7 y.o.OH boy whose rectum was brutally attacked in 1994,by his enraged Mommy Dearest,after he soiled his pants,now says that family dog raped him,exact same lie that Mommy Dearest gave to pigs & is now using in her appeal
Joe1orbit
This headline certainly grabbed my attention. Not too often that you see "Boy
says family dog raped him", as a headline. But on closer inspection, this is
simply another run of the mill parental child-slave TORTURE case, one of
MILLIONS that occur in amerikka each year, albeit with a FEW unique twists.
Over in Ohio in 1994, a Mommy Dearest almost killed her 7 year old tortured
son-slave by JAMMING an object up his rectum after he soiled himself. She was
found Guilty and condemned to LIFE in prison, BUT declared eligible for parole
after serving just 10 years. Case closed?? No, not by a long shot! Not in a
Sacred Family Unit/child-SLAVE based society!
This TORTURED 7 year old boy was forced to maintain CONTACT with his "sacred
biological family", and they have TERRORISTICALLY coerced/brainwashed him into
agreeing to HELP out his "beloved" Mommy, by claiming now, at age 14, that what
ACTUALLY happened to him in 1994, at age 7, was that the family DOG attacked
and raped him!
First of all, in a sane society our 14 year old tortured boy would never make
such a claim now, because ALL contact with all biological family members would
have been SEVERED at age 7. He wouldn't even give a passing thought to this
womb excretor, much less feel terroristically compelled to make up a lie on her
behalf, because society would have CUT her out of his life, TOTALLY, from the
MOMENT of her arrest onward. Secondly, no SANE judicial system would ALLOW this
terroristically coerced claim, by a tortured 14 year old boy, to be heard or
considered in an appeal, or in any other court proceeding. Simply by ALLOWING
this boy to testify, the court is LEGITIMIZING the coercion and brainwashing
that this boy's family has inflicted upon him.
Please note how the article REFUSES to name EITHER the boy or his Mommy, even
though she is an ADULT. The purported reason for this is to "protect the
privacy" of the boy. The ACTUAL societal intention and result, is of course to
FILL the boy with SHAME, to TEACH him that he should feel ashamed over ALL
aspects of his life, that there is a NEED for him to keep SECRET both the
notion that his Mommy tortured him rectally and his dog tried to rape him. "You
are UNCLEAN, my boy. You are perverse, my child. HIDE it, for you will be
MOCKED and RIDICULif the TRUE facts of your life are ever known", THAT is the
OVERT, intentional societal message, in trying to keep all identities secret.
The undeniable facts are, a slaveowner had a slave. the slave was expected to
serve the slaveowner. Soiling pants with feces/urine at age 7, does not
constitute proper servitude. Thus, homicidal RAGE was provoked in the Mommy.
She decided to teach the slave a lesson, TARGETING the orifice that had failed
to meet her slaveowner demands, the rectum. She brutalized the rectum of her
slave. Realizing that he needed medical care afterwards, she innovatively
thought about the family dog, perhaps a bit more aggressive than the average
dog, and decided to FRAME him for the attack/rectum injuries, KNOWINg that dogs
cannot TALK english and therefore cannot overtly reveal TRUTH.
The tortured 7 year old was of course TOLD that the doggie was guilty, Mommy
still loved him, etc..., and this EVIL coercion/lie was allowed to CONTINUE to
be promoted to the tortured child, all through his Mommy's arrest, trial,
conviction, AND AFTERWARDS as well, as regular and constant CONTACT between the
tortured child and the SAME Sacred Family Unit that his Mommy/torturer was
attached to, was not only ALLOWED, but IMPOSED upon this tortured child.
