Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
When Jews take over your government, you get False Flag Terror and Conspiracies of Silence - PLEASE DON'T LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU!
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Crickets
Apr 25, 2013, 11:49:34 PM4/25/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
False Flag Terror and Conspiracies of Silence
http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/04/16/false-flag-terror-and-conspiracies-of-silence/
This article was first published at
Memoryholeblog and GlobalResearch on
August 10, 2012 following the Aurora, Colorado and Oak Creek,
Wisconsin mass shootings. It is reposted here in light of the April 15
Boston Marathon bombing.-JT
________________________________
The news media’s readiness to accept official pronouncements and
failure to more vigorously analyze and question government authorities
in the wake of “domestic terrorist” incidents including mass shootings
and bombings contributes to the American public’s already acute case
of collective historical amnesia, while further rationalizing the
twenty-first century police state and continued demise of civil
society.
Some may recall “Bugs Raplin” (Giancarlo Espisito), the resolute
investigative journalist depicted in Tim Robbins’ 1992 political
mockumentary Bob Roberts. After being framed as the culprit in a false
flag assassination attempt by corrupt political huckster Bob Roberts
(Robbins), Raplin delivers a perceptive soliloquy that among other
things effectively describes the American public’s moribund civic
condition and short-circuited democracy. “The reason Iran-Contra
happened,” Raplin begins,
is because no one did anything substantial about Watergate. And the
reason Watergate happened is because there were no consequences from
the Bay of Pigs. They’re all the same operatives—the foot soldiers at
the Bay of Pigs, the plumbers that got busted at Watergate, the
gunrunners in Iran-Contra—all the same people, same faces. Now it
doesn’t take a genius to figure out the connection here: A secret
government beyond the control of the people and accountable to no one.
And the closer we are to discovering the connection, the more Congress
turns a blind eye to it. “We can’t talk about that in open session,”
they say. “National security reasons.” The truth lies dormant in their
laps and they stay blind out of choice. A conspiracy of silence.
Twenty years later amidst the vast outsourcing of intelligence and
military operations many more events may arguably be added to such a
shadow government’s achievements—the 1993 World Trade Center bombing,
the 1995 Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building bombing, the September
11 terror attacks, the non-existent weapons of mass destruction
prompting the occupation of Iraq, the July 7, 2005 London bombings,
the shoe and underwear “bombings”—all of which have contributed to the
official justification of imperial wars abroad and an ever-expanding
police state at home.
Lacking meaningful contexts with which to understand such events in
their totality the general public is incapable of recognizing the road
it is being forced down. The most recent set of events that give pause
are the horrific, military-style shootings in Aurora, Colorado and Oak
Creek, Wisconsin that authorities maintain were carried out by “lone
wolf” gunmen.
Operation Gladio in America?
A potential backdrop and precursor to the Colorado and Wisconsin
events is the oft-forgotten Operation Gladio, a campaign involving US
and British intelligence-backed paramilitaries anonymously carrying
out mass shootings and bombings of civilian targets throughout Europe.
Hundreds of such attacks took place between the late 1960s and early
1980s by “stay behind armies” of right wing and fascist saboteurs in
an overall effort to terrorize populations, deploy a “strategy of
tension,” and thereby maintain a centrist political status quo.[1] In
the uncertain environment the petrified citizenry pled for stepped-up
security and stood poised to part with personal freedoms. At the same
time the maneuvers allowed for political adversaries—in Gladio’s time
socialist and communist groups—to be blamed for the attacks and
thereby demonized in the public mind.
The string of still unresolved US political assassinations throughout
the 1960s suggest how such practices were not restricted to foreign
countries. Nor were they solely the terrain of intelligence agencies.
Along lines similar to Gladio, in the early 1960s the US Joint Chiefs
of Staff proposed Operation Northwoods, where terrorist attacks would
be initiated against US civilians in American cities and the violence
blamed on Cuban combatants to justify war against the island nation.
[2] The Kennedy administration rejected the proposal. While Northwoods
exhibited the capacity for government to conceive and propose such
plans, Gladio was demonstrably carried out against Western civilian
populations in multiple locations over many years.
Consideration of Gladio and Northwoods might be dismissed were it not
for early eyewitness accounts following the Colorado and Wisconsin
shootings contending how there were two or more killers present at
each incident—testimonies contradicting official government narratives
that have accordingly been suppressed in the public mind.[3]
As communications historian Christopher Simpson observes, “the tactics
that created the [Gladio] stay behinds in the first place are still in
place and continue to be used today. They are standard operating
procedure.”[4] Such potential explanations will appear foreign to an
American public that is systematically misinformed and easily
distracted. And in times of crisis especially that very public is
tacitly assured of its safe remove from such practices, looking
instead to political authorities and experts to reestablish a stasis
to the carefully constructed “reality” major media impose on the mass
psyche.
In this alternate reality Gladio has effectively been “memory-holed.”
A LexisNexis Academic search for “Operation Gladio” retrieves a mere
31 articles in English language news outlets—most in British
newspapers. In fact, only four articles discussing Gladio ever
appeared in US publications—three in the New York Times and one brief
mention in the Tampa Bay Times. Barring a 2009 BBC documentary [5] no
network or cable news broadcasts have ever referenced the maneuver.
Almost all of the articles related to Gladio appeared in 1990 when
Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti publicly admitted Italy’s
participation in the process. The New York Times downplayed any US
involvement, misleadingly calling Gladio “an Italian creation” in a
story buried on page A16.[6] In reality, former CIA director William
Colby revealed in his memoirs that covert paramilitaries were a
significant agency undertaking set up after World War II, including
“the smallest possible coterie of the most reliable people, in
Washington [and] NATO.”[7]
A Plausible Narrative
Gladio’s successful concealment for so many years demonstrates how
mass atrocities can be carried out by a shadow network with complete
impunity. Most incidents from the Gladio period remain unsolved by
authorities. In the US, however, a plausible narrative appears to be
required for public consumption. For example, just a few hours after
the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms (ATF) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) officials
swept in and wrested the case from Oak Creek authorities by
classifying it as an act of “domestic terrorism.”[8]. Less than twenty
four hours later one of the federal government’s foremost de facto
propaganda and intelligence-gathering arms—the Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC)—developed a storyline that was unquestioningly lapped up
by major news media.[9]
In an August 6, 2012 Democracy Now interview with SPLC spokesman Mark
Potok and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reporter Don Walker, Potok
explained in unusual detail how the alleged killer was involved in
“white supremacist groups,” “Nazi skinhead rock bands,” and that the
SPLC had been “tracking” the groups he was in since 2000. Potok’s
remarks, which dominate the exchange and steer clear of the suspect’s
experience in psychological operations, contrasted sharply with
Walker’s, who more cautiously pointed out that the suspect’s “work in
[US Army] PsyOps is still a bit of a mystery to all of us … We talked
to a psychiatrist who said that [being promoted to PsyOps is] like
going from the lobby to the 20th floor very quickly.”[10]
Like the Aurora Colorado storyline of a crazed shooter who expertly
booby-trapped his apartment with exotic explosives, such appealingly
sensationalistic narratives serve to sideline the countervailing
testimonies of eyewitnesses and are difficult to contest or dislodge
once they are driven home by would-be experts through almost every
major news outlet.
A similar scenario played out in the wake of the Oklahoma City federal
building bombing when the ATF, FBI and SPLC together constructed the
dominant frame of Timothy McVeigh as the lone bomber, an account that
likewise diverged with the local authorities’ initial findings, early
news reports of unexploded ordinance and a mysterious accomplice of
McVeigh, and the overall conclusions of the Oklahoma City Bombing
Investigation Committee’s Final Report.[11] The narrative nevertheless
served to maintain the political status quo while securing the Clinton
administration’s second term in office. To this day most Americans
believe McVeigh was solely responsible for the bombing despite
overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
For its time Raplin’s prognosis was an accurate description of
America’s cascading socio-political nightmare. Elected officials
abdicate their responsibility of oversight for personal gain and thus
perpetuate “a conspiracy of silence.” Yet over the past two decades,
the quickening pace of “terrorist” events suggests how shadow networks
have grown in boldness and strength, while each attack has contributed
to the steady erosion of civil society and constitutional rights.
