Another Creationist LIE Exposed
Budikka666
An Italian scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a
meeting at which scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of
Science, “that conventional dating methods are wrong, that fossil
strata resulted from the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years
ago,” not to mention “why evolution is unscientific. '
Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist
conspiracy, call them what they are: LIARS.
Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
scientific evidence for a creation....
Budikka
ilbe...@gmail.com
Bud, It doesnt matter if EVERY Creationist on this planet as well as
Mars told a lie ; you still have a future meeting with The Creator ---
just you and him . Its your choice on how it goes but you have to
decide beforehand. Choose wisely.
Free Lunch
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
So you claim, but keep ignoring requests for evidence to back up your
claim. Why should I believe you?
>just you and him . Its your choice on how it goes but you have to
>decide beforehand. Choose wisely.
Show me the evidence that you know what will happen. Show me why I
should accept your claim.
ilbe...@gmail.com
Quote :'Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of
positive
scientific evidence for a creation.... '
Budikka
Answer : If you take a look up where the sun doesnt shine , youll
notice about 60 major anatomical systems in your own Body that ALL
work with extraordinary precision / collaboratively along with
hundreds of other systems and parts....so you can choose to deny God
having a part in knitting you together in your mothers womb making you
unlike any other person out of 6,000,000,000 . A slimey pond scum
Protozoa didnt do it Bud -- thats believing in fairy tales .
ilbe...@gmail.com
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:21:07 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Read the Bible, and believe. Its going to occur to all of us. Make
plans now.
Free Lunch
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
I've read the Bible. I have no reason to believe it. I have a lot of
evidence that shows that the Bible is strewn with mistakes. Why would I
waste my time believing something that is so unreliable?
I take it that you don't actually have evidence if you only have an old
collection of stories, rules, poems, etc. to offer.
Free Lunch
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>On Dec 21, 4:07�pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
There is no evidence that God had anything to do with it.
Start over.
Syd M.
More threats, Dave?
That's not an argument.
PDW
Syd M.
No.
Your threats aren't going to work.
PDW
thomas p.
Fairy tales do not use observed natural causes as explanations. Clearly the
Bible is a fairy tale.
MarkA
> On Dec 21, 4:07ļæ½pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/creationism-at-1.html An Italian
>> scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a meeting at which
>> scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of Science, ļæ½that
>> conventional dating methods are wrong, that fossil strata resulted from
>> the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years ago,ļæ½ not to mention
>> ļæ½why evolution is unscientific. '
>>
>> Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
>> being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist conspiracy,
>> call them what they are: LIARS.
>>
>> Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
>> scientific evidence for a creation....
>>
>> Budikka
>
> Quote :'Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of
> positive
> scientific evidence for a creation.... ' Budikka
>
> Answer : If you take a look up where the sun doesnt shine , youll notice
> about 60 major anatomical systems in your own Body that ALL work with
> extraordinary precision / collaboratively along with hundreds of other
> systems and parts
...exactly what you would expect from 3 billion years of evolution.
....so you can choose to deny God having a part in
> knitting you together in your mothers womb making you unlike any other
> person out of 6,000,000,000 . A slimey pond scum Protozoa didnt do it
> Bud -- thats believing in fairy tales .
Argument from Ignorance + Argument from Personal Incredulity = ZERO points
supporting the "Goddidit" hypothesis. Thanks for playing.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
MarkA
> On Dec 21, 4:07ļæ½pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/creationism-at-1.html An Italian
>> scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a meeting at which
>> scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of Science, ļæ½that
>> conventional dating methods are wrong, that fossil strata resulted from
>> the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years ago,ļæ½ not to mention
>> ļæ½why evolution is unscientific. '
>>
>> Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
>> being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist conspiracy,
>> call them what they are: LIARS.
>>
>> Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
>> scientific evidence for a creation....
>>
>> Budikka
>
> Bud, It doesnt matter if EVERY Creationist on this planet as well as Mars
> told a lie ; you still have a future meeting with The Creator --- just you
> and him . Its your choice on how it goes but you have to decide
> beforehand. Choose wisely.
IF that's true (a mighty big IF), I expect HE will be very proud of me for
using the brain HE gave me. HE might not be so proud of you.
