Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.talk.royalty
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Succession of a Posthumous Child in the UK
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
George Knighton  
View profile  
 More options Dec 17 2002, 10:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: georgeknigh...@aol.comm (George Knighton)
Date: 17 Dec 2002 15:35:42 GMT
Local: Tues, Dec 17 2002 10:35 am
Subject: Re: Succession of a Posthumous Child in the UK
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

>From: atsarisb...@hotmail.com
>If her mother had turned out to be pregnant,

My rather delicately phrased explanations have caused a couple of you to miss
the point.

Her Majesty would _not_ have been pregnant.

Their Majesties reached an agreement that there would be no heir other than the
heiress presumptive, Princess Elizabeth, and this agreement was reached well
before His Majesty's death.

Lord, have mercy, people, do I have to spell it out!?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google