Baby Matthew soils his diaper. Again. (was: Re: ||||||| GARY YOUR A LOSER! BLAM! ||||||||)
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Oh I think
>I've yet to see any evidence for that statement. Please post proof.
Your dancing, so the music I'm playing must be good.
>>I have. It's just not apparent to you yet, give me a
>>couple more weeks to pop that ego of yers, then you'll see.
>[snort]
Are you turning into a pig now? Shall I slop yer trough for you?
Here pig, pig, pig. Here pig, pig, pig, SUWWEEEE!
>>>> but have you
>>>>REALLY looked at the date of that thing? ROTFLMAO....kind of a coinky
>>>>dink that it was made shortly before I started attacking AUK
>>>>regs...LOL.
>>>Shortly? SHORTLY???
>>There, there, don't get upset, I know you get sensitive when I bring
>>up your height, but come on. It's not that bad being short, is it?
>>`, )
>Snip and run Diaper Boy. It's all you can do.
Bitch and whine Pinball. It's all you can do.
-=*TILT*=-
-Mad Hatter
John Kimball
>On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:53:22 -0500, John Kimball
><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>Oh I think
>
>>I've yet to see any evidence for that statement. Please post proof.
>
>Your dancing, so the music I'm playing must be good.
And you're the floor I'm dancing on. It could use a good cleaning
however, so hop to it Diaper Boy.
>
>>>I have. It's just not apparent to you yet, give me a
>>>couple more weeks to pop that ego of yers, then you'll see.
>
>>[snort]
>
>Are you turning into a pig now?
Free clue: I was laughing at you.
>>>>> but have you
>>>>>REALLY looked at the date of that thing? ROTFLMAO....kind of a coinky
>>>>>dink that it was made shortly before I started attacking AUK
>>>>>regs...LOL.
>
>>>>Shortly? SHORTLY???
>
>>>There, there, don't get upset, I know you get sensitive when I bring
>>>up your height, but come on. It's not that bad being short, is it?
>>>`, )
>
>>Snip and run Diaper Boy. It's all you can do.
>
>Bitch and whine Pinball. It's all you can do.
If bitching and whining means pointing out your cowardice, I guess
that's true.
>
>-=*TILT*=-
-=*SPLAT*=-
--
"Having a little variety in your sex life means switching hands."
Baby Matthew AKA Mad Hatter explains his lonely
sex life in <3a23ed91....@news.supernews.com>
http://ils.unc.edu/inls300/usr/mlb/doc225.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been incontinent all my life and would like to talk to others
who have to wear diapers and share experiences. I would also like any
suggestions on which diapers have worked the best for you if you have
ever worn them.
Matt Moulton (mou...@wwics.com)
Waitsburg, WA USA - Friday, May 03, 1996 at 03:43:13 (EDT)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Oh I think
>I've yet to see any evidence for that statement. Please post proof.
Your dancing, so the music I'm playing must be good.
>Free clue: I was laughing at you.
You know most normal people can actually laugh without snorting.
>If bitching and whining means pointing out your cowardice, I guess
>that's true.
If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
you and you're still bellyaching?
>>-=*TILT*=-
>
>-=*SPLAT*=-
Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.
-=*TILT*=-
-Mad Hatter
John Kimball
>If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>you
Hint: You're not.
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>>you
> Hint: You're not.
Boy I dunno where you've been buying hints from but maybe you oughta
ask for yer money back there Kitten. `, )
-Mad Hatter
SeaFood
Mad HatterŠ wrote in message <3a4f9765...@news.supernews.com>...
Sooo, to sum it up, you being immortalized by the
little turd on South Park...
****TILT/WHOOP/SPLAT/SMACK/KICK/SLAP/BURN*****
Unknown
wrote:
I've beat the living shit out of him so much he's been reduced to
incoherent nonsensical yammerings about the only television show his
two last barely alive brain cells can handle without rupturing. How
nice. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Nighthawk
news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>
> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
> >you
>
> Hint: You're not.
The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Everyone is gifted. Some just open their packages sooner!
Unknown
wrote:
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>
>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>>
>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>> >you
>>
>> Hint: You're not.
>
>The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Martin Hannigan
Oooh. Oooh. Baby Matty PooPoo make a funny. AN AN AN AN AN AN AN.
--
Martin Hannigan e: hann...@world.std.com
Boston, MA w: http://world.std.com/~hannigan
arin: mh309-arin netsol: mh309
Interesting web pages: http://world.std.com/~hannigan/fun/
Unknown
Hannigan) wrote:
>In article <3a4de566....@news.supernews.com>, Mad HatterŠ <> wrote:
>>On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>>>> >you
>>>>
>>>> Hint: You're not.
>>>
>>>The Bed WetterŠ has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
>>
>>Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
>>so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
>>
>>-Mad Hatter
>
>
>Oooh. Oooh. Baby Matty PooPoo make a funny. AN AN AN AN AN AN AN.
Hey look who finally woke up! BTW Hannigan I guess by your failure to
respond to my post in which I claimed SPNAK, there's no argument from
your end. I'll give that idiot Vic a couple more weeks to respond
(cause he's a little slow) then I'll go ahead and claim SPNAK on him
as well. Have a nice day. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Martin Hannigan
>On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 17:58:30 GMT, hann...@world.std.com (Martin
>Hannigan) wrote:
>
>>>On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>>>>> >you
>>>>>
>>>>> Hint: You're not.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
>>>so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
>>>
>>>-Mad Hatter
>>
>>
>>Oooh. Oooh. Baby Matty PooPoo make a funny. AN AN AN AN AN AN AN.
>
>Hey look who finally woke up! BTW Hannigan I guess by your failure to
>respond to my post in which I claimed SPNAK, there's no argument from
>your end. I'll give that idiot Vic a couple more weeks to respond
>(cause he's a little slow) then I'll go ahead and claim SPNAK on him
>as well. Have a nice day. `, )
>
>-Mad Hatter
Just the fact that you are clamoring for my attention indicates I have
SPANKed your sorry ass.
I claim SPANK on Matty PooPoo, irregardless of the fact of his
posting. Or not.
I suggest that DiaperBoy take his lumps like a BBQ Man./
-M
Jesus Slut Fucker
>
> In article <3a53ea93....@news.supernews.com>, Mad HatterŠ <> wrote:
> >On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 17:58:30 GMT, hann...@world.std.com (Martin
> >Hannigan) wrote:
> >
> >>>On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
> >>>>> >you
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hint: You're not.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
> >>>so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
> >>>
> >>>-Mad Hatter
> >>
> >>
> >>Oooh. Oooh. Baby Matty PooPoo make a funny. AN AN AN AN AN AN AN.
> >
> >Hey look who finally woke up! BTW Hannigan I guess by your failure to
> >respond to my post in which I claimed SPNAK, there's no argument from
> >your end. I'll give that idiot Vic a couple more weeks to respond
> >(cause he's a little slow) then I'll go ahead and claim SPNAK on him
> >as well. Have a nice day. `, )
> >
> >-Mad Hatter
>
> Just the fact that you are clamoring for my attention indicates I have
> SPANKed your sorry ass.
>
> I claim SPANK on Matty PooPoo, irregardless of the fact of his
> posting. Or not.
Point taken. You spanked him pretty thoroughly.
>
> I suggest that DiaperBoy take his lumps like a BBQ Man./
>
Diaper boy is even bigger girlie man than Newbomb.
-Jesus
--
Top Ten Mad Hatter Quote List:
10. I'm not gay or anything, but I've stuck things up my ass to see
what it feels like!
9. You think night time incontinence is funny? You try waking up in
a
cold pool of piss and see how funny you think that is!
8. Variety in sex is switching hands. Rubber gloves or a sock add
some
spice as well. I've also experimented with those penis pumps but
wasn't
all that impressed.
7. I was born with a white count so fucking high. I can't catch HIV.
6. You may look at me as stupid, so what even if I am, why should I
care?
5. Diapers are the thing to turn a woman on. On the first date you
know a
woman digs you if she is willing to change your dirty diaper.
4. Sure I let Big Daddy Spank my ass. He really laid it on. Spanked
my
ass so hard it brought tears to my eyes. He has the pictures of my
red
ass on his web page. But I'm not gay. We never had sex (though he
did get
a ragin' hard on as I squirmed on his lap), it was just spanking.
3. I'm can't be as stupid as you think I am.
2. I'm going to run all you bastards out of alt.flame in the name of
SNUH.
1. You can't embarrass me. I piss the bed every night. You think you
can
do any worse than that?
Nighthawk
If that keeps you from crying while you're getting your diaper changed, you
just keep right on thinking that.
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Each of the kobolds has a Wand of Orcus?
Jesus Slut Fucker
Damn Diaper boy, your fantasy life is sure full of a lot of claims.
As much as I would like to say that you are less pathetic than that
right winged moron Newbomb, I can't. And that really pisses me off.
Hell, before you came here he was easily a shoe in for MOY, now you
went a blew it. Kind of like you blew Big Daddy, eh?
-Jesus
---
victor
I already responed to you. If you would clean the shit our of your
face you would have seen it. Have fun in Deja!
Your friend
Vic
victor
Top Ten Mad Hatter Quote List:
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Your friend
Vic
dasuunt
ha ha! spank! now that is funny! just like anally raping my father's new
wife! you guys are too much! just a kick in the pants!
Unknown
wrote:
Sorry puppyfucker, I don't play fetch, if you couldn't sum up the
balls to reply to the posts in triangle where they originated, you
self SPNAK yourself in a really pathetic and amusing way. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
><Mad HatterŠ> wrote in message news:3a4de566....@news.supernews.com...
>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>> >> >you
>> >>
>> >> Hint: You're not.
>> >
>> >The Bed WetterŠ has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
>>
>> Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
>> so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
>
>If that keeps you from crying while you're getting your diaper changed, you
>just keep right on thinking that.
Wow, that was actually pretty original. See, when you bother to put
some time into what you're doing you can actually stop from looking
like a complete moronic fuckup. Oh by the way, my earlier poast...it
wasn't a call for you to demonstrate your brain damage to Usenet. Now
take your inane delusions elsewhere before we decide to give you shock
treatment again. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
<drap...@NOSPAMhome.com> wrote:
Good God yer slurpin Hannigan...what the hell is wrong with you? I
mean it's okay to try and flame me...but try and not do it in a follow
up to a post by Hannigan...that's just nasty on so many different
levels. I mean you just about killed any respect you had as a flamer
in that poast. The best you can do now is take multiple showers,
think happy, happy thoughts and hope to God you don't end up like Vic
& Prick. `, \
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
<drap...@NOSPAMhome.com> wrote:
>> Hey look who finally woke up! BTW Hannigan I guess by your failure to
>> respond to my post in which I claimed SPNAK, there's no argument from
>> your end. I'll give that idiot Vic a couple more weeks to respond
>> (cause he's a little slow) then I'll go ahead and claim SPNAK on him
>> as well. Have a nice day. `, )
>Damn Diaper boy, your fantasy life is sure full of a lot of claims.
>As much as I would like to say that you are less pathetic than that
>right winged moron Newbomb, I can't. And that really pisses me off.
>Hell, before you came here he was easily a shoe in for MOY, now you
>went a blew it. Kind of like you blew Big Daddy, eh?
Just out of curiosity, who is "Big Daddy"? Cause there is only one
person I know by that name and he is a convicted child sex offender.
Are you conversing with pedophiles now deary? That's not really a
wise thing to do, you know. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Jesus Slut Fucker
You've the one blowing him Diaper Boy. Oh BTW how do you like the
way my nickname for you has caught on?
-Jesus
--
TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR NEWBOMB TURK, SEND EMAIL TO:
"STEP AWAY FROM THE SANDBOX! PUT THE LITTLE BOY DOWN!"
-Words spoken through a bullhorn by an anonymous policeman to
Benjamin D.
Capoeman
"Of course, having that tape released a couple of days before the
election was not an attempt to sway any uncommitted black votes to
the
Democrats, you don't think?"
-Newbomb, struggling for sanity, once again makes a complete ass out
of
himself thinking events in South Africa will somehow influence an
election
in the US (what a fucking moron).
"...fuck you Paris, just because I've had a dick in my mouth doesn't
make
me a fag..."
-John Kimball
You won't tell anyone that my pussy smells like pork, will you
Jesus?
-Sara Jaye (Miss Piggie)
"...given a choice I'd rather suck on a dick than eat pussy..."
-John Kimball
Jesus Slut Fucker
Translated: Ohhhhhhh that one hurt.
You are an idiot Diaper Boy. Look how mad I have Newbomb, he's mad
enough to shit in his hand and throw it at me. That is a flaming job
and my rep is safe. You on the other hand can't get people to stop
laughing at you long enough to
get pissed off.
Nighthawk
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:04:51 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> ><Bed Wetter©> wrote in message
news:3a4de566....@news.supernews.com...
> >> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Bed Wetter©) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out
of
> >> >> >you
> >> >>
> >> >> Hint: You're not.
> >> >
> >> >The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
> >>
> >> Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
> >> so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
> >
> >If that keeps you from crying while you're getting your diaper changed,
you
> >just keep right on thinking that.
>
> Wow, that was actually pretty original. See, when you bother to put
> some time into what you're doing you can actually stop from looking
> like a complete moronic fuckup. Oh by the way, my earlier poast...it
> wasn't a call for you to demonstrate your brain damage to Usenet. Now
> take your inane delusions elsewhere before we decide to give you shock
> treatment again. `, )
Who is *we* Bed Wetter?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Famous Last Words #47: "It's not poisonous..."
SeaFood
Nighthawk wrote in message ...
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>
>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>>
>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>> >you
>>
>> Hint: You're not.
>
>The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
I don't know, Greg. It looks like he is pulverizing himself pretty good...
SeaFood
Mad HatterŠ wrote in message <3a4e9ab4...@news.supernews.com>...
You beat the shit out of shit? Did it change
into a Madhatter? Or mayhaps a Ari or Upa...
Is South Park to intense for you? Tell us how
you beat up Gumby and of course the
Sesame Street gang. Huff....etc..
