Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr304960bku.6.1336864037047;
        Sat, 12 May 2012 16:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: h15ni1299bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Caranx latus <aug.r...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Lucy FACTOID 101
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 16:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 153
Message-ID: <c29a062d-9b24-451f-88cd-80c4a768a58b@p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
References: <dfritzin-BF3CEA.19050527032012@news.eternal-september.org>
 <11ea9272-960a-47f6-8614-6c8614c2c605@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
 <Jason-0605121442260001@66-53-218-213.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>
 <f76606da-fed1-4896-b742-ba6de8531388@m15g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
 <Jason-0705120005530001@67-150-123-77.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>
 <5e135653-2a78-4a9d-ac9f-2d945647caa1@n4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <d39f448d-1ec9-4268-ba2d-72e864c17b6d@n4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <b26d5826-426f-4c77-a3a6-b9b796fccb4b@a3g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <bc369b02-095b-490a-824b-ff5dc41a9211@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <7f4d917c-0cf7-44c4-9cfb-1a49d1c9009f@s9g2000pbq.googlegroups.com>
 <302679a0-4f75-4713-84be-d59965809b19@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <982d2e52-ddab-4d9e-8d15-ce200d7a8bb8@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com> <5395c937-fd6a-4f08-ae8e-eaab341ea2b0@j28g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.237.7.236
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1336864036 19487 127.0.0.1 (12 May 2012 23:07:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 23:07:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=204.237.7.236; posting-account=Ll3S6QoAAACs5sECr6XBvAe_hPvQFldA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/535.19,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 12, 9:39=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 11, 1:31=A0pm, Caranx latus <aug.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 2:56=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 11, 10:53=A0am, Caranx latus <aug.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 10, 10:20=A0am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 9, 1:35=A0pm, Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 9, 8:49=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrot=
e:
>
> > > > > > > On May 7, 10:15=A0am, Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On May 7, 9:05=A0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > > <f76606da-fed1-4896-b742-ba6de8531...@m15g2000vbh.googleg=
roups.com>,
>
> > > > > > > > > Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 11:42=3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because I have visited the Grand Canyon. Yes,=
 the river has playe=3D
> > > > > > > > > > d a =3D3D
> > > > > > > > > > > > role=3D3D3D
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, the Grand Canyon would not be like i=
t is today if it had=3D
> > > > > > > > > > =A0not=3D3D
> > > > > > > > > > > > =3DA0bee=3D3D3D
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > n
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for Noah'sFlood.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you keep claiming.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But you have nothing to support your claim.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The Grand Canyon is the evidence.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > How did the walls of mud not slump?
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I was not present to witness the early days of Noah's=
Floodso I don't kn=3D
> > > > > > > > > > ow.
>
> > > > > > > > > > So mud walls don't slump unless you see it? =A0Did Ye F=
loode carve
> > > > > > > > > > through solid rock or mud?
>
> > > > > > > > > I meant that I don't know anything about the mud walls th=
at you mentioned
> > > > > > > > > in your post. I wish you well.
>
> > > > > > > > Assuming you still reading this; your mates at the ICR "kno=
w" that all
> > > > > > > > the sedimentary layers were laid down by Ye Floode. =A0That=
 being so,
> > > > > > > > when Ye Floode carved a gorge the layers were still soft, l=
ike mud.
> > > > > > > > If you don't think that, all they say is swill, yet you sti=
ll think
> > > > > > > > they are right. =A0Your cognitive dissonance must be frying=
 your brain.
> > > > > > > > I have mentioned this so many times in the past that I thin=
k you've
> > > > > > > > closed your mind, rather like you did with the mosasaur/wha=
le
> > > > > > > > thingey. =A0BTW, I'm uncertain I appreciate your good wishe=
s, apart from
> > > > > > > > the detail I'm not sure you are being sincere.
>
> > > > > > > I think the proof of the Grand Canyon gets down to the amount=
 of water
> > > > > > > and force needed to create a chasm like that, and that the la=
yers of
> > > > > > > the canyon are all neatly on top of each other without any er=
osions
> > > > > > > between them. =A0That, logically, puts a globalfloodas the ca=
use.
> > > > > > > People can look too at the top layer of the canyon and see so=
me
> > > > > > > erosion. =A0That's caused by mostly wind. =A0If the stratas w=
ere laid in
> > > > > > > separate, long, time periods, they would have shown at least =
the
> > > > > > > same. =A0They just don't.
>
> > > > > > > wg
>
> > > > > > I have been reading your ravings for some time now but have not=
 yet
> > > > > > worked out whether you are OEC, like the late unlamentedJasoncl=
aimed
> > > > > > to be or a YEC likeJason'sbosom buddies, the ICR? =A0BTW, what =
do you
> > > > > > know of angular unconformities?
>
> > > > > I don't belong to any of your supposal orgs. =A0The only unconfor=
mity
> > > > > that I can think of as worthy is the eroding at the top of the
> > > > > canyon.
>
> > > > That isn't even an unconformity, jester. It will be if another laye=
r
> > > > of sediment is ever deposited over it.
>
> > > > So you don't know what an unconformity is. That's a shame since the=
re
> > > > are rather a lot of them in the Grand Canyon strata, including the
> > > > significant angular unconformity near the base of the canyon that
> > > > Wombat hinted at.
>
> > > > One other note... People who aren't afraid of the facts don't usual=
ly
> > > > care what people who are terrified of them consider as "worthy".
>
> > > > >=A0It shows that erosion is a process that will happen if layers
> > > > > aren't happening quick and protected like the GC is. =A0The erodi=
ng at
> > > > > the top is natural from after the Flood, onward.
>
> > > > > And the Canyon would have been ripe for a huge 'separating' when =
the
> > > > > layers would have not been yet hardened by the vast pressure of F=
lood
> > > > > runoff.
>
> > > > > wg
>
> > > I am guessing that would be some kind of 'jaggedness', which I don't
> > > find compelling at this point.
>
> > Of course you don't. You don't want to learn anything, and least of
> > all about anything that shows that you believe things that are false.
>
> > Oh, bad guess, by the way. Have another guess... three for a quarter.
>
> MMMMud....let me count the wayssss....??

You're drunk again, aren't you? Isn't there someone there who can help
you stay off the sauce?