With this in mind both the mainstream and “alternative” news media,
through their overt censorial practices, their consistent failure to
place events in meaningful historical contexts, and their overall
deliberate obeisance to dubious and unaccountable authorities,
compound this conspiracy by ensnaring the public in questionable
realities from which it cannot readily escape.
Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Daniele Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and
Terrorism in Western Europe, New York: Routledge, 2005; Richard
Cottrell, Gladio: NATO’s Dagger at the Heart of Europe, Progressive
Press, 2012. For a succinct historical overview of false flag terror
see Kurt Nimmo,”A Brief History of False Flag Terror Attacks, Or Why
Our Government Loves State-Sponsored Terror,” Infowars.com, August 14,
2012. See also the BBC Timewatch documentary, “Operation Gladio.”
[2] James Bamford, Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret
National Security Agency, New York: Anchor Books, 2002, 83. For
recent applications see Michel Chossudovsky, Syria: Killing Innocent
Civilians as Part of a US Covert Op. Mobilizing Support for a R2P
War,” GlobalResearch.ca, May 30, 2012, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=31122.
Entire Operation Northwoods document available at
http://archive.org/stream/OperationNorthwoods/operation_northwoods#page/n0/mode/2up
[3] Overall sufficient scrutiny of the Colorado and Wisconsin
shootings is entirely lacking save a handful of alternative news
media. See Alex Thomas, “Wisconsin Sikh Shooting False Flag: Multiple
Shooters, Army Psy-Ops, The FBI, Operation Gladio, and the SPLC,”
Intellhub.com, August 6, 2012,
http://theintelhub.com/2012/08/06/wisconsin-sikh-shooting-false-flag-multiple-shooters-army-psy-ops-the-fbi-operation-gladio-and-the-splc/
Jon Rappoport, “Shooting in Sikh Temple: Who Benefits Big Time?”
August 5, 2012, http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/shooting-in-sikh-temple-who-benefits-big-time/
Kurt Nimmo, “Sikh Shooter a Former Psyop Soldier Linked to FBI’s
National Alliance,” Infowars.com, August 6, 2012,
http://www.infowars.com/sikh-shooter-a-former-psyop-soldier-linked-to-fbis-national-alliance/
[4] NATO’s Secret Armies, Andres Pichler, director, 2009. Simpson
interview at 46:23, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/07/09/18653266.php.
[5] NATO’s Secret Armies.
[6] Clyde Haberman, “Evolution in Europe: Italy Discloses Its Web of
Cold War Guerrillas,” New York Times, November 16, 1990, A16.
[7] Stephen Lendman, “NATO’s Secret Armies” [A Review of Daniele
Ganser, NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in
Western Europe, op cit.] September 15, 2010,
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/09/natos-secret-armies.html
[8] Steven Yaccino, Michael Schwirtz, and Marc Santora, “Gunman Kills
6 at a Sikh Temple Near Milwaukee,” New York Times, August 6, 2012,
A1.
[9] For example, Erica Goode and Serge F. Kovaleski, “Wisconsin Killer
Was Fueled by Hate-Driven Music,” New York Times, August 7, 2012,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/07/us/army-veteran-identified-as-suspect-in-wisconsin-shooting.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all,
Madison Gray, “Sikh Temple Shooter Identified, Had Ties to White
Supremacist Movement,” Time News Feed, August 6, 2012,
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/08/06/sikh-temple-shooter-identified-had-ties-to-white-supremacist-movement/,
Dinesh Ramde and Todd Richmond, SPLC: ‘Frustrated neo-Nazi Opened Fire
on Sikh Temple,” Associated Press, August 6, 2012,
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/08/06/white-supremacist-opened-fire-on-sikh-temple/
[10] Amy Goodman, “Neo-Nazi Rampage: Army Psy-Ops Vet, White Power
Musician ID’d as Gunman in Sikh Temple Shooting,” Democracy Now,
August 7, 2012, http://www.democracynow.org/2012/8/7/sikh_temple_shooter_wade_michael_page
[11] Charles Key, The Final Report on the Bombing of the Alfred P.
Murrah Federal Building, Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Bombing Investigation
Committee, 2001. http://www.okcbombing.net/
-James F. Tracy
CUNTICA
Apr 26, 2013, 12:03:16 AM4/26/13
to
The discreet charm of a 9/11 radio kook: All of this is, of course,
total ping-pong-balls-for-brains nonsense.
Usually, it would be best to ignore conspiracy mongers such as Alex
Jones and not reward him and his angry gaggle of paranoiac followers
with any sort of attention. But, in a week when thoughts of the dead
and maimed victims of the Boston Marathon bombings weigh heavy on
the
hearts and minds of most Americans, it is worth pointing out what a
worthless waste of skin and bones Jones and his minions happen to
be.
Nearly as soon as I heard about the bombings on Monday, I was certain
that somewhere in the nutty right-wing blogosphere someone was
already
concocting a storyline that would blame the crime on Barack Obama
and
the federal government. Alex Jones came through with impressive
rapidity.
Jones runs a radio show from Austin, Texas. He describes himself as a
libertarian and an “aggressive constitutionalist.” The Southern
Poverty Law Center says he has stirred up racial animus “to appeal
to
the fears of the antigovernment Patriot movement.” He certainly
appeals to fear. Jones asserts that both the Oklahoma City bombing
and
the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by the U.S.
government as part of a scheme to promote a New World Order through
“exploitable hysteria.”
So, it is no surprise that he is now pushing the idea that the Boston
bombings were the nefarious handiwork of federal agents. At
Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick’s press briefing just a few hours
after the explosions, one of Jones’ minions, Dan Biondi, was on hand
to ask the governor if this was a “staged attack to take our civil
liberties and promote homeland security while sticking their hands
down our pants on the streets?”
“No,” Patrick replied tersely. “Next question.”
Meanwhile, Jones was on the air, on Twitter and on the Internet
pushing his claim that the FBI engineered the bombings under the
“false flag” of a terrorist group as a pretense for expanding the
power of the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation
Security Administration. He warned of TSA groping teams at sporting
events “coming soon.”
Jones is asking Americans to believe their own government is
responsible for all of the worst terrorist attacks in the country’s
history and the motivation for the latest one is a desire to grope
sports fans. All of this is, of course, total ping-pong-balls-for-
brains nonsense. It would be laughable if it were not for the fact
that this conspiracy kook claims 2 million radio listeners and more
online followers than Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh combined.
Jones is a purveyor of the neo-Confederate brand of “patriotism” that
has gained currency on the far starboard side of American politics.
I
do not think he should shut up or be shut down; he has the same
First
Amendment rights as I do. But he deserves to be exposed for what he
is: a delusional, self-promoting bully who is slandering the very
people who are right now doing the truly patriotic work of bringing
the Boston bombers to justice.
Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner David Horsey is a political
commentator
for the Los Angeles Times. Go to latimes.com/news/politics/
topoftheticket/ to see more of his work. (c)2012, David Horsey
DISTRIBUTED BY Tribune Media Services
total ping-pong-balls-for-brains nonsense.
Usually, it would be best to ignore conspiracy mongers such as Alex
Jones and not reward him and his angry gaggle of paranoiac followers
with any sort of attention. But, in a week when thoughts of the dead
and maimed victims of the Boston Marathon bombings weigh heavy on
the
hearts and minds of most Americans, it is worth pointing out what a
worthless waste of skin and bones Jones and his minions happen to
be.
Nearly as soon as I heard about the bombings on Monday, I was certain
that somewhere in the nutty right-wing blogosphere someone was
already
concocting a storyline that would blame the crime on Barack Obama
and
the federal government. Alex Jones came through with impressive
rapidity.
Jones runs a radio show from Austin, Texas. He describes himself as a
libertarian and an “aggressive constitutionalist.” The Southern
Poverty Law Center says he has stirred up racial animus “to appeal
to
the fears of the antigovernment Patriot movement.” He certainly
appeals to fear. Jones asserts that both the Oklahoma City bombing
and
the September 11 terrorist attacks were perpetrated by the U.S.
government as part of a scheme to promote a New World Order through
“exploitable hysteria.”
So, it is no surprise that he is now pushing the idea that the Boston
bombings were the nefarious handiwork of federal agents. At
Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick’s press briefing just a few hours
after the explosions, one of Jones’ minions, Dan Biondi, was on hand
to ask the governor if this was a “staged attack to take our civil
liberties and promote homeland security while sticking their hands
down our pants on the streets?”
