Anticyclonic effects
Weatherlawyer
6.5 2007/01/31 03:15 -30 -178 Kermadec Islands, New Zealand
6.3 2007/01/30 21:37 21 145 Mariana Islands Region
6.8 2007/01/30 04:54 -55 148 West Of Macquarie Island
There is a similar blip noticeable in the weather over the UK. The
anticyclonic spell started with the last large magnitude quake on the
21st. There is still an anticyclone as would be brought on by the
subsequent time of the lunar phase but not with the fantastic clear
skies.
(Notable striations though.)
The weather forecasts on the telly warn that winds will take over from
the calm. Until then though the temperatures are rather high for the
time of year. I have the idea this change in the weather will be an
accompaniment to the change of phase which is also going to be
anticyclonic.
And the point I am mooting is that anticyclones over the UK are as
portentous as cyclones in the Indian Ocean and the Asian half of the
Pacific when it comes to earthquake activity.
And has me wondering too if there is a connection with tropical Lows
and West European Highs.
(It seems pretty conclusive to me that swarms of small earthquakes
around a fairly small region, occur when there is a tropical cyclone
raging. It also seems quite conclusive that fogs or mists here occur
when there is a tropical storm. The degree of visibility decreasing as
the strength of the cyclone increases.)
The end of the warm spell will bring a severe quake somewhere, to
early to say how strong. I believe there is a need for the spells to
run through a few similar phases with very few earthquakes of much
more than 5.5 Mag.
Since this part of the build up is missing and the weather forecasts
seem quite on the ball, it can only be stated as "something
interesting to watch unfolding" is about to occur.
Watch this space.
Weatherlawyer
Weatherlawyer wrote:
>
> It looks like the blip is over for low magnitude quakes
Or not, as the case may be.
> The end of the warm spell will bring a severe quake somewhere, to
> early to say how strong. I believe there is a need for the spells to
> run through a few similar phases with very few earthquakes of much
> more than 5.5 Mag.
>
> Since this part of the build up is missing and the weather forecasts
> seem quite on the ball, it can only be stated as "something
> interesting to watch unfolding" is about to occur.
A small reappraisal of the lunar phases shows that the weather is
going to be rather windy for the next spell with any high pressure
coming from a ridge therefore rather speculative:
Full moon 2nd Feb 05:45
> Watch this space.
Timberwoof
"Weatherlawyer" <Weathe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like the blip is over for low magnitude quakes:
>
> 6.5 2007/01/31 03:15 -30 -178 Kermadec Islands, New Zealand
> 6.3 2007/01/30 21:37 21 145 Mariana Islands Region
> 6.8 2007/01/30 04:54 -55 148 West Of Macquarie Island
>
> There is a similar blip noticeable in the weather over the UK. The
> anticyclonic spell started with the last large magnitude quake on the
> 21st. There is still an anticyclone as would be brought on by the
> subsequent time of the lunar phase but not with the fantastic clear
> skies.
Did you actually mention hurricanes, earthquakes, and tides, all in one
paragraph? Yes, you did. I can already tell this is going to be good.
> (Notable striations though.)
>
> The weather forecasts on the telly warn that winds will take over from
> the calm. Until then though the temperatures are rather high for the
> time of year. I have the idea this change in the weather will be an
> accompaniment to the change of phase which is also going to be
> anticyclonic.
Ahah! Now you've brought in "phase". I wonder what hat means in this
context.
> And the point I am mooting is that anticyclones over the UK are as
> portentous as cyclones in the Indian Ocean and the Asian half of the
> Pacific when it comes to earthquake activity.
You know, for once, I agree with you. Yes, indeed. "anticyclones" in the
UK have just as much to do with predicting earthquakes as cyclones do in
the Indian and Pacific Oceans.
Namely, none at all.
> And has me wondering too if there is a connection with tropical Lows
> and West European Highs.
Yeah, they're on the same planet. Sometimes tropical lows become
tropical storms which wander to Europe. That happened to me when I was
in Germany to observe the solar eclipse of 1999. The whole place was
covered in clouds. Some people at Land's End in England and some people
in Greece saw it, but the rest of us only got darkness. Do you hintk
there was a connection between Oleg camping out in Europe and the
eclipse?
> (It seems pretty conclusive to me that swarms of small earthquakes
> around a fairly small region, occur when there is a tropical cyclone
> raging.
Well, yeah, considering that there's a tropical cyclone raging *all the
time* on this planet, and there re swarms of small earthquakes *all the
time* too.
