Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

TF #1 ongoing preview...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Thunder Strikes Twice!

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:43:23 AM11/5/09
to
http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=23587


This may be old news, I dunno (I don't keep up on all the big TF sites
that much).

Wow, the artwork is... to be honest, I really hate it. I know this is
Figueroa's new "style" but I really have to take a pass on it. Every
time I buy an issue, I'm going to have to get around that to try and
enjoy the story.

What's anyone else think about it? Like it? Hate it?

t.k.

Kil - Michael McCarthy

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:46:40 AM11/5/09
to
"Thunder Strikes Twice!" <dece...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:UBtIm.244$_b5...@newsfe22.iad...


God lord, Hot Rod's face is just.... Gah! Horrid!


-Kil

Gustavo Wombat

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:15:13 AM11/5/09
to

Yuck.

And I don't like the designs either -- is there any reason not to give
them either their Classic G1 or Classics bodies? It's been something
that has bothered me with a lot of the IDW stuff, but matching it with
ugly style and bletch.

Gustavo!

ahsan.sa...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:21:26 AM11/5/09
to

Scrunchformers comes to G1. It had to happen some-time.

Bumblebee looks so like his Movieverse counterpart, they could be
twins. Well, fraternal twins, anyway.

Don's mech designs still look good, it's just the faces. Dear god, the
faces.

And have they killed off Ironhide? To make for his being such a rear
manifold in "AHM"?

TigerMegatron

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:11:43 AM11/5/09
to
I'll be buying the on-going series. I have a strong feeling it's gonna
be great.

I won't be buying any micheal bay movie verse TF comics. I won't be
buying the bumblebee comics as I always hated that character & found
him to be utterly useless,weak & dull.
I won't be buying the TF robot hero's comic.

robo_rob

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 11:17:01 AM11/5/09
to
I'm planning on giving this series a shot. I tried following the
various miniseries to different levels of success throughout the IDW
run and for the most part I've enjoyed what I've bought. So I'm going
to try and be a dedicated comics buyer again and follow the new
ongoing series each month.

The art doesn't bug me so much and really don't surprise me either.
The movies were mega successful and more media that followed it's suit
outside of the movie tie in stuff was inevitable. If you want to think
about it, it's really a good idea. Hasbro and IDW have to be involved
with Paramount for movie related stuff right? Well, by making the
standard cast look more like movie designs, they can draw the movie
fan crowd (and kids who recognize that Bumblebee over G1 Bee any day)
without dealing with the movie studio. I wouldn't be too surprised if
toys and new cartoon followed suit for awhile either (at least while
the movies bank serious cash).

I may be wrong, but hasn't other comics followed suit when a movie
adaption was mega successful?

Craig Little

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:52:25 PM11/5/09
to

"Thunder Strikes Twice!" <dece...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:UBtIm.244$_b5...@newsfe22.iad...
Well, I'm a total IDW fanboi and have bought all their G1 stuff (except
for.AHM #16 which I can't find around here anywhere), mostly in TPB form but
some individual issues as well.

I bought the Reign of Starscream, Alliance & Defiance series, so I'm used to
seeing movie-style bots in the comics verse, so the art doesn't bother me
that much, even if it is a departure for Don. However, I was bothered by the
Movie-style G1 Optimus Prime in that one AHM 'Coda' story, the gribblies
didn't look quite right....

In the preview, the art is clean, most of the Transformers are readily
identifiable as who they are (Ironhide is obviously Ironhide, for example),
though I don't get why Hot Rod appears to be on his 3rd IDW body (is there a
Universe/Classics style toy coming?).

The little snippet we have leaves me intrigued and wanting to see what
happens next, so the writing is already above All Hail Megatron in that
regard. I'm looking forward to this one, just because it'll be nice to have
an on-going, but it's #2 on my anticipation list behind Roche's Wreckers
mini.
--
Craig (And what's the point of the Bumblebee mini?)


Gabi TM D'Galvatron

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:01:54 PM11/5/09
to
On Nov 5, 7:43 am, "Thunder Strikes Twice!" <decep...@shaw.ca> wrote:

>
> What's anyone else think about it? Like it? Hate it?
>
> t.k.

The big time UGLY of this TF art really takes the cake for me .
I was really looking foward to an ongoing series , since I felt that
IDW (just like DW) took way too long to start an ongoing series and by
the time DW did , the hype just wasn't there as much .

This series ... , well it'll be a first for me but I may just have to
"sample" a few issues on-line because as much as I want to buy an
ongoing , I really don't see myself paying for an art form that comes
close to turning my stomach .

Not to mention the conflict that I feel in regards to Don , whom I
highly respect on one hand , but I am left confounded by on the
other .
Between Don's claims as to why he chose a different look for the book
and the "hot movie look" that Hasbro is pushing , I just don't know
who's to blame really .

I almost didn't have the stomach for EJ Su's "Mecha Formers" look ,
but I still wanted to read the comic so I went after the trades
because of the story .
The question for me is : Will I end up doing the same with this book
(?) , or will this be my "blue tennis ball that says Transformers on
it" that I'll finally drop due to overwhelming lack of interest .

Gr�e

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:04:11 PM11/5/09
to
"Thunder Strikes Twice!" <dece...@shaw.ca> wrote in news:UBtIm.244$_b5.169
@newsfe22.iad:

> What's anyone else think about it? Like it? Hate it?

From a distance, its OK, the close ups are a bit too detailed, I guess.

No One in Particular

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:35:13 PM11/5/09
to

"Gr�e" <a...@a.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CBACC2...@204.127.204.17...

Not too detailed, just too...Bay-ish. I *hated* the art in that Coda issue,
and this is just as bad: the movie aesthetic brought to our favorite
GeeWunners. Blarg.

Brian. Other'n that, might be a fair passable comic.


ahsan.sa...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 6:06:30 AM11/6/09
to
On Nov 6, 12:52 am, "Craig Little" <c_lit...@bmx.bom> wrote:
> "Thunder Strikes Twice!" <decep...@shaw.ca> wrote in messagenews:UBtIm.244$_b5...@newsfe22.iad...>http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=23587

Much as I'm not sure about the art, I'd probably wind up getting it as
well (by the time it comes out here, next year maybe, or the year
after), just to see what new shenanigans Prime and the gang are up to.

Prime and his Li'l Rascals. Heehee! Prime with a li'l antenna on his
head like Alfalfa.

Gr�e

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 1:24:42 PM11/6/09
to
"No One in Particular" <blcj...@shawneelink.net> wrote in
news:hd05ic$1ccl$1...@adenine.netfront.net:

> Not too detailed, just too...Bay-ish. I *hated* the art in that Coda
> issue, and this is just as bad: the movie aesthetic brought to our
> favorite GeeWunners. Blarg.
>
> Brian. Other'n that, might be a fair passable comic.

The whole thing loooks very mix-mash of various genres...bumblebee,
sideswipe, and others appear to be in their Classics modes, for example.
Its a hodepodge.

No One in Particular

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:22:44 AM11/7/09
to

"Gr�e" <a...@a.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CBB7E4...@204.127.204.17...

> "No One in Particular" <blcj...@shawneelink.net> wrote in
> news:hd05ic$1ccl$1...@adenine.netfront.net:
>
> The whole thing loooks very mix-mash of various genres...bumblebee,
> sideswipe, and others appear to be in their Classics modes, for example.
> Its a hodepodge.

True enough, but the comic might still be decent storytelling. I don't
think that the movie-style art will last, either: this is a comic meant to
appeal to the older fans, who by and large are not very impressed with the
movie(s).

Brian


0 new messages