“No,” Patrick replied tersely. “Next question.”
Meanwhile, Jones was on the air, on Twitter and on the Internet
pushing his claim that the FBI engineered the bombings under the
“false flag” of a terrorist group as a pretense for expanding the
power of the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation
Security Administration. He warned of TSA groping teams at sporting
events “coming soon.”
Jones is asking Americans to believe their own government is
responsible for all of the worst terrorist attacks in the country’s
history and the motivation for the latest one is a desire to grope
sports fans. All of this is, of course, total ping-pong-balls-for-
brains nonsense. It would be laughable if it were not for the fact
that this conspiracy kook claims 2 million radio listeners and more
online followers than Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh combined.
Jones is a purveyor of the neo-Confederate brand of “patriotism” that
has gained currency on the far starboard side of American politics.
I
do not think he should shut up or be shut down; he has the same
First
Amendment rights as I do. But he deserves to be exposed for what he
is: a delusional, self-promoting bully who is slandering the very
people who are right now doing the truly patriotic work of bringing
the Boston bombers to justice.
Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner David Horsey is a political
commentator
for the Los Angeles Times. Go to latimes.com/news/politics/
topoftheticket/ to see more of his work. (c)2012, David Horsey
DISTRIBUTED BY Tribune Media Services
Crickets
Apr 26, 2013, 6:41:24 AM4/26/13
to
On Apr 25, 9:03 pm, CUNTICA <brianlambsn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The discreet charm of a 9/11 radio kook: All of this is, of course,
> total ping-pong-balls-for-brains nonsense.
>
> Usually, it would be best to ignore conspiracy mongers such as Alex
> Jones and not reward him and his angry gaggle of paranoiac followers
> with any sort of attention. But, in a week when thoughts of the dead
> and maimed victims of the Boston Marathon bombings weigh heavy on
> the
> hearts and minds of most Americans, it is worth pointing out what a
> worthless waste of skin and bones Jones and his minions happen to
> be. ......................<snip>
> The discreet charm of a 9/11 radio kook: All of this is, of course,
> total ping-pong-balls-for-brains nonsense.
>
> Usually, it would be best to ignore conspiracy mongers such as Alex
> Jones and not reward him and his angry gaggle of paranoiac followers
> with any sort of attention. But, in a week when thoughts of the dead
> and maimed victims of the Boston Marathon bombings weigh heavy on
> the
> hearts and minds of most Americans, it is worth pointing out what a
> worthless waste of skin and bones Jones and his minions happen to
You got that shit right , Hymie. A Jewish stopped clock is right
twice a day just like a Goyim stopped clock.
======= From the Spook Archive ========
MORE BUSTED SPOOKS -- 9-11 GATEKEEPERS
THE J0NES BROTHERS
Alex and Steven Jones - two rotten peas in the same evil pod.
They're not really brothers but they both hold the same ridiculous
conspiracy theory: that Bush and the neocons rigged WTC 1, 2 and 7
for controlled demolition; HOWEVER, 19 Muslims hijacked planes and
flew them into the very buildings that the government rigged to fall.
What are the odds of that happening? One in a number so large it
would have to be expressed in exponential form. According to the
Jones brothers: *somebody* hit the terror-trifecta on 9-11-01?
Either the neocons, who rigged the exact same buildings that
terrorists flew planes into - OR - the terrorists, who flew planes
into the only buildings in the United States that were secretly
rigged
to explode. Somebody got lucky!
Common sense would tell you: if the government *knew* the WTC was
going to be struck by planes, they wouldn't rig the buildings for
controlled demolition. They wouldn't need to. Even if the
buildings
didn't fall, it would be enough shock-and-awe to start two wars,
legalize torture and wiretapping, and create Patriot Acts I, II, III.
The government wouldn't fix something that wasn't broke.
If the government planted explosives in the WTC like the Jones
brothers state, there would be no need for planes. Without the need
for planes, the no-planes theory can take off.
In order for the no-planes theory to have legs, or wings, or one
wing,
media fakery must be proven. When media fakery is proven, it's time
to revisit the aftermath, the WTC before-and-after pictures.
The perfectly round holes in the ground where the buildings used to
be
looks like the effects of a beam (Directed-Energy) weapon.
So now the DEW NO-PLANES theory is flying high, higher and higher,
but
wait! Somebody is trying to shoot it down! It's the Jones brothers!
They're not alone. 99% Of the 911-truth movement are trying to shoot
down the no-planes theory. The "truthers" have to keep the suicide
hijackers alive, else the war-on-terror is bogus. The "truthers"
have
to attack the DEW theory, because Muslims don't have that weapon.
Now it's time to cast a skeptical eye on the Jones brothers. Who are
they protecting? What information are they hiding or ignoring?
What's their motivation? Who do they work for? Who's their daddy?
~~~~~~~~~~~Alex Jones~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.truthin7minutes.com/alex-jones.php
Alexander Emerick Jones is an American paleoconservativeradio host
and
documentary filmmaker. His nationally syndicated talk show (titled
The
Alex Jones Show) airs via the Genesis Communication Network on over
60
AM, FM, and Short Wave radio stations across the United States, as
well as having a large internet based audience. Alex Jones has been
referred to as a "conspiracy theorist" by mainstream media outlets,
while Russia Today has referred to him as an investigative
journalist.
Alex Jones was born February 11, 1974.
The elite put Alex Jones in place to be the leader and symbol of the
alternative media.
Alex Jones repeatedly attacks the idea that TV Fakery was used on
9/11. It has become obvious to serious investigators of 9-11 that no
airplanes were used in the attack.
Alex Jones Reacts To No-Planers On The Howard Stern Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&hl=en&v=VuIo5zGFZJw
Is Alex Jones too naive to catch on, or is he deliberately covering
up
evidence that links the mainstream media to 9-11?
Indeed, Alex Jones would appear to have a clear motive for wanting to
cover up the media's role in 9-11. His network, GCN Live, has close
ties to ABC News. In fact, ABC NY provides satellite broadcasting
services for The Alex Jones Show. Some say that this is only a
business deal, and is not very important... but think about it -- why
would part of the controlled media provide satellites to a network
that was dangerous to them?
This is easily explained by considering that Alex Jones is not really
on the side of real truth. His job is to distract us from following
the most important people in the world... the Jesuits.
The Most Powerful Terrorist Organization In The World - The Society
of
Jesus, a.k.a., The Jesuits.
http://www.truthin7minutes.com/jesuit-companion-notes.php
ABC is owned by Walt Disney, which has had a Jesuit priest on it's
board of directors since 1996. This brings us to the question of why
Jones is seemingly reluctant to talk about the role of the Society of
Jesus in world corruption.
When Alex Jones released his famous "Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian
Grove" film, he gave us detailed background information about the
Grove, yet, for some reason he left out the fact that Roman Catholic
masses take place at the Grove, and that the Bohemian Club's patron
saint is John of Nepomuk, a Roman Catholic figure who symbolizes the
Seal of Confession. The story of John of Nepomuk was developed by
Bohuslav Balb�n, a Jesuit.
Alex Jones' suspicious connections do not end there. He has close
ties
with the John Birch Society. His father was a member of JBS and he
had
it's President, John F. McManus, on his show. McManus was trained by
Jesuits at Holy Cross College and was involved in US Air Force
Weapons
Development.
END The Alex Jones GAME
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread311540/pg1
...In an Alex Jones article, seen here, talking about Operation
Mockingbird - a CIA operation to control media - Jones mentions the
networks to be controlled and experimented on: "Media assets will
eventually include ABC, NBC, CBS, Time, Newsweek, Associated Press,
United Press International (UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers,
Scripps-Howard, Copley News Service, etc."
Media assets will eventually include ABC?
Well, doesn't GCN carry the Alex Jones Show? According to GCN's
Program Directory, they do.
Well, as you may or may not know, GCN uses the satellites of none
other than ABC.
So, which is it, Alex? Is the CIA controlling ABC, in which case, you
shouldn't have a show supported by their satellites if you're a true
"patriot"? Or are you garbage, your claims are lies, and you're being
allowed to stay on the air because you're not really giving anybody
any "truth"? ...
