Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Interview with Michael Hess: Evidence that NIST Lied about When He and Barry Jennings Were Rescued
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
VTR  
View profile  
 More options Sep 28 2008, 2:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.terrorism.world-trade-center, nyc.politics, alt.activism, alt.true-crime
From: VTR <vexjo...@gmx.us>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:36:22 -0500
Local: Sun, Sep 28 2008 2:36 am
Subject: Interview with Michael Hess: Evidence that NIST Lied about When He and Barry Jennings Were Rescued
The 9/11 Interview with Michael Hess:
Evidence that NIST Lied about When He and Barry Jennings Were Rescued

by David Ray Griffin
September 17, 2008

Shortly after the first strike on the World Trade Center, which occurred at 8:46 AM on 9/11,
Michael Hess, New York City's corporation counsel, and Barry Jennings, the deputy director of
the Emergency Services Department of the New York City Housing Authority, headed to the Office
of Emergency Management's Emergency Operating Center, which was on the 23rd floor of WTC 7,
where they assumed that Mayor Rudy Giuliani would be. But when Hess and Jennings arrived, the
place was empty. Jennings then telephoned someone to ask what they should do and was told that
they should leave immediately. Finding that the elevators would not work, they started down the
stairs. When they reached the sixth floor, however, there was a powerful explosion beneath
them, which, Jennings told the makers of Loose Change Final Cut,1 caused the landing on which
they were standing to give way. Making their way back up to the eighth floor, they were able to
break a window and call for help. Hess later reported: "[W]e were trapped on the eighth floor
with smoke, thick smoke, all around us, for about an hour and a half [before] the New York Fire
Department . . . came and got us out."2

Hess made this statement while being interviewed by Frank Ucciardo of UPN 9 News "on Broadway
about a block from City Hall," almost a half mile from WTC 7. This interview began before noon,
most likely at 11:34. The conclusion that it began at 11:34 is based on evidence derived from a
DVD containing UPN 9 programs from that morning, in which the Hess interview begins at the
57-minute mark. According to a note on the DVD itself, its video began at 10:37 AM, which would
mean that the Hess interview began at 11:34. It is possible, however, that the video might have
actually started at 11:00: At the 111-minute mark, the UPN 9 program switched to live coverage
by CNN of a Taliban news conference, and the only reference we have been able to find to this
coverage indicates that it began at 12:51.3 This would mean that the video began at 11:00 and
the Hess interview, therefore, at 11:57. Nevertheless, whether the earlier or the later
starting time is correct, UPN 9 News began interviewing Michael Hess before noon.

However, NIST---the National Institute of Standards and Technology---which was tasked with
providing the official explanation of the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, claimed that
the two men were rescued at "12:10 to 12:15 PM."4 Why might NIST have made this claim? The
reason becomes evident in another NIST document's statement about Hess and Jennings, which begins:

"With the collapse of the two towers, a New York City employee and a WTC 7 building staff
person became trapped inside of WTC 7. The two had gone to the OEM center on the 23rd floor and
found no one there. As they went to get into an elevator to go downstairs the lights inside of
WTC 7 flickered as WTC 2 collapsed. At this point, the elevator they were attempting to catch
no longer worked, so they started down the staircase."5

According to NIST, therefore, Hess and Jennings, upon finding the OEM center vacated, started
downstairs just after 9:59, when the second tower collapsed. It was this collapse, NIST
suggested, that was responsible for the elevator's failure to work.

As we saw earlier, however, Jennings said that they had arrived at the OEM center shortly after
the strike on the North Tower, hence around 9:00 AM. He added, in fact, that he had to have
been on the 23rd floor "when the second plane hit" (which was at 9:03).6 Besides contradicting
Jennings' testimony on that point, the NIST account went on to say:

"When they got to the 6th floor, WTC 1 [the North Tower] collapsed, the lights went out in the
staircase, the sprinklers came on briefly, and the staircase filled with smoke and debris. The
two men went back to the 8th floor broke out a window and called for help."7

According to NIST, therefore, what Hess and Jennings took to be an explosion in WTC 7 was
really just an effect of the collapse of the North Tower. That collapse occurred at 10:28.
Accordingly, if the two men were then trapped for about 90 minutes before they were rescued,
this rescue must have occurred at about noon---hence NIST's claim that they were rescued at
"12:10 to 12:15 PM."

NIST's timeline is clearly implausible. Claiming that Hess and Jennings started down the stairs
after the collapse of the South Tower caused the elevator to fail, NIST implies that it took
them 29 minutes---from 9:59 to 10:28---to descend from the 23rd floor to the 6th floor.

