Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

new Snurchables page at Snurcher's

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 20, 2001, 10:54:08 PM10/20/01
to
I was having entirely too much fun this week:

http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html

Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)


--
Thinkum
http://www.snurcher.com/

"You're very wise." "I don't get out much, so I read."

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 20, 2001, 11:21:00 PM10/20/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>
> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>
> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>
>

Very nice. You DO have a lot of time on your hands.
[Thinkum looks at Tim; raises brows]
"On a Mac you can do it like *that*!" [Thinkum snaps fingers]

--
Tim Weaver
http://members.home.net/tweaver85
ICQ: 14019787
"Lock up the women and hide the fried chicken!"

Trouble

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 12:07:44 AM10/21/01
to
Thinkum wrote

> I was having entirely too much fun this week:

Looks like you were... but seeing as the week isn't over, I think
the past tense of 'was' may be a little pessemistic ; )

> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)

I did... but... I often enjoy frivolously wasting time.

T


Tom Francis

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 7:53:01 AM10/21/01
to

"Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
news:01HW.B7F7B1100...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>
> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>
> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)

I get a "cannot find page" error.

When I go to snurcher.com I get "Thinkum didn't pay her bill,
so this page is temporarily out of service".

Ok, maybe it does not say you didn't pay the bill, but I can't
even get to the main page.

Just thought you would like to know.


Gareth Kitchener

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 8:22:16 AM10/21/01
to
Tom Francis says...
It worked for me.

--
Gareth Kitchener
Bedfordshire, England
http://www.garethkitchener.com

Jim Larson

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 11:33:25 AM10/21/01
to
Tom Francis wrote:

ditto

--
Jim

Gareth Kitchener

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 12:17:52 PM10/21/01
to
Gareth Kitchener says...

> Tom Francis says...
> >
> > "Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
> > news:01HW.B7F7B1100...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...
> > > I was having entirely too much fun this week:
> > >
> > > http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
> > >
> > > Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
> >
> > I get a "cannot find page" error.
> >
> > When I go to snurcher.com I get "Thinkum didn't pay her bill,
> > so this page is temporarily out of service".
> >
> > Ok, maybe it does not say you didn't pay the bill, but I can't
> > even get to the main page.
> >
> > Just thought you would like to know.
> >
>
> It worked for me.
>

Note that 'worked' is of course in the past tense. It looks like
Snurchers is now totally "temporarily unavailable".

James

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 2:15:10 PM10/21/01
to
Jim Larson <larso...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tom Francis wrote:
>> Thinkum <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote:
>>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>>>
>>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>>>
>>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>
>> I get a "cannot find page" error.
>>
>> When I go to snurcher.com I get "Thinkum didn't pay her bill,
>> so this page is temporarily out of service".
>>
>> Ok, maybe it does not say you didn't pay the bill, but I can't
>> even get to the main page.
>>
>> Just thought you would like to know.
>
> ditto

Now ain't that a coincidinkum... I got on with no trouble
whatsoever. (I wonder if Thinkum is attempting to lull me
or something???)

--
James
*** "...the main purpose of criticism...is not to make its readers
*** agree, nice as that is, but to make them, by whatever orthodox
*** or unorthodox methods, think." - John Simon, Feb. 6, 1984

Boldman

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 3:17:48 PM10/21/01
to

"Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
news:01HW.B7F7B1100...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...
> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>
> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>
> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)

Cool! Look at all this stuff!

Er. What do I do with it?

Boldman

Deb Falcon

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 11:25:28 PM10/21/01
to
James wrote

> Jim Larson wrote:
>> Tom Francis wrote:
>>> Thinkum wrote:
>>>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>>>>
>>>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>>
>>> I get a "cannot find page" error.
>>>
>>> When I go to snurcher.com I get "Thinkum didn't pay her bill, so this
>>> page is temporarily out of service".
>>>
>>> Ok, maybe it does not say you didn't pay the bill, but I can't
>>> even get to the main page.
>>>
>>> Just thought you would like to know.
>>
>> ditto
>
> Now ain't that a coincidinkum... I got on with no trouble
> whatsoever. (I wonder if Thinkum is attempting to lull me
> or something???)
>

I looked at it with no problem, but then there has been plenty of time to fix
whatever 'bugs' were happening prior. Looks really neat, I like the Rygel
Icons...but LOVE the DRD's! Great job Thinkum!