======= The other brother from another mother ========
=========== STEVEN Jones ===========
"...The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal
employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever
present and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we
should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that
public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific
technological elite. ..."
--Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961
http://www.h-net.org/~hst306/documents/indust.html
�Jones earned his bachelor�s degree in physics, magna cum laude,
from
Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in physics from
Vanderbilt University in 1978. Jones conducted his Ph.D. research at
the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (from 1974 to 1977), and
post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson
Physics Facility�
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/some-straight-forward-ques...
"To control the opposition: you become the opposition."
--DC Dave, Ph.D., exposed FBI informant
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&ta...
Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in
1917, is widely credited with the following quotation:
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."
Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.
Is it possible the �truth movement� has been run by the 9/11
perpetrators since day one?
Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer
the
�truth movement� away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these
plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?
Is it even possible that some of these plants are �in on it�
while
others got suckered in? You be the judge.
***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the
Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html
Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many
commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the
towers�
destruction.
Mineta steered the �truth movement� toward hijackings and plane
crashes by spreading the �Cheney stand down order� hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871
***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at
Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm
Jones steered the �truth movement� toward thermite/conventional
explosives/molten metal theories. Jones� molten metal evidence has
been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...id=91&Itemid=60
Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories
with
statements such as �These two are noted for their
no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of
ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.�
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm
***Physicist Greg Jenkins� has connections to the NSA and DEW:
"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by
funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
Jenkins� papers were listed in an annual report which also listed
at
least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm
Jenkins steered the �truth movement� away from directed energy
weapons
by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read
of
the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html
***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van
Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html
Romero steered the �truth movement� toward standard controlled
demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount
of
explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html
***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about
as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.
Bowman steered the �truth movement� toward hijackings, and NORAD
standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE
Although he is in Jim Fetzer�s Scholars group, I have not heard him
speaking about Dr Wood�s DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an
interview where Bowman states that he �doesn�t fall for
conspiracy
theories� with regard to controlled demolition.
Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call
this
a conspiracy theory?
======= End =========
Freedom Man
Apr 26, 2013, 1:06:05 PM4/26/13
to
The 9/11 "ATTACK" - ELEVEN YEARS, NO JUSTICE!
The crime of the century that mass-murdered 3000 innocent Americans on
September 11, 2001 remains unsolved. Many know this with certainty and some
suspect it, but some Americans still believe the coverup lies and propaganda
fed them through the government-manipulated corporate mass-media. To
understand why, and know the truth, read on - -
To understand the point I wish to make, let's assume that an obviously alien
creature was walking peacefully down the street, and observe peoples'
reactions to it.
Some would simply not see it! Their brains would reject as IMPOSSIBLE what
their eyes tell them, and block out their awareness of the unearthly
creature.
Some might stare, perhaps be shocked or frightened, but then go on,
rationalizing that they only saw someone in costume, or that they had
indulged too heavily at last night's party and were seeing things. They
would tell no one what they saw for fear of being thought crazy. They would
even, in defense of their own rationalization, label other people that
reported such a sighting as crazy. This is the psychological phenomenon of
DENIAL.
Perhaps in fear for their own sanity, deniers condemn as crazy others that
claim aliens or whatever to be real. Such assertions are frightening because
they violate their sense of reality - "only KOOKS believe in aliens!" Thus
people tend to reject as unreal what is not comfortable for them to accept,
and likewise embrace beliefs that do not hold up to scientific scrutiny but
do provide them comfort. You don't believe what you DON'T WANT to believe;
denial thus serves to protect the mind from what would be mentally traumatic
if accepted.
Some things are simply too horrific, too abominably appalling, too greatly
in violation of what we WANT to think or believe, to accept as actual
reality - even when they ARE real! "Look; the Emperor wears no clothes,"
said the child too naïve to know that such facts are not to be spoken of,
nor even acknowledged to oneself.
PSYOPS - definition paraphrased from Wikipedia: Psychological Operations.
Techniques used to influence a target audience's value systems, beliefs,
emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. PSYOPS are used to induce
confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the
originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or
false flag tactics. The phrase is commonly used by governments who wish to
avoid the terms propaganda and brainwashing in reference to their own work
because those terms have negative connotations. The use of such euphemisms
for what is in effect mind control is in itself an example of psychological
operations, i.e. using psychological techniques to persuade a large number
of people to support something they wouldn't normally support or to
unquestioningly accept lies.
Obviously, to permit or commit an atrocity on the scale of the 9/11 attacks,
and/or to exploit the horror, shock, and fear thus created to influence
public opinion and actions, is clearly a PSYOP. The exploitation of the
psychological phenomenon of DENIAL is also clearly a PSYOP. Who would want
to believe that traitors in our own government would permit, or even
perpetrate, such an atrocity on their own people? How much easier it would
be to accept the existence of aliens - or fanatical Jihadists!
"But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." -
Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg Trials.
Now that we understand what PSYOPS are, and the psychological phenomenon of
DENIAL, we are in a better position to rationally investigate the true
nature and possible sources of the 9/11 attacks.
The UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE of an INSIDE JOB:
BLOWN TO BITS:
The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse of
steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes, is the
SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small fires and
superficial debris damage could not account for this collapse, which had all
the earmarks of controlled demolition by explosives. Videos clearly show
this. Such demolitions take many days or weeks to set up - not the few hours
between the plane "attacks" and the collapse. The explosives therefore had
to be put in place BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of
previously placed explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like
the badly damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have
remained standing.
Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological denial
still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it obviously was, and
they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and fabrications, elaborate
lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to defend their indefensible
position. The REAL terrorists are desperate to cover up their mass-murderous
crime of the century - the permitting if not perpetration of, and subsequent
political and economic exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.
Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's most
sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible morning? I don't
think so!
There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable than the
explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing down of NORAD.
Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby
buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If
the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire alone, what blew these
bodies to smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable
distances? The plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering
force) necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny
bits and throw them such distances.
So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than their
being the result of high explosives being detonated in the towers?
The NORAD STAND-DOWN (complete failure to take defensive action) is
compelling evidence of the 9/11 conspiracy. NORAD is the world's most
sophisticated aerospace defense system, with backups and redundancies that
make it extremely reliable and effective. NORAD routinely intercepts off
course or out of communication aircraft of all kinds, especially near such
security-sensitive areas as New York City and the Pentagon. On 9/11, FOUR
allegedly hijacked subsonic-speed commercial jets were out of communication
and flying towards known terrorist targets for well over an hour. NOT ONE of
these planes was intercepted by NORAD! We were told that NORAD only looks
for aircraft coming from outside the USA, but this is a blatant LIE, given
the history of NORAD's routine interceptions!
The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the
falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade
Center building collapses:
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World TradeCenter
(WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of
the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after
the towers fell, WTC building 7 also collapsed suddenly, completely, and
straight down at near free-fall speed. This steel-framed building was not
touched by the planes that struck the towers, and had sustained relatively
minor debris damage and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily
damaged remained standing.
In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan Reynolds,
former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated,
"The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September11,
2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day
goes beyond the pale."
We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's tale
that's "beyond the pale!"
Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics, and the
emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have stymied
objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of authoritarian
assertions?
The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told us
that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now referred to as
a "pancake collapse". According to the government claims, the plane crashes
and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet fuel is NOT exotic) fires
heated the UL-certified structural steel to the point where it was
significantly weakened, which is very difficult to believe, never mind
repeat in an experiment. Even with massive fires that incinerate everything
else, the steel frames of such buildings generally remain standing.
According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical evidence was
quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly caused part of the
tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the tower, which, we've been
repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain reaction of the lower floors
sequentially, one at a time, yielding to the weight falling from above.
There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the observed
facts
* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical steelcore
columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the next.
* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to gravity
alone. This article focuses on the latter of these two discrepancies.
Those that concocted the "pancake theory" made a fatal error - they didn't
check their story against the inviolate laws of physics! This is easy to do,
even without any physical evidence to examine. We can test that incredible
pancake tale using basic high-school physics. Let's do that - use a simple,
unassailable, incontrovertible conservation-of-energy analysis to perform a
reality check that establishes once and for all that the government, and
such government story backers as PBS, Popular Mechanics, and Scientific
American have falsified the true nature of the 9/11 disaster.