Nighthawk
news:JN316.12286$Zu.1...@e420r-sjo3.usenetserver.com...
Good point. Change what I wrote above to: The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat
the shit out of *anyone* here, other than himself.
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Random chance is what you expect; fate is what you get.
Optional Identity
GMT, the Troll "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com> Expectorated this
gratuitously obvious, attention, seeking, statement into the aethyr of
alt.usenet.kooks :
Can't find the wee in a wet bed, now there's an insult!
--
--
Optional Identity
Skepticult Rank: Colonel
Skepticult Serial Number: 321-29337-833
"During the space race, the Americans spent $4 million developing a
space-pen (a biro that does not rely on gravity: it uses compressed
gas). The Russians used pencils."
Weyoun the Dancing Borg AKA 420 explains the Cold War,
in msg ID <PujJ5.10959$bL1.2...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
"What is all this shit about masutrbating. Are you saying you don't, or
didn't in the past? Any man who doesn't whack it isn't a man, and
doesn't have a penis." Cock Rocket explains his masculinity in msg
ID <3a008d5f...@news.earthlink.net>
"You're Optional Identity??? Oh, I forgot, everyone in this group is a
carbon copy wannabe of the Cock Rocket. Get over it."
Cock Rocket has delusions anyone wants to be him!!! in msg
<3a42c89f...@news.earthlink.net>
"UM, i do NOT care what phone numbers you have dippy. if you
do what you say you will do, this will NEVER end. because simply
this, the more you do, the worse i get." BBQ Man (Emmutt Gulley)
explains Usenet dancing and invites Obsidian to lead, in msg ID
<bikj0t4tuuqg2t1b3hk0cu71pbnhgfetna@news-server>
"I have admitted to my possibly being a troll in this very thread."
Flagship1 of the Paranormal redefines his raison d'être in
msg ID<3A1FFDE8...@flagship1.com>
"Posting nude photos of children, regardless of content, is hardly
proof that I am a child molester."
St00pid, Richard Bullis, tries to justify the unjustifiable in msg ID
<pscT5.12628$9X6.3...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>
"WRONG! i am quite sane til you piss me off."
BBQ Man (Emmett Gulley) describes the anger management
skills he has developed since leaving prison, in msg ID
<an052t49c5fdttdql...@4ax.com>
"There are 20 billion people on the earth."
Dore Williamson explains how she counted herself as the
fourth member of the trinity, in msg ID
<JwAR5.6927$pZ1.1...@nntp3.onemain.com>
Nighthawk
news:csrc4t0lqbje4kjmq...@4ax.com...
I said "who", not "what"...
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Easter kit on sale now: two boards, three nails, and a martyr.
Optional Identity
Said the Princess to the Pee!
Nighthawk
Got any pics of the princess peeing?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Only XT users know that January 1, 1980, was a Tuesday.
Unknown
wrote:
If you two don't stop tryin to grope each other I'm going to lock you
in separate rooms for the rest of the day and then take away your
favorite Perry Como 8 track. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
><Bed WetterŠ> wrote in message news:3a61bea0...@news.supernews.com...
>
>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:04:51 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ><Bed WetterŠ> wrote in message
>news:3a4de566....@news.supernews.com...
>> >> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Bed WetterŠ) wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out
>of
>> >> >> >you
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hint: You're not.
>> >> >
>> >> >The Bed WetterŠ has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
>> >>
>> >> Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the head
>> >> so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
>> >
>> >If that keeps you from crying while you're getting your diaper changed,
>you
>> >just keep right on thinking that.
>>
>> Wow, that was actually pretty original. See, when you bother to put
>> some time into what you're doing you can actually stop from looking
>> like a complete moronic fuckup. Oh by the way, my earlier poast...it
>> wasn't a call for you to demonstrate your brain damage to Usenet. Now
>> take your inane delusions elsewhere before we decide to give you shock
>> treatment again. `, )
>
>Who is *we* Bed Wetter?
Hey you're the one who can't seem to stop refering to me as multiple
people Lackey. Who do I get to be this week? `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>You bea<SMACK>
So pathetic I'll just claim -=*TILT*=- on yer stupid ass again.
*sigh*...if only you could try harder. If you don't start improving
over the next couple weeks I'll just claim a Usenet wide SPNAK on yer
ass, add you to my trophy case, and then plonk you, leaving you to
forever wander after my poasts looking for tidbits to masturbate over
whilst my bots give you a nice run around. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Nighthawk
news:3a61bea0...@news.supernews.com...
> >
> >> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:04:51 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >news:3a4de566....@news.supernews.com...
> >> >> On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 07:17:36 GMT, "Nighthawk"
<som...@microsoft.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Bed Wetter©) wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit
out
> >of
> >> >> >> >you
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Hint: You're not.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope, but apparently the Mad Hatter has beat you up long side the
head
> >> >> so many times you've suffered from some sort of brain damage. `, )
> >> >
> >> >If that keeps you from crying while you're getting your diaper
changed,
> >you
> >> >just keep right on thinking that.
> >>
> >> Wow, that was actually pretty original. See, when you bother to put
> >> some time into what you're doing you can actually stop from looking
> >> like a complete moronic fuckup. Oh by the way, my earlier poast...it
> >> wasn't a call for you to demonstrate your brain damage to Usenet. Now
> >> take your inane delusions elsewhere before we decide to give you shock
> >> treatment again. `, )
> >
> >Who is *we* Bed Wetter?
>
> Hey you're the one who can't seem to stop refering to me as multiple
> people Lackey. Who do I get to be this week? `, )
How about Matthew, the Diaper Boy?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Where are those flashbacks they promised me?
Unknown
wrote:
Does it ever tire you to reply to bots? `, )
-Mad Hatter
SeaFood
Nighthawk wrote in message ...
>"SeaFood" <na...@sanctum.com> wrote in message
>news:JN316.12286$Zu.1...@e420r-sjo3.usenetserver.com...
>>
>> Nighthawk wrote in message ...
>
>> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:54:40 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>> >> >you
>> >>
>> >> Hint: You're not.
>> >
>> >The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat the shit out of *anyone* here.
>>
>> I don't know, Greg. It looks like he is pulverizing himself pretty
good...
>
>Good point. Change what I wrote above to: The Bed Wetter© has yet to beat
>the shit out of *anyone* here, other than himself.
>
>--
SeaFood
Mad HatterŠ wrote in message <3a531bfb...@news.supernews.com>...
>On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:34:47 -0800, "SeaFood" <na...@sanctum.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Nighthawk wrote in message ...
>>>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:t469mrn...@news.supernews.com...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >If I'm such a coward why is it that I'm still beating the shit out of
>>>> >you
>>>>
>>>> Hint: You're not.
>>>
>>
>>
>>I don't know, Greg. It looks like he is pulverizing himself pretty good...
>
>If you two don't stop tryin to grope each other I'm going to lock you
>in separate rooms for the rest of the day and then take away your
>favorite Perry Como 8 track. `, )
>
>-Mad Hatter
Huffin and Puffin...
SeaFood
Mad HatterŠ wrote in message <3a541c60...@news.supernews.com>...
Good question...You got to be HANKY the Xmas Poo...
Unknown
<etao...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
><HarlequinŠ> wrote in message news:3a5af934...@news.supernews.com...
>
>> >> Does it ever tire you to reply to bots? `, )
>> >
>> >Not especially...
>>
>> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
>
>If and when it happens, we'll let you know.
Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
-Harlequin
Steve Henderson
<Harlequin©> wrote in message news:3a712f91...@news.supernews.com...
> >> >> Does it ever tire you to reply to bots? `, )
> >> >
> >> >Not especially...
> >>
> >> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
> >
> >If and when it happens, we'll let you know.
>
> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
You don't have the wherewithal to reply to messages -yourself-, let alone
configure a 'bot to do so for you.
Unknown
<etao...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
><HarlequinŠ> wrote in message news:3a712f91...@news.supernews.com...
Hey, if i wanted any shit from you i'd squeeze your head.
-Harlequin
Steve Henderson
<Harlequin©> wrote in message news:3a7743cd...@news.supernews.com...
> >> >> >> Does it ever tire you to reply to bots? `, )
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Not especially...
> >> >>
> >> >> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
> >> >
> >> >If and when it happens, we'll let you know.
> >>
> >> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
> >
> >You don't have the wherewithal to reply to messages -yourself-, let alone
> >configure a 'bot to do so for you.
>
> Hey, if i wanted any shit from you i'd squeeze your head.
I have yet to even begin to give you shit, boy.
Unknown
<etao...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
><HarlequinŠ> wrote in message news:3a7743cd...@news.supernews.com...
Excuse me, we are being told that the celery will not have peanut
butter but feces of the same consistency. Sorry for any confusion or
inconvenience.
-Harlequin
John Kimball
>On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 10:43:53 -0600, "Steve Henderson"
><etao...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><Harlequin©> wrote in message news:3a7743cd...@news.supernews.com...
>>
>>> >> >> >> Does it ever tire you to reply to bots? `, )
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >Not especially...
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
>>> >> >
>>> >> >If and when it happens, we'll let you know.
>>> >>
>>> >> Does it ever tire you to make yourself look stupid? `, )
>>> >
>>> >You don't have the wherewithal to reply to messages -yourself-, let alone
>>> >configure a 'bot to do so for you.
>>>
>>> Hey, if i wanted any shit from you i'd squeeze your head.
>>
>>I have yet to even begin to give you shit, boy.
>
>Excuse me, we are being told that the celery will not have peanut
>butter but feces of the same consistency.
Something that you'd never be short of, no doubt.
--
"Having a little variety in your sex life means switching hands."
Baby Matthew AKA Mad Hatter explains his lonely
sex life in <3a23ed91....@news.supernews.com>
http://ils.unc.edu/inls300/usr/mlb/doc225.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been incontinent all my life and would like to talk to others
who have to wear diapers and share experiences. I would also like any
suggestions on which diapers have worked the best for you if you have
ever worn them.
Matt Moulton (mou...@wwics.com) AKA The Mad Hatter
Waitsburg, WA USA - Friday, May 03, 1996 at 03:43:13 (EDT)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Excuse me, we are being told that the celery will not have peanut
>>butter but feces of the same consistency.
>Something that you'd never be short of, no doubt.
We'll get along just fine as soon as
you realize i'm GOD.
-Harlequin
Unknown
<drap...@NOSPAMhome.com> wrote:
>You are an idiot Diaper Boy.
Would you like me to post the stats on how many times you've replied
to my bots?
>Look how mad I have Newbomb, he's mad
>enough to shit in his hand and throw it at me.
So I guess you're saying he's mad, huh? Do you somehow think I care?
I mean it's wonderful for you to think that making somebody mad is
such an incredible thing, but hey, I gotta tell you, it's not that big
a deal.
>That is a flaming job
>and my rep is safe.
If your reputation is that important to you, you've lost. I mean look
at me, I don't even have a set nyme, I don't care whether I look good
flaming the shit out of someone like you or not. I just do it, for
fun.
>You on the other hand can't get people to stop
>laughing at you long enough to
>get pissed off.
So I guess lying is a big thing for you, huh? I mean you yourself are
genuinely ticked off at me. Why? Because you want me to respect you,
to acknowledge you. You know I'm a good flamer, one of the best, if
not the best, and it bothers you *SO* much when I tell you that you're
not very good at it. I bothers you *SO* much that you follow up my
poast trying to justify why I should have the teeniest bit of respect
for you as a flamer. Please, I've seen better flamers in alt.Webtv.
Now get all pissed my little fireball and start replying to my bots
some more. `, )
-Mad Hatter
John Kimball
[blather]
>You know I'm a good flamer, one of the best, if
>not the best, and it
[more blather]
That's not the general consensus around here, Diaper Boy:
From: 'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
Subject: Annual alt.flame awards, 2000. The results.
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:59:23 +0100
Message-ID: <gm5p4t4k9s3k56qco...@4ax.com>
1) Best Flamer
----------------------------------------------
Menjy 58
Suzieflame 44
Hogarth 35
Saeger 32
Kirk 25
[snip]
4) Most Boring Writer
----------------------------------------------
Mad Hatter 34
^^^^^^^^^^
Sara Jaye 28
LJ Beauregard 25
S Henderson 22
alt.flamenet 19
5) Worst Flamer
----------------------------------------------
Mad Hatter 43
^^^^^^^^^^
Saeger 32
Tanner 30
Sara Jaye 29
Negron 28
8) Worst Newbie
----------------------------------------------
Mad Hatter
^^^^^^^^^
Best Punchbag
----------------------------------------------
Diaper Boy
^^^^^^^^^
For details see http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/poll00.htm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Nighthawk
Hey! Congratulations, Critter!
> 5) Worst Flamer
> ----------------------------------------------
> Mad Hatter 43
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> Saeger 32
> Tanner 30
> Sara Jaye 29
> Negron 28
>
>
> 8) Worst Newbie
> ----------------------------------------------
> Mad Hatter
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
>
>
>
> Best Punchbag
> ----------------------------------------------
> Diaper Boy
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> For details see http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/poll00.htm
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Wipe your nose. Your brains are leaking!
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>You know I'm a good flamer, one of the best, if
>>not the best, and it
>That's not the general consensus around here, Diaper Boy:
Apparently my claiming to be the best has scared you pretty bad.
Truth really hurts you, huh?
>From: 'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com>
I seriously SPNAKED that fuckup Menjy over a month ago. He's still got
poasts that he couldn't sum up the balls to reply to.
>1) Best Flamer
>----------------------------------------------
>Menjy 58
Got his ass spanked so hard he ran off crying.
>Hogarth 35
Got his ass spanked so hard he unsubscribed from AUK.
>Suzieflame 44
>Saeger 32
>Kirk 25
Never even heard of these lackwits.
>4) Most Boring Writer
>----------------------------------------------
>Mad Hatter 34
>^^^^^^^^^^
If I'm so boring why do I have more people responding to my poasts
than any other flamer on the whole of Usenet? I mean most people
don't read shit they find boring, so unless your excuse is that you're
a fuckin moron, that's the biggest PKB I've ever seen.