--
Deb Falcon
Life is a Lemon and I want my money back. -Meatloaf

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 21, 2001, 11:53:24 PM10/21/01
to
Jim Larson wrote:
> Tom Francis wrote:
>> Thinkum wrote
>>>
>>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>
>> I get a "cannot find page" error.
>>
>> When I go to snurcher.com I get "Thinkum didn't pay her bill,
>> so this page is temporarily out of service".
>>
>> Ok, maybe it does not say you didn't pay the bill, but I can't
>> even get to the main page.
>>
>> Just thought you would like to know.
>
> ditto

Murphy has such Perfect timing. About six hours after I posted the
announcement and went to bed, my web hosting company had an extremely rare
(for them) service interruption:

"We had a temporary problem with one of our database servers, causing our web
panel to show Internal Server Errors. Everything is working again now and we
are rebuilding all of the configuration files to restore any websites that
went down."

Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the regional Renn
Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed seeing me in a Jester
outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).

Everything should now be working normally. My apologies for the confusion!

Mitchell A. Carpenter

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 10:23:33 AM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

Kewl stuff TK. Is there a Desktop Theme in the works?


--
The Egg, The Symbol of Life

M Carpenter
sha...@sprynet.com


Jen Langlois

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:02:59 PM10/22/01
to

"Gareth Kitchener" <g...@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.163d057e4...@news.cis.dfn.de...

It seems to be back now.

jen

--
JLLan...@msn.com

You can't fool all the people
all the time...some of them are
busy fooling you.

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:25:35 PM10/22/01
to
Mitchell A. Carpenter wrote:
> Thinkum wrote:
>
>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>
> Kewl stuff TK. Is there a Desktop Theme in the works?

I have to learn how, first. I just only conquered icons last week. ;-)

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:38:36 PM10/22/01
to
Boldman wrote:
> Thinkum wrote

>>
>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>
> Cool! Look at all this stuff!
> Er. What do I do with it?

1. Easiest: Ignore it. ;-)

2. Next Easiest: Look at the pretty pictures on the website and enjoy them.

3. Slightly more timeconsuming:

a. Macintosh: Download an archive, unstuff it, put the resulting icon files
anywhere you like. To apply an icon, select the icon file itself from the
desktop, do a Get Info (Command-I), click on the icon in the resulting window
and choose "Copy". Find the target files/folders you'd like to apply it to,
do a Get Info on them, click the icon in the resulting window and choose
"Paste".

b. Windows 2000: Download an archive, unzip it, store the cursors in your
system cursors folder and the icons in your system icons folder. To apply
cursors, go to the "Mouse" control panel and choose the "Pointers" tab. To
apply icons to "My Computer" or other key system items, go to the "Display"
control panel, and choose the "Effects" tab. To apply icons elsewhere,
access Properties for the target file/folder from the Desktop.

(older versions of Windows, I have no idea, but assume you can probably
figure it out from the Win2K instructions above)

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:47:52 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

You can save them anywhere in Windows. They don't have to be in a special
file as long as you can remember where you put them.

Mitchell A. Carpenter

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:51:37 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

You will not fear....fear is the ming killer <beg>

You must look where they cannot!

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 3:56:28 PM10/22/01
to
catherine wrote:

> Thinkum wrote:
>>
>> b. Windows 2000: Download an archive, unzip it, store the cursors in
>> your system cursors folder and the icons in your system icons folder.
>
> You can save them anywhere in Windows. They don't have to be in a special
> file as long as you can remember where you put them.

Sorry, I should have been more clear. You can save them anywhere; however,
if you put them in the Cursors and Icons directories, it saves time when you
want to change them, since you don't have to browse to a custom directory
elsewhere on your harddrive.

One other tip: I haven't played around with how to change a folder's icon
directly. However, you can make a desktop Shortcut to a folder, and then
change the Shortcut's icon just as you would any other file.

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 4:02:28 PM10/22/01
to
Mitchell A. Carpenter wrote:
> Thinkum wrote:
>> Mitchell A. Carpenter wrote:
>>> Thinkum wrote:
>>>
>>>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>>>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>>>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>>
>>> Kewl stuff TK. Is there a Desktop Theme in the works?
>>
>> I have to learn how, first. I only just conquered icons last week. ;-)

>
> You will not fear....fear is the ming killer <beg>
> You must look where they cannot!