And so here we are, 6-7 years later, in court yesterday, our tortured victim
BETRAYS himself, betrays Truth, tells the judge: "My mom is innocent. She
didn't do this. The dog attacked me.'' It's BETTER my slave, isn't it, to LOVE
your Mommy, to defend her, to declare her a fellow victim?? Yes, it is. Because
your ENTIRE LIFE, the past 7 years, at EVERY turn, your society has
terroristically told you that to NOT have a Mommy is terrible. To be
responsible for putting your Mommy in prison, makes you a terrible child. To
have PROVOKED your Sacred Mommy to ATTACK your RECTUM, makes you a DEMON, so
evil that your NAME cannot ever be mentioned as having been involved in this
incident.
Yes folks, YOUR ultra-evil society has done this. You have CHOSEN to allow
this boy to be tortured by his Mommy, AND then, for the NEXT 6 years, you have
chosemn to allow systematical mental torture and terrorization to CONTINUE. You
have inflicted this mental torture, as a matter of CHOSEN societal policy. You
have TAUGHT this boy that he is so WORTHLESS, that he must RESCUE and protect
the ONE person on planet earth who has tortured him more than ANY other person,
his Mommy, SOLELY because she excreted him from her womb 14 years ago. He must
DESTROY himself, betray himself, lie, FREE his very own torturer, in order to
be a "good boy". And that is what he is trying to do. OBEY societal doctrine on
how to be a "good son".
It IS of course interesting that DOG SEMEN was found inside this slave's
rectum, but all it demonstrates to me is that our Mommy Dearest was QUITE
thorough and tactically clever, in terms of THINKING THROUGH every detail,
BEFORE she took the slave to the hospital.
Since there is a BRIEF mention of Jeffrey Dahmer in this fascinating article,
I guess I''ll go ahead and post it to my Mailing List, as well as to Usenet.
Woof woof, JOE
The following appears courtesy of the 7/26/00 online edition of The Akron
Beacon-Journal newspaper:
Published Wednesday, July 26, 2000,
in the Akron Beacon Journal.
Boy says in court that family dog did rape him
Testimony backs story of imprisoned mother convicted in 1994 trial
BY MARK SCHLUEB
Beacon Journal staff writer
It was a trial that made everyone cringe. An Akron mother was accused of
seriously injuring her 7-year-old son by ramming an object into his rectum
after he had soiled his pants. Her defense: She didn't hurt the boy -- he was
raped by Bugsy, the family's pet pit bull.
The jury didn't buy it, and the woman was sentenced to life in prison on April
5, 1994.
But now the boy says that he remembers those terrible events from six years
ago, and that the dog really did rape him.
It's a revelation that could earn his mother a new trial.
``My mom is innocent,'' the boy, now 14 years old, told Summit County Common
Pleas Judge James Murphy yesterday. ``She didn't do this. The dog attacked
me.''
It's the same story his mother told doctors at Children's Hospital Medical
Center of Akron, where she took the boy in November 1993. The then-40-year-old
woman said she'd been taking a bath when she heard her son whimpering outside
the locked door. She opened the door to find him bleeding, his hands covered
with feces.
``The dog did it. Ask my mom,'' the 7-year-old told police who were summoned to
the hospital. He would say no more.
But doctors were skeptical that a 70-pound pit bull could penetrate the boy
without leaving scratches, bite marks or similar wounds.
The only injuries were those to the boy's rectum: internal tearing so severe
that doctors said he nearly needed a colostomy. One doctor would later testify
that he believed the boy was violated with something like a broomstick.
The lurid details of the case were made more sensational when tests at the
state crime lab confirmed that fluid found in the boy's rectum was indeed dog
semen.
Prosecutors weren't swayed; they convinced jurors that it's a relatively simple
task for those with the know-how to collect and transfer dog semen using a
sandwich bag and a straw or turkey baster.
The boy was called to testify on his mother's behalf, but he could not. Scared
and sitting on his older half brother's lap on the witness stand, the young boy
couldn't be persuaded to answer questions about what happened that day.
Without his testimony, the trial hinged on the testimony of a social worker.
