On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:00:09 PM UTC-7, Bigolhomo wrote:
> So who should have won?
You basically are asking the wrong question.
You obviously believe in the votes, and I find that folly and foolish to the extreme, Big...
There is too much money and influence on the show not to have at least serious attempts being made to manipulate the winner. Their failures the last 2-3 years have stagnated the show, probably beyond repair.
> A few weeks ago, when Angie seemed to be the
> frontrunner you were complaining about the show rigging it so she
> would win.
Obviously. She was the only marketable brand in the Top Ten!
> Then she got the boot and the two singers,
Stop. There's your second problem. To consider the singing even _relevant_ on that program is looking in the wrong direction. Take that thought pattern to X-Factor, if that show survives this season!
The problem is that the show is looking for a brand. Look what they did with Carrie Underwood after she won season four. THAT is American Idol, NOT the singing career.
> who from what I
> could tell from reading the group, were largely considered to be the
> best two singers of the season,
Irrelevant. So were Lakisha and Mandisa in their seasons, and they were booted for being unmarketably fat. Sorry, gonna say it, there it is.
If we go with the best singer of the season, then the Black belters are going to win 9 seasons out of 10, because if you take a general cross-section, they're going to be the best singers.
> ended up being the top two, and you're
> still not happy. So tell us, who would have been the deserving winner
> and why?
Again, you're asking the wrong question. I don't think there was a _deserving_ winner in at least the Top Ten. I think most of the performers who could be what American Idol advertises to me (rather than what it is) are summarily discarded long before the television voting rounds, to ensure at least a certain type of winner, if not a certain winner outright.
So much so that, if I were given the reins, I'd dispense with the national auditions outright and go with an outright scouting process, and hold the producers accountable for the results.
> What it tells me is that they're owning up to their compete and utter
> irrelevancy.
If they were that irrelevant, given what they've said, there wouldn't have been a problem with FOX shutting them down.
Especially as ratings went through the floor (for both shows) the last couple of years, I'd have a hard time understanding how such a group would not have MORE influence as time went by.
> Their one "victory" this season was at the top 4 voting,
> and even then the contestant eliminated was their third choice for
> elimination.
What VFTW never understood until too late was that THE -- SHOW -- IS -- FIXED.
Sometimes it gets away from them (several of the WGWGs), but the fact is that the show believes it can decide for us who our Idols are.
(Really no different than the rest of the industry, but I digress...)
The problem is: What happens when those Powers That Be (I'm looking right at you, Mr. Lythgoe...) are going to be fired _and they know it_?
Well, take out the one saleable brand and tell who's going to be picking up these pieces to try to sell Candice...
Mike