>Sara Jaye 28
>LJ Beauregard 25
>S Henderson 22
>alt.flamenet 19
LOL, you flame your own group, that's funny.
>5) Worst Flamer
>----------------------------------------------
>Mad Hatter 43
>^^^^^^^^^^
If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
against me has run away crying, too stupid, and too slow to keep up
with me. If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that all the jealous
little fuckups like yourself put so much effort into trying to tell me
I'm not the best. I mean if I wasn't the best you wouldn't say
anything.
>8) Worst Newbie
>----------------------------------------------
>Mad Hatter
>^^^^^^^^^
Still a newbie after being on Usenet for over 12 years, causing a
50,000+ poast flame war across three dozen groups, and spanking the
fuck out of every has been, no nothing, moron (f)Lamer across Usenet.
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Yeah your pathetic attempt to try and tell me I'm not the best is
pretty laughable. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Alex Brady
<937k8t$b38$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>:
>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:41:37 GMT, in article
><3a5bd5ee...@news.supernews.com>, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>
>>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever
>>gone against me has run away crying[SLAP]
>
>You mispelled "walk away yawning". hth
You misspelled "misspelled". HTH.
Unknown
<gbur...@databasix.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:41:37 GMT, in article
><3a5bd5ee...@news.supernews.com>, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>
>>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
>>against me has run away crying[SLAP]
>
>You mispelled "walk away yawning". hth
You misspelled "I'm so mad at Hatter for breaking my vanity mirror".
hth
What's the matter Gary, too scared to include triangle? You remember
triangle, don't you? You know, when I made you look stupid by
commenting on your pathetic little site. The one where you had
magazine clipping of things you supposedly owned. I mean wasn't that
just a riot when I pointed that out and then challenged you to actual
take a real picture of your imaginary toys...LOL...and of course you
ran away crying hoping I wouldn't ever bring it up again. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
>In article <Xns9021EE29Aalex...@130.233.43.33>,
>Is this thread still going? If so why?
You're proving my point. And doing a nice job of it. Oh but let's go
ahead and add the groups you snipped back in. We wouldn't want to
leave them out of the fun, would we? `, )
-Mad Hatter
victor
Fun? You call getting your ass kicked fun bed wetter? I guess that
makes you a sadomasochistic bed wetter.
Your friend
Vic
Unknown
wrote:
Vicky baby, how are ya? Speaking of sadomasochistic, how about your
slurping Marty...wow, now there's some torture. Hey does anyone
besides me notice that every single one of you lackwits are constantly
screaming, "we kicked yer ass, we kicked yer ass" over and over again.
And the REALLY funny part about it is that I can post literally
HUNDREDS of unresponded messages that people like you have run away
from. Just as a challenge to see if you can prove your little
argument I'd like you give a single message ID for a poast directed
towards me that I haven't responded to. You can't, can you? Now
backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
point and click no nothing. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Alex Brady
$a...@dosa.alt.net>:
>On 6 Jan 2001 21:24:26 GMT, alex...@yah.no.spam.oo.co.invalid (Alex
>Brady)wrote:
>
>>You misspelled "misspelled". HTH.
>
>You misspelled "I'm a boring twit" Timo.
Ha, you're just bitter, because I was faster than you in replying to
Gary.
Nighthawk
Quantity does NOT equal quality, Bed Wetter.
> backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
> point and click no nothing. `, )
You wouldn't have possibly meant "know-nothing," would you, moron?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* The sound of a sysop reading mail: <cr><cr><cr><cr><cr><cr><cr><cr><cr>
Unknown
wrote:
>> Vicky baby, how are ya? Speaking of sadomasochistic, how about your
>> slurping Marty...wow, now there's some torture. Hey does anyone
>> besides me notice that every single one of you lackwits are constantly
>> screaming, "we kicked yer ass, we kicked yer ass" over and over again.
>> And the REALLY funny part about it is that I can post literally
>> HUNDREDS of unresponded messages that people like you have run away
>> from. Just as a challenge to see if you can prove your little
>> argument I'd like you give a single message ID for a poast directed
>> towards me that I haven't responded to. You can't, can you? Now
>Quantity does NOT equal quality, Bed Wetter.
Is that your pathetic excuse for running away? I think it's more than
obvious that the quality of my poasts far exceeds your limited
capabilities my little jap teen raping slurper.
>> backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
>> point and click no nothing. `, )
>You wouldn't have possibly meant "know-nothing," would you, moron?
See, that's EXACTLY my point. I mean all I have to do is mispell one
fuckin word and you slurp over it. That's not flaming, hell that's
not even laming. I've seen loose floorboards that are more
interesting than you. Let me put it this way lackey, if that's the
extent of your flaming repertoire, you're a fuckin idiot. And if your
idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck outta
my way Webtv.
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
>You get what you pay for, McOptional!
>Wanna play with the big dogs spend a dime or two and
>quit telling us about how the library computer won't let you
>X post 200 mggs a day!
*snicker*....this really made you look stupid SeaFoodPlatter, can you
guess why? LOL.. `, D
-Mad Hatter
Nighthawk
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 19:12:13 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Vicky baby, how are ya? Speaking of sadomasochistic, how about your
> >> slurping Marty...wow, now there's some torture. Hey does anyone
> >> besides me notice that every single one of you lackwits are constantly
> >> screaming, "we kicked yer ass, we kicked yer ass" over and over again.
> >> And the REALLY funny part about it is that I can post literally
> >> HUNDREDS of unresponded messages that people like you have run away
> >> from. Just as a challenge to see if you can prove your little
> >> argument I'd like you give a single message ID for a poast directed
> >> towards me that I haven't responded to. You can't, can you? Now
>
> >Quantity does NOT equal quality, Bed Wetter.
>
> Is that your pathetic excuse for running away? I think it's more than
> obvious that the quality of my poasts far exceeds your limited
> capabilities my little jap teen raping slurper.
What running away? I answered the few posts of yours that you made any sense
in.
And get your facts straight. I've never raped any female, let alone a
teenaged Japanese.
> >> backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
> >> point and click no nothing. `, )
>
> >You wouldn't have possibly meant "know-nothing," would you, moron?
>
> See, that's EXACTLY my point. I mean all I have to do is mispell one
> fuckin word and you slurp over it. That's not flaming, hell that's
> not even laming. I've seen loose floorboards that are more
> interesting than you. Let me put it this way lackey, if that's the
> extent of your flaming repertoire, you're a fuckin idiot.
*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't even
know the correct word.
> And if your
> idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
> waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
> original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck outta
> my way Webtv.
I don't need your excuses, Bed Wetter..
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Be consistent, but don't do it all the time.
Unknown
wrote:
>> >Quantity does NOT equal quality, Bed Wetter.
>> Is that your pathetic excuse for running away? I think it's more than
>> obvious that the quality of my poasts far exceeds your limited
>> capabilities my little jap teen raping slurper.
>What running away? I answered the few posts of yours that you made any sense
>in.
Backpedal, backpedal, uh oh, LOOK OUT!
>And get your facts straight. I've never raped any female, let alone a
>teenaged Japanese.
Funny, I have an IRC buffer in which you outright claim to be a
pedophile. Tell us all again about how it's not pedophilia if it's in
a country outside of the US.
>> >> backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
>> >> point and click no nothing. `, )
>> >You wouldn't have possibly meant "know-nothing," would you, moron?
>> See, that's EXACTLY my point. I mean all I have to do is mispell one
>> fuckin word and you slurp over it. That's not flaming, hell that's
>> not even laming. I've seen loose floorboards that are more
>> interesting than you. Let me put it this way lackey, if that's the
>> extent of your flaming repertoire, you're a fuckin idiot.
>*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't even
>know the correct word.
When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't have
time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv. And I rarely
ever reread my own poasts, nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic that
you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
flaming.
>> And if your
>> idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
>> waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
>> original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck outta
>> my way Webtv.
>I don't need your excuses, Bed Wetter..
And nobody needs your pathetisad diaper lames, come up with something
original Webtv, or I'll expose your pedophilia in ways you can't even
begin to imagine. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Jesus Slut Fucker
Greg is a lot of things: a racist, a right winged nut, and the guy
most likely to rape your dog and steal your trash but a pedophile he
is not. I guess because you put diapers on your sorry ass you'd like
to fantasize the two of you together eh? Better start coming on to
Speedy, you and him are a natural match.
-Jesus
Unknown
>Greg is a lot of things: my butt buddy, a racist, a right winged nut, and the guy
>most likely to rape your dog and steal your trash but a pedophile he
>is not.
Okay I realize you're really stupid and slow, so I'll say it again,
only this time I'll make it easier for you.
HE...
ADMITTED...
TO...
BEING...
A...
PEDOPHILE...
If you're still having trouble grasping just tell me, I'll be more
than happy to beat yer stupid ass around the room again and see if we
can't knock a little bit of sense in there.
-Mad Hatter
Optional Identity
the Troll alex...@yah.no.spam.oo.co.invalid (Alex Brady) Expectorated
this gratuitously obvious, attention, seeking, statement into the
aethyr of alt.usenet.kooks :
Hey Meat-->Plow he's coming along nicely in the training for KOTM June
2001, don't you think?
--
--
Optional Identity
Skepticult Rank: Colonel
Skepticult Serial Number: 321-29337-833
"During the space race, the Americans spent $4 million developing a
space-pen (a biro that does not rely on gravity: it uses compressed
gas). The Russians used pencils."
Weyoun the Dancing Borg AKA 420 explains the Cold War,
in msg ID <PujJ5.10959$bL1.2...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
"What is all this shit about masutrbating. Are you saying you don't, or
didn't in the past? Any man who doesn't whack it isn't a man, and
doesn't have a penis." Cock Rocket explains his masculinity in msg
ID <3a008d5f...@news.earthlink.net>
"You're Optional Identity??? Oh, I forgot, everyone in this group is a
carbon copy wannabe of the Cock Rocket. Get over it."
Cock Rocket has delusions anyone wants to be him!!! in msg
<3a42c89f...@news.earthlink.net>
"UM, i do NOT care what phone numbers you have dippy. if you
do what you say you will do, this will NEVER end. because simply
this, the more you do, the worse i get." BBQ Man (Emmutt Gulley)
explains Usenet dancing and invites Obsidian to lead, in msg ID
<bikj0t4tuuqg2t1b3hk0cu71pbnhgfetna@news-server>
"I have admitted to my possibly being a troll in this very thread."
Flagship1 of the Paranormal redefines his raison d'être in
msg ID<3A1FFDE8...@flagship1.com>
"Posting nude photos of children, regardless of content, is hardly
proof that I am a child molester."
St00pid, Richard Bullis, tries to justify the unjustifiable in msg ID
<pscT5.12628$9X6.3...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>
"WRONG! i am quite sane til you piss me off."
BBQ Man (Emmett Gulley) describes the anger management
skills he has developed since leaving prison, in msg ID
<an052t49c5fdttdql...@4ax.com>
"There are 20 billion people on the earth."
Dore Williamson explains how she counted herself as the
fourth member of the trinity, in msg ID
<JwAR5.6927$pZ1.1...@nntp3.onemain.com>
Nighthawk
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 21:07:46 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >Quantity does NOT equal quality, Bed Wetter.
>
> >> Is that your pathetic excuse for running away? I think it's more than
> >> obvious that the quality of my poasts far exceeds your limited
> >> capabilities my little jap teen raping slurper.
>
> >What running away? I answered the few posts of yours that you made any
sense
> >in.
>
> Backpedal, backpedal, uh oh, LOOK OUT!
Think what you like. I simply refused to continue to play your little game
of cross-posting. I continued to reply, in a newsgroup you CLAIMED you were
reading. *You* are the thread-dropper here.
> >And get your facts straight. I've never raped any female, let alone a
> >teenaged Japanese.
>
> Funny, I have an IRC buffer in which you outright claim to be a
> pedophile. Tell us all again about how it's not pedophilia if it's in
> a country outside of the US.
You were speaking of rape, and of Japanese teens. Wrong on both counts.
Better go back and read that buffer again.
> >> >> backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked you little
> >> >> point and click no nothing. `, )
>
> >> >You wouldn't have possibly meant "know-nothing," would you, moron?
>
> >> See, that's EXACTLY my point. I mean all I have to do is mispell one
> >> fuckin word and you slurp over it. That's not flaming, hell that's
> >> not even laming. I've seen loose floorboards that are more
> >> interesting than you. Let me put it this way lackey, if that's the
> >> extent of your flaming repertoire, you're a fuckin idiot.
>
> >*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't even
> >know the correct word.
>
> When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't have
> time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv.
What would the fact that someone might use WebTV (other than the fact that
most of them are lamer than AOLers, or even you) have to do with someone's
thinking about what they're typing? And if you're capable of reading
headers, you can see very easily that I don't use WebTV. Thanks for proving
yourself incompetent yet again.
> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
> nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
That much is painfully obvious.
> that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic that
> you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
> flaming.
What's pathetic is that it speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence
and/or basic laziness. Better learn a better work ethic, kid, or you'll have
a hard time keeping a job when you get out of high school.
> >> And if your
> >> idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
> >> waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
> >> original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck outta
> >> my way Webtv.
>
> >I don't need your excuses, Bed Wetter..
>
> And nobody needs your pathetisad diaper lames, come up with something
> original Webtv, or I'll expose your pedophilia in ways you can't even
> begin to imagine. `, )
ROTFLMAO! You misquote me about sexual experiences overseas, and compare
that to your own admitted diaper fetish? Oh, the irony!
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Now on CD ROM, classic taglines of the computer era.
The Right Reverend Newbomb Turk
wrote:
>>>"Meat-->Plow" <fluf...@lart.com> wrote in <9384je$huj
>>>$a...@dosa.alt.net>:
>>>
>>>>On 6 Jan 2001 21:24:26 GMT, alex...@yah.no.spam.oo.co.invalid (Alex
>>>>Brady)wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You misspelled "misspelled". HTH.
>>>>
>>>>You misspelled "I'm a boring twit" Timo.