I refuse to let any MS product get the better of me; I shall prevail! ...I
just have to get the laundry done and the garbage taken out and the checkbook
balanced before I can go back to the fun stuff. (Plus, I have a zillion
Annotations updates to post.)

Sigh. So many toys, so little time to play... <beg>

Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 6:28:08 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote

> Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the regional
Renn
> Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed seeing me in a Jester
> outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).

Gosh that's a shame ; )

T


Mark Morrison

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 6:37:55 PM10/22/01
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 22:54:08 -0400, Thinkum
<thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote:

>I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>
> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>
>Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)

Thinkum,

In the 'Farscape Logo Set', instead of Farscape, they say 'Arscap'.

Is this intentional ?

And what in an Arscap ?

A type of bottom-wear for winter ?

John Iwaniszek

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 6:38:32 PM10/22/01
to

A jpeg of your butt.

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 7:26:50 PM10/22/01
to
Mark Morrison wrote:

> Thinkum wrote:
>
>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>
> Thinkum,
>
> In the 'Farscape Logo Set', instead of Farscape, they say 'Arscap'.
> Is this intentional ?

Yep.

> And what in an Arscap ?
> A type of bottom-wear for winter ?

LOL. Yeah, I should have posted an explanation of that one.

At the Burbank convention last summer, they had a large projection screen
behind the stage, on which they displayed episode clips, bloopers, etc. In
between these items, it displayed the Farscape logo -- only they didn't have
the screen width properly adjusted, so most of the time it only said
"ARSCAP", due to the first and last letter spilling offscreen. It became a
running joke among some of the attendees: "Hey, I hear you really like that
Arscap show -- what's it about?"

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 7:27:56 PM10/22/01
to

And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
<beg>

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 7:33:23 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

Better than, "So tell me about this Fire Escape show." No matter how many
times I tell my boss Farscape, he insists it's Fire Escape.

--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit
and the recipient who doesn't get it

casu...@velocityhsi.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 8:16:46 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote
> Trouble wrote:
> > Thinkum wrote

> >> Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the
regional
> >> Renn Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed seeing me in a
> >> Jester outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).

> > Gosh that's a shame ; )

> And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
> <beg>

Um yeah... there sure was bosom aplenty there... and most of it
yea verily swoonworthy ; )

T


Tom Francis

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 8:26:34 PM10/22/01
to

"Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
news:01HW.B7FA23BC0...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> Trouble wrote:
> > Thinkum wrote
> >>
> >> Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the
regional
> >> Renn Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed seeing me in a
> >> Jester outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).
> >
> > Gosh that's a shame ; )
>
> And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
> <beg>

You know, I went there once - a long time ago - and wasn't all that
impressed.

I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.


Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 8:48:38 PM10/22/01
to
Tom Francis wrote:
> Thinkum wrote
>> Trouble wrote:
>>> Thinkum wrote
>>>>
>>>> Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the
>>>> regional Renn Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed
>>>> seeing me in a Jester outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).
>>>
>>> Gosh that's a shame ; )
>>
>> And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
>> <beg>
>
> You know, I went there once - a long time ago - and wasn't all that
> impressed.
>
> I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.

The point? To enjoy one another's company in a relaxing setting, and goggle
at all the...different...types of folks you see there. ;-)

Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 8:52:43 PM10/22/01
to
Tom Francis wrote
> "Thinkum" wrote

> > And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
> > <beg>

> You know, I went there once - a long time ago - and wasn't all that
> impressed.

Not impressed with what? the bosoms, they might have not been
in bloom yet if it was really a long time ago. I've seen bigger faires
and more bosoms, but I was really there to say hi to friends, only
got the one really good flirt in before I caught up with the Thinky
and the rest.

> I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.

Um... yeah... like me in a sports bar about 30 minutes ago
that calls itself a 'pub' the coke was good, the liquor better
but their corned beef and cabbage was mediocre, and I
don't watch the sports that everyone else was there for.

T


Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 8:57:40 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote
> Tom Francis wrote:

> > I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.

> The point? To enjoy one another's company in a relaxing setting, and
goggle
> at all the...different...types of folks you see there. ;-)

Yeah and then there's my dancing skills right Thinky?