How Gravity Acts:
Sir Isaac Newton noticed that apples fell from trees. Others had also
noticed this, but none had ever devised a theory of gravity from the
observation. Over the years, mankind has learned that the force ofgravity at
and near Earth's surface produces an acceleration of known constant
magnitude. That doesn't mean we know HOW it works, or WHY, but we have
become able to predict its effects with a high degree of precision and
certainty - gravity has always had the same, predictable, effect.
Galileo Galilei used the leaning tower of Pisa to demonstrate that a large
ball and a small one (of lesser mass) fell (accelerated downward) at the
same rate. Prior to Galileo, people had just assumed that heavier objects
fall faster, much the way they had assumed the Earth was flat.
So while an object of greater mass will exert more force (its weight) upon
anything supporting it against gravity's pull, it does not experience any
greater acceleration when gravity's pull is not opposed - when it is
falling. Earth's gravity at and near the surface of the planet can only
accelerate objects downward at one known, constant rate: 32 feet persecond
for each second of free fall. As Galileo demonstrated centuries ago, heavier
objects are not accelerated any quicker than are lighter objects.
So Earth's gravity produces a downward acceleration of 32 feet per second
per second. This means that an object, after falling one second, will be
falling at a speed of 32 ft/sec. After the 2nd second, it will be falling at
64 ft/sec. After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96 ft/sec., and so
on.
Further, since gravity's acceleration is constant, and an object isfalling
at 32 ft/sec after one second has elapsed, we know that it has averaged 16
ft/sec for the entire distance. Thus after one second, the object has fallen
16 feet.
Scientists have derived simple free-fall equations that can be used to
harness this knowledge mathematically. These equations can be found inany
high-school physics book
* Falling velocity = acceleration of gravity x time. (V = G x T)
And
* Distance fallen = 1/2 x acceleration of gravity x time squared. (D =1/2 x
G x T x T)
So if we want to know how far an object has free-fallen after 3 seconds
Distance = 1/2 x 32 x 9 = 144 feet
So after 3 seconds in Earth's gravity, an object will have fallen 144 feet
and will be falling at 96 ft/sec.
Checking Our Work:
We've just solved a simple physics problem. Now let's check our work,using
conservation of energy.
We know that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - it merely changes
form. If we take the potential (in this case chemical, molecular) energyin a
barrel of oil and burn it, it changes to heat energy. When we burn gasoline
in our car's engine, we get kinetic (motional) energy, plus some heat, as an
engine is not 100% efficient. When we use our car's brakes to bleed off some
of that kinetic energy (slow down), that energy isconverted into heat (the
brakes get hot). Explosives convert potential energy [molecular or atomic]
to kinetic energy (explosive force) quickly enough to shatter or even
pulverize concrete.
In the case of the free-falling object, the two kinds of energy we are
concerned with are kinetic energy and potential energy. Examples of
potential (gravitational) energy are the energy available from water stored
up high in a water tower, or a boulder perched atop a hill. If whateveris
holding it up there is removed, it will fall under the influence of
gravity's pull. As it accelerates downward, the potential energy is
converted to the kinetic energy of the object's motion.
So, as an object falls, it changes its potential energy into kinetic energy.
The equation for potential energy is
* Potential Energy = Mass (or weight) x Gravity x Height. (PE = M x G xH)
The equation for kinetic energy is
* Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity squared. (KE = 1/2 x M x V x V)
So let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that our falling object hasa
mass of 1. (Remember, the object's mass will affect its energy, and its
momentum, but not its rate of free-fall.)
The potential energy given up by falling 3 seconds (144 ft) is: 1 x 32x144
= 4608
The kinetic energy gained after falling 3 seconds is 1/2 x 1 x 96 squared
=1/2 x 9216 = 4608
So, the available potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.Seeing
that energy was, in fact, conserved is how we know that the answer in the
simple case above was correct. We've checked our work, using an independent
analysis, based upon the sound physical principle of conservation of energy.
Now, and only now, we can be certain that our answer was correct.
One Little Complication - the effect of air resistance
The free-fall equations above reflect a perfect, frictionless world. They
perfectly predict the behavior of falling bodies in a vacuum. In fact, you
may have seen a science class demonstration in which the air is pumped out
of a tube and then a feather will fall, in that vacuum, just as fast as will
a solid metal ball.
That's how parachutes work: much of the falling object's potential energy
gets expended doing the work of pushing a lot of air out of the way inorder
for the object to fall. As a result, not all of the gravitational potential
energy can go towards accelerating the object downward at gravity's rate of
32 ft/sec/sec.
In other words, only when there is zero frictional resistance can any
falling object's potential energy be completely converted into kinetic
energy. Anything that resists a falling object's downward velocity reduces
its acceleration from the maximum gravitational acceleration of 32 feet per
second per second, as some of gravity's potential energy is consumed in
overcoming frictional resistance.
This explains the phenomena of "terminal velocity". The free-fall equations
predict that a falling object's velocity will continue to increase without
limit. But in air, once a falling object reaches a certain speed, its
propensity to fall will be matched by the air's resistance to the fall.At
that point the object will continue to fall, but its speed will no longer
increase over time. Another way of looking at it is this: gravity's
incessant force produces a downward acceleration, but friction with theair
creates an upward force and thus an upward acceleration. When falling at
terminal velocity, the acceleration downward equals the accelerationupward,
they cancel each other out, and a constant downward velocity ismaintained.
Thus the parachute, with its high air friction resistance, allows theperson
attached to it to float to earth unharmed.
A Quick Recap:
Earth's gravity causes objects to fall, and they fall according to precise
physical equations. The equations assume no air or other resistance. Any
resistance at all will cause the object to fall less rapidly than it would
without that resistance. If a falling object is affected by airresistance it
falls slower than it would if free-falling, and it will take longer to fall
a given distance.
Free-fall From WTC Building Heights
The towers were 1350 and 1360 feet tall; average = 1355 feet. Let's start by
using our free-fall equation to see how long it should take an objectto
free-fall from the towers' height.
Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time squared. (D = 1/2 x G x T x T)
With a little basic algebra, we solve the equation for the fall time,T:
2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared) (2 x D = G x T x T)
Time squared = (2 x Distance) / Gravity (T x T = 2 x D / G)
Time squared = 2 x 1355 / 32 = 84.7 (T = square root of (2 x D / G))
Time = 9.2
So our equation tells us that it takes 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the
ground from the height of the WTC towers.
Using our simpler equation, V = G x T, we can see that at 9.2 seconds, the
free-falling object's velocity must be about 295 ft/sec, which is justover
200 mph.
But that can only occur IN A VACUUM.
Since the WTC was in Earth's atmosphere at sea level, you might be able to
imagine how much air resistance that represents. Think about putting your
arm out the window of a car moving even half that fast! Most free-falling
objects reach their terminal velocity long before they reach 200 mph. For
example, the terminal velocity of a free-falling human body is around 120
mph. The terminal velocity of a free-falling cat is around 60 mph.
Therefore, it is clear that air resistance alone will make it take longer
than 9.2 seconds for anything falling from the towers' height to reach the
ground.
Observations from 9/11:
On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's
"complete and final report" on 9/11, that the South Tower collapsed in 10
seconds. Here is the exact quote
"At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That's the
government's official number. With all the videos that show it, they could
not lie about this.
But as we've determined above, the FREE-FALL TIME IN A VACUUM is 9.2
seconds, and 10 seconds is an exceptionally short fall time through the air.
This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from the
air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the tower. Those
undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered resistance thousands of
times greater than that of air. Those lower stories, and the central steel
core columns, had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years
despite hurricane-force winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.
Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the way of
the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction as air would?
Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing the fall of the upper
floors less than would, say, a parachute?
It is beyond the scope of the simple but uncontested physics here to tell
you how long such a collapse should have taken. Would it have taken a
minute? Ten minutes? Hard to say, but certainly it would take far more than
10 seconds!
What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers could not
have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower stories, as
rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is shown above to be
physically impossible!
Not only was tremendous energy expended in causing the observed massive
high-speed sideways debris ejections, but virtually all the concrete and
glass of the tower was pulverized - actually dissociated is a better word.
