(Dec 25 2009)
Few would guess that a simple murder trial will have international
implications, but the trial of Alberto Alvarez for the first degree
murder of a California cop Richard May is sure to bring deadly reprisals
against Californians from the Third World and by non-white Latinos
living in California.
The date was January 2007. Alvarez was minding his own business eating
at an East Palo Alto restaurant when he was assaulted by a thug. He did
not draw his weapon, but left the restaurant. The restaurant owner then
called the police. Richard May of the East Palo Alto Police Department
gang, saw Alvarez walking down the street. He then tossed his billyclub
at Alvarez and shot him in the leg. Alvarez, fearing for his life, then
drew his own gun and shot at May, killing him.
The revisionist prosecutors from San Mateo County police court, led by
District Attorney James Fox, Steve Wagstaffe and Craig Parsons were able
to misinform the jury about the law and appeal to their passions. The
defense attorneys were weak, one of whom was a Jew. Inadmissible
speculative evidence and inadmissible character evidence was allowed and
designed to place a cloud over clear evidence that would have exonerated
Alvarez for shooting May in self-defense. The prosecution could not
establish by relevant evidence that Alvarez was guilty "beyond a
reasonable doubt" the proper standard for a criminal conviction.
The jury was not allowed to weigh the depravity of the prosecutors, who,
only weeks before the incident, dismissed an inquiry against local
police who gunned-down Stanley Wong, a homeless man with a shopping cart
who tried to kick the butts of 3 police officers who confronted him. "I
feared for my safety", claimed the police officer who pulled the
trigger. Alvarez not only claimed he feared for his safety, but the
circumstances of the incident clearly proved it. In contrast, the
police who executed Wong could have clearly used a higher standard of
care and without drawing their guns.
Other executions of citizens by police were also excluded from the jury.
These executions could have rebutted any character evidence favorable to
May. Character evidence of May's military training to kill adversaries
was also excluded. May served as a Marine in Iraq.
According to California law, Alvarez could have been tried for
manslaughter, but the fact that he was subjected to a
"kill-or-be-killed" situation would have normally precluded a
prosecution and conviction even for that.
Richard May was white, blond, and with blue eyes. So are his wife and
daughters who attended the trial and were clearly visible by the jury
every day of the trial and in the newspapers. Alberto Alvarez is
obviously Latino, dark hair, dark eyes, medium dark skin, and by all
standards a non-White. There appeared to be no racial motive for killing
May, but it should be strongly presumed there was a racial motive for
convicting Alvarez. It was not argued by the defense that May, a former
Marine, should not have accepted assignments in dangerous neighborhoods
because of the risks that would affect his dependent family.
Nonetheless, the well-tampered jury prounounced a death sentence for
Alvarez as a White Christmas gift to May's family.
"With a beautiful family like that, Richard May had to be a real jerk to
take those police assignments. I feel so sad for them." commented one
critic.
It could be expected now that California's Hispanic population will plot
killings of their White overlords, such as homeowners, business
proprietors and factory elites. This would be a bloodbath unprecedented
in U.S. history.
San Mateo County is the former home of Patricia Hearst, the famous
hostage of the Symbionese Liberation Army of the 1970's. East Palo Alto
is a slave community with most of its male population non-White and
related to the prison system. It is the home of a local association
calling itself "The Taliban" in emulation of foreign resistance against
the U.S. police state. The local Taliban was most likely provoked into
existence by the White police-state culture.
Several comments may be of interrest from the readers' forum at
http://www.paloaltoonline.com :
Posted by Mr. Ironic, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Nov
25, 2009 at 3:48 pm
"Cops abuse their power way to often including May which I know from
first hand experience. I've lived in East Palo Alto for 28 years have a
clean record, college educated and have had 8 different cops pull guns
out on me in my lifetime including May. Not once has a civilian pulled a
gun out on me. I fear cops cause they can kill you and get away with it.
911 has always been a joke in my town."
Posted by Me, a resident of the Midtown neighborhood, on Nov
26, 2009 at 12:48 pm
"It's true, police nowadays execute everything with full
force. They believe that they are above the law, and that they can do
anything... Of course part of the reason they believe that is that they
can get away with anything. There are no consequences for police
officers unless they do something that is noticeably against the law.
Police think that they can violate your rights and just search you with
no probable cause whatsoever, and that is just going straight against
what they're paid to do. Personally i feel that this case was not taken
seriously enough by the jury, and that this man obviously did not
perform a first degree murder. If the captain of the EPAPD even said
that May was not following the guidelines, then May must have not being
doing his job properly... "It wasn't the police who caused this to
happen" Actually it was, it was pretty clear that the pig wasn't
following standard procedure, and guidelines that were given to him.
And that deviance gave him what he was asking for."
-----------------
This remailer is a free service that allows individuals including crime
victims, domestic violence victims, persons in recovery, and others,
such as *those living under oppressive regimes*, to communicate
confidentially in a manner that ensures their privacy under even the
most adverse conditions.