T


Jim Larson

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:00:03 PM10/22/01
to
Trouble wrote:

MPEG! MPEG! MPEG!

--
Jim

Nick

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:03:42 PM10/22/01
to
Jim Larson wrote:

Of boobies or dancing?
Or, dare I say it, dancing boobies?

Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:08:21 PM10/22/01
to
Jim Larson wrote

There are no movies of the day... no pictures to be released
either... and verbal transcripts are _right-out_

T


Jim Larson

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:09:04 PM10/22/01
to
Trouble wrote:

Hammer would have filmed it.

You, sir, are no Hammer.[1]

--
Jim

[1] Just kidding. We all know you're Hammer.

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:10:50 PM10/22/01
to
Jim Larson wrote:

> Trouble wrote:
>
>> Jim Larson wrote
>>> Trouble wrote:
>>> > Thinkum wrote
>>> >> Tom Francis wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> > I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.
>>> >
>>> >> The point? To enjoy one another's company in a relaxing setting,
>>> >> and goggle at all the...different...types of folks you see there.
>>> >> ;-)
>>> >
>>> > Yeah and then there's my dancing skills right Thinky?
>>>
>>> MPEG! MPEG! MPEG!
>>
>> There are no movies of the day... no pictures to be released either...
>> and verbal transcripts are _right-out_
>
> Hammer would have filmed it.
>
> You, sir, are no Hammer.[1]
>

I don't.

Jim Larson

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:12:06 PM10/22/01
to
catherine wrote:

> Jim Larson wrote:
>
>> Trouble wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Larson wrote
>>>> Trouble wrote:
>>>> > Thinkum wrote
>>>> >> Tom Francis wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> > I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.
>>>> >
>>>> >> The point? To enjoy one another's company in a relaxing setting,
>>>> >> and goggle at all the...different...types of folks you see there.
>>>> >> ;-)
>>>> >
>>>> > Yeah and then there's my dancing skills right Thinky?
>>>>
>>>> MPEG! MPEG! MPEG!
>>>
>>> There are no movies of the day... no pictures to be released either...
>>> and verbal transcripts are _right-out_
>>
>> Hammer would have filmed it.
>>
>> You, sir, are no Hammer.[1]
>>
>
> I don't.
>

Neither do I. What are we talking about now?

--
Jim

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:10:25 PM10/22/01
to

Oh, yes, indeedy. You showed remarkable stamina, dancing with both me and
Traci at the same time. I think even Cyril was impressed. <beg>

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:17:07 PM10/22/01
to
Jim Larson wrote:

Just about how I replied to the wrong post...


Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:19:42 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote
> Trouble wrote:

> > Yeah and then there's my dancing skills right Thinky?

> Oh, yes, indeedy. You showed remarkable stamina, dancing with both me and
> Traci at the same time. I think even Cyril was impressed. <beg>

Oh geez... not _that_ I meant the 'twisting' demonstration... even
Tom would have liked that

wink, wink... nudge, nidge...

T


Nick

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:21:01 PM10/22/01
to
catherine wrote:

How is that possible?

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:23:57 PM10/22/01
to
Nick wrote:

Just one of the impossible things I manage to accomplish in my day. Just
ask my client-

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:23:44 PM10/22/01
to

...say no more. ;-)

Nick

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:26:10 PM10/22/01
to
catherine wrote:

Does he/she post here too?

catherine

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:29:11 PM10/22/01
to
Nick wrote:

no, but I'll be happy to provide a phone number if you like-

Trouble

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 9:37:34 PM10/22/01
to
Thinkum wrote
> Trouble wrote:

> >>> Yeah and then there's my dancing skills right Thinky?

> >> Oh, yes, indeedy. You showed remarkable stamina, dancing with both me
and
> >> Traci at the same time. I think even Cyril was impressed. <beg>

I don't need to _impress_ any more men[1] by way of dancing with their
womenfriends it may not be healthy for me ; )

> > Oh geez... not _that_ I meant the 'twisting' demonstration... even
> > Tom would have liked that

> > wink, wink... nudge, nidge...

> ...say no more. ;-)

exactly...

T

[1] And sitting between the two of them at dinner nobody stomped my
foot even once... course they might have and I didn't notice with my
steel toed boots on.

