I cannot confirm that all meteorites, cut or uncut, contain fossils,
but all the meteorites I bought (over 60 pieces) contain fossils. The
following is just a randonly chosen meteorite ball exposing ET blood
vessel containing red blood cells. I purchased the meteorite ball at US
$12 via an auction on the web.
Figure 1: shows the meteorite ball and the blood vessel remains marked
by a sticker http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395464&p=80
Figure 2: 60x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remains
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395465&p=81
Figure 3: 200x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remains
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395461&p=82
Figure 4: 500x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remains
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691405327&p=83
Figure 5: 1,000X micrograph showing the sticker and “fossilized RBC’s
in BV” http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395463&p=84
> I cannot confirm that all meteorites, cut or uncut, contain fossils,
> but all the meteorites I bought (over 60 pieces) contain fossils
Do you have support for this claim? The photos say next to nothing.
Well, your meteorite must have been the one that hit earth many
millions of years ago that went directly on top of a family of
Dinosaurs thereby imprinting their DNA , etc...on the meteorites
surface. You should sell that to The Smithsonian Institute or at
least take it to your local Pawn Shop . What do u think ???
Here's what Raven1 thinks:
"Seriously, I've been on Usenet for 13 years, and you have to
be the dumbest, most ignorant person I've run across in that time"
Yeah, they mean nothing to archaeologists for thousands of years.
A meteorite ball???? I reckon you got caught for a sucker there chum.
Read very carefully. I shall say this only once.
NO METEORITES CONTAIN FOSSILS
>
> I cannot confirm that all meteorites, cut or uncut, contain fossils,
> but all the meteorites I bought (over 60 pieces) contain fossils. The
> following is just a randonly chosen meteorite ball exposing ET blood
> vessel containing red blood cells. I purchased the meteorite ball at US
> $12 via an auction on the web.
>
> Figure 1: shows the meteorite ball and the blood vessel remains marked
> by a stickerhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395464&p=80
>
> Figure 2: 60x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remainshttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395465&p=81
>
> Figure 3: 200x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remainshttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691395461&p=82
>
> Figure 4: 500x micrograph showing the sticker and the BV remainshttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691405327&p=83
No, only those follen from Mars. (from the Media)
snip
What would be the single most important discovery in modern biology and you
bought the evidence for a few bucks and post it on usenet...
Fucking idiot.
Sorry, there are microbial remains; http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/home/mars_meteorite.html
Dah! I think you should READ the article and not just the flashy
heading.
What is identified is magnetite nanocrystals, this does not
necessarily imply life.
In any event the poster is saying he has bold vessels and other crap
from terrestrial meteorites.
I just added a new micrograph showing many cross sections of many
vertical blood vessels found within that 200-um blood vessel.
Here is the newly-labelled micrograph marked for lumens of vertical
blood vessels crossing the large,horizontal blood vessel:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691421063&p=85
I did not notice them the first time. I bet you did not see them
either. But they cannot escape the eyes of anatomists.
The so-called science of 'martian meteorites' is highly speculative.
Only 34 meteorites have been identified as possibly coming from Mars.
That is 34 world-wide.
To identify a meteorite in this class (which MIGHT be Martian) you
need highly sophisticated neutron spectrometry.
NONE of the so-called Martian meteorites have unambiguous life-
traces.None.
The traces that are interesting are curious chemical markings that
COULD have originated from living things.
There are no living things on ANY meteorites.
There are NO anatomically interesting features on ANY meteorite.
Last point - you are an idiot .
What do *you* think?
--
Rockinghorse Winner
"Hug your sweetie today."
Did you not read the last message I posted? If so, it is re-posted as
follows.
I just added a new micrograph showing many cross sections of many
vertical blood vessels found within that 200-um blood vessel.
Here is the newly-labelled micrograph marked for lumens of vertical
blood vessels crossing the large,horizontal blood vessel:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691421063&p=85
I did not notice them the first time. I bet you did not see them
either. But they cannot escape the eyes of anatomists.
I hope the photos say something to non-babblers.
Unambiquous prettiest blood vessel remains found in a meteorite
Someone (Chazwin) claimed my evidences are ambiguous concerning
fossils found in meteorites. So, I took out my prettiest meteorite,
imaged it for scarlet blood vessel remains and displayed them below.
You decide if they show rock minerals.
Figure 1: Meteorite 6
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427559&p=87
Figure 2: 100X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427560&p=88
Figure 3: 200X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427565&p=89
Figure 4: 500X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427563&p=90
Additional figures:
200X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427566&p=91
60X BV near sticker
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427568&p=92
60X another BV near stikcer
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=25&f=1691427567&p=93