Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.talk.creationism
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Proving Creation: The Evolution of Feathers - NOT
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Devils Advocaat  
View profile  
 More options Apr 8 2012, 12:41 am
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.talk.creationism
From: Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 21:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Apr 8 2012 12:41 am
Subject: Re: Proving Creation: The Evolution of Feathers - NOT
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Apr 8, 4:43 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:

> "Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:a7f76005-aa87-4412-a634-a0c01336fe44@v1g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> >http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2012/04/04/yutyran...

> > Budikka

> From the above site..........................................................:

>  "Admittedly, there's no direct evidence for a feathery T.rex"

Doesn't mean other dinosaurs didn't have feathers.

>  "Yutyrannus's 'feathers' might have been a winter coat."

Even if it were for insulation, the evidence stands that this
particular relative of T. Rex had feathers.

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Folks, dinosaurs did not have feathers. This is actually
> part of a grand scientific hoax, as Dr. Olson so stated..

> "The idea of feathered dinosaurs and the theropod origin of
> birds is being actively promulgated by a cadre of zealous
> scientists..who have become outspoken and highly biased
> proselytizers of the faith. Truth and careful scientific weighing
> of evidence have been among the first casualties in their
> program, which is now fast becoming one of the grander
> scientific hoaxes of our age - the paleontological equivalent
> of cold fusion."

> Storrs L. Olson, Curator of Birds
> National Museum of Natural History
> Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560http://dml.cmnh.org/1999Nov/msg00263.html.

Storrs Olson was voicing an opinion.

He presented no evidence to support his statements.

Not then.

And not since.

At least not as far as I'm aware.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google