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 22, 2001, 11:05:41 PM10/22/01
to
New at Snurchables (http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/) this evening:

- a Chiana icon

- a rounded-corner version of the PK logo

- a wallpaper version of the original painting (a Russian work titled "Beat
the Whites With the Red Wedge") used as inspiration for PK designs

John Sergent

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 1:03:22 AM10/23/01
to
In article <Xns9140ED9C0B41...@24.4.125.74>,
Tim Weaver <twea...@home.com> wrote:

> Thinkum wrote:
>
> > I was having entirely too much fun this week:
> >
> > http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
> >
> > Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
> >
> >
>

> Very nice. You DO have a lot of time on your hands.
> [Thinkum looks at Tim; raises brows]
> "On a Mac you can do it like *that*!" [Thinkum snaps fingers]

Maybe, but what you CAN'T do on a Mac is use the DRD pointers.

--
Have fun!

James

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:27:23 AM10/23/01
to

[James swoons.]

--
James
*** "...the main purpose of criticism...is not to make its readers
*** agree, nice as that is, but to make them, by whatever orthodox
*** or unorthodox methods, think." - John Simon, Feb. 6, 1984

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 9:33:42 AM10/23/01
to
John Sergent wrote:

Good point!

--
Tim Weaver
http://members.home.net/tweaver85
ICQ: 14019787
"Lock up the women and hide the fried chicken!"

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 10:24:08 AM10/23/01
to
Tim Weaver wrote:
> John Sergent wrote:

>> Tim Weaver wrote:
>>> Thinkum wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>>>> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>>>> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>>
>>> Very nice. You DO have a lot of time on your hands.
>>> [Thinkum looks at Tim; raises brows]
>>> "On a Mac you can do it like *that*!" [Thinkum snaps fingers]
>>
>> Maybe, but what you CAN'T do on a Mac is use the DRD pointers.
>
> Good point!

Actually, you can, with the appropriate software. Just as you can use Themes
in Windows2K, but only with the appropriate software.

Mac users just usually don't bother; there are too many other ways to
customize the environment to care what the cursors look like, and the
built-in cursors get the job done efficiently and unobtrusively.

In any case, I think you both missed the point. I specifically posted both
Mac and Windows versions of all the icons and desktops, because I'm not
interested in getting into this debate again.

Christian Bauer

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 10:39:02 AM10/23/01
to
Thinkum wrote:
> [...] it displayed the Farscape logo -- only they didn't have
> the screen width properly adjusted, so most of the time it only said
> "ARSCAP", due to the first and last letter spilling offscreen.

Reminds me of the Dune movie which becomes "UN" when shown on TV. :-)

Bye,
Christian

--
/ Coding on PowerPC and proud of it
\/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 12:54:43 PM10/23/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

Too late. I'm renning ME and you'd think it was 95 if you didn't check
the version. Same teal desktop. The only changes I've ever made is to
switch to animated hourglasses cursors and got rid of some of the
annoying sounds.

Actually, Mac OS X.I looks pretty damn good. I may be switching to all
Mac pretty soon. Apple has a QT movie about the new OS on their site.
I sent the link to Thinkum (trying to make nice) but never heard back.
She must have plonked me. Oh well, I stull might move to Mac. I AM
getting tired of fighting all the configuration errors.

Nick

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 1:27:22 PM10/23/01
to

I do not like Windows ME. It does things that I do not want it to do.

Hannah

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 1:53:37 PM10/23/01
to
Nick wrote

And lies about it. And when it gets tired with that, it does not do things
that you do want it to do, or at least does them differently.

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:01:04 PM10/23/01
to
Hannah wrote:

Just out of curiosity what does it do and not do that you don't like.
I've done so much stuff to this desktop it's amazing it'll still even
boot up.

Nick

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:21:49 PM10/23/01
to
Tim Weaver wrote:

I was trying to copy an html page to another location and it kept
copying this folder full of the pictures that are referenced on it to
the directory also. I did not want the pictures copied and it would
not let me copy the file with out also copying the directory.

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:26:52 PM10/23/01
to
Nick wrote:

Interesting. You were coping with Windows Explorer?

Nick

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:33:52 PM10/23/01
to
Tim Weaver wrote:

Yes. Well I was attempting to cope[1] with it but I was finding it
difficult.


