Question---Stefano's paintings
Rainie S 1
>be the one to paint them.
Are you kidding? That makes too much sense and we're talking about days here.
rainie
I started out with nothing...
and I still have most of it left.
TresBonBon
>house, so that he can replace the ones that have masterpieces hidden
>under them. But what I don't understand is that why does Hope have to
>be the one to paint them. I know she painted them the first time, but
>surely Stefano could have found an artist to copy them instead of going
>to all the trouble and worry of turning Hope back into Gina so she could
>do it.
>Any thoughts?
>
And why were the Rene's that were stolen from Ms. F's house painted over if
they are in Stefano's possesion? Since nobody was going to see them anyway,
why would he have Gina paint over them which prevents HIS enjoyment also? None
of this makes much sense.
Bonbon
ldy...@my-dejanews.com
tresb...@aol.comNoSpam (TresBonBon) wrote:
> >
> And why were the Rene's that were stolen from Ms. F's house painted over if
> they are in Stefano's possesion? Since nobody was going to see them anyway,
> why would he have Gina paint over them which prevents HIS enjoyment also?
None
> of this makes much sense.
>
> Bonbon
>
That's the most obvious reason I can think of... tee!hee!
Non-watcher Mom
...bip...
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Eadie Silverberg
Lora Elaine wrote:
> I understand that Stefano needs copies of the paintings in Viv's town
> house, so that he can replace the ones that have masterpieces hidden
> under them. But what I don't understand is that why does Hope have to
> be the one to paint them. I know she painted them the first time, but
> surely Stefano could have found an artist to copy them instead of going
> to all the trouble and worry of turning Hope back into Gina so she could
> do it.
> Any thoughts?
That would be the logical way of doing things . . . so of course they
wouldn't do THAT!!
It would never do, to have a copy made of the paintings, without a
three-month story to go with it!! . . . when did Stefano (or the writers of
DAYS) do anything that might be considered the least bit logical!?!?
EADIE !
Jerry
Lora Elaine wrote in message
. But what I don't understand is that why does Hope have to
>be the one to paint them. I know she painted them the first time, but
>surely Stefano could have found an artist to copy them instead of going
>to all the trouble and worry of turning Hope back into Gina so she could
>do it.
>Any thoughts?
WHO CARES? This whole storyline is SO ridiculous and SO lame that they
should just end it as painlessly as possible without taking up any more air
time. It make no sense and will continue to make no sense because it seems
to have NOT been though out very carefully in the first place. Just take
it for the far fetched farce that it is and maybe the writers will move on
to something more interesting. If you keep asking all these questions they
may figure that the viewers are really interested and drag the story out
more.
Being an artist myself, I was horrified when Stephano said he had those
priceless masterpieces painted over. Can you imagine the damage that could
do? Look at the trouble museums go through to protect the paintings they
have and Stephano just paints over them and hangs them in plain sight. Oh
those clever writers, what will they think of next?
Donna and Ken
country. If he were to ship them out as is, they would have been caught
as the art thieves. He needed PG to paint over them because he doesn't
want anyone to know that he has them in his possesion. PG is the only
one that knows he has them and can copy them.
TresBonBon wrote:
>
> >I understand that Stefano needs copies of the paintings in Viv's town
> >house, so that he can replace the ones that have masterpieces hidden
> >under them. But what I don't understand is that why does Hope have to
> >be the one to paint them. I know she painted them the first time, but
> >surely Stefano could have found an artist to copy them instead of going
> >to all the trouble and worry of turning Hope back into Gina so she could
> >do it.
> >Any thoughts?
> >
Donna and Ken
over it. It would look more like the original if she was the one that
copied them.
Btrflie4u
and what kind of paint are they using on these things that will come off and
leave the painting unharmed and still worth something??
GO HOKIES!!!
V VTTTTTTT
V V T
V T
Donna & Ken
want DOOL to be a pretend world then I haave no choice but to pretend
also if I want to continue to watch or I would go out of my mind.
K G
could have the originals, not painting over the good ones. Argh this is
too confusing . . .
Kirsten
Oogi...@webtv.net
Jerry
Donna & Ken wrote in message
>That is were the writers are crazy. Maybe water color. But if they
>want DOOL to be a pretend world then I haave no choice but to pretend
>also if I want to continue to watch or I would go out of my mind.
