Re: Stupid ads--2008
Ubiquitous
>The ad for McDonalds with those two retards singing about chicken
>mcnuggets being on sale is as bad as it gets.
Remember the McDonald's ad with the retard working at McDonalds?
I'm surprised they didn't show the employees sticking his face
into the deep-frier or soemthing!
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
S. Smith
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:G42dnewdNJ6LcmXa...@giganews.com...
The VW ad with the honking is so anoying. I should not be surprized as VW
consistantly has worse/stupid ads than anyone else.
S. Smith
"S. Smith" <sasm...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:6ZIPj.11229$aq4.8194@trnddc02...
I should have added the new commerical for 6 Flags. I don't know if it is
local or national, but talk about anoying!!!! A guy screaming 1 flag, 2
flag...6 flags. They should bring back Mr. 6...he was cool and the music
was catchy. I don't think they ever revealed who Mr. 6 was...male or
female. Who in the world wants to be SCREAMED AT?
Geoff Miller
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> writes:
> Remember the McDonald's ad with the retard working at McDonalds?
> I'm surprised they didn't show the employees sticking his face
> into the deep-frier or soemthing!
Why would a company hire retards for positions that involve
interacting with the public, much less have commercials that
literally advertise the fact that they do so? That question
occurred to me several years ago, when I saw that my local
Safeway had a window-licker bag boy.
And before any of you PC types erupts with righteous indignation,
bigotry has nothing to do with it. These people aren't "special";
they're defective human beings, and as such are understandably
unsettling to be around.
Geoff
--
"The future stretches before us, brown and sticky, like the
broad smile of a mongoloid eating peanut butter off a spoon."
-- snide
Dano
"Geoff Miller" <geo...@lava.net> wrote in message
news:Fd-dndPdIOUvEL7VnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@lavanet...
>
>
> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> writes:
>
> > Remember the McDonald's ad with the retard working at McDonalds?
> > I'm surprised they didn't show the employees sticking his face
> > into the deep-frier or soemthing!
>
>
> Why would a company hire retards for positions that involve
> interacting with the public, much less have commercials that
> literally advertise the fact that they do so? That question
> occurred to me several years ago, when I saw that my local
> Safeway had a window-licker bag boy.
>
> And before any of you PC types erupts with righteous indignation,
> bigotry has nothing to do with it. These people aren't "special";
> they're defective human beings, and as such are understandably
> unsettling to be around.
>
I'm sure the irony of your post escapes you...retard.
Geoff Miller
Dano <janea...@yahoo.com> wants to book me for Murder One:
> I'm sure the irony of your post escapes you...retard.
What I find ironic is that you object to my post, and then
hypocritcally use the word "retard" as an epithet.
Of course, you're too retarded to know how to use a text
editor to delete unnecessary quoted text, so what can one
reasonably expect?
Dano
> Dano <janea...@yahoo.com> wants to book me for Murder One:
>
>> I'm sure the irony of your post escapes you...retard.
>
>
> What I find ironic is that you object to my post, and then
> hypocritcally use the word "retard" as an epithet.
>
Just wanted to see if you had the nerve to object. I knew you wouldn't let
me down.
> Of course, you're too retarded to know how to use a text
> editor to delete unnecessary quoted text, so what can one
> reasonably expect?
>
Why would I delete any of the stupidity that was posted? That was the point
dillweed.
"And before any of you PC types erupts with righteous indignation,
bigotry has nothing to do with it. These people aren't "special";
they're defective human beings, and as such are understandably
unsettling to be around." - Geoff Miller
I suppose your solution to the "retard" problem is permanent
institutionalization? Or maybe extermination? So you needn't be offended
by their very existence. You are a disgraceful excuse for a human being and
far below the level of a "retard"...therefore I hereby apologize to all
"retards". Insufferable bastard. Your mother should be ashamed.
Geoff Miller
Dano <janea...@yahoo.com> blathers ever onward:
: What I find ironic is that you object to my post, and then
: hypocritcally use the word "retard" as an epithet.
> Just wanted to see if you had the nerve to object. I knew
> you wouldn't let me down.
Object? I'm not offended by your using "retard" as an epithet.
It hardly requires any nerve to point out that your use of the
word in a derogatory manner was hypocritical of you. What I
happen to think about it is immaterial.
: Of course, you're too retarded to know how to use a text
: editor to delete unnecessary quoted text, so what can one
: reasonably expect?
> Why would I delete any of the stupidity that was posted? That
> was the point dillweed.
Why? Because whatever you think of the previous poster's ideas,
it's common courtesy (to the readership at large, if not to the
person you're rebutting) to delete all but the most strictly
relevant quoted material. And it's possible to do that and still
retain adequate context.
Maybe your mommy can explain that to you, if you can manage to
coax her out from underneath that Republican. (Do have the
consideration to wait until he busts his cookies, though.)
> "And before any of you PC types erupts with righteous indignation,
> bigotry has nothing to do with it. These people aren't "special";
> they're defective human beings, and as such are understandably
> unsettling to be around." - Geoff Miller
Yup, that's what I said, all right.
What specifically do you take issue with in that quoted passage?
That the mentally retarded are defective human beings? That
many, if not most, people find them unsetling? You'd have a
long row to hoe either way.
Or, as I suspect, do you actually agree with what I said but
take issue with me because however true it is, being up front
about it wasn't "nice?"
Yeah, I bet that's it. You must be a liberal. Libbos are not
only PC, they care more about *how* something is said that about
the content of what's said.
> I suppose your solution to the "retard" problem is permanent
> institutionalization? Or maybe extermination? So you needn't
> be offended by their very existence.
A Final Solution to the Retard Question? Of course not. I simply
believe that hiring them for customer-facing positions is in ques-
tionable taste, even though it's done with the best of intentions.
> You are a disgraceful excuse for a human being and far below
> the level of a "retard"...therefore I hereby apologize to all
> "retards".
Excuse me? You hadn't even seen my response to your supposition
when you wrote that. I certainly hope you don't go off this
prematurely in the sack.
> Insufferable bastard. Your mother should be ashamed.
"Soylent Green is really retards. IT'S RETARDS!!" -- Brian Saunders
Geoff
--
"Dennis Kucinich, D-Alpha Centauri" -- Jonah Goldberg