The naked ape
Poussière des rêves
chie...@aol.comnojunk (Chief989) wrote:
> In article <8dsfno$60j$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, Poussière des rêves
> <huma...@about.com> writes:
>
> >
> >I wasn't making a claim, I was asking a question. It was a question a
> >person with severe learning difficulties might have understood.
> >Seemingly it was well beyond your abilities. The alternative
> >explanation is that you are cripplerd with some agenda or other or
else
> >are just a hopelessly rude and ignorant person.
> >
> >Can *you* find me a state of the American union wherein the convicted
> >sex predators comprise a significant female component? Say over 5
> >percent? What does that ultimately prove? I will tell you, as in
> >murder and serious violence, males perpetrate nearly all of it.
> >Therefore the only people who don't have 'proof' are the deadbeat
women
> >haters on these news groups.
> >
> >
>
> You accuse someone else of being hopelessly rude and ignorant while
you bandy
> about catchphrases like "deadbeat women haters". A little ironic and
not very
> productive, that is if productive discussion is what you are looking
for and
> not just a little male bashing.
>
I am entitled to my pinion. It is not rude relative to their preceding
behaviour really is it? Deadbeat intellects started the abuse and
ridicule and are living on a different planet.
They are hopelessly pursuing a seemingly dishonest and bogus agenda and
resort to pejorative rancour because sane people object to their
spurious laughable drivel.
There has to be a reason for ocean going kook positions. There just has
to be. The truth has no agenda, grade A and cast iron BS most certainly
does. I sense an enormous resentment with any educated 'real world'
perspective.
My impression is that there are kooks out there who can't support their
drivel with any bona fide references and this (USENET) is a ghetto some
of them have resorted to. Sane people would just accept reality once
established. Therefore in my opinion we have a bogus dishonest agenda
reliant on tediously labored mendacity.
Women do not feature in any sizable way amongst those convicted of
violent sex crime or murder. That is a proven fact. I was interested
to see if there was one guy who could produce evidence in just one
state of the union of hordes of female convicted of either violent sex
crime or murder. Nobody has attempted it because they know it is
impossible.
We have previously had on this thread idiots calling Government
stats "lies". I mean what the hell kind of attitude is that? It is kook
stuff. It is the sort of utterly moronic prevarication that kooks do.
The Government stats were based on 8,000 court cases. Nobody has made a
bigger effort.
There is an agenda at work and it is no different to the fruitcakes
posting about Dachau not hurting any jews and kooks posting to sheetboy
news groups. Women have to contend with a similarly dubious set of
outrageous antagonists. It is garbage without intellect.
--
Poussière des rêves
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.