Two members of the creative team that produced the two-minute minute spot for ad agency Wieden+Kennedy donated their personal time in 2008 to make pro-Obama art.
This years most discussed Super Bowl ada two-minute spot for Chrysler narrated by Clint Eastwoodcontinues to generate controversy in conservative political circles, where a host of questions have been raised about the automakers alleged motives for commissioning the advertisement.
In the days ahead, similar politically charged queries also are likely to be raised about the highly regarded Portland Oregon-based ad agency that produced the spotWieden+Kennedy, some of whose key creative professionals privately supported Barack Obama in the 2008 election.
VIDEO: The Best (and Worst) Super Bowl Commercials of 2012
Eastwood was the surprise narrator of the spot that aired during Sundays NFL title game, one which both Republican and Democratic politicos have characterized as subtly echoing some of the incumbent presidents major reelection campaign themes. Political advertising mavens also have pointed out that the Chrysler ads title and themeIts Halftime in Americaclosely parallels one of the two most famous campaign ads in history: Ronald Reagans famousand legendarily effectiveIts Morning in America spot.
In an appearance on Fox News Monday, GOP political strategist Karl Rove charged that, The leadership of the auto companies feel they need to do something to repay their political patronage. It is a sign of what happens when you have Chicago-style politics, and the president of the United States and his political minions are, in essence, using our tax dollars to buy corporate advertising.
Chrysler Chairman and CEO Sergio Marchionne, however, insisted to a Detroit radio station interviewer that the spot had "zero political content. I think we need to be careful, and God knows, I mean I can't stop anybody from associating themselves with a message but it was not intended to be any type of political overture on our part.
STORY: Clint Eastwood on Chrysler Super Bowl Ad: 'I Am Certainly Not Affiliated With Mr. Obama'
Similarly, in an email to the New York Times Tuesday, Eastwood wrote, The ad doesnt have a political message. It is about American spirit, pride and job growth. (Chrysler paid NBC about $12.8 million to air the spot; Eastwood will reportedly donate his fees for narrating and briefly appearing in the ad to charity.)
Wieden+Kennedy, which produced Its Halftime in America, has a reputation as a highly creative ad agency with a flair for weaving appealing, socially conscious themes into its clients messages. Its major corporate accounts include Nike, Coca Cola, ESPN, Honda, Old Spice, Microsoft, Proctor and Gamble, Starbucks, Heineken, Dodge and Chrysler for which it produced a Super Bowl spot last year. The agency currently is collaborating with former Vice President Al Gore on a project linking gaming and concern over global warming.
PHOTOS: 10 Entertainers Democrats and Republicans Love to Hate
Several members of the Wieden+Kennedy team that produced the Eastwood spot were among the creative professionals who privately supported Obamas first election campaign. Creative director Aaron Allen, for example, created a striking poster, called "United the States of America," on candidate Obamas behalf. The poster shows an Obama silhouette bringing together red and blue spheres meant to represent Americas partisan division. His official bio notes that he also works on personal art projects, including a poster for the 2008 Obama campaign that was shown in several galleries and publications.
The ads art director, Jimm Lasser, created an entire art exhibit in New York around Nike-style shoes bearing Obamas image. Another of the creative directors, Michael Tabtabai has used his Twitter account recently to send out the message Obama x Incredible Hulk. America STRONG! and linking to an image of an action doll of the president looking like the comic book super hero.
The Eastwood spot actually was produced by Los Angeles and New York-based Chelsea Pictures, which selected David Gordon Green, best known for the comedy film Pineapple Express, to direct the ad.
In the Chrysler ad, the director and star narrates an inspirational message while images of Detroit assembly lines and ordinary working Americans roll across the screen. Finally, Eastwood emerges from a gritty tunnel to speak to the camera in person. Its halftime. Both teams are in their locker rooms discussing what they can do to win this game in the second half, Eastwood begins. Its halftime in America, too. People are out of work and theyre hurting. And theyre all wondering what theyre gonna do to make a comeback.