NIST's timeline is also directly contradicted by the testimony of Jennings, who said: "After
getting to the 8th floor everything was dark . . . . [B]oth buildings were still standing.
Because I looked . . . one way, looked the other way. . . . [B]oth buildings were still standing."8

The strongest evidence against NIST's timeline, however, is Hess's interview with UPN 9 News.
Defenders of the official account, according to which there were no explosions in WTC 7, might
challenge the truth of Jennings's testimony. But if Hess was giving an interview almost a half
mile away before noon, then NIST's timeline, according to which the two men were not rescued
until after noon, is objectively disproved. This is the case whether we accept the 11:34 or the
11:57 starting time for this interview.

Given the fact that the interview occurred almost a half mile from the WTC, it would probably
have taken Hess at least a half hour to get there after he was rescued (he surely would have
talked to firefighters and other officials about the ordeal before taking off). So if the
interview began at 11:34, he and Jennings would have been rescued before 11:05. If the
interview began at 11:57, they would have been rescued before 11:30.

In either case, NIST's explanation for the event that Hess and Jennings took to be a massive
explosion in WTC 7 itself is disproved. If the two men were rescued before 11:05 after having
been trapped, as Hess said, for about 90 minutes, the event must have occurred before 9:35.
Even if they were not rescued until closer to 11:30, the event must have occurred at least by
10:00. In either case, the event could not have been the collapse of the North Tower, which did
not occur until 10:28.

That said, I endorse the earlier times---11:34 for the beginning of the Hess interview, 11:05
or earlier for the rescue, and 9:35 or earlier for the explosion---for three reasons. First,
the note on the DVD says that the video started at 11:34. Second, the account by Hess and
Jennings suggests that they would have reached the 6th floor, where the landing was knocked out
from under them, at about 9:15. Third, whereas the later times would suggest that this event
occurred around 10:00, Jennings stated, as we saw, that after the explosion occurred and he and
Hess made it back up to the 8th floor, the South Tower, which collapsed at 9:59, was still
standing.

As I pointed out in The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, a BBC special on WTC 7 that aired July 6,
2008 ("The Conspiracy Files: 9/11--The Third Tower"), distorted Jennings' testimony. Although
he evidently told the BBC interviewer the same story he had earlier told to the makers of Loose
Change Final Cut, the BBC placed his testimony within the time-framework suggested by NIST. So,
after playing footage in which Jennings described a massive explosion in WTC 7 (which was
probably at about 9:15), the BBC says: "At 10:28, the North Tower collapses. . . . Tower 7
takes a direct hit. . . . Early evidence of explosives were just debris from a falling
skyscraper."9

However, Jennings will apparently not be available to correct the record. Jennings, 53 years
old, evidently died in August 2008, reportedly only a few days before NIST issued its report on
WTC 7.10

In any case, UPN 9's interview of Michael Hess is now publicly available, thanks to Dylan
Avery, who made a copy of it available, and Fred Burks, who posted it at The Transformation
Team (click here).

NOTES

1 This interview was not included in Loose Change Final Cut at Jennings' request, after he had,
he said, received threats to his job. But after Jennings participated in a BBC documentary
about WTC 7 ("The Conspiracy Files: 9/11--The Third Tower"), Dylan Avery, who had conducted the
interview, put it on the Internet: "Barry Jennings Uncut," Loose Change 911, July 9, 2008
(http://www.loosechange911.com/blog/?p=105). The term "uncut" in that title alludes to the fact
that extracts from this interview had already been posted on the Internet. The interview is
also included in a video, Fabled Enemies, produced by Jason Bermas, another member of the Loose
Change team.

2 For documentation of the information provided in this article, see Chapter 1 of David Ray
Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé (Northampton: Olive
Branch, 2008), 45-48.

3 Michael Ventura, "9/11: American Ungoverned"
(http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/column?oid=oid%3A83213).

4 NIST, Appendix L: Interim Report on WTC 7
(http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_june04/appendixl.pdf), L-18. No source for this claim is
cited.

5 NIST NCSTAR 1-8, Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center
Disaster: The Emergency Response Operations (http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-8.pdf), Section 5.9.

6 Quoted in Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, 46.

7 NIST NCSTAR 1-8: Section 5.9

8 Quoted in Griffin, The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, 46.

9 Ibid., 276-77 n184.

10 Aaron Dykes, "Key Witness to WTC 7 Explosions Dead at 53," Infowars.com, September 16, 2008
(http://www.infowars.com/?p=4602).


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »