alt.talk.royalty Google Group

Re: King Wesley

2008-07-08T12:55:07Z

Many localities recognise the legal validity of various types of
common-law marriage. The criteria for recognition varies from locality
to locality. Are the offspring of common-law marriages still in the
Order of Succession ? If so, what distinguishes the offspring of such
a marriage from the offspring of a cohabiting couple, or even from a

Own Grandfather

2008-07-08T03:59:30Z

How about Hakon Eirikson, Jarl of Lade or Trondelag & Hlathir (d.1030)? He
was Regent of Norway 1012-15 & 1028-29.
Firstly sharing the office with Sveinn Hakonarson & then with Canute the
Great.
Wikipedia makes some interesting comments about his family tree.
Wikipedia says that he was the son of Eirik Hakonson & Gytha, daughter of

Re: Royals now cost 4 pence a year more than last year !

2008-07-07T18:40:53Z

Just in case you haven't managed to work out what happened yet "Google
groups" broke your thread. If you lack the skills to use a proper
newsclient/newsreader then the problem will stay where originated, at
your keyboard.

Re: Coats of arms for ex and or attainted peers

2008-07-07T17:01:29Z

According to a former staff member of the College of Arms, posting in
the American Heraldry Society forum some time ago, a peer who
renounces his peerage also loses the use of any "accidents" of peerage
included in the arms, specifically the supporters, coronet, and barred
helm. He keeps the shield and crest and displays them with the helm

Re: King Wesley

2008-07-07T16:53:07Z

On Jul 7, 9:52 am, "Tom Wilding / Stephen Stillwell"
I wonder if Wesley Berger really thinks Ft. Bragg is in Texas, or if
we're just seeing the Daily Mail's usual high standards of accuracy at
work.
Of course, as Alexander McCall Smith's Moritz Maria von Igelfeld
hypothesized, one American state must be pretty much the same as any

Re: Royals now cost 4 pence a year more than last year !

2008-07-07T15:07:33Z

Did I delete the alt.talk.royalty group in my post to CJ buyers? are you
sure that's what I did?
This is just another one of your assumptions, a claim you have made
without even bothering to look at the headers to my post, if you look
you will see that the newsgroups listed are,
"Newsgroups:uk.politics.misc, scot.politics, alt.talk.royalty.

King Wesley

2008-07-07T13:52:10Z

Thought some of you would enjoy this. It is about people down the line in
the British succession.
[link]

Re: the "4th of July", 1776, "declaration": a Bible perspective

2008-07-07T12:56:33Z

As I pointed out 8 years ago, there are truly fascinating parallels
between the Declarations against James II, which are now available at:
[link] and at
[link]
and the charges against George III contained in the Declaration of

Mme. Musard & King Willem III of the Netherlands

2008-07-06T18:48:24Z

Does anyone have information about an American-born woman (her maiden
name was Blakeney and she was from Rockland County, New York), Mme.
Musard, whose French husband was a musical conductor and violinist?
She was a mistress of King Willem III and became quite wealthy through
her association with him until she indiscreetly told of his plans in

Re: Royals now cost 4 pence a year more than last year !

2008-07-06T14:09:29Z

The post to which I replied was posted to scot.politics, I replied to
scot.politics.

Re: Durchlaucht/Serene Highness in Danish (was Re: Denmark: Marriage between Prince Joachim and Miss Marie Cavallier)

2008-07-06T12:56:49Z

In these letters, _Celsitudo Vestra_ is used to directly address
rulers above the rank of Count and below the rank of King (kings are
_Majestas Vestra_). The Duke of Savoy is _Celsitudo Vestra Regalis_.
(The order of the words is not prescribed; Vestra Celsitudo Regalis,
Regalis Vestra Celsitudo are also found). I do not find "serena" or

Re: Durchlaucht/Serene Highness in Danish (was Re: Denmark: Marriage between Prince Joachim and Miss Marie Cavallier)

2008-07-06T11:41:50Z

The Germans were at least sometime extremely unpopular in Denmark;
their language therefore also.
In Germany, plus Liechtenstein, etc you have sovereign Houses who were
titled “Durchlaucht”, I believe. A minimum of relations - despite
unpopularity - had to exist. The German language may not have been

Re: Durchlaucht/Serene Highness in Danish (was Re: Denmark: Marriage between Prince Joachim and Miss Marie Cavallier)

2008-07-06T11:16:33Z

"CJ Buyers" <susuha...@hotmail.co.uk> skrev i melding
Well, I didn't make those claims in the first place, but only explained the
reasons behind the usage of the style Højhed (Highness) instead of the
old-fashioned
"Durchlaucthighed" (Serene Highness) for Princess Benedikte's husband the
Prince of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg and his 3 children. The court has just

Re: Royals now cost 4 pence a year more than last year !

2008-07-06T09:01:39Z

Why did you delete the atr address in this thread ? You have accused
me of being your troll. You behaviour is very suspect. This thread has
largely atr posters. If jumped in with express purpose of interrupting
the thread to make a point from another thread.

Re: Royals now cost 4 pence a year more than last year !

2008-07-06T08:23:09Z

He, 'Jellore' has the same problem in reading the posts of others, as
can be seen in his reply in another thread,
> ...I read your posts and that is how they come across to me. If you