ANALYSIS: Was Chrysler's Super Bowl Commercial a Nod to Obama?
We find a way through tough times, and if we cant find a way then well make one. All that matters now is whats ahead, how do we come from behind, how do we come together, and how do we win. Detroits showing us it can be done. Eastwood also speaks of an America roaring back.
Just an hour or so before the spot aired, Obama told a pre-game interviewer that he deserves a second term, in part because his economic policies have coaxed the country into recoverya point Democrats argue was reinforced by the most recent declines in unemployment. The President made a similar set of points during a recent address in the Motor City, where his administrations successful bailouts of Chrysler and General Motors are highly poplar.
While the background of some of Wieden+Kennedys creative team probably will fuel further conservative suspicions, theres also some online evidence suggesting that there was neither consultation nor collaboration between the agency and the Obama reelection campaign. Following the presidents Labor Day speech to a Detroit audience, creative director Joe Staples tweeted, I think Obama just paraphrased our ad in his Labor Day speech [from Detroit] Holy crap.
Sunday, Obama political adviser David Axelrod tweeted that the ad was a powerful spot, but then went on to wonder, Did Clint shoot that, or just narrate it?
Chryslers spot, moreover, wasnt the only Super Bowl ad that seemed to adopt themes from the Obama reelection campaigns playbook. GEs advertisement showed American workers once more on the assembly line turning out industrial projects for domestic consumption, something the president hopes to encourage with his policies. Both ads sounded themes similar to Obamas in front of the largest audience ever to watch an American television broadcast111.3 million people.
-- "If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the 21st century."
On Feb 7, 10:55 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> This years most discussed Super Bowl ada two-minute spot for Chrysler
> narrated by Clint Eastwoodcontinues to generate controversy in
> conservative political circles, where a host of questions have been
> raised about the automakers alleged motives for commissioning the
> advertisement.
> In the days ahead, similar politically charged queries also are
> likely to be raised about the highly regarded Portland Oregon-based ad
> agency that produced the spotWieden+Kennedy, some of whose key creative
> professionals privately supported Barack Obama in the 2008 election.
> Eastwood was the surprise narrator of the spot that aired during Sundays
> NFL title game, one which both Republican and Democratic politicos have
> characterized as subtly echoing some of the incumbent presidents major
> reelection campaign themes.
Academy award-winning actor Clint Eastwood told The Daily Caller that
the Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul of Texas is as
good as anybody else in the race but that he will decide on a
candidate in another month or two after listening to all that crap on
television.
TheDC asked Eastwood if he is still not a fan of President Barack
Obama which he stated in 2010 and for his opinion on GOP
frontrunner Mitt Romney.
I didnt say I wasnt a fan of his, I said I thought he was a pretty
good guy. At least he seems to be I never met him. I just thought
that we need that a president, in my opinion, needs to spend more time
governing and less time with other things instead of just campaigning,
I guess. But thats just one opinion and thats the way I believe it
should be done, Eastwood told TheDC at the opening of the Warner Bros
theater in the National Museum of American History in Washington
Wednesday.
Now, whether any of these other guys [Republicans] would be any
better, its a coin flip.
When asked whom he would vote for as a self-described libertarian,
Eastwood said, You want me to go for Ron Paul, is that it?
I think hes nice, Eastwood replied. Hes as good as anybody else.
Theyre all nice guys. Well see what cooks with them.
Following the interview with TheDC, Eastwood, who served as mayor of
Carmel, Calif., revisited the topic of the GOP presidential race. He
told TheDC, Ill answer those other questions later. Give me another
month or two of just listening to all that crap on television.
On Feb 8, 6:29 pm, trotsky <gmsi...@email.com> wrote:
> On 2/8/12 12:21 PM, Mason Barge wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:55:43 -0500, Ubiquitous<web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> > Talk about a "tempest in a teapot'!
> > Politicos simply cannot let anything *not* be reduced to the procrustean
> > bed of their Republican-Democratic tunnel vision.
