!! The Simpsons got higher then King of the Crappy Hill!!!!!!
Are complete Nielson ratings available on the net???

Please respond!

Bill Baldwin

unread,
Nov 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM11/1/97
to

Joe S wrote:

> Joseph Baldwin wrote:
> >
>
> Oh, No! Not another Baldwinnnnnnnn!!!!!
>

Hey!

0 new messages