Never mind what happened to all the supporting steel core columns! The
energy requirements to do anything like that, alone, rival the total amount
of potential energy that the entire tower had to give. Gravity alone is
sufficient to cause some things to fall that far, even through air, in close
to the observed 10 second collapse time. But that is without the huge
expenditure of energy necessary to pulverize all of that concrete and glass,
eject debris, plus cause the steel core columns to effectively disappear.
The gravitational potential energy present was certainly not enough to have
done all these things at once.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it only changes form. So WHERE
DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM?
Conclusions
In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the observed
duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more of the
following zany-sounding conditions must have been met
* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero resistance to
the collapse.
* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any expenditure
of energy.
* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by magic.
* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, gravity was much stronger than
gravity.
* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, energy was not conserved.
None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible, conditions can
be accounted for by the official government theory of 9/11, nor by any of
the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to prop up this official myth
of 9/11.
The Bottom Line
The government explanations for the WTC collapses fail the most basic
conservation-of-energy reality check. Therefore the government theory is
FALSE; it does not fit the observed facts, and the notion of a "pancake
collapse" cannot account for what happened. The "pancake collapse"
explanation is impossible, and thus absurd. It is A LIE.
It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that theWTC
collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the plane impacts.
The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that the
towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but rather they
came down because something else was causing them to disintegrate.
So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates' other
premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is left to you to
decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly incorrect
presumptions, is also flawed.
The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, and which
also collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day,
similarly fails the conservation-of-energy analysis. The 9/11 Commission
made no attempt to explain it.
Just how and why so many highly-accredited and credentialed people all so
miserably failed to check the "pancake collapse" theory, by giving it this
basic physics reality check, is beyond the scope of this analysis.
---------
FURTHER IRREFUTABLE PROOF BY PHYSICS OF THE 9/11 INSIDE JOB
http://vehme.blogspot.com/2007/12/glaring-proof-of-something-hotter-than.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law_of_black_body_radiation Also see:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
SO - WHO DONE IT??
Any good detective will tell you that the way to find criminals is to
investigate those that benefitted, or stood to benefit, from the crime.
Surely those that were quickly blamed for this mass-murderous crime of the
century - Bin Laden, etc., had evil intentions against America, but could
not have done it single-handedly. Just after 9/11 Iraq and Saddam Hussein
were implied as guilty in a PSYOP to justify the invasion of Iraq, when in
fact they were blameless for 9/11.
Here are some that, under the criteria of the good detective above, must be
considered suspects:
Bush, Cheney, and their fellow Republican/neo-conservatives then in power.
Then NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani.
WTC owner/leaseholder Larry Silverstein.
The theocratic nation of Israel.
DEMAND that congress reopen the investigation and bring the real
MASS-MURDERERS to justice!
NINE ELEVEN - NEVER AGAIN!
The crime of the century that mass-murdered 3000 innocent Americans on
September 11, 2001 remains unsolved. Many know this with certainty and some
suspect it, but some Americans still believe the coverup lies and propaganda
fed them through the government-manipulated corporate mass-media. To
understand why, and know the truth, read on - -
To understand the point I wish to make, let's assume that an obviously alien
creature was walking peacefully down the street, and observe peoples'
reactions to it.
Some would simply not see it! Their brains would reject as IMPOSSIBLE what
their eyes tell them, and block out their awareness of the unearthly
creature.
Some might stare, perhaps be shocked or frightened, but then go on,
rationalizing that they only saw someone in costume, or that they had
indulged too heavily at last night's party and were seeing things. They
would tell no one what they saw for fear of being thought crazy. They would
even, in defense of their own rationalization, label other people that
reported such a sighting as crazy. This is the psychological phenomenon of
DENIAL.
Perhaps in fear for their own sanity, deniers condemn as crazy others that
claim aliens or whatever to be real. Such assertions are frightening because
they violate their sense of reality - "only KOOKS believe in aliens!" Thus
people tend to reject as unreal what is not comfortable for them to accept,
and likewise embrace beliefs that do not hold up to scientific scrutiny but
do provide them comfort. You don't believe what you DON'T WANT to believe;
denial thus serves to protect the mind from what would be mentally traumatic
if accepted.
Some things are simply too horrific, too abominably appalling, too greatly
in violation of what we WANT to think or believe, to accept as actual
reality - even when they ARE real! "Look; the Emperor wears no clothes,"
said the child too naïve to know that such facts are not to be spoken of,
nor even acknowledged to oneself.
PSYOPS - definition paraphrased from Wikipedia: Psychological Operations.
Techniques used to influence a target audience's value systems, beliefs,
emotions, motives, reasoning, or behavior. PSYOPS are used to induce
confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the
originator's objectives, and are sometimes combined with black operations or
false flag tactics. The phrase is commonly used by governments who wish to
avoid the terms propaganda and brainwashing in reference to their own work
because those terms have negative connotations. The use of such euphemisms
for what is in effect mind control is in itself an example of psychological
operations, i.e. using psychological techniques to persuade a large number
of people to support something they wouldn't normally support or to
unquestioningly accept lies.
Obviously, to permit or commit an atrocity on the scale of the 9/11 attacks,
and/or to exploit the horror, shock, and fear thus created to influence
public opinion and actions, is clearly a PSYOP. The exploitation of the
psychological phenomenon of DENIAL is also clearly a PSYOP. Who would want
to believe that traitors in our own government would permit, or even
perpetrate, such an atrocity on their own people? How much easier it would
be to accept the existence of aliens - or fanatical Jihadists!
"But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy
and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they
are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism
and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." -
Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg Trials.
Now that we understand what PSYOPS are, and the psychological phenomenon of
DENIAL, we are in a better position to rationally investigate the true
nature and possible sources of the 9/11 attacks.
The UNDENIABLE EVIDENCE of an INSIDE JOB:
BLOWN TO BITS:
The sudden, complete, straight down at near free-fall speed collapse of
steel framed WTC building 7, which was not touched by the planes, is the
SMOKING GUN of the 9/11 conspiracy. The building's few small fires and
superficial debris damage could not account for this collapse, which had all
the earmarks of controlled demolition by explosives. Videos clearly show
this. Such demolitions take many days or weeks to set up - not the few hours
between the plane "attacks" and the collapse. The explosives therefore had
to be put in place BEFOREHAND. This lends credibility to the use of
previously placed explosives to bring down the towers as well, which like
the badly damaged and fire-gutted Deutchbank building would probably have
remained standing.
Propaganda shills, disinformationists, and those in psychological denial
still insist the collapse of WTC 7 could not be what it obviously was, and
they employ often ludicrous rationalizations and fabrications, elaborate
lies, and infantile ad-hominem attacks to defend their indefensible
position. The REAL terrorists are desperate to cover up their mass-murderous
crime of the century - the permitting if not perpetration of, and subsequent
political and economic exploitation of the fully preventable 9/11 disaster.
Could Bin Laden have somehow totally incapacitated NORAD - the world's most
sophisticated aerospace defense system - on that horrible morning? I don't
think so!
There is evidence of an INSIDE JOB even more clear and indisputable than the
explosive demolition collapse of building 7 and the standing down of NORAD.
Many very small HUMAN BODY FRAGMENTS have been found on the roofs of nearby
buildings. These were too far away to be from jumpers from the towers. If
the towers simply collapsed from damage and fire alone, what blew these
bodies to smithereens and sent the fragments flying for considerable
distances? The plane impacts did not have the explosive brisance (shattering
force) necessary to do this - only HIGH EXPLOSIVES can blow bodies to tiny
bits and throw them such distances.
So - who can credibly account for these body fragments, other than their
being the result of high explosives being detonated in the towers?
The NORAD STAND-DOWN (complete failure to take defensive action) is
compelling evidence of the 9/11 conspiracy. NORAD is the world's most
sophisticated aerospace defense system, with backups and redundancies that
make it extremely reliable and effective. NORAD routinely intercepts off
course or out of communication aircraft of all kinds, especially near such
security-sensitive areas as New York City and the Pentagon. On 9/11, FOUR
allegedly hijacked subsonic-speed commercial jets were out of communication
and flying towards known terrorist targets for well over an hour. NOT ONE of
these planes was intercepted by NORAD! We were told that NORAD only looks
for aircraft coming from outside the USA, but this is a blatant LIE, given
the history of NORAD's routine interceptions!