>>>
>>>Ha, you're just bitter, because I was faster than you in replying to
>>>Gary.
>>
>>Hey Meat-->Plow he's coming along nicely in the training for KOTM June
>>2001, don't you think?
>
>Yes, Alex has got all the attributes for a KOTM. He just needs to
>intensify a bit. Problem is at the moment, he's a bit boring and few
>feel the urge to poke him with sharp sticks.
Coming from that used to be lamer Max Hell, I find this amusing.
How you been doing Kevin?
The Right Reverend Newbomb Turk
Rector, Our Lady of Perpetual Motion, ULC
ICQ #22039552
FLAME AOY - 1995
FLAME AOY Lifetime Achievement Award - 1997
MODERATOR, alt.flamenet
MODERATOR Alt.Hackers.Malicious
FNB - Alpha Test Team Leader
Special Agent, Echomail Liberation Army
Fidonet Zone 1, H.N.I.C.
Fidonet Galactic Coordinator
Asshole Net <> Fidonet Internet Gateway Coordinator
Director, Asshole Net Research & Development Branch
victor
>On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 02:19:50 GMT, victor6...@agoron.com (victor)
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 23:18:19 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 22:18:48 GMT, optional...@my-deja.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <Xns9021EE29Aalex...@130.233.43.33>,
>>>> alex...@yah.no.spam.oo.co.invalid (Alex Brady) wrote:
>>>>> Gary L. Burnore <gbur...@databasix.com> wrote in
>>>>> <937k8t$b38$1...@astroconsulting.databasix.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> >On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:41:37 GMT, in article
>>>>> ><3a5bd5ee...@news.supernews.com>, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever
>>>>> >>gone against me has run away crying[SLAP]
>>>>> >
>>>>> >You mispelled "walk away yawning". hth
>>>>>
>>>>> You misspelled "misspelled". HTH.
>>>>
>>>>Is this thread still going? If so why?
>>>
>>>You're proving my point. And doing a nice job of it. Oh but let's go
>>>ahead and add the groups you snipped back in. We wouldn't want to
>>>leave them out of the fun, would we? `, )
>>>
>>>-Mad Hatter
>>
>>
>>Fun? You call getting your ass kicked fun bed wetter? I guess that
>>makes you a sadomasochistic bed wetter.
>
>Vicky baby, how are ya?
I'm doing good thanks for asking.
>Speaking of sadomasochistic, how about your
>slurping Marty...wow, now there's some torture.
Torture would be sitting in the same room as you as you get your
jollys off sitting around in a soiled diaper.
> Hey does anyone
>besides me notice that every single one of you lackwits are constantly
>screaming, "we kicked yer ass, we kicked yer ass" over and over again.
If you took the diaper off your head you would realize that *everyone*
notices that your getting your ass kicked.
>And the REALLY funny part about it is that I can post literally
>HUNDREDS of unresponded messages
Maybe the people at alt.spank-the-diaper-boy are tired of giving you
pleasure by spanking your sorry ass.
> that people like you have run away
>from.
Don't cry diaper lad i'm still here. Do yourself a favor and tell
mommy she needs to burp you.
> Just as a challenge
What! Are you going to see if you can become the most spanked persona
on usenet next to Gary Burnore.
> to see if you can prove your little
>argument I'd like you give a single message ID
> for a poast directed
>towards me that I haven't responded to.
BWHAHAHHA!!!! How bout I give you the message ID *SPANKEE*
>You can't, can you?
Are you going to hold your breath until you turn blue now?
> Now
>backpedal and whine about how I'm getting my ass kicked
I don't have to backpedal.
Your getting your ass kicked. Its time you changed your diapers.
because you've become delusional from the smell.
>you little
>point and click no nothing. `, )
I see your wit is getting better. <snicker>
Your friend
Vic
>-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>> Backpedal, backpedal, uh oh, LOOK OUT!
>Think wha<SMACK>
I didn't ask you for another backpedal lackey.
>> >And get your facts straight. I've never raped any female, let alone a
>> >teenaged Japanese.
>> Funny, I have an IRC buffer in which you outright claim to be a
>> pedophile. Tell us all again about how it's not pedophilia if it's in
>> a country outside of the US.
>You were speaking of rape, and of Japanese teens. Wrong on both counts.
>Better go back and read that buffer again.
Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
again if you really want me to, your choice.
>> >*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't even
>> >know the correct word.
>> When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't have
>> time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv.
>What would the fact that someone might use WebTV (other than the fact that
>most of them are lamer than AOLers, or even you) have to do with someone's
>thinking about what they're typing? And if you're capable of reading
>headers, you can see very easily that I don't use WebTV. Thanks for proving
>yourself incompetent yet again.
Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you didn't
graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
certainly indicate.
>> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
bots make.
>> nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
>That much is painfully obvious.
Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
>> that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic that
>> you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
>> flaming.
>What's pathetic is that it speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence
>and/or basic laziness. Better learn a better work ethic, kid, or you'll have
>a hard time keeping a job when you get out of high school.
What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames, even
after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
>> >> And if your
>> >> idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
>> >> waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
>> >> original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck outta
>> >> my way Webtv.
>> >I don't need your excuses, Bed Wetter..
>> And nobody needs your pathetisad diaper lames, come up with something
>> original Webtv, or I'll expose your pedophilia in ways you can't even
>> begin to imagine. `, )
>ROTFLMAO! You misquote me about sexual experiences overseas, and compare
>that to your own admitted diaper fetish? Oh, the irony!
Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite a
bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's plain
to see that I am indeed not a diaper fetishist and you are indeed a
pedophile. Thanks for proving that for everyone lackwit.
-Matthew
Unknown
wrote:
>>Vicky baby, how are ya?
>I'm doing good thanks for asking.
Still slurping up Marty, or are you starting to grow past that?
>>Speaking of sadomasochistic, how about your
>>slurping Marty...wow, now there's some torture.
>Torture would be sitting in the same room as you as you get your
>jollys off sitting around in a soiled diaper.
This coming from the guy who gets his jollies off molesting young
puppies.
>> Hey does anyone
>>besides me notice that every single one of you lackwits are constantly
>>screaming, "we kicked yer ass, we kicked yer ass" over and over again.
>If you took the diaper off your head you would realize that *everyone*
>notices that your getting your ass kicked.
This coming from the guy who has had his ass spanked, kicked,
blistered, and generally beaten the shit out of so many times he's
become like the ultimate Usenet joke. Everyone on Usenet knows that
the nyme Vic == puppy fucker.
>>And the REALLY funny part about it is that I can post literally
>>HUNDREDS of unresponded messages
>Maybe the people at alt.spank-the-diaper-boy are tired of giving you
>pleasure by spanking your sorry ass.
Maybe that's just the lamest, stupidest, most incoherent backpedal you
could think of. Now hurry up and give me another one.
-Matthew
Nighthawk
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 01:32:47 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Backpedal, backpedal, uh oh, LOOK OUT!
>
> >Think wha<SMACK>
>
> I didn't ask you for another backpedal lackey.
Couldn't respond to the facts, eh?
> >> >And get your facts straight. I've never raped any female, let alone a
> >> >teenaged Japanese.
>
> >> Funny, I have an IRC buffer in which you outright claim to be a
> >> pedophile. Tell us all again about how it's not pedophilia if it's in
> >> a country outside of the US.
>
> >You were speaking of rape, and of Japanese teens. Wrong on both counts.
> >Better go back and read that buffer again.
>
> Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
> again if you really want me to, your choice.
Feel free. You'll show everyone just how low your reading comprehension
*is*, moron.
> >> >*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't
even
> >> >know the correct word.
>
> >> When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't have
> >> time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv.
>
> >What would the fact that someone might use WebTV (other than the fact
that
> >most of them are lamer than AOLers, or even you) have to do with
someone's
> >thinking about what they're typing? And if you're capable of reading
> >headers, you can see very easily that I don't use WebTV. Thanks for
proving
> >yourself incompetent yet again.
>
> Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you didn't
> graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
> certainly indicate.
Nice backpedal.
> >> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>
> >Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
>
> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
> bots make.
>
> >> nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
>
> >That much is painfully obvious.
>
> Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
> dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
Someone certainly needs to.
> >> that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic that
> >> you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
> >> flaming.
>
> >What's pathetic is that it speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence
> >and/or basic laziness. Better learn a better work ethic, kid, or you'll
have
> >a hard time keeping a job when you get out of high school.
>
> What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames, even
> after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
Almost as pathetic as you making the same misteaks over and over, even after
they've been called to your attention?
> >> >> And if your
> >> >> idea of retaliation to that accusation is to say "I'm not going to
> >> >> waste my time trying to flame you", you only serve to further the
> >> >> original point. You lose, fuckin deal with it, or get the fuck
outta
> >> >> my way Webtv.
>
> >> >I don't need your excuses, Bed Wetter..
>
> >> And nobody needs your pathetisad diaper lames, come up with something
> >> original Webtv, or I'll expose your pedophilia in ways you can't even
> >> begin to imagine. `, )
>
> >ROTFLMAO! You misquote me about sexual experiences overseas, and compare
> >that to your own admitted diaper fetish? Oh, the irony!
>
> Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
> indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
> it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
Because you're embarrassed about them, based on some of your earlier
reactions.
> enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite a
> bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's plain
I use it quite a bit, whether you're accusing me of pedophilia or not.
> to see that I am indeed not a diaper fetishist and you are indeed a
> pedophile. Thanks for proving that for everyone lackwit.
Dream on, Bet Wetter.
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Praise: What you receive when you are no longer alive.
Unknown
>We know how reliable your word is.
Who needs my word when I've already poasted proof and you even
admitted in several post that you fucked a teenage asian whore. The
one thing you didn't mention though, was how much you paid her. Or
maybe you didn't. I bet you just took her out back and molested her,
huh?
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>> >Think wha<SMACK>
>> I didn't ask you for another backpedal lackey.
>Couldn't respond to the facts, eh?
You had facts? I'm sorry, they must have gotten lost in your
stupidity somewhere.
>> >You were speaking of rape, and of Japanese teens. Wrong on both counts.
>> >Better go back and read that buffer again.
>> Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
>> again if you really want me to, your choice.
>Feel free. You'll show everyone just how low your reading comprehension
>*is*, moron.
Grammar and spelling lames again, huh? It's okay, nobody really
expected any better.
>> >> >*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't even
>> >> >know the correct word.
>> >> When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't have
>> >> time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv.
>> >What would the fact that someone might use WebTV (other than the fact that
>> >most of them are lamer than AOLers, or even you) have to do with someone's
>> >thinking about what they're typing? And if you're capable of reading
>> >headers, you can see very easily that I don't use WebTV. Thanks for proving
>> >yourself incompetent yet again.
>> Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you didn't
>> graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
>> certainly indicate.
>Nice backpedal.
That wasn't a backpedal, that was a statement of fact, you're just too
much in denial to accept it.
>> >> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>> >Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
>> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
>> bots make.
No arguments with this I see.
>> >> nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
>> >That much is painfully obvious.
>> Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
>> dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
>Someone certainly needs to.
Seeing as how you're my new secretary, I think I'll also have you wear
a short, tight little skirt, sheer nylon pantyhose, maybe some black,
frilly, little laced panties...mmmm...you're lookin pretty hot there
bitch. Now go feel yourself up and get some work done.
>> >> that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic that
>> >> you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
>> >> flaming.
>> >What's pathetic is that it speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence
>> >and/or basic laziness. Better learn a better work ethic, kid, or you'll have
>> >a hard time keeping a job when you get out of high school.
>> What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames, even
>> after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
>Almost as pathetic <SMACK>
Autoflame grade C+
You just admitted that you were being pathetic.
>> Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
>> indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
>> it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
>Because you're embarrassed about them, based on some of your earlier
>reactions.
Why would I be embarrassed over something that I supposedly enjoy? I
mean...that's pretty fuckin stupid, don't you think. Oh...oh no, I
guess you don't think, huh?
>> enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite a
>> bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's plain
>I use it quite a bit, whether you're accusing me of pedophilia or not.
But you use it a lot more when your pedophilia is being pointed out.
BTW, it's not an accusation when you yourself have admitted to fucking
an asian teenage whore up the ass.
>> to see that I am indeed not a diaper fetishist and you are indeed a
>> pedophile. Thanks for proving that for everyone lackwit.
>Dream on, Bet Wetter.
Lame on, Child Molester.
-Mad Hatter
John Kimball
>On Fri, 05 Jan 2001 04:59:56 -0500, John Kimball
><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>You know I'm a good flamer, one of the best, if
>>>not the best, and it
>
>>That's not the general consensus around here, Diaper Boy:
>
>Apparently my claiming to be the best has scared you pretty bad.
Scared? Of you??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You're just the object of
ridicule here, Diaper Boy, nothing more.
>Truth really hurts you, huh?
Reality really hurts you, huh?
>>From: 'Menjy' <me...@SPAMBLOCKdatabasix.com>
>
>I seriously SPNAKED that fuckup Menjy over a month ago. He's still got
>poasts that he couldn't sum up the balls to reply to.
Didn't I give you the definition of "bored" last month, you
incontinent shit-splattered fuckup? Try getting an education
elsewhere, Diaper Boy.
>>1) Best Flamer
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Menjy 58
>
>Got his ass spanked so hard he ran off crying.
*giggle*
>>Hogarth 35
>
>Got his ass spanked so hard he unsubscribed from AUK.
Hogarth wasn't subscribed to auk, cunter.
>>Suzieflame 44
>>Saeger 32
>>Kirk 25
>
>Never even heard of these lackwits.
You never heard of using a toilet either. That doesn't mean they don't
exist.
>>4) Most Boring Writer
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Mad Hatter 34
>>^^^^^^^^^^
>
>If I'm so boring why do I have more people responding to my poasts
>than any other flamer on the whole of Usenet? I mean most people
>don't read shit they find boring, so unless your excuse is that you're
>a fuckin moron, that's the biggest PKB I've ever seen.
Simple. You're such an easy target.
>>Sara Jaye 28
>>LJ Beauregard 25
>>S Henderson 22
>>alt.flamenet 19
>
>LOL, you flame your own group, that's funny.