Ken
> Bud, It doesnt matter if EVERY Creationist on this planet as well as
> Mars told a lie ; you still have a future meeting with The Creator ---
> just you and him . Its your choice on how it goes but you have to
> decide beforehand.
Choose wisely.
Why?
You sure haven't, because you chose stupidity
Dimwit replies with his "The Boggieman is gonna get you" but that only
works on little kids and brainwashed fundy idiots like you
Quote the Raven1: "Seriously, I've been on Usenet for 13 years, and
you have to
be the dumbest, most ignorant person I've run across in that time"
half...@bfe.inc
On the other hand, what happens when you stand before God and are
asked "Why did you tell lies in my name?"
I am curious as to what your answer will be.
Halfstop
Budikka666
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka
Budikka666
Great. Please post a list of these "60 major anatomical systems" in
response ot this message, together with your *positive* *scientific*
evidence showing how they demonstrate design and refute evolution, and
I'll be happy to formally debate them all with you.
What do you say?
Budikka
Ken
> On the other hand, what happens when you stand before God and are
> asked "Why did you tell lies in my name?"
>
> I am curious as to what your answer will be.
>
> Halfstop
As there's no god, never has been and never will be, Dimwitted Dave
has nothing to sweat during the lie detector test
Free Lunch
in alt.talk.creationism:
So you think he knows there is no god?
bob young
On 12/22/09 10:21 AM, in article
2d9c6c28-4c4c-4128...@t19g2000vbc.googlegroups.com,
"IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
And your proof of this is ?
Ken
> So you think he knows there is no god?
No god and no santa, no easter bunny, no tooth fairy, no great
pumpkin, no fairy godparents..BUT that doesn't keep Dimwit (and a
number of other fundy brainwashies) from trying to "prove" to us that
some sky fairy exists when we all know it doesn't
fasgnadh
> Unmet challenge #1
> The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/8e03d6bb01bb35c5?hl=en&dmode=source
where I challenged you for proof that 12 year old Alexei,
terrorised, tortured and murdered, was a 'despot?
> only to see you RUN AWAY.
# Subject: Atheist admits their murder of a 13 year old,
# claims it was because he was a 'Despot' - Where's the Proof?
# was Re: Atheist infanticide - "most horrific political crime of
the 20th century"
# From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,aus.religion,alt.politics.communism,
# uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.religion,alt.politics.democrats,
# alt.politics.republicans
# Message-ID: <jcBKl.7665$y61...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:39:59 GMT
#
#
# Budikka admits they murdered a 12 year old, claims he deserved it: 8^o
# >> Seon demonstrated his disinterest in Atheist crimes against humanity:
# >>> fasgnadh wrote:
# >>>>
# >>>> "Russia exonerates Tsar Nicholas II
# >>>>
# >>>> The Russian supreme court has ruled that the country's
# >>>> last tsar and his family must be recognised as victims
# >>>> of Soviet repression 90 years after they were executed
# >>>> by a Bolshevik firing squad.
# >>>>
# >>>>
# >>>> By Adrian Blomfield in Moscow
# >>>>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/3115053/Russia-exonerates-Tsar-Nicholas-II.html
# >>>>
# >>>>
# >>>>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
# >>>>
# >>>>
# >>>> Tsar Nicholas II with his wife Tsarina Alexandra
# >>>> (background), the Tsaravitch (2nd from right)
# >>>> and his four daughters Photo: PA
# >>>>
# >>>> In an unexpected ruling, the court in Moscow declared
# >>>> that Nicholas II and the royal family had been killed
# >>>> illegally and are entitled to legal rehabilitation
# >>>> by the state.
# >>>>
# >>>> The decision brings to a close a decade-long campaign
# >>>> by the tsar's descendants to force the state to admit
# >>>> culpability for what many Russians regard as the single
# >>>> most horrific political crime of the 20th century."
# >>>>
# >>>>
# >>>> The children saw their father shot and "were stabbed
# >>>> with bayonets and then shot at close range in the head" by
# >>>> the big Brave atheists.
# >>>> Alexei was 13 and Anastasia 17
# >>>> - Massie, R, The Romanovs The Final Chapter, 6
# >>>>
# >>>> "It also represents a symbolic end to Russia's often
# >>>> tortured process of addressing the repressions of
# >>>> the Soviet era."
# >>>>
# >>>> Nothing as tortured as the atheist holocaust deniers
# >>>> trying to deny that the USSR was an atheist state! B^p
# >>>>
...