The following article proves, using the inviolate laws of physics, the
falsity of the government's propaganda explanation for the World Trade
Center building collapses:
SIMPLE PHYSICS EXPOSES THE BIG 9/11 LIE - GOVERNMENT BUILDING COLLAPSE
EXPLANATION FAILS REALITY CHECK
On September 11, 2001, the world watched in horror as the World TradeCenter
(WTC) Twin Towers collapsed, killing thousands of innocent people. Videos of
the collapses were replayed ad nauseam on TV for days. About 5 hours after
the towers fell, WTC building 7 also collapsed suddenly, completely, and
straight down at near free-fall speed. This steel-framed building was not
touched by the planes that struck the towers, and had sustained relatively
minor debris damage and small fires. Nearby buildings far more heavily
damaged remained standing.
In June 2005, in an apparent response to an article by Morgan Reynolds,
former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated,
"The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September11,
2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day
goes beyond the pale."
We will prove here, with scientific rigor, that it's the government's tale
that's "beyond the pale!"
Did most of the American people really understand the unprecedented
phenomena they had witnessed? Could a lack of knowledge of physics, and the
emotional shock of this mass-murderous "terrorist attack" have stymied
objective thinking and led to the blind acceptance of authoritarian
assertions?
The government and the media TOLD US what we saw. The government told us
that we had witnessed a "gravitational" collapse; what is now referred to as
a "pancake collapse". According to the government claims, the plane crashes
and subsequent kerosene (like lamp oil - jet fuel is NOT exotic) fires
heated the UL-certified structural steel to the point where it was
significantly weakened, which is very difficult to believe, never mind
repeat in an experiment. Even with massive fires that incinerate everything
else, the steel frames of such buildings generally remain standing.
According to the "pancake theory", this purported (all physical evidence was
quickly and illegally destroyed) weakening supposedly caused part of the
tower to collapse downward onto the rest of the tower, which, we've been
repeatedly told, somehow resulted in a chain reaction of the lower floors
sequentially, one at a time, yielding to the weight falling from above.
There are some problems with that theory - it does not fit the observed
facts
* It cannot account for the total failure of the immense vertical steelcore
columns - as if they were there one moment and gone the next.
* The collapse times were near free-fall, far too rapid to be due to gravity
alone. This article focuses on the latter of these two discrepancies.
Those that concocted the "pancake theory" made a fatal error - they didn't
check their story against the inviolate laws of physics! This is easy to do,
even without any physical evidence to examine. We can test that incredible
pancake tale using basic high-school physics. Let's do that - use a simple,
unassailable, incontrovertible conservation-of-energy analysis to perform a
reality check that establishes once and for all that the government, and
such government story backers as PBS, Popular Mechanics, and Scientific
American have falsified the true nature of the 9/11 disaster.
How Gravity Acts:
Sir Isaac Newton noticed that apples fell from trees. Others had also
noticed this, but none had ever devised a theory of gravity from the
observation. Over the years, mankind has learned that the force ofgravity at
and near Earth's surface produces an acceleration of known constant
magnitude. That doesn't mean we know HOW it works, or WHY, but we have
become able to predict its effects with a high degree of precision and
certainty - gravity has always had the same, predictable, effect.
Galileo Galilei used the leaning tower of Pisa to demonstrate that a large
ball and a small one (of lesser mass) fell (accelerated downward) at the
same rate. Prior to Galileo, people had just assumed that heavier objects
fall faster, much the way they had assumed the Earth was flat.
So while an object of greater mass will exert more force (its weight) upon
anything supporting it against gravity's pull, it does not experience any
greater acceleration when gravity's pull is not opposed - when it is
falling. Earth's gravity at and near the surface of the planet can only
accelerate objects downward at one known, constant rate: 32 feet persecond
for each second of free fall. As Galileo demonstrated centuries ago, heavier
objects are not accelerated any quicker than are lighter objects.
So Earth's gravity produces a downward acceleration of 32 feet per second
per second. This means that an object, after falling one second, will be
falling at a speed of 32 ft/sec. After the 2nd second, it will be falling at
64 ft/sec. After the 3rd second, it will be falling at 96 ft/sec., and so
on.
Further, since gravity's acceleration is constant, and an object isfalling
at 32 ft/sec after one second has elapsed, we know that it has averaged 16
ft/sec for the entire distance. Thus after one second, the object has fallen
16 feet.
Scientists have derived simple free-fall equations that can be used to
harness this knowledge mathematically. These equations can be found inany
high-school physics book
* Falling velocity = acceleration of gravity x time. (V = G x T)
And
* Distance fallen = 1/2 x acceleration of gravity x time squared. (D =1/2 x
G x T x T)
So if we want to know how far an object has free-fallen after 3 seconds
Distance = 1/2 x 32 x 9 = 144 feet
So after 3 seconds in Earth's gravity, an object will have fallen 144 feet
and will be falling at 96 ft/sec.
Checking Our Work:
We've just solved a simple physics problem. Now let's check our work,using
conservation of energy.
We know that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - it merely changes
form. If we take the potential (in this case chemical, molecular) energyin a
barrel of oil and burn it, it changes to heat energy. When we burn gasoline
in our car's engine, we get kinetic (motional) energy, plus some heat, as an
engine is not 100% efficient. When we use our car's brakes to bleed off some
of that kinetic energy (slow down), that energy isconverted into heat (the
brakes get hot). Explosives convert potential energy [molecular or atomic]
to kinetic energy (explosive force) quickly enough to shatter or even
pulverize concrete.
In the case of the free-falling object, the two kinds of energy we are
concerned with are kinetic energy and potential energy. Examples of
potential (gravitational) energy are the energy available from water stored
up high in a water tower, or a boulder perched atop a hill. If whateveris
holding it up there is removed, it will fall under the influence of
gravity's pull. As it accelerates downward, the potential energy is
converted to the kinetic energy of the object's motion.
So, as an object falls, it changes its potential energy into kinetic energy.
The equation for potential energy is
* Potential Energy = Mass (or weight) x Gravity x Height. (PE = M x G xH)
The equation for kinetic energy is
* Kinetic Energy = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity squared. (KE = 1/2 x M x V x V)
So let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that our falling object hasa
mass of 1. (Remember, the object's mass will affect its energy, and its
momentum, but not its rate of free-fall.)
The potential energy given up by falling 3 seconds (144 ft) is: 1 x 32x144
= 4608
The kinetic energy gained after falling 3 seconds is 1/2 x 1 x 96 squared
=1/2 x 9216 = 4608
So, the available potential energy was converted into kinetic energy.Seeing
that energy was, in fact, conserved is how we know that the answer in the
simple case above was correct. We've checked our work, using an independent
analysis, based upon the sound physical principle of conservation of energy.
Now, and only now, we can be certain that our answer was correct.
One Little Complication - the effect of air resistance
The free-fall equations above reflect a perfect, frictionless world. They
perfectly predict the behavior of falling bodies in a vacuum. In fact, you
may have seen a science class demonstration in which the air is pumped out
of a tube and then a feather will fall, in that vacuum, just as fast as will
a solid metal ball.
That's how parachutes work: much of the falling object's potential energy
gets expended doing the work of pushing a lot of air out of the way inorder
for the object to fall. As a result, not all of the gravitational potential
energy can go towards accelerating the object downward at gravity's rate of
32 ft/sec/sec.
In other words, only when there is zero frictional resistance can any
falling object's potential energy be completely converted into kinetic
energy. Anything that resists a falling object's downward velocity reduces
its acceleration from the maximum gravitational acceleration of 32 feet per
second per second, as some of gravity's potential energy is consumed in
overcoming frictional resistance.
This explains the phenomena of "terminal velocity". The free-fall equations
predict that a falling object's velocity will continue to increase without
limit. But in air, once a falling object reaches a certain speed, its
propensity to fall will be matched by the air's resistance to the fall.At
that point the object will continue to fall, but its speed will no longer
increase over time. Another way of looking at it is this: gravity's
incessant force produces a downward acceleration, but friction with theair
creates an upward force and thus an upward acceleration. When falling at
terminal velocity, the acceleration downward equals the accelerationupward,
they cancel each other out, and a constant downward velocity ismaintained.
Thus the parachute, with its high air friction resistance, allows theperson
attached to it to float to earth unharmed.
