Re: La Reunion breaks world rainfall records over 3 to 9 day periods, Feb 2007
Weatherlawyer
> On Mar 23, 6:46?am, "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 11:27?pm, Rodney Blackall <rblack...@rodsrisc.demon.co.uk>
> > wrote:
>
> > > In article <1173932611.611726.192...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> > > There is always intense ET (Extra-Tropical?) activity SOMEWHERE on Earth -
>
> > Looks like a no score draw for this week. Mist or mistyish weather
> > yesterday and no cyclonic activity.
>
> > But of course next week's spell will be much more interesting, no
> > that's not quite right...
>
> > The next spell (25th Mar with the phase at 18:16) ostensibly the same
> > sort of weather MUST produce a large tropical cyclone. Either that or
> > a severe earthquake to take its place.
>
> > (Assuming that the NAO remains positive that is.)
>
> OK then.
>
> A Magaquake is now on the cards.
>
> Lets see how the MetO's wonderputers deal with that then, boys and
> girls.
That's it then. Nothing much on the site for a week or so then:
6.0 Mag. 01:08 VANUATU
6.7 Mag. 00:41 NEAR THE WEST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
7.2 Mag. 00:40 VANUATU
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php
Major tragedies of course but still, not bad for an old man with
extraordinary insight.
(A low attention span and no database.)
Weatherlawyer
>
> - Show quoted text -
Back to normal:
http://satellite.ehabich.info/hurricane-watch.htm
Kara heads to Western Australia.
Surprisingly, I had assumed that the next cyclones I'd be talking
about would be in the Northern Indian Ocean, or somewhere towards the
Philippines.
That just goes to show the importance of having a good database.
Deep fog in parts but misty all the way from Stoke to Craven Arms this
morning. I am surprised that there is so little cyclonic activity.
One could use the absence to compare the factors and amplitudes of 7+
magnitude earthquakes in the system if one was aware of how to adjust
assemblies to show the weather more accurately.
No doubt all models are running to play catch up.
Boy, do I feel powerful!
sir.jp...@neuf.fr
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
... are you saying that you anticipated both those Quakes ?
Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464
Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~
for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
Nick Gardner
Don't encourage him, please! The village nutter, you understand?
Robb C. Overfield
nichola...@nospambtinternet.com said...
> ... are you saying that you anticipated both those Quakes ?
>
> Don't encourage him, please! The village nutter, you understand?
>
>
>
role....
--
Rob C. Overfield
Hull
Weatherlawyer
> On a tatty piece of sub-ether Nick Gardner at
>
> > Don't encourage him, please! The village nutter, you understand?
>
> I would have said the person in question is over-qualified for that
> role....
For some reason the hollowed halls of subterranean academia insist on
pinpointing the so called window of a prediction to unbelievably
narrow margins. If such were applied to meteorology then the Met
Office would have packed up and disappeared long, long before it was
The Board Of Trade.
However you only have to check back a day or two to the time I said
that a large magnitude quake was imminent to realise that I did indeed
forecast -in a manner of speaking, all three.
I don't expect anyone to take my words on board. However, when all you
duffers are dead and gone then someone will come along and, unhindered
by your soul destroying propensities, have another stab at it.
And then I shall be famous.
Dead famous but famous, none the less.
What can you do in your spare time that compares to what I do?
Weatherlawyer
5. Weatherlawyer View profile
More options Mar 23, 7:46 am
Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather
From: "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlaw...@gmail.com>
Date: 22 Mar 2007 23:46:04 -0700
Local: Fri, Mar 23 2007 7:46 am
Subject: Re: La Reunion breaks world rainfall records over 3 to 9 day
periods, Feb 2007
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this
author
On Mar 15, 11:27?pm, Rodney Blackall <rblack...@rodsrisc.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
> In article <1173932611.611726.192...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> There is always intense ET (Extra-Tropical?) activity SOMEWHERE on Earth -
Looks like a no score draw for this week. Mist or mistyish weather
yesterday and no cyclonic activity.
But of course next week's spell will be much more interesting, no
that's not quite right...
The next spell (25th Mar with the phase at 18:16) ostensibly the same
sort of weather MUST produce a large tropical cyclone. Either that or
a severe earthquake to take its place.
(Assuming that the NAO remains positive that is.)
Reply Reply to author Forward
6. Weatherlawyer View profile
More options Mar 24, 3:50 pm
Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather
From: "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlaw...@gmail.com>
Date: 24 Mar 2007 07:50:17 -0700
Local: Sat, Mar 24 2007 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: La Reunion breaks world rainfall records over 3 to 9 day
periods, Feb 2007
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this
author
On Mar 23, 6:46?am, "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> On Mar 15, 11:27?pm, Rodney Blackall <rblack...@rodsrisc.demon.co.uk>
Weatherlawyer
>
> For some reason the hollowed halls of subterranean academia insist on
> pinpointing the so called window of a prediction to unbelievably
> narrow margins. If such were applied to meteorology then the Met
> Office would have packed up and disappeared long, long before it was
> The Board Of Trade.
>
> However you only have to check back a day or two to the time I said
> that a large magnitude quake was imminent to realise that I did indeed
> forecast -in a manner of speaking, all three.
Cosidering the amount of fog we have had in Britain and the way it
occurrs along with tropic cyclones elsewhere, it was strange that the
storms in the waters around Australia petred out so mildly.
Then there was this:
A massive spring storm spawned dozens of tornadoes from the Rockies to
the Plains, killing at least four people in three states, including a
woman who was flung into a tree by a twister as wide as two football
fields.
Sixty-five tornadoes were reported late Wednesday in Oklahoma, Texas,
Kansas, Colorado and Nebraska, the National Weather Service said. The
storms continued Thursday afternoon, with a tornado injuring at least
five people in Oklahoma City.
http://www.poststar.com/articles/2007/03/30/ap/headlines/d8o682u83.txt
I am not claiming I had any idea they were coming, of course but it is
interesting that the power that must have been in the system should be
poured out so dramatically.
New things learned perhaps?
It would be nice if such desperate tragedies could be seen coming as
far in advance as the times of the phases of the moon can be.
Rodney Blackall
Weatherlawyer <Weathe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 28, 8:25?pm, "Weatherlawyer" <Weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
[Snip]
> Cosidering the amount of fog we have had in Britain and the way it
> occurrs along with tropic cyclones elsewhere, it was strange that the
> storms in the waters around Australia petred out so mildly.
[Snip]
What fog? Was it more than usual, usual, or less than usual?
Tropical cyclones are not associated with fog (except hill fog).
Surely you are not suggesting that Australian storms cause fog here or vice
versa!?
--
Rodney Blackall (retired meteorologist)(BSc, FRMetS, MRI)
Buckingham, ENGLAND
Using Acorn SA-RPC, OS 4.02 with ANT INS and Pluto 3.03j
Der Coach
Weatherlawyer
>
> A Magaquake is now on the cards.
>
> Lets see how the MetO's wonderputers deal with that then, boys and
> girls.
7.6 M. 2007/04/01 SOLOMON ISLANDS
In and out of the spell. Smart or what?
Weatherlawyer
>
> In and out of the spell. Smart or what?
Now let me hear about windows in getting accurate hits. Whaaaat?