# > Hey fasgnadh, how does the Russian Royal family with a handful of
# > children - who were Christians but behaved like despots
#
# You claim that you atheists killed a 13 year old because he
# was a DESPOT???
#
# WHERE'S YOUR PROOF, you vile murdering bastard!!!
#
# THE Russian SUPREME COURT, and the RUSSIAN PEOPLE, know otherwise!!!
#
# You claim that the atheist bayonet stuck in a 17 year old girl
# is Atheist REASON and ATHEIST RATIONALITY?!?!????
#
# > - stack up against the 276 children
# > that believer Jim Jones had killed?
# And what is this DEPRAVED moral relativism you are
# attempting, that the murder of children by an ATHEIST STATE
# is somehow EXCUSED by the mass suicide/mass killing of some
# cult OTHER THAN ATHEISM?
#
# Your 'argument is "Sure we killed kids, but they killed
# MORE KIDS"? B^p
#
# What kind of fucking MORAL DEGENERATE ARE YOU!???
#
# *I* condemn ALL crimes of violence, you defend some, IF the killers
# are ATHEISTS, by trying to distract to some other murders, IRRELEVANT
# to the crime under discussion.
#
# You don't give a FUCK, not even about the Jonestown victims,
# except as a way of DISTRACTING from the Atheist infanticide
# you have DEFENDED! 8^o
#
# Unlike you, I DON'T AGREE THAT ONE CRIME EXCUSES ANOTHER.
#
# and UNLIKE YOU, I AM NOT DEFENDING THE JONESTOWN KILLINGS
# AS YOU ARE DEFENDING THE ATHIST INFANTICIDE and, by YOUR
# fucked up 'logic', the far greater slaughter of 40,000,000
# victims of the atheist holocausts.
#
# They don't 'STACK UP' in your terms because I condemn ALL
# the murders whereas YOU have tried to tell us that 13 year
# old Alexei and 17 year old Anastasia deserved to be killed
# by atheist thugs because they were 'despots'
#
# Prove it .. or stand condemned for your SUPPORT OF INFANTICIDE
...
#
# EVERY atheist regime was like that..
#
# ..it has taken YOU 'modern' atheists to demonstrate beyond doubt that
# NOTHING has CHANGED....
#
# http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
>
> Unmet challenge #2
Budikka exposed the atheist lie that 'atheism is mere
non-belief in God' ..it is militant, hate-filled anti-theism:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/874776cb72b43b60?hl=en&dmode=source
# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
# Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
#
# You can keep your spiritual values.
# I'll piss on them and pass on them.
#
# Budikka
# Subject: Bukakke debunks the atheist lie that "atheism is no more than
# disbelief in God" .. it is militant ANTI-THEISM was Re"
# The atheist dilemma - the unanswerable questions atheists flee from
# From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# Message-ID: <cLoXm.63535$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:27:52 GMT
#
# Budikka666 demonstrated that militant atheism is anti-theism:
#
# > "Morton Lucifer" wrote:
# >>
# >> Atheism makes many claims - "Atheism is a rational
# >> position", "Atheism is free of the dogma of primitive
# >> superstition"..
#
# and their most common lie, the only defence they have to
# the accusation that EVERY atheist regime has been a totalitarian
# tyranny.. the claim that 'pure' atheism is "no more than the belief
# that there is no God"
#
# > You can keep your spiritual values. I'll piss on them and pass on
# > them.
#
#
# So there we have it, (and not for the first time), the hate-filled
# bigotry and violent (toilet fetishist) anti-theism of the militant
# atheists.
> Unmet challenge #3
Bukakke's response, typical of irrational atheists,
was to snip all the facts all the properly cited evidence of atheist
crimes against humanity, and RUN AWAY, leaving only abuse, lies,
slander and ranting bile-filled hatred.. when challenged to
prove her slanders.. she fell silent and RAN AWAY;
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/c68682218c1b6d2a?hl=en&dmode=source