[1] That is a very funny typo you made. If, indeed, it was a typo.

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 2:48:55 PM10/23/01
to
Nick wrote:

It was a typo. I've never heard of that happening. Interesting. You
mean you dragged one html file to another folder and the pics that were
referenced in the html file ended up in the destination folder? If
that's the cast it is truly bizarre.

Nick

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 3:10:55 PM10/23/01
to
Tim Weaver wrote:

That is indeed the case. My wife had saved the page from the website
of a client of hers who is changing domain hosting providers. When she
saved the page to the hard drive it created a little directory for all
the graphic files that go with the page. I was trying to put all the
files in one directory so it would be easier to ftp them up to the new
server. I first copied all the graphic files to one directory then I
was trying to copy the html files. Everytime I would drag the file to
the new directory it would create the graphics sub-directory in that
directory also and put all the graphics files in there too.
I ended up going to DOS to do it all. I love DOS. DOS is my friend.
DOS does exactly what I tell it to do. DOS does not attempt to do what
it thinks I might want to do. It does exactly what I tell it to do.
This is the biggest problem I have with this new windows crap. A
machine should do exactly what I tell it to do. It should not attempt
to divine my intentions.

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 3:12:26 PM10/23/01
to
Nick wrote:
>
> This is the biggest problem I have with this new windows crap. A
> machine should do exactly what I tell it to do. It should not attempt
> to divine my intentions.

Unless it always divines them correctly, of course. I think a telepathic
interface would be worth a fortune...

Nick

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 3:17:04 PM10/23/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

> Nick wrote:
>>
>> This is the biggest problem I have with this new windows crap. A
>> machine should do exactly what I tell it to do. It should not
>> attempt to divine my intentions.
>
> Unless it always divines them correctly, of course. I think a
> telepathic interface would be worth a fortune...


No, I do not want it to divine them at all.

Tim Weaver

unread,
Oct 23, 2001, 3:32:12 PM10/23/01
to
Nick wrote:

She must have used Save As fromt he File menu and selected "Web Page,
complete" from the "Save As Type" drop down. I agree with you about
DOS. BAT files are our pals too.

Mitchell A. Carpenter

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 11:01:58 AM10/24/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

> I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>
> http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>
> Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>

> --
> Thinkum
> http://www.snurcher.com/
>
> "You're very wise." "I don't get out much, so I read."

On the Russian Painting, I asked My GF (who is russian) and the text
says something like
"Drive the Red Wedge into the Whites"

Seems to make reference to the Bolsheviks crushing the independence and
revolt movement in northern russia in the early 20's, which included US
+ British forces. Ukrainian, Polish, and Cossack peoples (who were
involved for independence reasons)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/modern/russia/russihtm.htm

Seems to suggest a little more about the PK's than we may have
suspected. or Just A cool Painting.
--
The Egg, The Symbol of Life

M Carpenter
sha...@sprynet.com


Mitchell A. Carpenter

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 11:04:42 AM10/24/01
to
"Mitchell A. Carpenter" wrote:

> Thinkum wrote:
>
> > I was having entirely too much fun this week:
> >
> > http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
> >
> > Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
> >
> > --
> > Thinkum
> > http://www.snurcher.com/
> >
> > "You're very wise." "I don't get out much, so I read."
>
> On the Russian Painting, I asked My GF (who is russian) and the text
> says something like
> "Drive the Red Wedge into the Whites"
>
> Seems to make reference to the Bolsheviks crushing the independence and
> revolt movement in northern russia in the early 20's, which included US
> + British forces

And French! No Offense for the Omission intended!

jayembee

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 2:14:30 PM10/24/01
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:01:58 -0400, Mitchell A. Carpenter babbled...


> On the Russian Painting, I asked My GF (who is russian)
> and the text says something like
> "Drive the Red Wedge into the Whites"

Translations vary, but the typical title given to the work is
"Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge"

> Seems to make reference to the Bolsheviks crushing
> the independence and revolt movement in northern
> russia in the early 20's, which included US + British
> forces. Ukrainian, Polish, and Cossack peoples (who
> were involved for independence reasons)

[...]


> Seems to suggest a little more about the PK's than
> we may have suspected. or Just A cool Painting.