> It also seems quite conclusive that fogs or mists here occur
> when there is a tropical storm. The degree of visibility decreasing as
> the strength of the cyclone increases.)
You're being silly.
> The end of the warm spell will bring a severe quake somewhere, to
> early to say how strong.
Ptui. In case you haven't noticed, strong earthquakes happen on this
planet. They're not all that rare or special.
> I believe there is a need for the spells to
> run through a few similar phases with very few earthquakes of much
> more than 5.5 Mag.
>
> Since this part of the build up is missing and the weather forecasts
> seem quite on the ball, it can only be stated as "something
> interesting to watch unfolding" is about to occur.
>
> Watch this space.
Yeah. Weather will keep happening. Earthquakes will keep happening. You
got any *science* to back up what you're kinda sorta implying?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
"Like this cup," the master daid, "you are full of your own opinions and
speculations. How can I show you anything unless you first empty your cup?"
Timberwoof
"Weatherlawyer" <Weathe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Appraisal of the lunar phases shows that there will be weather.
Weatherlawyer
Timberwoof wrote:
>
> Appraisal of the lunar phases shows that there will be weather.
Is there any point to you besides the shape of your head?
Landy
"Timberwoof" <timberw...@infernosoft.com> wrote in message
news:timberwoof.spam-2A...@nnrp-virt.nntp.sonic.net...
> In article <1170253405.9...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
> "Weatherlawyer" <Weathe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Weatherlawyer wrote:
>> >
>> > It looks like the blip is over for low magnitude quakes
>>
>> Or not, as the case may be.
>>
>> > The end of the warm spell will bring a severe quake somewhere, to
>> > early to say how strong. I believe there is a need for the spells to
>> > run through a few similar phases with very few earthquakes of much
>> > more than 5.5 Mag.
>> >
>> > Since this part of the build up is missing and the weather forecasts
>> > seem quite on the ball, it can only be stated as "something
>> > interesting to watch unfolding" is about to occur.
>>
>> A small reappraisal of the lunar phases shows that the weather is
>> going to be rather windy for the next spell with any high pressure
>> coming from a ridge therefore rather speculative:
>>
>> Full moon 2nd Feb 05:45
>>
>> > Watch this space.
>
> Appraisal of the lunar phases shows that there will be weather.
>
The only way you can possibly not have weather is if time stops.
I always laugh at people who say "we won't have much weather tomorrow".
Why? Is the world going to end? Perhaps they mean we won't be having
much inclement weather?
cheers
Bill
Timberwoof
"Weatherlawyer" <Weathe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
You're certainly quick with the abuse. Not even for a moment do you
consider the possibility of defending your ... a, hell, I cannot in good
conscience use the term "scientific" to describe the silly oven-roasted
goodness of your cyclonic meanderings.
Timberwoof
"Weatherlawyer" <Weathe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Timberwoof wrote:
> > Yeah. Weather will keep happening. Earthquakes will keep happening. You
> > got any *science* to back up what you're kinda sorta implying?
> >
> > --
> > Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> http://www.timberwoof.com
> > "Like this cup," the master daid, "you are full of your own opinions and
> > speculations. How can I show you anything unless you first empty your cup?"
>
> My goodness me, you really have done your homework haven't you. What
> was your point again? Some sort of a canine snout for a cap is it?
>
> Does it help if I rattle your cage? They say another pack howling can
> get a wolf on heat. But somehow getting involved with you reminds me
> of the Simpson's cartoon; Chief Wiggum starving and teasing his guard
> dogs and having the effect ruined by getting too close to the
> characters.
>
> I beg you please, fuck off and think. It can't be that hard. Not even
> for you. Do you have anyone that can get you some prosaic? A touch of
> a little daily daily could help you get the testosterone out of your
> head.
Actually, I get quite enough prosaic on a regular basis. Sometimes, for
diversion, I also take some poetic.
> I don't expect you to be able to come to a logical conclusion of
> course.
Well, considering what passes for logic in your mind, as demonstrated by
your typical ramblings, I take that as a compliment. Thank you, Sir.
> ven if you calmed down I doubt you'd be capable of thinking
> about what I wrote, let alone thinking clearly. It's just that your
> rabid attachment to things beyond you is rather off putting. (Actually
> I think it is endearing. Or some sort of ring around your end.)
>
> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. I hope this hurts you more than it
> tickles me.
So in other words, you have no scientific basis at all for your silly
magnetic field moon phase weather earthquake kookery. Is there any point
to you, other than your daily typing practice and exercises in creating
complete and reasonably coherent (although, so far, divorced from
reality) sentences?