# From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
# Subject: Flatnads is LYING SCUM. End of Story.
# Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:43:04 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<3e60edc9-1a86-42e6...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
#
# Your LIES were refuted several months ago. The fact that you're still
# SPAMMING ten news groups with this juvenile horseshit when they're
# nothing but your own manufactured jerk-off inanity proves what a
# useless piece of cowardly, vacuous hypocritical trash you truly are.
#
# End of story. End of you.
#
# Budikka
How could she have 'refuted' a day old post showing her hate filled
anti-theism 'months ago? Psycho powers? B^D
This is clear evidence of the consistently GUTLESS COWARDLY AND
INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST practice of atheists of SNIPPING the FACTS,
RUNNING AWAY, and leaving Nothing but hate-filled abuse and bare faced LIES!
as I detailed in the subsequent post:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/843e0abd1f13fe7b?hl=en&dmode=source
# Subject: Re: Bukakke debunks the atheist lie that "atheism is no
# more than disbelief, in God" .. it is militant ANTI-THEISM
# was Re: The atheist dilemma - the, unanswerable questions atheists
flee from
# From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,
# alt.agnosticism,alt.religion.Islam,alt.politics.democrats,
# alt.politics.republicans,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics
# Message-ID: <ogpXm.63546$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:03:16 GMT
#
# Budikka666 wrote:
# > fasgnadh wrote:
# >> Budikka666 demonstrated that militant atheism is anti-theism:
# >>
# >>> "Morton Lucifer" who looks remarkably like a Flatnads sock puppet on
# >>> Dec 18, 2:48 pm wrote:
# >>>> Atheism makes many claims - "Atheism is a rational
# >>>> position", "Atheism is free of the dogma of primitive
# >>>> superstition"..
# >>
# >> and their most common lie, the only defence they have to
# >> the accusation that EVERY atheist regime has been a totalitarian
# >> tyranny.. the claim that 'pure' atheism is "no more than the belief
# >> that there is no God"
# >>
# >>> You can keep your spiritual values. I'll piss on them and pass on
# >>> them.
# >>
# >>
# >> So there we have it, (and not for the first time), the hate-filled
# >> bigotry and violent (toilet fetishist) anti-theism of the militant
# >> atheists.
# >>
# >
# > Your LIES were refuted several months ago.
#
# You refuted my post from today 'several months ago'???
#
# BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA!
#
# Not even your dimwitted atheist moron mates would swallow such
# a load of shit from you! B^D
#
# > End of story.
#
# Sure, all you atheists cut and run from "the, unanswerable
# questions atheists flee from" .. just like you did last time!
#
# Thanks for your repeat performance, eveyone can see clearly
# what a gutless lying sack of shit you are! B^]
#
#
# All the proof of what hate-filled militant atheists support
# replaced from where the Bukakke snipped it as she RAN AWAY:
#
# AGAIN!!! B^D
#
# >>
# >> Bukakke is a serial hit-and-run liar and abuser who is still
# >> RUNNING away (day 233!) from my devastating rational
# >> tour de force, critiquing this very issue of historical
# >> atheist brutality and it's contemporary apologists:
# >>
# >>
# >> # Budikka whined hypocritically:
# >> # >
# >> # > Unmet challenge #1
# >> #
# >> # From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# >> # Subject: How Bukakke was humbled and crawled away in defeat!
# >> # Message-ID: <H7bPl.11167$y61.6...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# >> # Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:05:27 GMT
# >>
# >> Such a long time ago, and yet Bukakke is still stung by her
# >> loss! B^D
>
> Unmet challenge #4
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/4cf9bf9265a6176b?hl=en&dmode=source
Subject: Bukakke claims the atheist slogan
"There is no God" doesn't make any sense!!!! B^D
Message-ID: <SrZXm.63911$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:13:06 GMT
>
> Unmet challenge #5
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion.christian/msg/c3d5dfb386544ac6?hl=en&dmode=source
# Message-ID: <syHXm.63732$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:51:20 GMT
#
# Budikka666 still running (day 234) :
#
# > I refuted your LIES.
#
# You never even IDENTIFIED any lies in my post..
# you just snipped it and CLAIMED you had 'refuted it'
# BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHA
#
# There is NO EVIDENCE of any lies by me,
# there is NO EVIDENCE of any refutation, by you
#
# There is just evidence of you SNIPPING THE WHOLE POST
# and raving like a MAD BITCH ... as usual
> Unmet challenge #6
.. Oh why bother, Bukakke is STILL RUNNING AWAY!!!
