On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:28:49 -0700 (PDT), Jope <
jop...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On May 23, 2:33�pm, raven1 <
quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:52:59 -0700 (PDT), Jope <
jope...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >You do have a choice to make.Either believe that you are dealing with
>> >a massive lie and face the consequences whatever they may be or
>> >believe the �witness testimonies and put your trust in an invisible
>> >God.
>> >No way out of that so called wager.
>>
>> You (and Pascal) are making the rather large assumptions that:
>>
>> 1) You're choosing the correct God out of the thousands that humans
>> have claimed exist over the centuries - which (surprise!) just happens
>> to be the one you already believe in, and
>>
>> 2) He will reward an insincere profession of faith while punishing
>> honest disbelief.
>>
>> The first is wildly unlikely, statistically speaking, and when you
>> think about it, the second doesn't really indicate a God worthy of
>> being trusted, does it?
>
>The fact that there are many gods does not mean that there is no god
>at all.
Good grief! Could you have written anything more confused?
>There is only one God.
The author of Exodus certainly didn't seem to think so.
>He is the creator of the universes
>The divine requirement is ,that man must believe from his heart.
Thanks, but I believe in things (or not) from my brain, and if there
is a God, he knows that I am not capable of believing in it without
any evidence.
>The purpose of this life is to select the children of God that must
>inherit eternal life and be transformed into the
>perfect image of God.For that cause ,tests and obstacles are set
>before the path of mankind.
Interesting theology there. It's certainly not an orthodox one.
>Among those:
>You must believe in a God that you don't see.
Why? That's not faith, it's gullibility.
>You must decide among all religions ,which one is telling the truth.
What if none of them are?
>You must live a moral life
Why does anyone need a God for that? I don't live my life any
differently than I would if I believed in one.
>despite those natural propensities to self-
>gratification.
What's wrong with self-gratification if it harms no one?
>You must keep the faith despite the trials and temptations of life.
>Making the right choice can only come from within a sincere heart.
Why have faith in something for which there is no evidence? And the
whole "sincere heart" bit is meaningless piffle: I can assure you that
my non-belief is just as sincere as your belief.
>The overcomers will see God like he is and look exactly like him .
Back to the "interesting" theology, I see...
>And
>they will never die.
Except that they do. "All men are mortal" is not just the first
premise of a famous syllogism.
>>He will reward an insincere profession of faith while punishing
>>honest disbelief.
>
>God will judge people based on their deeds and the contents of their
>hearts while doing those deeds.
Then why bother with Pascal's Wager in the first place? Just live a
good life, without worrying about whether there's no god, one, or
dozens.
>Everything you do or think is in the
>public domain,when it comes to the spiritual realm.Your deepest
>thoughts and your most secret motives are plain before the eyes of
>God.Nothing can be hidden from him.
Well, then, he knows I am not capable of believing he exists without
evidence.
>The judgemnt of God will be in accordance with perfect justice.Any
>reasonable person will approve the final sentence.
No reasonable person would approve of the notion of eternal punishment
for a sincerely held mistaken belief. Or, for that matter, for any
reason.