The woman told jurors that after she had talked with the boy over several days,
he finally opened up and said his mother, angry with him for soiling his pants,
had inserted something into his rectum.
Jurors convicted the mother of felonious sexual penetration and endangering a
child. She was sentenced to life in prison but becomes eligible for parole in
2004.
Many of those involved in the case were happy to be done with it. A prosecutor
compared it to the case of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who cannibalized his
victims.
But last summer, the boy started asking his older half sister questions about
the mother he hadn't seen since the trial. Then the boy told his sister he
remembered the incident.
University of Akron law professor Dean Carro is representing the mother. He has
asked the court to grant the woman a new trial, based on her son's account of
the incident.
At a hearing yesterday, the boy again took the stand. This time, he had few
problems answering questions from his mother's lawyer and the judge.
``I needed to use the bathroom, because I had really bad bathroom problems, and
I pulled down my pants, and the dog attacked me,'' said the boy, who now lives
with his father in a Cleveland suburb.
The eighth-grader said he doesn't remember telling the social worker that his
mother hurt him, but thinks he may have said it under pressure from his
divorced father. ``I think I told her that because my dad kept telling me it
wasn't true and to just blame it on my mom,'' the boy told the judge.
Murphy said his research did not yield any examples of a child coming forward
with testimony after reaching age 10, the legal age at which one is presumed
competent to testify. The judge said he would research that legal point further
before deciding within weeks whether to grant a new trial.
The boy, who was dressed yesterday in a T-shirt, knee-length khaki shorts and
tennis shoes, hasn't visited his mother since the trial, according to Carro.
The woman is in the Ohio Reformatory for Women in Marysville. Five days a week,
she works as a sewing machine operator for Ohio Penal Industries, making
American and Ohio flags.
Many of the prison's 1,782 inmates are confined in dormitories, but the Akron
mother has her own cell.
``A single cell would be preferred,'' prison spokeswoman Maralene Sines said.
``You typically are rewarded with a single cell for good behavior.''
The whereabouts of Bugsy is unknown. He was locked up at the Summit County
Animal Shelter until the end of the trial, but was released to the boy's
stepfather after being cleared.
*************************************
Join the Joe1orbit Serial and Mass Murder Mailing List! For more information on
my Mailing List, please visit:
http://hometown.aol.com/joe1orbit/myhomepage/index.html
**************************************
Jason...@virgin.net
Came up with a new name for a character for your torture stories, how about Anisa?
A dark-haired gal, slim of figure, fair of face, half-caste and gorgeous,
........just one flaw though,........a real bitch for a mother!
ciao
Jason
Jason...@virgin.net
Dog3 wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> <Jason...@virgin.net> wrote in message
> news:3981D2D0...@virgin.net...
> > Hey Joe/Sondra
> >
> > Came up with a new name for a character for your torture stories, how
> about Anisa?
> >
> > A dark-haired gal, slim of figure, fair of face, half-caste and gorgeous,
> > ........just one flaw though,........a real bitch for a mother!
> >
> > ciao
> >
> > Jason
>
> Not necessary Jason. What is your *real* motivation here. Fess up and
> redeem yourself.
>
> Michael
Payback's a bitch!
I owe her nothing!
ciao
Jason
Victorhntr
Jason...@virgin.net
Victorhntr wrote:
> This Joe guy needs some mental help pretty bad.
Sondra / Joe needs the help!
I doubt she will go and get it though!
ciao
Jason
On a lighter note:
Welcome to the Psychiatric Hotline.
If you are obsessive compulsive, press 1 repeatedly.
If you are co-dependent, ask someone to press 2.
If you have multiple personalities, press 3, 4, 5 and 6.
If you are paranoid-delusional, we know who you are and what you want.
Just stay on the line so we can trace the call.
If you are schizophrenic, listen carefully, a little voice will tell you
which number to press.
If you are manic-depressive, it doesn't matter what you press, no-one
will answer.