> > Detroit wants to get out the "buy American" message in the worse way.
> > Who's to blame them?
> Yeah, except only one guy is responsible for them still being around.
And his turd blossom, who seems woefully out of touch on this
particular topic. If Rove thinks Eastwood is a liberal, or even a
liberal front man, he must also think unicorns exist and leprechauns
were responsible for President Bush winning two terms.
> On Feb 8, 6:29 pm, trotsky<gmsi...@email.com> wrote:
>> On 2/8/12 12:21 PM, Mason Barge wrote:
>>> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:55:43 -0500, Ubiquitous<web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> Talk about a "tempest in a teapot'!
>>> Politicos simply cannot let anything *not* be reduced to the procrustean
>>> bed of their Republican-Democratic tunnel vision.
>>> Detroit wants to get out the "buy American" message in the worse way.
>>> Who's to blame them?
>> Yeah, except only one guy is responsible for them still being around.
> And his turd blossom, who seems woefully out of touch on this
> particular topic. If Rove thinks Eastwood is a liberal, or even a
> liberal front man, he must also think unicorns exist and leprechauns
> were responsible for President Bush winning two terms.
Eastwood has already held public office as a Republican. Maybe we need to make a distinction between Republicans and Turd Republicans.
"David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com> wrote:
> I watched it, liked it, didn't see it as being for any political
> candidate, just America's future and the resilience of the American
> spirit.
That's why it's anti-Republican and part of the big leftist
conspiracy! The fact that there were no Red States represented in
the Super Bowl is also part of the big leftist conspiracy. It's right
up there with the big leftist global warming, fake moon landings and
9/11 being an inside job conspiracies, not forgetting how Obama
continues to live in the White House while having only produced a fake
birth certificate. We just need Newt to establish his credibility
with the average American by admitting publicly that he believes in
all of them. Then, and only then will the Tea Party be certain that
he's the right man for the job.
drso...@aol.com wrote:
>From whom did you steal this article?
Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
--
"Admittedly, conservatives give as good as they get. The difference
between us and [leftists] is that we can argue as well as inveigh.
They can only hurl invectives." -- Don Feder
On Feb 8, 8:16 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> drso...@aol.com wrote:
> >From whom did you steal this article?
> Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
Thanks for doing the heavy lifting... you've proven to everyone
reading this thread that you don't know the difference between a
question and an argument.
On Feb 7, 2:55 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net>plagiarized:
> Two members of the creative team that produced the two-minute minute spot
> for ad agency Wieden+Kennedy donated their personal time in 2008 to make
> pro-Obama art.
Since President Obama got 53% of the vote in 2008 you would expect
that, roughly, half of the creative team would have supported him in
that election. That whoever wrote this can find *two* people is not
exactly news.
Tom wrote:
> On Feb 8, 8:16 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> drso...@aol.com wrote:
>>> From whom did you steal this article?
>> Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
> Thanks for doing the heavy lifting... you've proven to everyone
> reading this thread that you don't know the difference between a
> question and an argument.
> Tom
Nor his ass and a hole in the wall. Or shit and shineola.
drso...@aol.com wrote:
>On Feb 8, 8:16 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>> drso...@aol.com wrote:
>> >From whom did you steal this article?
>> Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>Thanks for doing the heavy lifting... you've proven to everyone
>reading this thread that you don't know the difference between a
>question and an argument.
Thanks for proving my point about you having to use strawmen because you have nothing to offer as a rebuttle. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
-- "If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the 21st century."
Someone's sockpuppet wrote:
>Tom wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 8:16 pm, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> drso...@aol.com wrote:
>>>> From whom did you steal this article?
>>> Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>> Thanks for doing the heavy lifting... you've proven to everyone
>> reading this thread that you don't know the difference between a
>> question and an argument.
>Nor his ass and a hole in the wall. Or shit and shineola.
Oh, the irony! Do try not to be such a sore loser, mmkay?
-- "If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the 21st century."