On Jul 7, 8:10 pm, FCS <sipston_
...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> Not that there is an "Arthurian Era" as such
> I saw this in a newspaper feature today and
> remembered the tarot deck.
> "Work is under way [...in Cambridgeshire...]
> to form a 3700 hectare fen between Huntingdon
> and Peterborough. It incorporates land that
> boasted the largest lake in England, outside
> Cumbria, until it was drained in the 19th
> Century."
> Given the commonality of localisation in oral
> legend this, notably, large, lake in South England
> may cloud the chronology of some aspects of
> where the myths originally formed, whether on
> Great Britain or in the Rhone valley, but must,
> regardless of the origin of narrative features, be
> considered as an environmental Cognitive Type
> in sufficiently many Old and Middle English minds
> to have stayed part of the landscape for so long.
> Then again, as Hierophants storm out of their
> towers all across Christendom in protest at the
> High Priestess and threaten to defect to various
> other sides - from which some presumably will
> counter-defect, by way of osmosis - it is nice to
> see English Geography demonstrate something
> less contentious than the holistic deluge.
> G DAEB
> COPYRIGHT (C) 2008 SIPSTON
> --
Subject: Two Signs Error - Age of Cetus
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Now what is the point. There is no point. we are approaching 2011 in
an asinine way, as armed with NASA but still doing the same errors
that were forbidden to the Jews by their monotheistic deity, generally
known as IHVH. In an allegedly Christian world and up the topocentric
slopes of the Himalayas the errors have different names as Chaldean
sin is now called mundane, sidereal, Vedic, tripical or younameit
astrology. In 2000 years man has not calculated a single exact
horoscope. Alleged cultural heroes could not state their own position
of the Sun, thus Sai Baba is informed that His natal Sun is in Libra
on November 23th (sic).
As all is over soon, we doubt that asinine errors ranging to quarter a
sky or worse will be corrected. Essentially no one is interested in
astrology. Even Bill Meridian keeps to the error rate in hope he can
make for it later. But people do not know that the true error rate has
nothing to do with ayanamsha as it has spread across two signs, also o
one doubted the ascent as it was assumed that the skies never rotate.
Thus you have completely false ascendants that were not neary there
when you were born. Kind of too late for truth as 2011 approaches, and
we have 2010 in focus, too.
In this perspective it is worthless even to predict. California might
be there or not, who knows: well we do or might, but generally
speaking, chances are that people will not notice even Doomsday. Why
should they?
http://lulu.com/astrology
Reply Reply to author Forward
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before
posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Candy West
View profile
More options Jul 10, 7:28 am
Newsgroups: alt.divination, alt.astrology, alt.apocalypse,
alt.astrology.asian, alt.jyotish
From: Candy West <wirel...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 22:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 10 2008 7:28 am
Subject: Re: Two Signs Error - Age of Cetus
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jul 10, 7:25 am, Candy West <wirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Now what is the point. There is no point. we are approaching 2011 in
> an asinine way, as armed with NASA but still doing the same errors
> that were forbidden to the Jews by their monotheistic deity, generally
> known as IHVH. In an allegedly Christian world and up the topocentric
> slopes of the Himalayas the errors have different names as Chaldean
> sin is now called mundane, sidereal, Vedic, tripical or younameit
> astrology. In 2000 years man has not calculated a single exact
> horoscope. Alleged cultural heroes could not state their own position
> of the Sun, thus Sai Baba is informed that His natal Sun is in Libra
> on November 23th (sic).
> As all is over soon, we doubt that asinine errors ranging to quarter a
> sky or worse will be corrected. Essentially no one is interested in
> astrology. Even Bill Meridian keeps to the error rate in hope he can
> make for it later. But people do not know that the true error rate has
> nothing to do with ayanamsha as it has spread across two signs, also o
> one doubted the ascent as it was assumed that the skies never rotate.
> Thus you have completely false ascendants that were not neary there
> when you were born. Kind of too late for truth as 2011 approaches, and
> we have 2010 in focus, too.
> In this perspective it is worthless even to predict. California might
> be there or not, who knows: well we do or might, but generally
> speaking, chances are that people will not notice even Doomsday. Why
> should they?
>
http://lulu.com/astrology Precession means that everything was rotating for a while, your
ascendant as well, thus the average error you probably enjoy is two or
more signs/constellations. What does it mean? If you go to popular web
sites that spread average error ike Swiss error astro.ch their
ephemeris are mangled by two signs. You are thus told that you are a
"Scorpio" with Sun in Virgo. What does it mean Sun in Virgo? The Sun
is in the Virgo constellation as conjunct a star there, e.g. Spica
Virginis is in Virgo, but in Switzerland it is soon in Scorpio, as it
moves as the error moves. All this is stupid but people believe in
astro.ch or worse. Worse. Yes it can be even worse like London Astro
Lodge, absolute drunkards, apart from +++Appleby, an institute called
Kepler, hilarious, and so on. with two signs of error and galopping
you can call yourself anything asinine in order to instill importance
to superstition. The ascendant has moved. You can not have Aries
ascending at due east, but you can have Aquila as the U.S.A. does. The
situation is funny since we had to calculate the U.S.A. ascendant at
the time when SKYGLOBE set the standards for astrology. Remember Orion
Mystery?I worked with those guys, ok? Once upon a time when men were
brave, Aries rose at east, those were the times of King Clovis and
King Arthur. Capricornus, Scorpius and other constellations do not
rise at east at this epoch. This is simply a fact. The mob does not
check the sky for precession as their "astrologers" are merely average
buffoons. lulu.com/astrology
posted by:
