On May 28, 5:28 pm, Irrellius Spamticon king of the Potato people
<
Ob1ken...@att.net> wrote:
> I saw these today in St. Louis, along with the new Voyager Starscream
> and Bulkhead. Apparently Wal-mart is putting them out with the new
> toys reset, along with the G.I.Joe toys.
Ah, spotted them over the weekend, finally. Now, I had assumed that
Chad was describing them as Jumpstarters because they had some kind of
vaguely similar fold-me-over transformation, but they're literally
Jumpstarters reincarnated, right down to the gigantic feet and the
little hook inside the chest to lock the vehicle mode together. It's
ridiculous! I had thought that perhaps somebody was blatantly ripping
off Hasbro's old ideas (well, Takara's idea, really), but then I
checked the packaging and these Spider-Man toys are, indeed, made by
Hasbro. So, uh, Hasbro's basically ripping off their own ideas. Not
sure if that makes it better or worse. I wouldn't be surprised if the
internal motor was identical to the old Jumpstarter toys, too.
So, the obvious question is: Will they reintroduce Jumpstarters into
the Transformers toy line at some point? Nowadays, with their simple
transformations, the Jumpstarters would likely be marketed towards
younger kids. Could they be test-marketing the Spider-Man versions as
a prelude to something else? Not only could they bring back Topspin
and Twin Twist, but they could expand on the concept and do
Jumpstarter versions of popular characters like Bumblebee and Optimus
Prime. That would be a laugh riot.
The biggest problem I always had with the motorized G1 toys
(Jumpstarters, Battlechargers, etc.) was that the places I lived
rarely had flat surfaces to roll on. It was all carpeting.
Obviously, you couldn't use the kitchen table, because the toys would
just fly off into oblivion. When I was ten years old, my neighbors
had an awesome basement. That was our Throttlebot racing depot.
Zob