Received: by 10.68.129.169 with SMTP id nx9mr7469579pbb.2.1332409331614; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Path: kz5ni19744pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k14g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Devils Advocaat Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,sci.anthropology.paleo Subject: Re: Jason and the Whales Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 118 Message-ID: <4a415572-2245-492b-9cec-c3a0ba1fa536@k14g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> References: <6a965ae5-0ece-4d74-84de-9f736303fed1@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <3a3f4e5f-3f57-4a1a-bda3-1bcdf3becbed@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.41.67.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1332409331 31818 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2012 09:42:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k14g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.41.67.242; posting-account=4GfIfgoAAADaiZw7okWRhagASwbfxs6r User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.79 Safari/535.11,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mar 22, 6:52=A0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > In article > , Devil= s > > > > > > > > > > Advocaat wrote: > > On Mar 21, 11:18=3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > > In article > > > , > > > > Devils Advocaat wrote: > > > > On Mar 21, 7:49=3D3DA0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > > > > In article > > > > > <3a3f4e5f-3f57-4a1a-bda3-1bcdf3bec...@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com= >, D=3D > > evil=3D3D > > > > s > > > > > > Advocaat wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 21, 6:46=3D3D3DA0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > =3D > > , Ca=3D3D > > > > ranx > > > > > > > > latus wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 4:26=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrot= e: > > > > > > > > > In article > > > > > > > > > <6a965ae5-0ece-4d74-84de-9f736303f...@hs8g2000vbb.googleg= roup=3D > > s.co=3D3D > > > > m>, > > > > > > > > > > Caranx latus wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 20, 2:42=3D3D3D3D3DA0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason= ) wrot=3D > > e: > > > > > > > > > > > In article > 131>=3D3D > > > > , Mi=3D3D3D > > > > > > tche=3D3D3D3D > > > > > > > > ll > > > > > > > > > > > Holman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regardless, there are still millions of evil peop= le i=3D > > n th=3D3D > > > > e wo=3D3D3D > > > > > > rld.=3D3D3D3D > > > > > > > > =3D3D3DA0If > > > > > > > > > > > > > you don't believe me, visit Las Vegas and take a = look=3D > > =A0at =3D3D > > > > the =3D3D3D > > > > > > sign=3D3D3D3D > > > > > > > > s. > > > > > > > > > > > > > =3D3D3D3D3DA0 =3D3D3D3D3DA0 You clearly haven't bee= n to Veg=3D > > as. The =3D3D > > > > entertai=3D3D3D > > > > > > ners > > > > > > > > > > > > are professional, the tourists like tourists everyw= here=3D > > , > > > > > > > > > > > > the gamblers are just sad. What "evil" are you talk= ing > > > > > > > > > > > > about? > > > > > > > > > > > > Some streets have signs advertising totally nude show= s. > > > > > > > > > > > Advertising nudity on the street is evil? > > > > > > > > > > They were signs mounted on large bars. > > > > > > > > > I'm not seeing the evil part yet. > > > > > > > > The signs mounted on the outside of the various bars indicate= d th=3D > > at > > > > > > > totally nude women were dancing in those "strip" bars. > > > > > > > Curious isn't it? The ones who believe Adam and Eve were create= d > > > > > > naked, believe that nudity is evil. > > > > > > I doubt that Eve done any pole dancing--at least--I hope not. > > > > > Address the point I made, if you can. > > > > They were nude. However, in that case is was OK. That's very differen= t > > > than what happens in strip bars. > > > How? > > When a husband and wife are nude in their bedroom--there is nothing wrong > with that issue. > > When a woman strips off her clothing on stage in a strip bar--there is > something wrong with that issue. It's sinful and in the 1800's was > probably illegal in most cities in America. Why is it sinful?