The latter is more the case. Here's a relevant quote from
FARSCAPE: THE ILLUSTRATED COMPANION, by Paul
Simpson and David Hughes (London: Titan Books, 2000),
page 27-28:

"There were other artistic influences on the fight scene.
Ricky Eyres explains: 'Russian constructivism was a form
of art that developed before the revolution. There was
a famous painting called "Beat the Whites with the Red
Witch" [1], and there's one blatant piece of it in this
episode, which you see when Aeryn's fighting with
Matala. It starts with an overhead crane shot, and it's
actually that painting, broken down as a carpet. It just
seemed to fit, and from a visual point of view it was
very strong.'"

[1] Yes, it says "witch". I suspect that the interview was
conducted by phone, and that the interview misheard.


-- jayembee (jerry period boyajian at-sign eds period com)

©1953 by Robert S. and Mary J. Boyajian
© renewed 2001 by Mary J. Boyajian

GutPageant

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 4:54:57 PM10/24/01
to
Jerry wrote:

>Translations vary, but the typical title given to the work is
>"Beat the Whites with the Red Wedge"

After BABABTTF aired I was driving myself nuts trying to remember the artist's
name. I did remember the title, so I did a web search but was a little lazy.
All I typed in was "Beat the whites"... resulting in my being presented with a
plethora of websites full of [TA-DA]-- recipes requiring *egg* beating!

>Ricky Eyres explains: 'Russian constructivism was a form of art
that developed before the revolution.

An art-related tidbit: the 'Farscape font' is called Pritchard. If you go to

http://www.identifont.com/show?34P

you'll see the following info:

PRITCHARD
Designer: Martin Wait, 1990
"Inspired by the strong geometric styles of the 1920's
Soviet Constructivist movement."

Examples: Farscape (British science-fiction TV serial).


Aside from the erroneous "British" bit, it was interesting to happen
accidentally upon the FS mention, in addition to finding out that the font is
consistent with other visual elements of the show.


--GP

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 6:26:05 PM10/24/01
to
GutPageant wrote:
>
> An art-related tidbit: the 'Farscape font' is called Pritchard. If you go to
> http://www.identifont.com/show?34P
> you'll see the following info:
>
> PRITCHARD
> Designer: Martin Wait, 1990
> "Inspired by the strong geometric styles of the 1920's
> Soviet Constructivist movement."
>
> Examples: Farscape (British science-fiction TV serial).
>
> Aside from the erroneous "British" bit, it was interesting to happen
> accidentally upon the FS mention, in addition to finding out that the font is
> consistent with other visual elements of the show.

Very cool, GP -- both the background on the font, and the site itself. I can
see a new footnote coming to Snurcher's RSN... <g>

Boldman

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 7:11:29 PM10/24/01
to

"Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
news:01HW.B7F9F22C0...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...
> catherine wrote:
> > Thinkum wrote:
> >>
> >> b. Windows 2000: Download an archive, unzip it, store the cursors in
> >> your system cursors folder and the icons in your system icons folder.
> >
> > You can save them anywhere in Windows. They don't have to be in a
special
> > file as long as you can remember where you put them.
>
> Sorry, I should have been more clear. You can save them anywhere;
however,
> if you put them in the Cursors and Icons directories, it saves time when
you
> want to change them, since you don't have to browse to a custom directory
> elsewhere on your harddrive.
>
> One other tip: I haven't played around with how to change a folder's icon
> directly. However, you can make a desktop Shortcut to a folder, and then
> change the Shortcut's icon just as you would any other file.

Thanks for your help, people! I've had this laptop for almost a year now
(has it been that long since I first posted in atf? Wow.) and I still don't
know much about it!

Boldman

Thinkum

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 7:15:37 PM10/24/01
to
Boldman wrote:
> Thinkum wrote

>>
>> You can save them anywhere; however, if you put them in the Cursors
>> and Icons directories, it saves time when you want to change them,
>> since you don't have to browse to a custom directory elsewhere on
>> your harddrive.
>>
>> One other tip: I haven't played around with how to change a folder's icon
>> directly. However, you can make a desktop Shortcut to a folder, and then
>> change the Shortcut's icon just as you would any other file.
>
> Thanks for your help, people! I've had this laptop for almost a year now
> (has it been that long since I first posted in atf? Wow.) and I still don't
> know much about it!