A Quick Recap:
Earth's gravity causes objects to fall, and they fall according to precise
physical equations. The equations assume no air or other resistance. Any
resistance at all will cause the object to fall less rapidly than it would
without that resistance. If a falling object is affected by airresistance it
falls slower than it would if free-falling, and it will take longer to fall
a given distance.
Free-fall From WTC Building Heights
The towers were 1350 and 1360 feet tall; average = 1355 feet. Let's start by
using our free-fall equation to see how long it should take an objectto
free-fall from the towers' height.
Distance = 1/2 x Gravity x Time squared. (D = 1/2 x G x T x T)
With a little basic algebra, we solve the equation for the fall time,T:
2 x Distance = Gravity x Time(squared) (2 x D = G x T x T)
Time squared = (2 x Distance) / Gravity (T x T = 2 x D / G)
Time squared = 2 x 1355 / 32 = 84.7 (T = square root of (2 x D / G))
Time = 9.2
So our equation tells us that it takes 9.2 seconds to free-fall to the
ground from the height of the WTC towers.
Using our simpler equation, V = G x T, we can see that at 9.2 seconds, the
free-falling object's velocity must be about 295 ft/sec, which is justover
200 mph.
But that can only occur IN A VACUUM.
Since the WTC was in Earth's atmosphere at sea level, you might be able to
imagine how much air resistance that represents. Think about putting your
arm out the window of a car moving even half that fast! Most free-falling
objects reach their terminal velocity long before they reach 200 mph. For
example, the terminal velocity of a free-falling human body is around 120
mph. The terminal velocity of a free-falling cat is around 60 mph.
Therefore, it is clear that air resistance alone will make it take longer
than 9.2 seconds for anything falling from the towers' height to reach the
ground.
Observations from 9/11:
On page 305 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we are told, in the government's
"complete and final report" on 9/11, that the South Tower collapsed in 10
seconds. Here is the exact quote
"At 9:58:59, the South Tower collapsed in ten seconds". That's the
government's official number. With all the videos that show it, they could
not lie about this.
But as we've determined above, the FREE-FALL TIME IN A VACUUM is 9.2
seconds, and 10 seconds is an exceptionally short fall time through the air.
This "collapse" was not without far more physical resistance than from the
air alone. It proceeded through all the lower stories of the tower. Those
undamaged floors below the plane impact zone offered resistance thousands of
times greater than that of air. Those lower stories, and the central steel
core columns, had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years
despite hurricane-force winds and tremors. Air cannot do that.
Can anyone possibly imagine undamaged lower floors getting out of the way of
the upper floors as gracefully and relatively without friction as air would?
Can anyone possibly imagine the lower stories slowing the fall of the upper
floors less than would, say, a parachute?
It is beyond the scope of the simple but uncontested physics here to tell
you how long such a collapse should have taken. Would it have taken a
minute? Ten minutes? Hard to say, but certainly it would take far more than
10 seconds!
What is certain, beyond any shadow of a doubt, is that the towers could not
have collapsed gravitationally, through their intact lower stories, as
rapidly as was observed on 9/11. Not even close. This is shown above to be
physically impossible!
Not only was tremendous energy expended in causing the observed massive
high-speed sideways debris ejections, but virtually all the concrete and
glass of the tower was pulverized - actually dissociated is a better word.
Never mind what happened to all the supporting steel core columns! The
energy requirements to do anything like that, alone, rival the total amount
of potential energy that the entire tower had to give. Gravity alone is
sufficient to cause some things to fall that far, even through air, in close
to the observed 10 second collapse time. But that is without the huge
expenditure of energy necessary to pulverize all of that concrete and glass,
eject debris, plus cause the steel core columns to effectively disappear.
The gravitational potential energy present was certainly not enough to have
done all these things at once.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it only changes form. So WHERE
DID ALL THAT ADDITIONAL DESTRUCTIVE ENERGY COME FROM?
Conclusions
In order for the towers to have collapsed "gravitationally" in the observed
duration, as we've been told over and over again, one or more of the
following zany-sounding conditions must have been met
* The undamaged structure below the impact zone offered zero resistance to
the collapse.
* The glass and concrete spontaneously disintegrated without any expenditure
of energy.
* The massive vertical steel core columns simply vanished, as if by magic.
* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, gravity was much stronger than
gravity.
* On 9/11 alone, in that location alone, energy was not conserved.
None of these laws-of-physics-violating, and thus impossible, conditions can
be accounted for by the official government theory of 9/11, nor by any of
the subsequent analyses and arguments designed to prop up this official myth
of 9/11.
The Bottom Line
The government explanations for the WTC collapses fail the most basic
conservation-of-energy reality check. Therefore the government theory is
FALSE; it does not fit the observed facts, and the notion of a "pancake
collapse" cannot account for what happened. The "pancake collapse"
explanation is impossible, and thus absurd. It is A LIE.
It is utterly impossible for a gravitational collapse to proceed so
destructively through a path of such great resistance in anywhere near
free-fall time. This fact debunks the preposterous contention that theWTC
collapses can be blamed solely upon damage resulting from the plane impacts.
The unnaturally short durations of the top-down collapses reveal that the
towers did not disintegrate because they were coming down, but rather they
came down because something else was causing them to disintegrate.
So, to the extent that people accept the ridiculous "pancake collapse"
story, former CIA Director and current Secretary of Defense Gates' other
premise, that people know what they saw, is also false. It is left to you to
decide if his conclusion, which was based upon clearly incorrect
presumptions, is also flawed.
The collapse of WTC building 7, which was NOT hit by any plane, and which
also collapsed within a second of free-fall time later that same day,
similarly fails the conservation-of-energy analysis. The 9/11 Commission
made no attempt to explain it.
Just how and why so many highly-accredited and credentialed people all so
miserably failed to check the "pancake collapse" theory, by giving it this
basic physics reality check, is beyond the scope of this analysis.
---------
FURTHER IRREFUTABLE PROOF BY PHYSICS OF THE 9/11 INSIDE JOB
http://vehme.blogspot.com/2007/12/glaring-proof-of-something-hotter-than.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_law_of_black_body_radiation Also see:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
SO - WHO DONE IT??
Any good detective will tell you that the way to find criminals is to
investigate those that benefitted, or stood to benefit, from the crime.
Surely those that were quickly blamed for this mass-murderous crime of the
century - Bin Laden, etc., had evil intentions against America, but could
not have done it single-handedly. Just after 9/11 Iraq and Saddam Hussein
were implied as guilty in a PSYOP to justify the invasion of Iraq, when in
fact they were blameless for 9/11.
Here are some that, under the criteria of the good detective above, must be
considered suspects:
Bush, Cheney, and their fellow Republican/neo-conservatives then in power.
Then NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani.
WTC owner/leaseholder Larry Silverstein.
The theocratic nation of Israel.
DEMAND that congress reopen the investigation and bring the real
MASS-MURDERERS to justice!
NINE ELEVEN - NEVER AGAIN!
Crickets
Apr 28, 2013, 8:04:43 AM4/28/13
to
On Apr 26, 10:06 am, "Freedom Man" <freespe...@4eva.com> wrote:
> The 9/11 "ATTACK" - ELEVEN YEARS, NO JUSTICE!
>
> The crime of the century that mass-murdered 3000 innocent Americans on
> September 11, 2001 remains unsolved. ... <snip>.
> The 9/11 "ATTACK" - ELEVEN YEARS, NO JUSTICE!
>
> The crime of the century that mass-murdered 3000 innocent Americans on
Zionist Uncle Sam is a God Damned Liar.
I want to see three thousand birth and death certificates for the
vicsim 3000.
Cough 'em up, Freedon Man, or I'll beat them out of ya with a two by
four.
"Freedom Man" in Orwellian America would be the FEMA Camp Warden.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_warden
The FEMA camp Warden (Freedom Man) supervises all the operations in
their prison, dealing with the personnel of the prison (ranging from
prison officers, prison doctors, janitors, cooks, and other
occupations), stewarding public funds which they would use
appropriately, securing the safety of the public, and handling the
prison which would contain thousands of people.
The FEMA Camp Warden (Freedon Man) can also arrange for programs like
work crews of prisoners where they perform work at the prison and the
local communities. ...
0 new messages