If these were "priceless masterpieces" they would not have been painted over
under any circumstances. Art restoration is a painstaking process.
Although I am sure Stephano will just wipe the painting and it will be
restored. More nonsense for us to believe.
Jerry
K G wrote in message
I thought she was painting duplicates of all the paintings so Steffano
could have the originals, not painting over the good ones. Argh this is
too confusing . . .
Stephano is having Gina paint copies of the fake paintings so they can be
put in place of the already painted over "prrrrrrriceless masterpieces."
You have to remember to roll your R's when you say this like Stephano does.
Tara Keith
paint can be washed off. Oil repels water and the whole process does
surprisingly little damage to the original painting if done correctly.
I read about this several years ago. Many paintings that were stolen
from Jews in Nazi times were smuggled out of the country this way. Just
a little info...This is one time the seemingly ridiculous stories the
writers come up with is actually accurate!!!
Erin
DonnaB wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 19:34:10 -0500 (EST) in
> alt.tv.days-of-our-lives tar...@webtv.net (Tara Keith)
> found the time to say:
> Is it just watercolor? I thought it could be done with
> several different media as long as they were water soluble
> instead of oil soluble. But, agree that it's a very common
> thing for both good & bad purposes.
>
> --
> DonnaB RATSFuzz, CCWF, MPW, LGAW, DucTapR, GRITS, SWATCHr &
> ARIAA <*> www.delphi.com/soapopera 8^> icq308592
>
> "It's useless to hold a person to anything he says while
> he's in love, drunk, or running for office." - Shirley
> MacLaine
Rainie S 1
>under any circumstances. Art restoration is a painstaking process.
>Although I am sure Stephano will just wipe the painting and it will be
>restored. More nonsense for us to believe.
Heck Jerry, if Rolf can implant memories and moodchanging devices, restoring
the paintings will be a snap.
rainie
"If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be
dead." -Johnny Carson
Rainie S 1
>paint can be washed off. Oil repels water and the whole process does
>surprisingly little damage to the original painting if done correctly.
>I read about this several years ago. Many paintings that were stolen
>from Jews in Nazi times were smuggled out of the country this way. Just
>a little info...This is one time the seemingly ridiculous stories the
>writers come up with is actually accurate!!!
>
Sonofagun, you mean they actually got something right!
rainie
"In elementary school, in case of fire you have to line up quietly in a single
file line from smallest to tallest. What is the logic? Do tall people burn
slower?" -Warren Hutcherson
DonnaB
alt.tv.days-of-our-lives tar...@webtv.net (Tara Keith)
found the time to say:
| If a person paints over an oil painting with watercolors, the watercolor
| paint can be washed off. Oil repels water and the whole process does
| surprisingly little damage to the original painting if done correctly.
| I read about this several years ago. Many paintings that were stolen
| from Jews in Nazi times were smuggled out of the country this way. Just
| a little info...This is one time the seemingly ridiculous stories the
| writers come up with is actually accurate!!!
Is it just watercolor? I thought it could be done with
Jerry
Rainie S 1 wrote in message
>Heck Jerry, if Rolf can implant memories and moodchanging devices,
restoring
>the paintings will be a snap.
Sorry, I keep forgetting that reality and logic have nothing to do with this
show. I am really getting sick of this show. It is like a badly written
comic book. There is a great ABC sictcom that just got canceled called
"Cupid." It is funny, touching, well written, great actors, great
plots.....everything that DOOL is not.
TresBonBon
>> >The paintings needed to be painted over
>>
>> and what kind of paint are they using on these things that will come off
>and
>> leave the painting unharmed and still worth something??
>> GO HOKIES!!!
>>
previous works because of the high cost of new canvas. They were found many
years later and restored to the original painting. I'm assuming they used oil,
just as the original was in oil. Maybe oil paint can be removed in layers.
Sorry, not an expert on this subject.
Bonbon
TresBonBon
>paint can be washed off. Oil repels water and the whole process does
>surprisingly little damage to the original painting if done correctly.
>I read about this several years ago. Many paintings that were stolen
>from Jews in Nazi times were smuggled out of the country this way. Just
>a little info...This is one time the seemingly ridiculous stories the
>writers come up with is actually accurate!!!
>
They do not adhere nor are they opaque. The watercolors have to have special
paper to paint on...they'd run right off the oils. Tempra...maybe, but nobody
in their right mind could confuse a tempra painting with the real thing
Bonbon