You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
----------------Original Message-------------
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 21:28:57 -0600 (CST), you wrote:
|>------------------------------
|>
|>Subject: Letter: Thousands of gun owners support the registry
|>
|>MONTREAL GAZETTE - NOVEMBER 2, 2011
|>Letter: The killing of the long-gun registry
|>http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/killing+long+registry/5642381/story.html |>
|>Re: "Gun owners win; women lose" (Opinion, Oct. 28).
|>http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Opinion+owners+women+lose/5618734/story.html |>
|>The Conservative government is intent on doing away with the gun registry
|>because of its dogma that gun ownership is a right and not a privilege. But
|>thousands of gun owners support the registry because they feel it is a tool
|>police can use to combat and prevent gun-related crimes. This protects
|>legitimate, legal gun ownership. There should be a legal challenge to stop
|>the government from destroying the records in the registry.
|>
|>David Superstein, Montreal West
|>
|>------------------------------
That's a good concept, or legal tool AFTER they have confiscated
your guns, and you get a complete 9 yards review for a duration of some
1-->3 years.
Buy that time they would have scratched your guns and have performed
a serious bunch of chamber/cartridge pressure overcharging experiments at
YOUR expense..........did I mention the bent barrels caused by the pink
cable running from the muzzle to breach and torqued on as cheap "trigger
guard" concept configuration.