Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Dag T. Hoelseth  
View profile
 More options May 10, 5:27 pm
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: "Dag T. Hoelseth" <dh...@nospam.online.no>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 23:27:16 +0200
Local: Sat, May 10 2008 5:27 pm
Subject: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
*Is this the future of the Royal Family?*

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/1942633/Is-...

(The Daily Telegraph 10 May 2008)

--
Dag T. Hoelseth
dh...@nospam.online.no
http://www.geocities.com/dagtho/royalty.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sacha  
View profile
 More options May 10, 6:59 pm
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: Sacha <sa...@nowhere.myzen.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 23:59:10 +0100
Local: Sat, May 10 2008 6:59 pm
Subject: Re: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
On 10/5/08 22:27, in article s-6dnRvT8c2njrvVRVnz...@telenor.com, "Dag T.

Hoelseth" <dh...@nospam.online.no> wrote:
> *Is this the future of the Royal Family?*

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/1942633/Is-...
> future-of-the-Royal-Family.html

> (The Daily Telegraph 10 May 2008)

I'm afraid this strikes me as the sort of article that is trotted out every
time a member of the British royal family marries.  The fine details may
vary but otherwise the overall tone is much the same.
Zara Phillips did a similar interview in Hello when she was living with her
previous boyfriend but this is studiously ignored by Peter Phillips present
critics.  The difference is that Zara didn't marry that boyfriend.
--
Sacha

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
CJ Buyers  
View profile
(2 users)  More options May 11, 3:47 am
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: CJ Buyers <susuha...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 00:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, May 11 2008 3:47 am
Subject: Re: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
On May 10, 11:59 pm, Sacha <sa...@nowhere.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

It is hard to be surprised. Live by media, die by media. All very well
signing up to a wad of cash from Hello, but giving one magazine an
exclusive only results in all the others who lose out trashing the
whole thing.

What bugs me is these people who make a great play of being "I am an
ordinary person",  "I don't want titles", "call me Jo", etc, etc, are
also the people who trade on their royal connections. Choose one or
the other. Either be in the Royal Family and subscribe to the duties
and responsibilities. Else, leave and work in relative anonymity in a
bank or growing vegitables in Shropshire.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sacha  
View profile
 More options May 11, 4:44 am
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: Sacha <sa...@nowhere.myzen.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 09:44:30 +0100
Local: Sun, May 11 2008 4:44 am
Subject: Re: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
On 11/5/08 08:47, in article
ae2fb6a0-a1c2-41f1-aada-38e772cee...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com, "CJ

I think it's tacky but I think that sort of think tacky whoever does it.
The problem the Phillips couple might find is that once you awaken the
sleeping dog of the media, you can't send it back into its kennel.
--
Sacha

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
atsarisb...@hotmail.com  
View profile
 More options May 14, 2:07 pm
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: atsarisb...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 11:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 14 2008 2:07 pm
Subject: Re: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
On May 10, 4:27 pm, "Dag T. Hoelseth" <dh...@nospam.online.no> wrote:

> *Is this the future of the Royal Family?*

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/1942633/Is-...

> (The Daily Telegraph 10 May 2008)

> --
> Dag T. Hoelseth
> dh...@nospam.online.nohttp://www.geocities.com/dagtho/royalty.html

The fact is, they haven't inherited power, only glamour. In the
present utterly commodified civilization, they'd be idiots not to
trade on it. And the media is brainlessly needy of objects in order to
make good livings. (I wish I could make as good a living just being
sleazy.) So they make use of it, but if it were not what the PUBLIC
wants, there would be no money in it. So I blame the public, frankly.

In her just-about-last interview, Diana told a friend at The New
Yorker, "Andrew and Anne work harder than all the rest of them, but
they hardly get any credit for it; it's most unfair."

P.S. The last reigning queen was also extremely close to her first
grandchild, who was sixth in line for the throne at his birth (ahead
of her four younger daughters) and who was at her bedside when she
died. He became Kaiser Wilhelm II. So it don't mean much, do it?

Jean Coeur de Lapin


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
CJ Buyers  
View profile
 More options May 15, 3:59 am
Newsgroups: alt.talk.royalty
From: CJ Buyers <susuha...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 00:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 15 2008 3:59 am
Subject: Re: UK: Is this the future of the Royal Family?
On May 14, 7:07 pm, atsarisb...@hotmail.com wrote:

" In her just-about-last interview, Diana told a friend at The New
Yorker, "Andrew and Anne work harder than all the rest of them, but
 they hardly get any credit for it; it's most unfair."

Ugh?

Garter, Thistle, Grand Master of the RVO, Colonel of the Blues and
Royals and Goldstick-in-Waiting.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google