The past several weeks have been educational on this end, as well. <g>

I learned how to make Themes yesterday. Hopefully this weekend I'll get a
few hours to start building some.

catherine

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 7:25:22 PM10/24/01
to
Thinkum wrote:

> GutPageant wrote:
>>
>> An art-related tidbit: the 'Farscape font' is called Pritchard. If you
>> go to http://www.identifont.com/show?34P you'll see the following
>> info:
>>
>> PRITCHARD
>> Designer: Martin Wait, 1990
>> "Inspired by the strong geometric styles of the 1920's
>> Soviet Constructivist movement."
>>
>> Examples: Farscape (British science-fiction TV serial).
>>
>> Aside from the erroneous "British" bit, it was interesting to happen
>> accidentally upon the FS mention, in addition to finding out that the
>> font is consistent with other visual elements of the show.
>
> Very cool, GP -- both the background on the font, and the site itself.
> I can see a new footnote coming to Snurcher's RSN... <g>
>
>

Interesting that it is a British science-fiction TV serial-

Joan Hedman (QuietI)

unread,
Oct 24, 2001, 8:39:00 PM10/24/01
to

"Thinkum" <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote in message
news:01HW.B7FCB83D0...@News.CIS.DFN.DE...

> GutPageant wrote:
> >
> > An art-related tidbit: the 'Farscape font' is called Pritchard.
If you go to
> > http://www.identifont.com/show?34P
> > you'll see the following info:
> >
> > PRITCHARD
> > Designer: Martin Wait, 1990
> > "Inspired by the strong geometric styles of the 1920's
> > Soviet Constructivist movement."
> >
> > Examples: Farscape (British science-fiction TV serial).
> >
> > Aside from the erroneous "British" bit, it was interesting to
happen
> > accidentally upon the FS mention, in addition to finding out
that the font is
> > consistent with other visual elements of the show.
>
> Very cool, GP -- both the background on the font, and the site
itself. I can
> see a new footnote coming to Snurcher's RSN... <g>


Along with another entry for my "Did you know" trivia tidbits in the
weekly 'zine at FSW. This is really excellent. Thanks!

Joan
http://www.farscapeweekly.com

Mark Morrison

unread,
Oct 25, 2001, 1:09:56 PM10/25/01
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:38:32 -0400, John Iwaniszek
<Jo...@Iwaniszek.com> wrote:

>Mark Morrison wrote:


>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 22:54:08 -0400, Thinkum
>> <thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote:
>>
>> >I was having entirely too much fun this week:
>> >
>> > http://www.snurcher.com/loot/snurchables/index.html
>> >
>> >Hope you enjoy this completely frivolous waste of time. ;-)
>>

>> Thinkum,
>>
>> In the 'Farscape Logo Set', instead of Farscape, they say 'Arscap'.
>>
>> Is this intentional ?
>>
>> And what in an Arscap ?
>>
>> A type of bottom-wear for winter ?
>
>A jpeg of your butt.

You can kiss my jpeg.

Mark Morrison

unread,
Oct 25, 2001, 1:09:59 PM10/25/01
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 20:48:38 -0400, Thinkum
<thinku...@snurcher.com> wrote:

>Tom Francis wrote:
>> Thinkum wrote
>>> Trouble wrote:
>>>> Thinkum wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I wasn't able to post a warning earlier; I was off at the
>>>>> regional Renn Faire until about ten minutes ago (Tom, you missed
>>>>> seeing me in a Jester outfit. And no, there are no pictures. :-P).
>>>>
>>>> Gosh that's a shame ; )
>>>
>>> And wouldn't Nick have swooned over all those bosoms yesterday, Paul?
>>> <beg>
>>
>> You know, I went there once - a long time ago - and wasn't all that
>> impressed.
>>
>> I guess I missed the point somewhere along the way.
>
>The point? To enjoy one another's company in a relaxing setting, and goggle
>at all the...different...types of folks you see there. ;-)

And bosoms.

Mark Morrison

unread,
Oct 25, 2001, 1:49:14 PM10/25/01
to
On 24 Oct 2001 23:25:22 GMT, catherine
<casumme...@velocityhsi.com> wrote:

Hence the quality of the show.

If it were US made, it would be crap.

0 new messages