Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Powerful Love Spells

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Joseph Littleshoes

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 4:08:09 AM7/18/08
to
WitchesCorner wrote:

> On Jul 17, 9:31�pm, "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Is this automated spam or, you saying you can't resist ren's spell?
>>
>>
>>
>>"WitchesCorner" <witchescor...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Please subscribe to my blog athttp://witches-corner.blogspot.com/or
>>>visit my websitewww.witchescorner.com- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> I'm not posting automated spam at all! I do everything manually and
> am just trying to promote my blog and spread information on love spells

Joseph Littleshoes

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 4:20:02 AM7/18/08
to
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:

Fortunately for me you are such a nice person that my pointing out to
you what seems to me your less than honesty with yourself - much less
any one else - and with or for which, perhaps, you are less than capable
of being with me, suffice it to say, it secures for me a vague
complacence in commenting on your schemes:)
--
Joseph Littleshoes

aine

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 1:53:31 PM7/18/08
to
On Jul 18, 1:20 am, Joseph Littleshoes <jpsti...@isp.com> wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> > WitchesCorner wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 17, 9:31�pm, "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Is this automated spam or, you saying you can't resist ren's spell?
>
> >>> "WitchesCorner" <witchescor...@live.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Please subscribe to my blog athttp://witches-corner.blogspot.com/or
> >>>> visit my websitewww.witchescorner.com-Hide quoted text -

>
> >>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> I'm not posting automated spam at all!  I do everything manually and
> >> am just trying to promote my blog and spread information on love spells
>
> Fortunately for me you are such a nice person that my pointing out to
> you what seems to me your less than  honesty with  yourself - much less
> any one else - and with or for which, perhaps, you are less than capable
> of being with me, suffice it to say, it secures for me a vague
> complacence in commenting on your schemes:)
> --
> Joseph Littleshoes- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

I can usually follow this train of thought because that is my normal
way of expressing myself unless I reign it in, but, I got lost at "you
are less than capable of being with me"..

Then I thought well, it is not posted to me, so, maybe Marisa gets it.

Tom

unread,
Jul 18, 2008, 11:04:23 PM7/18/08
to

"Joseph Littleshoes" <jpst...@isp.com> wrote in message
news:78fd7$48804fb6$4396f4e3$63...@DIALUPUSA.NET...

> WitchesCorner wrote:
>>
>>>Is this automated spam or, you saying you can't resist ren's spell?
>>
>> I'm not posting automated spam at all! I do everything manually

OK, it's manual spam.

Executive Function

unread,
Jul 19, 2008, 5:34:13 AM7/19/08
to
On 19 Jul, 05:04, "Tom" <dantPAYATTENTIONo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "Joseph Littleshoes" <jpsti...@isp.com> wrote in message

There should be a word worse than spam. 'Fodder' might fill the gap.
Only fit for domesticated farm animals.

0 new messages