TAROT = ZODIAC

[Academic Zodiac]

TAROT = ZODIAC

Why was it necessary to make people believe in 12 ascendants or even 13
zodiacal stations? Why hide something obvious? There are no 12 zodiacal
ascendants rising at east. Anyone �believing� in 12 ascendants would be
surprised at observing the real sky, while looking for whatever was
never there at all: childish models not of one�s own � a simplified
fabricated sky for anyone who couldn�t otherwise care less for any
starry sky at all. So, people don�t care about stars: they never did.
Over a long history, those who really observed the stars were not only
few: they can be traced to numbers less than three; approaching zero: ay
best, there would be some through larger China and Egypt where shreds of
zodiac would be found perhaps as traced back to Germany or revolutionary
France. Not only people in general, but also astronomers have no idea of
the zodiac. Not only of zodiacs and ascendant sets: that basic knowledge
is out of hand for most: a simple five minute scan can not penetrate
default mind at all; but also various tarot fortune tellers who of
course � like the rest � haven�t got the slightest idea of what the
Tarot could be. The basic precept is very simple, indeed: the Tarot is
the zodiac; there is no difference: 16 ascendants or guardian angels
along with 22 zodiacal stations: nothing simpler than that.







Win at all times! Positive daily magick http://bit.ly/UAbom0 #fb
http://bit.ly/UAbpq5