That's not my group, Diaper Boy.
>>5) Worst Flamer
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Mad Hatter 43
>>^^^^^^^^^^
>
>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
>against me has run away crying, too stupid, and too slow to keep up
>with me. If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that all the jealous
>little fuckups like yourself put so much effort into trying to tell me
>I'm not the best. I mean if I wasn't the best you wouldn't say
>anything.
See above re: boring.
>
>>8) Worst Newbie
>>----------------------------------------------
>>Mad Hatter
>>^^^^^^^^^
>
>Still a newbie after being on Usenet for over 12 years, causing a
Post proof, you urine soaked urinal cake.
>50,000+ poast flame war across three dozen groups, and spanking the
>fuck out of every has been, no nothing, moron (f)Lamer across Usenet.
*yawn*
>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>
>Yeah your pathetic attempt to try and tell me I'm not the best is
>pretty laughable. `, )
You're not the best, you're the worst. The awards prove it pumpkin.
Even flamenet gave you "clueless moron of the year." So how does it
feel to be the laughingstock of usenet for 2000, are you going to go
to Disney now? I hear they have changing tables in every bathroom
there - You should feel right at home.
--
"Having a little variety in your sex life means switching hands."
Baby Matthew AKA Mad Hatter explains his lonely
sex life in <3a23ed91....@news.supernews.com>
http://ils.unc.edu/inls300/usr/mlb/doc225.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been incontinent all my life and would like to talk to others
who have to wear diapers and share experiences. I would also like any
suggestions on which diapers have worked the best for you if you have
ever worn them.
Matt Moulton (mou...@wwics.com) AKA The Mad Hatter
Waitsburg, WA USA - Friday, May 03, 1996 at 03:43:13 (EDT)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Hogarth
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:41:37 GMT, (Mad Hatter©) wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 05 Jan 2001 04:59:56 -0500, John Kimball
>><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>Suzieflame 44
>>>Saeger 32
>>>Kirk 25
>>
>>Never even heard of these lackwits.
>
>You never heard of using a toilet either. That doesn't mean they don't
>exist.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
_________
Hogarth
_________
"I appease my sexually desires with masterbation. Most people think of
masterbation as bad but in my opinion it is a lot better than having
sex"
Diaper Boy (mou...@hscis.net, formerly mou...@wwics.com) confesses
all in: http://rainforest.parentsplace.com/dialog/get/teens/29/4.html
"I enjoy doing it by hand, increases my typing dexterity"
Diaper Boy confesses again in Message-ID:
<3a3c8c2...@news.supernews.com>
"Actually I did it by hand, and it only took about 15 minutes, it was
nice though while it lasted"
Diaper Boy finally climaxes in Message-ID:
<3a3c8c2...@news.supernews.com>
John Kimball
I think you're confusing Burnore with Hannigan, Diaper Boy.
Fuckhead.
Kristopher K. Barrett
the Giant Obsidian Doorknocker, and spake the following non-sequitur:
>On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 02:04:23 GMT, new...@home.com (The Right Reverend
>Newbomb Turk)wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 07 Jan 2001 19:07:10 -0500, "Meat-->Plow" <fluf...@lart.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>>>"Meat-->Plow" <fluf...@lart.com> wrote in <9384je$huj
>>>>>$a...@dosa.alt.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 6 Jan 2001 21:24:26 GMT, alex...@yah.no.spam.oo.co.invalid (Alex
>>>>>>Brady)wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You misspelled "misspelled". HTH.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You misspelled "I'm a boring twit" Timo.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ha, you're just bitter, because I was faster than you in replying to
>>>>>Gary.
>>>>
>>>>Hey Meat-->Plow he's coming along nicely in the training for KOTM June
>>>>2001, don't you think?
>>>
>>>Yes, Alex has got all the attributes for a KOTM. He just needs to
>>>intensify a bit. Problem is at the moment, he's a bit boring and few
>>>feel the urge to poke him with sharp sticks.
>>
>>Coming from that used to be lamer Max Hell, I find this amusing.
>
>HUH?
>
>
>>How you been doing Kevin?
>
>I never did Kevin, how do you find him?
>
Hey!!!11!!! It's my turn to be Kevin this week!
--
--
****************************************
Kristopher K. Barrett, Usenet Knave
mhm26x22 Meow!
Official ZOG ID# 0,000,000,016
Emmett and CENKOC mirrors available
at my Page o' HTH website:
http://404-between-the-ears.com/
Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est
****************************************
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>You mispelled "walk away yawning". hth
>>You misspelled "I'm so mad at Hatter for breaking my vanity mirror".
>>hth
>>What's the matter Gary, too scared to include triangle? You remember
>>triangle, don't you? You know, when I made you look stupid by
>>commenting on your pathetic little site. The one where you had
>>magazine clipping of things you supposedly owned. I mean wasn't that
>>just a riot when I pointed that out and then challenged you to actual
>>take a real picture of your imaginary toys...LOL...and of course you
>>ran away crying hoping I wouldn't ever bring it up again. `, )
>I think you're confusing Burnore with Hannigan, Diaper Boy.
Naw...really? Unfortunetly it only caused Vic and Prick to show up, I
was hoping for Mr Martin to come out and play, but I guess he's smart
enough to know not to screw with me. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>That's not the general consensus around here, Diaper Boy:
>>Apparently my claiming to be the best has scared you pretty bad.
>Scared?
Stupid?
>Of you??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You're just the object of
>ridicule here, Diaper Boy, nothing more.
So says the idiot who is going around answering poasts for other
people because he's afraid I'm making alt.(f)lamenet look even
stupider than it's already made itself.
>>Truth really hurts you, huh?
>Reality really hurts you, huh?
No, not at all.
>>I seriously SPNAKED that fuckup Menjy over a month ago. He's still got
>>poasts that he couldn't sum up the balls to reply to.
>Didn't I give you the definition of "bored" last month, you
>incontinent shit-splattered fuckup? Try getting an education
>elsewhere, Diaper Boy.
You know, I really hate having to teach the Usenet retarded, but I'll
go ahead and make you look stupid again by pointing out the fact that
if you were bored you wouldn't care so much. I mean if you were truly
bored you wouldn't put so much concentrated effort into trying to get
me to stop. And that is what you're trying to do. You want me to
stop making you look stupid. The unfortunate thing for you...is that
I'm not going to stop making you look stupid...EVER. Ask Whoops
about that, he knows ALL about being made to look stupid. He finally
learned that the only way to make me stop was for him to run away, but
unfortunately for him that doesn't stop me from continuing to point
out his idiocy.
>>>1) Best Flamer
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Menjy 58
>>Got his ass spanked so hard he ran off crying.
>*giggle*
You just love pretending to be a little giggling school girl, huh?
>>>Hogarth 35
>>Got his ass spanked so hard he unsubscribed from AUK.
>Hogarth wasn't subscribed to auk, cunter.
And how would you know? What are you, his butt buddy?
>>>Suzieflame 44
>>>Saeger 32
>>>Kirk 25
>>Never even heard of these lackwits.
>You never heard of using a toilet either.
Why would I need one when I have someone like you to slurp my shit up?
>>>4) Most Boring Writer
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Mad Hatter 34
>>>^^^^^^^^^^
>>If I'm so boring why do I have more people responding to my poasts
>>than any other flamer on the whole of Usenet? I mean most people
>>don't read shit they find boring, so unless your excuse is that you're
>>a fuckin moron, that's the biggest PKB I've ever seen.
>Simple. You're such an easy target.
Simple backpedal for such a simpleton. Don't you think you could have
come up with a better excuse than that? I mean take a look at your
entire poast lackwit, it's just one fuckin excuse after another. Your
entire defense against me is hiding in a corner and backpedaling.
>>>Sara Jaye 28
>>>LJ Beauregard 25
>>>S Henderson 22
>>>alt.flamenet 19
>>
>>LOL, you flame your own group, that's funny.
>That's not my group, Diaper Boy.
Oh really? And what is your group? Oh...oh that's right, you don't
have one. Nobody likes you, huh Pinball? -=*TILT*=-
>>>5) Worst Flamer
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Mad Hatter 43
>>>^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
>>against me has run away crying, too stupid, and too slow to keep up
>>with me. If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that all the jealous
>>little fuckups like yourself put so much effort into trying to tell me
>>I'm not the best. I mean if I wasn't the best you wouldn't say
>>anything.
>See above re: boring.
See above re: pathetic backpedal.
>>>8) Worst Newbie
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>Mad Hatter
>>>^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>Still a newbie after being on Usenet for over 12 years, causing a
>Post proof, you urine soaked urinal cake.
What do you mean post proof you complete fucknugget, don't you know
how to operate Deja? Or is that simplistic task just too fuckin much
for ya?
>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>>Yeah your pathetic attempt to try and tell me I'm not the best is
>>pretty laughable. `, )
>You're not the best, you're the worst. The awards prove it pumpkin.
Your pathetic awards don't mean ANYTHING to me little one. They only
prove that the lot of you are so pathetic that you're willing go to
incredibly kooky means to try and stop me from making you look stupid.
>Even flamenet gave you "clueless moron of the year."
In less than a month too, and only after I so obviously made them all
look like morons when I invoked them into causing a cascade of shit
that fucked AHM over royally. Yes, alt.(f)Lamenet truly won that
award, didn't they.
>o how does it
>feel to be the laughingstock of usenet for 2000, are you going to go
>to Disney now? I hear they have changing tables in every bathroom
>there - You should feel right at home.
http://www.amihotornot.com/r/?eid=NES8AR&key=YPX
-=*TILT*=-
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>>You never heard of using a toilet either. That doesn't mean they don't
>>exist.
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Well who needs a toilet when I have stupid morons like you to slurp my
shit up? Now get on yer knees and start lickin! BTW
Hogwart...SPANK!!!
Maybe at some point you'll be able to sum up the balls to reply to
those poasts you ran away from last month. Now do something stupid
like claim I didn't spank you so that I can repost what you so
cowardly ran away from. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
>>Ah Seafood, hello again. I see you are a bright enough lad, so next time
>>you are actually in a library have a look at the word "SARDONIC" in one
>>of their dictionaries, ok? I am not refering to this thread, but the one
>>that took two days to upset you!
>"SARDONIC"...A wine from the Outback served with dingo pee...
Uh oh, looks like somebody is all pissy. What's the matter Seafood,
doesn't anyone like you?
>In the first place, we now know that you are a Roo Hopping Wanker,
>albeit a bit sharper than the average Aussie. But, you still have a
>dingo as a pet, AND your mailbox is 10 miles from your house cause
>that's where the road ends and...
Uh oh, looks like Sea Food has got himself all puffed up. Onward with
the 3rd grade level insults!
>>Optional Identity (please try and hurt me with another well thought out
>>name lame <SLAP>)
>My misteake Roo Man...You're no friend of Hattie, but then, who is?
Friends are only enemies that don't have the guts to kill you. I
don't have any friends, there are people who see you getting your ass
beaten and they laugh about it, that doesn't make them my friends
though, Stupid. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Hogarth
Heh heh heh! I was in South America for three weeks over Xmas, as you
well know. Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
that, Diddums.
John Kimball
>On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 06:36:01 -0500, John Kimball
><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>That's not the general consensus around here, Diaper Boy:
>
>>>Apparently my claiming to be the best has scared you pretty bad.
>
>>Scared?
>
>Stupid?
IKY.
>
>>Of you??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You're just the object of
>>ridicule here, Diaper Boy, nothing more.
>
>So says the idiot who is going around answering poasts for other
>people
I'm just having fun slapping you around, Diaper Boy.
> because he's afraid I'm making alt.(f)lamenet look even
>stupider than it's already made itself.
This is not possible.
>
>>>Truth really hurts you, huh?
>
>>Reality really hurts you, huh?
>
>No, not at all.
Just admit it, Baby Matt. You'll feel much better, trust me.
>>>I seriously SPNAKED that fuckup Menjy over a month ago. He's still got
>>>poasts that he couldn't sum up the balls to reply to.
>
>>Didn't I give you the definition of "bored" last month, you
>>incontinent shit-splattered fuckup? Try getting an education
>>elsewhere, Diaper Boy.
>
>You know, I really hate having to teach the Usenet retarded, but I'll
>go ahead and make you look stupid again by pointing out the fact that
>if you were bored you wouldn't care so much.
I didn't say *I* was bored, Uber-moron, So here's another IKYABWAI.
What's it like to eat your own words, incontinent Luvs© loser?
> I mean if you were truly
>bored you wouldn't put so much concentrated effort into trying to get
>me to stop.
See above, clusterfuck.
> And that is what you're trying to do.
No, I want you to keep posting. Really.
> You want me to
>stop making you look stupid. The unfortunate thing for you...is that
>I'm not going to stop making you look stupid...EVER.
(Tee hee!)
>Ask Whoops
>about that, he knows ALL about being made to look stupid. He finally
>learned that the only way to make me stop was for him to run away, but
>unfortunately for him that doesn't stop me from continuing to point
>out his idiocy.
OK, one more time for the clue-deficient:
bore2 —n. tiresome or dull person or thing. —v. (-ring) weary by
tedious talk or dullness. bored adj. boring adj. [origin unknown]
>>>>1) Best Flamer
>>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>Menjy 58
>
>>>Got his ass spanked so hard he ran off crying.
>
>>*giggle*
>
>You just love pretending to be a little giggling school girl, huh?
Did you get a woody when you were thinking that?
>
>>>>Hogarth 35
>
>>>Got his ass spanked so hard he unsubscribed from AUK.
>
>>Hogarth wasn't subscribed to auk, cunter.
>
>And how would you know? What are you, his butt buddy?
Ahhh, the tried and true usenet classic: the fag lame. In any case,
I've not seen him post to AUK (not counting crossposts) in the 18
months that I've been reading it.
>
>>>>Suzieflame 44
>>>>Saeger 32
>>>>Kirk 25
>
>>>Never even heard of these lackwits.
>
>>You never heard of using a toilet either.
>
>Why would I need one when I have someone like you to slurp my shit up?
Thanks for admitting to your disgusting proclivities, Diaper Boy.
>>>>4) Most Boring Writer
>>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>Mad Hatter 34
>>>>^^^^^^^^^^
>
>>>If I'm so boring why do I have more people responding to my poasts
>>>than any other flamer on the whole of Usenet? I mean most people
>>>don't read shit they find boring, so unless your excuse is that you're
>>>a fuckin moron, that's the biggest PKB I've ever seen.
>
>>Simple. You're such an easy target.
>
>Simple backpedal for such a simpleton. Don't you think you could have
>come up with a better excuse than that?
There was no backpedal, Diaper Boy. Here's another word for the day:
Occams razor: It is the principle that states that the simplest
explanation for a phenomenon is the one preferred by nature.
> I mean take a look at your
>entire poast lackwit, it's just one fuckin excuse after another.
^^^^^^
You misspelled "smack upside the head."
> Your
>entire defense against me is hiding in a corner and backpedaling.
There were no backpedals, Diaper Boy, is this another word you don't
understand? Perhaps you should do some research before coming back and
continuing to making an utter fool of yourself.
>>>>Sara Jaye 28
>>>>LJ Beauregard 25
>>>>S Henderson 22
>>>>alt.flamenet 19
>>>
>>>LOL, you flame your own group, that's funny.
>
>>That's not my group, Diaper Boy.
>
>Oh really? And what is your group?
DYOFR, I'll leave that one for you to figure out for yourself, Baby
Matt. I'm not getting paid for your education here you know,
brain-dead fucksickle.
> Oh...oh that's right, you don't
>have one.
(sigh) see above, snotling.
> Nobody likes you, huh Pinball? -=*TILT*=-
I'm not looking for friends here, Diaper Boy.
>>>>5) Worst Flamer
>>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>Mad Hatter 43
>>>>^^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
>>>against me has run away crying, too stupid, and too slow to keep up
>>>with me. If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that all the jealous
>>>little fuckups like yourself put so much effort into trying to tell me
>>>I'm not the best. I mean if I wasn't the best you wouldn't say
>>>anything.
>
>>See above re: boring.
>
>See above re: pathetic backpedal.
See above re: "I didn't say *I* was bored, Uber-moron"
>>>>8) Worst Newbie
>>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>Mad Hatter
>>>>^^^^^^^^^
>>>
>>>Still a newbie after being on Usenet for over 12 years, causing a
>
>>Post proof, you urine soaked urinal cake.
>
>What do you mean post proof you complete fucknugget, don't you know
>how to operate Deja? Or is that simplistic task just too fuckin much
>for ya?
Bullshit. You got your computer for Christmas 1995 from Mommy and
Daddy (unless he's seen the light and fled long ago...), shortly after
you were posting in those disgusting nappy chat rooms and message
boards.
(retch.)
>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>
>>>Yeah your pathetic attempt to try and tell me I'm not the best is
>>>pretty laughable. `, )
>
>>You're not the best, you're the worst. The awards prove it pumpkin.
>
>Your pathetic awards don't mean ANYTHING to me little one. They only
>prove that the lot of you are so pathetic that you're willing go to
>incredibly kooky means to try and stop me from making you look stupid.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>
>>Even flamenet gave you "clueless moron of the year."
>
>In less than a month too, and only after I so obviously made them all
>look like morons when I invoked them into causing a cascade of shit
>that fucked AHM over royally.
[insert massive yawn here.]
> Yes, alt.(f)Lamenet truly won that
>award, didn't they.
Umm no, you did.
>>o how does it
>>feel to be the laughingstock of usenet for 2000, are you going to go
>>to Disney now? I hear they have changing tables in every bathroom
>>there - You should feel right at home.
No answer?
John Kimball
wrote:
>On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 06:36:01 -0500, John Kimball
><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:41:37 GMT, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 05 Jan 2001 04:59:56 -0500, John Kimball
>>><john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>Suzieflame 44
>>>>Saeger 32
>>>>Kirk 25
>>>
>>>Never even heard of these lackwits.
>>
>>You never heard of using a toilet either. That doesn't mean they don't
>>exist.
>
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>
[Bows.]
--
"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
carpet..."
Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID: <3A016FD9...@home.com>
Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
AKA Paskel Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
Parole Officer:
Chris Hudson
d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
(405)681-4663
Unknown
wrote:
>Heh heh heh!
Ease up on the nitrous there Hogfart, wouldn't want to see you go into
another fit of stupidity.
>I was in South America for three weeks over Xmas, as you
>well know.
I had no idea you were in SA, nor do I really care, that's no excuse
for not responding. I mean it seems yer dumb ass is back, so get to
work lil bitch. Don't be such a pussy.
>Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
>officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
>that, Diddums.
Official to who lackwit? AAVFFF? Like every member of that group
hasn't gotten their asses beaten by me and numerous others on a
multitude of occasions. I mean alt.(f)Lamenet may be the most
ridiculed of all the disruptive groups on Usenet, but AAVFFF is a VERY
close second. They would probably be the highest if they weren't so
fuckin obscure. You can tell me I'm the worst flamer on the entire
fuckin face of the planet, but unless it's coming from like snuh,
romath, AUK, etc, it doesn't mean jack shit. And it doesn't change
the fact that when it comes to flamers I invoke more controversy and
more poasts than ANYONE on Usenet. When I poast, people listen and
they reply. I have more power in a single nose hair than you have in
your entire delusional fantasy realm of stupidity.
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
<john...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Apparently my claiming to be the best has scared you pretty bad.
>>>Scared?
>>Stupid?
>IKY.
Can you say, lame?
>>>Of you??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You're just the object of
>>>ridicule here, Diaper Boy, nothing more.
>>So says the idiot who is going around answering poasts for other
>>people
>I'm just having fun slapping you around, Diaper Boy.
Oh look another backpedal, how original for you, sure didn't see that
one coming. Why do you always respond to my poasts like you're on
trial for something? Just kinda curious.
>> because he's afraid I'm making alt.(f)lamenet look even
>>stupider than it's already made itself.
>This is not possible.
I think so, I think it may actually turn out to be an entirely new
breed of stupid, much like AAVFFF.
>>>>Truth really hurts you, huh?
>>>Reality really hurts you, huh?
>>No, not at all.
>Just admit it, Baby Matt. I'll feel much better, trust me.
Oh I know it would make you feel better, but then that's not really my
goal here, now is it?
>>>>I seriously SPNAKED that fuckup Menjy over a month ago. He's still got
>>>>poasts that he couldn't sum up the balls to reply to.
>>>Didn't I give you the definition of "bored" last month, you
>>>incontinent shit-splattered fuckup? Try getting an education
>>>elsewhere, Diaper Boy.
>>You know, I really hate having to teach the Usenet retarded, but I'll
>>go ahead and make you look stupid again by pointing out the fact that
>>if you were bored you wouldn't care so much.
>I didn't say *I* was bored, Uber-moron, So here's another IKYABWAI.
>What's it like to eat your own words, incontinent Luvs© loser?
So if you're not bored I guess that makes you what, stupid? An idiot
perhaps? Now do something really moronic like try to claim that
you're getting some kind of enjoyment out of being run around in my
rat maze. That will greatly amuse me.
>> I mean if you were truly
>>bored you wouldn't put so much concentrated effort into trying to get
>>me to stop.
>See above, clusterfuck.
Slurping up my own flames now, what's the matter lackwit, too stupid
to come up with your own material? Oh BTW here's the proof. You
started using the word starting 12/11/2000 after you slurped it up
from my poasts. No one else in any of the groups you normally hang
out in have used the word so it's more than apparent you're imitating
me...how...flattering. `, )
:01/08/2001 Re: Death-from-boredom metal alt.rock-n-roll.metal John Kimball
:01/01/2001 Re: Anyone on RSPW have more rec.sport.pro-wrestli John Pelan
:12/22/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet John Kimball
:12/21/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet John Kimball
:12/11/2000 Re: ||||||| GARY YOUR A LOSE triangle.general John Kimball
:12/24/2000 Re: SE Hacking - How to deal alt.2600 Mad Hatter©
:12/22/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet Mad Hatter©
:12/21/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamnet Mad Hatter©
:12/20/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.snuh Mad Hatter©
:12/20/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamnet Mad Hatter©
:12/20/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamnet Mad Hatter©
:12/20/2000 Re: Diaper Boy breaks world alt.usenet.kooks Mad Hatter©
:12/19/2000 Nomination alt.usenet.kooks Mad Hatter©
:12/17/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet Mad Hatter©
:12/17/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet Mad Hatter©
:12/17/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet Mad Hatter©
:12/17/2000 Re: Jesse Jackass Threatens alt.flamenet Mad Hatter©
:12/16/2000 Re: Diaper Boy breaks world alt.usenet.kooks Mad Hatter©
:12/14/2000 Re: ITS OVER!!!! BUSH WINS - rec.climbing Mad Dog
:12/11/2000 Re: Defacement of foreign KP alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:12/07/2000 Re: Thanks for the fun alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:12/06/2000 Re: ((((( SPANKED! ))))) str alt.revenge Mad Hatter©
:12/06/2000 Re: BIGGLES, THY NAME IS...B alt.alien.vampire.flo Mad Hatter©
:12/06/2000 Re: ((((( SPANKED! ))))) str alt.revenge Mad Hatter©
:12/06/2000 Re: BIGGLES, THY NAME IS...B alt.usenet.kooks Mad Hatter©
:12/03/2000 Re: BIGGLES, THY NAME IS...B alt.alien.vampire.flo Mad Hatter©
:12/02/2000 Re: BIGGLES, THY NAME IS...B alt.alien.vampire.flo Mad Hatter©
:12/01/2000 Re: YO AHM, listen up, I've alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:11/30/2000 Re: YO AHM, listen up, I've alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:11/30/2000 Re: YO Mad Blabber wants a s alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:11/29/2000 Re: Just rename this lame gr alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
:11/28/2000 Re: An apology to AHM... alt.hackers.malicious Mad Hatter©
>> And that is what you're trying to do.
>No, I want you to keep posting. Really.
It's nice to know my social engineering skills have not been lost.
>>Ask Whoops
>>about that, he knows ALL about being made to look stupid. He finally
>>learned that the only way to make me stop was for him to run away, but
>>unfortunately for him that doesn't stop me from continuing to point
>>out his idiocy.
>OK, one more time for the clue-deficient:
>
>bore2 —n. tiresome or dull person or thing. —v. (-ring) weary by
>tedious talk or dullness. bored adj. boring adj. [origin unknown]
Hey look, you're backpedaling for Whoops now, why do you suppose
you're doing that? What are you so afraid of little one?
>>>*giggle*
>>You just love pretending to be a little giggling school girl, huh?
>Did you get a woody when you were thinking that?
Sorry, I'm not going to help you indulge in any sordid sexual fantasy
that you want to try and play out.
>>>>Got his ass spanked so hard he unsubscribed from AUK.
>>>Hogarth wasn't subscribed to auk, cunter.
>>And how would you know? What are you, his butt buddy?
>Ahhh, the tried and true usenet classic: the fag lame. In any case,
>I've not seen him post to AUK (not counting crossposts) in the 18
>months that I've been reading it.
Well nobody ever said you were very bright. As for fag
lames...well...it really wasn't. You're not a fag, just his little
bitch, that's all.
>>>>Never even heard of these lackwits.
>>>You never heard of using a toilet either.
>>Why would I need one when I have someone like you to slurp my shit up?
>Thanks for admitting to your disgusting proclivities, Diaper Boy.
This coming from the guy who just admitted that he is indeed the one
slurping up my shit. Autoflame grade A-. Try again stupid.
>>>>If I'm so boring why do I have more people responding to my poasts
>>>>than any other flamer on the whole of Usenet? I mean most people
>>>>don't read shit they find boring, so unless your excuse is that you're
>>>>a fuckin moron, that's the biggest PKB I've ever seen.
>>>Simple. You're such an easy target.
>>Simple backpedal for such a simpleton. Don't you think you could have
>>come up with a better excuse than that?
>There was no backpedal, Diaper Boy.
Backpedaling with a denial of backpedaling, how nice.
> Here's another word for the day:
>Occams razor:
You obviously slurped it up from mainstream media, probably from the
movie Contact. I believe you're actually speaking of Ockham's Razor
or the law of parsimony.
>It is the principle that states that the simplest
>explanation for a phenomenon is the one preferred by nature.
Principle? Where are you getting yer definition retard? It's not a
principle, not by a long shot.
>> I mean take a look at your
>>entire poast lackwit, it's just one fuckin excuse after another.
> ^^^^^^
>You misspelled "smack upside the head."
That's it, make yourself look stupid and avoid facing the accusation
with facts. What's the more simpler explanation stupid, that I'm the
worst flamer despite having caused numerous flame wars and invoking
more responses from people than any other flamer or troll on Usenet
which is easily seen by examining Deja, or that you're somehow kicking
my ass by stupidly bleating your transparent victory over me again and
again and again. You do realize that you're not very convincing,
you're only making things worse for you by pissing other people off.
See lackey, I'm USING you to not only increase my poast count but to
flood certain groups that I dislike (AHM).
>> Your
>>entire defense against me is hiding in a corner and backpedaling.
>There were no backpedals, Diaper Boy, is this another word you don't
>understand? Perhaps you should do some research before coming back and
>continuing to making an utter fool of yourself.
Oh look, yet ANOTHER backpedal. Here's a thought stupid, why don't
you try explaining WHY and HOW you're not backpedaling. I mean if
you're not backpedaling, what the fuck are you doing, making yourself
look like an idiot? That's really the only other choice you have. So
which is it?
>>>>LOL, you flame your own group, that's funny.
>>>That's not my group, Diaper Boy.
>>Oh really? And what is your group?
>DYOFR, I'll leave that one for you to figure out for yourself, Baby
>Matt. I'm not getting paid for your education here you know,
>brain-dead fucksickle.
So are you claiming to be a reg, or are you claiming to somehow own
the entire group? Pussysickle.
>> Oh...oh that's right, you don't
>>have one.
>(sigh) see above, snotling.
(sigh) see above, snotslurp.
>> Nobody likes you, huh Pinball? -=*TILT*=-
>I'm not looking for friends here, Diaper Boy.
Well it's nice to know you're aware of your limitations.
>>>>If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that every person who has ever gone
>>>>against me has run away crying, too stupid, and too slow to keep up
>>>>with me. If I'm such a bad flamer why is it that all the jealous
>>>>little fuckups like yourself put so much effort into trying to tell me
>>>>I'm not the best. I mean if I wasn't the best you wouldn't say
>>>>anything.
>>>See above re: boring.
>>See above re: pathetic backpedal.
>See above re: "I didn't say *I* was bored, Uber-moron"
I said you were backpedaling stupid, not that you were bored.
>>>>>8) Worst Newbie
>>>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>>>Mad Hatter
>>>>>^^^^^^^^^
>>>>
>>>>Still a newbie after being on Usenet for over 12 years, causing a
>>>Post proof, you urine soaked urinal cake.
>>What do you mean post proof you complete fucknugget, don't you know
>>how to operate Deja? Or is that simplistic task just too fuckin much
>>for ya?
>Bullshit. You got your computer for Christmas 1995 from Mommy and
>Daddy (unless he's seen the light and fled long ago...), shortly after
>you were posting in those disgusting nappy chat rooms and message
>boards.
>
>(retch.)
Actually my first machine was donated to me from a university back in
87, it was an old Apple II. After that I got an AST 386, with 16mb of
ram, a 33Mhz processor, and a half gig HD, it was considered
incredibly powerful at the time. Around 91 or 92 I got a Packard Hell
machine, then in 93 I built my own machine rather than buy one and
I've been doing that ever since. Sorry to make you look stupid again,
but that's just the way things go. There is plenty of proof that I've
been on the Inet for a LONG time, you're just too fuckin stupid to
find it. So either poast the proof, or admit your idiocy lackwit.
>>>>>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
>>>>Yeah your pathetic attempt to try and tell me I'm not the best is
>>>>pretty laughable. `, )
>>>You're not the best, you're the worst. The awards prove it pumpkin.
>>Your pathetic awards don't mean ANYTHING to me little one. They only
>>prove that the lot of you are so pathetic that you're willing go to
>>incredibly kooky means to try and stop me from making you look stupid.
>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
That's the kind of response you give when you're afraid.
>>>Even flamenet gave you "clueless moron of the year."
>>In less than a month too, and only after I so obviously made them all
>>look like morons when I invoked them into causing a cascade of shit
>>that fucked AHM over royally.
>[insert massive yawn here.]
Just a yawn? What's the matter? Can't you refute my claim? Oh, oh
that's right, you CAN'T. I fucked AHM by using alt.(f)Lamenet, and
because they were all afraid of looking stupid they nominated me for
the award they had already won.
>> Yes, alt.(f)Lamenet truly won that
>>award, didn't they.
>Umm no, you did.
So refute my claim lackwit. What's the matter, too stupid to think of
a plausible backpedal? If you want I can even poast exact instances
where alt.(f)Lamenet regs admitted that I trolled them and that they
were no longer going to be my bitches and help me. You need me to
start posting those Lackey? I'll be more than happy to. Now try and
think of a better defense than, "You're not a good flamer and I'm not
backpedaling".
>>>o how does it
>>>feel to be the laughingstock of usenet for 2000, are you going to go
>>>to Disney now? I hear they have changing tables in every bathroom
>>>there - You should feel right at home.
>No answer?
I didn't really want to know how exactly it is that you found out
there's a changing table in every bathroom at Disney. I figured that
we just shouldn't go there, I'm not really one to indulge in any
sordid pedophilic fantasies like you. So keep your changing table
knowledge to yourself if you please.
-Mad Hatter
The Right Reverend Newbomb Turk
>>Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
>>officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
>>that, Diddums.
>
>Official to who lackwit? AAVFFF? Like every member of that group
>hasn't gotten their asses beaten by me and numerous others on a
>multitude of occasions. I mean alt.(f)Lamenet may be the most
>ridiculed of all the disruptive groups on Usenet, but AAVFFF is a VERY
>close second. They would probably be the highest if they weren't so
>fuckin obscure. You can tell me I'm the worst flamer on the entire
>fuckin face of the planet, but unless it's coming from like snuh,
>romath, AUK, etc, it doesn't mean jack shit. And it doesn't change
>the fact that when it comes to flamers I invoke more controversy and
>more poasts than ANYONE on Usenet. When I poast, people listen and
>they reply. I have more power in a single nose hair than you have in
>your entire delusional fantasy realm of stupidity.
>
Blow me, asswipe...
Unknown
Newbomb Turk) wrote:
>>>Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
>>>officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
>>>that, Diddums.
>>Official to who lackwit? AAVFFF? Like every member of that group
>>hasn't gotten their asses beaten by me and numerous others on a
>>multitude of occasions. I mean alt.(f)Lamenet may be the most
>>ridiculed of all the disruptive groups on Usenet, but AAVFFF is a VERY
>>close second. They would probably be the highest if they weren't so
>>fuckin obscure. You can tell me I'm the worst flamer on the entire
>>fuckin face of the planet, but unless it's coming from like snuh,
>>romath, AUK, etc, it doesn't mean jack shit. And it doesn't change
>>the fact that when it comes to flamers I invoke more controversy and
>>more poasts than ANYONE on Usenet. When I poast, people listen and
>>they reply. I have more power in a single nose hair than you have in
>>your entire delusional fantasy realm of stupidity.
>Blow me, asswipe...
Respond to me again and prove my point futher, lackwit... `, )
-Mad Hatter
Optional Identity
GMT, the Troll new...@home.com (The Right Reverend Newbomb Turk)
Expectorated this gratuitously obvious, attention, seeking, statement
into the aethyr of alt.usenet.kooks :
>On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:52:45 GMT, (Mad HatterŠ) wrote:
>
>>>Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
>>>officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
>>>that, Diddums.
>>
>>Official to who lackwit? AAVFFF? Like every member of that group
>>hasn't gotten their asses beaten by me and numerous others on a
>>multitude of occasions. I mean alt.(f)Lamenet may be the most
>>ridiculed of all the disruptive groups on Usenet, but AAVFFF is a VERY
>>close second. They would probably be the highest if they weren't so
>>fuckin obscure. You can tell me I'm the worst flamer on the entire
>>fuckin face of the planet, but unless it's coming from like snuh,
>>romath, AUK, etc, it doesn't mean jack shit. And it doesn't change
>>the fact that when it comes to flamers I invoke more controversy and
>>more poasts than ANYONE on Usenet. When I poast, people listen and
>>they reply. I have more power in a single nose hair than you have in
>>your entire delusional fantasy realm of stupidity.
>>
>
>Blow me, asswipe...
>
>
>The Right Reverend Newbomb Turk
Flame Lesson 3:
Is this the best you can do? I will translate what you said:
"OUCH, stop flaming me and spnaking me so hard at the same time!"
Retards. Can't even hold a candle to Mad Hatter, (teh officull wrost
falmer in all usenet!) you are all horrible failures as human beings.
If things don't start improving I'm going to go poke more kooks with
sticks, at least that is fun.
--
--
Optional Identity
Skepticult Rank: Colonel
Skepticult Serial Number: 321-29337-833
"During the space race, the Americans spent $4 million developing a
space-pen (a biro that does not rely on gravity: it uses compressed
gas). The Russians used pencils."
Weyoun the Dancing Borg AKA 420 explains the Cold War,
in msg ID <PujJ5.10959$bL1.2...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
"What is all this shit about masutrbating. Are you saying you don't, or
didn't in the past? Any man who doesn't whack it isn't a man, and
doesn't have a penis." Cock Rocket explains his masculinity in msg
ID <3a008d5f...@news.earthlink.net>
"You're Optional Identity??? Oh, I forgot, everyone in this group is a
carbon copy wannabe of the Cock Rocket. Get over it."
Cock Rocket has delusions anyone wants to be him!!! in msg
<3a42c89f...@news.earthlink.net>
"UM, i do NOT care what phone numbers you have dippy. if you
do what you say you will do, this will NEVER end. because simply
this, the more you do, the worse i get." BBQ Man (Emmutt Gulley)
explains Usenet dancing and invites Obsidian to lead, in msg ID
<bikj0t4tuuqg2t1b3hk0cu71pbnhgfetna@news-server>
"I have admitted to my possibly being a troll in this very thread."
Flagship1 of the Paranormal redefines his raison d'ętre in
Jesus Slut Fucker
You big meanie. Leave Newbomb alone. He is almost defenseless in a
battle of wits. Ooooohhhhhhhhhh kind of think of it the two of you
are pretty much evenly matched. 'cept I don't think he wears
diapers.
-Jesus
--
TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR NEWBOMB TURK, SEND EMAIL TO:
"STEP AWAY FROM THE SANDBOX! PUT THE LITTLE BOY DOWN!"
-Words spoken through a bullhorn by an anonymous policeman to
Benjamin D.
Capoeman
"Of course, having that tape released a couple of days before the
election was not an attempt to sway any uncommitted black votes to
the
Democrats, you don't think?"
-Newbomb, struggling for sanity, once again makes a complete ass out
of
himself thinking events in South Africa will somehow influence an
election
in the US (what a fucking moron).
"...fuck you Paris, just because I've had a dick in my ass doesn't
make
me a fag..."
-Newbomb Turk
You won't tell anyone that my pussy smells like pork, will you
Jesus?
-Sara Jaye (Miss Piggie)
"...given a choice I'd rather suck on a dick than eat pussy..."
-John Kimball
Nighthawk
Forget who it was you had your story screwed up about, moron?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future.
Nighthawk
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 04:18:49 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >Think wha<SMACK>
>
> >> I didn't ask you for another backpedal lackey.
>
> >Couldn't respond to the facts, eh?
>
> You had facts? I'm sorry, they must have gotten lost in your
> stupidity somewhere.
>
> >> >You were speaking of rape, and of Japanese teens. Wrong on both
counts.
> >> >Better go back and read that buffer again.
>
> >> Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
> >> again if you really want me to, your choice.
>
> >Feel free. You'll show everyone just how low your reading comprehension
> >*is*, moron.
>
> Grammar and spelling lames again, huh? It's okay, nobody really
> expected any better.
No. Just like in the log you have, you're just too damn stupid to understand
what you read unless every little detail is explained for you.
> >> >> >*I'm* the idiot? That wasn't a simple misspelling, dolt. You didn't
even
> >> >> >know the correct word.
>
> >> >> When you're typing at around 125 to 150 words a minute you don't
have
> >> >> time to sit and ponder over the words like you do Webtv.
>
> >> >What would the fact that someone might use WebTV (other than the fact
that
> >> >most of them are lamer than AOLers, or even you) have to do with
someone's
> >> >thinking about what they're typing? And if you're capable of reading
> >> >headers, you can see very easily that I don't use WebTV. Thanks for
proving
> >> >yourself incompetent yet again.
>
> >> Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you didn't
> >> graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
> >> certainly indicate.
>
> >Nice backpedal.
>
> That wasn't a backpedal, that was a statement of fact, you're just too
> much in denial to accept it.
It was a backpedal, lamer. Got any more bullshit excuses?
> >> >> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>
> >> >Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
>
> >> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
> >> bots make.
>
> No arguments with this I see.
Sure I do... How many resonses do you get to that idiocy?
> >> >> nor do I bother to spell check them. Not
>
> >> >That much is painfully obvious.
>
> >> Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
> >> dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
>
> >Someone certainly needs to.
>
> Seeing as how you're my new secretary, I think I'll also have you wear
> a short, tight little skirt, sheer nylon pantyhose, maybe some black,
> frilly, little laced panties...mmmm...you're lookin pretty hot there
> bitch. Now go feel yourself up and get some work done.
Take your sexual fantasies to alt.butt.boyz.rodeo. No one here cares.
> >> >> that any of that changes the fact that you're so fuckin pathetic
that
> >> >> you actually think attacking a persons spelling and grammar is
> >> >> flaming.
>
> >> >What's pathetic is that it speaks volumes about your lack of
intelligence
> >> >and/or basic laziness. Better learn a better work ethic, kid, or
you'll have
> >> >a hard time keeping a job when you get out of high school.
>
> >> What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames, even
> >> after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
>
> >Almost as pathetic <SMACK>
>
> Autoflame grade C+
>
> You just admitted that you were being pathetic.
Still can't understand simple statements, can you. The quote you clipped
there was a question, not a statement.
> >> Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
> >> indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
> >> it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
>
> >Because you're embarrassed about them, based on some of your earlier
> >reactions.
>
> Why would I be embarrassed over something that I supposedly enjoy? I
> mean...that's pretty fuckin stupid, don't you think. Oh...oh no, I
> guess you don't think, huh?
For the same reason Bill Clinton got embarrassed over getting caught getting
a blowjob from an intern. Tou need a course in logic, moron.
> >> enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite a
> >> bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's plain
>
> >I use it quite a bit, whether you're accusing me of pedophilia or not.
>
> But you use it a lot more when your pedophilia is being pointed out.
> BTW, it's not an accusation when you yourself have admitted to fucking
> an asian teenage whore up the ass.
Sure, but that's a far cry from what you were originally claiming. Did you
finally open up that log and get someone to explain it to you?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* A belly button is just there.
Unknown
wrote:
>> >> Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
>> >> again if you really want me to, your choice.
>> >Feel free. You'll show everyone just how low your reading comprehension
>> >*is*, moron.
>> Grammar and spelling lames again, huh? It's okay, nobody really
>> expected any better.
>No.
Exactly, it's nice to know you're not in denial over the fact.
>> >> Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you didn't
>> >> graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
>> >> certainly indicate.
>> >Nice backpedal.
>> That wasn't a backpedal, that was a statement of fact, you're just too
>> much in denial to accept it.
>It was a backpedal, lamer.
You can say that over and over again without actually explaining why
it supposedly is...but only if you want to further prove your
stupidity. I say go for it!
>Got any more bullshit excuses?
Why, are you starting to run low on them?
>> >> >> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>> >> >Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
>> >> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
>> >> bots make.
>> No arguments with this I see.
>Sure.
I'm glad you agree.
>> >> Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
>> >> dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
>> >Someone certainly needs to.
>> Seeing as how you're my new secretary, I think I'll also have you wear
>> a short, tight little skirt, sheer nylon pantyhose, maybe some black,
>> frilly, little laced panties...mmmm...you're lookin pretty hot there
>> bitch. Now go feel yourself up and get some work done.
>Take your sexual fantasies to alt.butt.boyz.rodeo. No one here cares.
What does yer imagined homosexuality have to do with what I said
little woman? When are you going to start accepting that bloody
little spot between your thighs and start dressing more like the
little woman you are.
>> >> What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames, even
>> >> after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
>> >Almost as pathetic <SMACK>
>> Autoflame grade C+
>>
>> You just admitted that you were being pathetic.
>Still can't understand simple statements, can you. The quote you clipped
>there was a question, not a statement.
No it was a statement, I didn't clip anything. Don't try and hide
your stupidity from us.
>> >> Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
>> >> indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
>> >> it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
>> >Because you're embarrassed about them, based on some of your earlier
>> >reactions.
>> Why would I be embarrassed over something that I supposedly enjoy? I
>> mean...that's pretty fuckin stupid, don't you think. Oh...oh no, I
>> guess you don't think, huh?
>For the same reason Bill Clinton got embarrassed over getting caught getting
>a blowjob from an intern.
How do you know that Bill Clinton got embarrassed? What'd you give
him a blow job too?
>Tou need a course in logic, moron.
"Tou" need a course in critical thinking and spelling.
>> >> enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite a
>> >> bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's plain
>> >I use it quite a bit, whether you're accusing me of pedophilia or not.
>> But you use it a lot more when your pedophilia is being pointed out.
>> BTW, it's not an accusation when you yourself have admitted to fucking
>> an asian teenage whore up the ass.
>Sure, but that's a far cry from what you were originally claiming. Did you
>finally open up that log and get someone to explain it to you?
Wait, wait, wait, let me see if I can get this straight, you don't see
anything wrong with fucking a 12 year old asian whore? I mean
theoretically some trailer park trash moron in the US could start
pimpin out their 12 year old daughter to all the local pedos, so I
guess you don't see anything wrong with that either, huh? Why don't
you just set the record straight for all of us and explain which types
of pedophilia are okay, and which aren't. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>> Who needs my word when I've already poasted proof and you even
>> admitted in several post that you fucked a teenage asian whore. The
>> one thing you didn't mention though, was how much you paid her. Or
>> maybe you didn't. I bet you just took her out back and molested her,
>> huh?
>Forget who it was you had your story screwed up about, moron?
Tell us about which forms of pedophilia are okay, and which aren't,
share yer trailer trash philosophy with us. `, )
-Mad Hatter
Nighthawk
And why is it you posted the above message to JSF? Can't remember what
stories you're making up about who, dumbass?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Piss on you! I'm workin' for Mel Brooks!
Nighthawk
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:42:16 GMT, "Nighthawk" <som...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >> Want me to poast it again? I'll glady make you look stupid all over
> >> >> again if you really want me to, your choice.
>
> >> >Feel free. You'll show everyone just how low your reading
comprehension
> >> >*is*, moron.
>
> >> Grammar and spelling lames again, huh? It's okay, nobody really
> >> expected any better.
>
> >No.
>
> Exactly, it's nice to know you're not in denial over the fact.
Now you've added post-editing to your bag of tricks... What's next? Mommy
flames?
> >> >> Just because you're not using Webtv to paost, doesn't mean you
didn't
> >> >> graduate from there last week, which your behavior would more than
> >> >> certainly indicate.
>
> >> >Nice backpedal.
>
> >> That wasn't a backpedal, that was a statement of fact, you're just too
> >> much in denial to accept it.
>
> >It was a backpedal, lamer.
>
> You can say that over and over again without actually explaining why
> it supposedly is...but only if you want to further prove your
> stupidity. I say go for it!
>
> >Got any more bullshit excuses?
>
> Why, are you starting to run low on them?
Not so long as you continue your whining in here.
> >> >> >> And I rarely ever reread my own poasts,
>
> >> >> >Havaing read a few of them myself, I can see why.
>
> >> >> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
> >> >> bots make.
>
> >> No arguments with this I see.
>
> >Sure.
>
> I'm glad you agree.
More post-editing? Lamer...
> >> >> Well why would I need to worry about spell checking when I have your
> >> >> dumb ass to copy edit every single one of my poasts.
>
> >> >Someone certainly needs to.
>
> >> Seeing as how you're my new secretary, I think I'll also have you wear
> >> a short, tight little skirt, sheer nylon pantyhose, maybe some black,
> >> frilly, little laced panties...mmmm...you're lookin pretty hot there
> >> bitch. Now go feel yourself up and get some work done.
>
> >Take your sexual fantasies to alt.butt.boyz.rodeo. No one here cares.
>
> What does yer imagined homosexuality have to do with what I said
> little woman? When are you going to start accepting that bloody
> little spot between your thighs and start dressing more like the
> little woman you are.
ROTFLMAO! At least you have an active imagination, faggot.
> >> >> What's REALLY pathetic is that you're STILL using grammar lames,
even
> >> >> after you're smacked across the face and told they're lame.
>
> >> >Almost as pathetic <SMACK>
>
> >> Autoflame grade C+
> >>
> >> You just admitted that you were being pathetic.
>
> >Still can't understand simple statements, can you. The quote you clipped
> >there was a question, not a statement.
>
> No it was a statement, I didn't clip anything. Don't try and hide
> your stupidity from us.
You're a liar, too? What was it you said about liars earlier? Nice
autoflame...
> >> >> Let me point out a large fallacy in your thinking little one. If I
> >> >> indeed had a diaper fetish, then why would you constantly try to use
> >> >> it as a form of attack? I mean if I truly enjoyed them, wouldn't I
>
> >> >Because you're embarrassed about them, based on some of your earlier
> >> >reactions.
>
> >> Why would I be embarrassed over something that I supposedly enjoy? I
> >> mean...that's pretty fuckin stupid, don't you think. Oh...oh no, I
> >> guess you don't think, huh?
>
> >For the same reason Bill Clinton got embarrassed over getting caught
getting
> >a blowjob from an intern.
>
> How do you know that Bill Clinton got embarrassed? What'd you give
> him a blow job too?
He certainly appeared that way in his news conferences and speeches about
it.
> >Tou need a course in logic, moron.
>
> "Tou" need a course in critical thinking and spelling.
LOL! A spelling lame? Whine about them some more, bitch!
> >> >> enjoy such "attacks"? I've noticed that you seem to enjoy it quite
a
> >> >> bit when I accuse you of pedophilia, so using simple logic it's
plain
>
> >> >I use it quite a bit, whether you're accusing me of pedophilia or not.
>
> >> But you use it a lot more when your pedophilia is being pointed out.
> >> BTW, it's not an accusation when you yourself have admitted to fucking
> >> an asian teenage whore up the ass.
>
> >Sure, but that's a far cry from what you were originally claiming. Did
you
> >finally open up that log and get someone to explain it to you?
>
> Wait, wait, wait, let me see if I can get this straight, you don't see
> anything wrong with fucking a 12 year old asian whore? I mean
> theoretically some trailer park trash moron in the US could start
> pimpin out their 12 year old daughter to all the local pedos, so I
> guess you don't see anything wrong with that either, huh? Why don't
> you just set the record straight for all of us and explain which types
> of pedophilia are okay, and which aren't. `, )
How did we go from teen-aged to 12? You just can't keep a damned thing
straight, can you?
--
Nighthawk
Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year - 1999
* Disco is making a comeback.
Unknown
wrote:
>> >> Grammar and spelling lames again, huh? It's okay, nobody really
>> >> expected any better.
>> >No.
>> Exactly, it's nice to know you're not in denial over the fact.
>Now you've added post-editing to your bag of tricks... What's next? Mommy
>flames?
Want some advice? What you just spattered out...that's not the
correct way to flame against someone who poast edits. Try again
though, next time try to be a little more original and a lot less
stupid.
>> >> >Nice backpedal.
>> >> That wasn't a backpedal, that was a statement of fact, you're just too
>> >> much in denial to accept it.
>> >It was a backpedal, lamer.
>> You can say that over and over again without actually explaining why
>> it supposedly is...but only if you want to further prove your
>> stupidity. I say go for it!
>> >Got any more bullshit excuses?
>> Why, are you starting to run low on them?
>Not so long as you continue your whining in here.
Autoflame grade C+. It's like you were tied to the tracks and that
stupid ol train just kept runnin over ya, didn't it? Just kept runnin
over ya! Why don't you divulge a little further and tell us all about
your quest to find bullshit excuses. `, )
>> >> >> A few, you read every single one of them you idiot, even the ones my
>> >> >> bots make.
>> >> No arguments with this I see.
>> >Sure.
>> I'm glad you agree.
>More post-editing? Lamer...
More "you're post editing, stop it." lames? Don't be such a fuckin
pussy lackwit, if you can't handle the heat just jack yourself off and
think happy, happy thoughts.
>> >> Seeing as how you're my new secretary, I think I'll also have you wear
>> >> a short, tight little skirt, sheer nylon pantyhose, maybe some black,
>> >> frilly, little laced panties...mmmm...you're lookin pretty hot there
>> >> bitch. Now go feel yourself up and get some work done.
>> >Take your sexual fantasies to alt.butt.boyz.rodeo. No one here cares.
>> What does yer imagined homosexuality have to do with what I said
>> little woman? When are you going to start accepting that bloody
>> little spot between your thighs and start dressing more like the
>> little woman you are.
>ROTFLMAO! At least you have an active imagination, faggot.
You accuse me of using fag lames and then your next response is a fag
lame...that's kind of...hmmm...ironic, huh? I also like how you moan
and bitch about me poast editing when you your stupid self have done
it on a variety of occasions.
>> >> Autoflame grade C+
>> >>
>> >> You just admitted that you were being pathetic.
>> >Still can't understand simple statements, can you. The quote you clipped
>> >there was a question, not a statement.
>> No it was a statement, I didn't clip anything. Don't try and hide
>> your stupidity from us.
>You're a liar, too?
No, I'm not a liar at all, why do you ask?
>> How do you know that Bill Clinton got embarrassed? What'd you give
>> him a blow job too?
>He certainly appeared that way in his news conferences and speeches about
>it.
Autoflame grade B-. Go and tell us all about how you gave Clinton a
blow job, we are all dying to hear about it. You know...yer makin all
this WAY too easy. I set em up...you just walk right into em. Who
wants to bet the next response from this k0oKiEy is a fag lame?
>> >Tou need a course in logic, moron.
>>
>> "Tou" need a course in critical thinking and spelling.
>LOL! A spelling lame?
I wanted to see what it would be like to be as stupid as you. You
should be flattered.
>Whine about them some more, bitch!
Imitate me some more, bitch!
>> Wait, wait, wait, let me see if I can get this straight, you don't see
>> anything wrong with fucking a 12 year old asian whore? I mean
>> theoretically some trailer park trash moron in the US could start
>> pimpin out their 12 year old daughter to all the local pedos, so I
>> guess you don't see anything wrong with that either, huh? Why don't
>> you just set the record straight for all of us and explain which types
>> of pedophilia are okay, and which aren't. `, )
>How did we go from teen-aged to 12? You just can't keep a damned thing
>straight, can you?
Backpedal, backpedal, uh oh, LOOK OUT! You avoided the questions
little one, why is that? Why don't you want to talk about the 12 year
old little girl you fucked in the Philippines? Are you afraid of
having your pedophilia exposed? Awww....I guess it sucks to be you,
huh?
-Mad Hatter
Unknown
wrote:
>> >Forget who it was you had your story screwed up about, moron?
>> Tell us about which forms of pedophilia are okay, and which aren't,
>> share yer trailer trash philosophy with us. `, )
>And why is it you posted the above message to JSF? Can't remember what
>stories you're making up about who, dumbass?
Do you always act this stupid, or only when you're trying to hide your
pedophilia fetish?
-Mad Hatter
Optional Identity
GMT, the Troll Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
Expectorated this gratuitously obvious, attention, seeking, statement
into the aethyr of alt.usenet.kooks :
>"Mad Diaper BoyŠ" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 22:57:15 GMT, new...@home.com (The Right Reverend
>> Newbomb Turk) wrote:
>>
>> >>>Anyway, what's the point of flaming you when you're
>> >>>officially the Worst Flamer On Usenet? You can't go any lower than
>> >>>that, Diddums.
>>
>> >>Official to who lackwit? AAVFFF? Like every member of that group
>> >>hasn't gotten their asses beaten by me and numerous others on a
>> >>multitude of occasions. I mean alt.(f)Lamenet may be the most
>> >>ridiculed of all the disruptive groups on Usenet, but AAVFFF is a VERY
>> >>close second. They would probably be the highest if they weren't so
>> >>fuckin obscure. You can tell me I'm the worst flamer on the entire
>> >>fuckin face of the planet, but unless it's coming from like snuh,
>> >>romath, AUK, etc, it doesn't mean jack shit. And it doesn't change
>> >>the fact that when it comes to flamers I invoke more controversy and
>> >>more poasts than ANYONE on Usenet. When I poast, people listen and
>> >>they reply. I have more power in a single nose hair than you have in
>> >>your entire delusional fantasy realm of stupidity.
>>
>> >Blow me, asswipe...
>>
>> Respond to me again and prove my point futher, lackwit... `, )
>
>
>You big meanie. Leave Newbomb alone. He is almost defenseless in a
>battle of wits. Ooooohhhhhhhhhh kind of think of it the two of you
>are pretty much evenly matched. 'cept I don't think he wears
>diapers.
>
>
Hey slut fucker, you would have more (i.e. some) credibility if you
tried to flame him without the obligatory diaper lame! Ah, forget it,
you just won't ever be able to flame anyone, face it.