"Buk Buk Buk BwAAAAARK" - Chicken Bukakke
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE atheist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges.
I have posed the UNANSWERABLE questions which atheists run from! B^]
I have presented them wit irrefutable proof of the totalitarian
tyranny what has been EVERY atheist regime, and of the hate filled
militant atheist thugs who continue the violent tradition of atheist
terror, torture and mass murder.
Agnosticism is the only rational default intellectual position,
the atheists can no more prove THEIR belief..
"There is No God"
http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html
than the theists can conclusively prove there is a God.
But the modern democratic MAJORITY theist societies at least
have a track record the atheist regimes have NEVER had,
of providing freedom of belief for all parties! B^]
That's why even atheists choose to live in the secular
states that modern majority religious societies have built
to protect everyone from DOMINATION by ONE DOGMA, as occurred
in the atheist tyrannies, and in some theocracies.
And the theist majority condemn violence, even within their ranks,
whereas we have all witnessed the atheist silently condoning or
more often, ACTIVELY SUPPORTING they violent thugs in THEIR RANKS:
# From: Trance Gemini <trance...@gmail.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
# Message-ID:
<128235a0-640d-495a...@g6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
# Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
#
# On Sep 26, 5:46=A0am, Steve Knight <sknigh...@cox.net> wrote:
#
# > We're here to talk about our own personal issues as atheists.
# >
# > BAAWA is back. You Knights out there better start being Knights
# > because if I don't see blood, and soon, you're gone.
# >
# > We kill theists and shit down their throats
# >
# > Warlord Steve
# > BAAWA
#
# ------------------------------------------------------------------
# BAAWA Knightette (?) Applicant
Trance signs up to Kill theists and shit down their throats. 8^o
Not satisfied with murder, Steve favours GENOCIDE
# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.religion.islam
# Subject: Re: Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
# Message-ID: <8t6ve5hs41qn3a2rv...@4ax.com>
# Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:58:18 -0800
#
# On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:22:32 +0200, "Katrina"
# <blondes_g...@yahoo.com> wrote:
#
# >Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
#
# It is the most foul, disgusting filth on Earth.
# The sooner we nuke you fuckers, the better.
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA
Chris lee prefers misogynist woman-hating psychosexual violence:
# From: Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
# Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:24:01 -0500
# Message-ID: <o07dl41sa4t4jhof3...@4ax.com>
#
# "go fuck yourself with your crucifix in a drill chuck'.
# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
# Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
#
# You can keep your spiritual values.
# I'll piss on them and pass on them.
#
# Budikka
Their reason...
> has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
> pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
>
> Case closed. End of story.
>
> Budikka
--
alt.atheism FAQ:
http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
Virgil
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Bukakke's response, typical of irrational atheists,
> was to snip all the facts all the properly cited evidence of fasgnadh's
> crimes against humanity
She wouldn't do that
fasgnadh
Explain to us agnostics how you *know* that some sky fairy doesn't exist?
Atheists act on their beliefs and pretend to "knowledge" which
they simply have no evidence for.
Seon Ferguson
"Virgil" <Vir...@home.esc> wrote in message
news:Virgil-A4C87D....@bignews.usenetmonster.com...
He accused me of doing that but all I was doing was getting rid of text so I
could easily find what to reply to. It's a good tactic to use though.
Virgil
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > On Dec 22, 4:00 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> >> So you think he knows there is no god?
> >
> > No god and no santa, no easter bunny, no tooth fairy, no great
> > pumpkin, no fairy godparents..BUT that doesn't keep Dimwit (and a
> > number of other fundy brainwashies) from trying to "prove" to us that
> > some sky fairy exists when we all know it doesn't
>
> Explain to us agnostics how you *know* that some sky fairy doesn't exist?
Explain to us non-beleivers how you know it does, fasgnadh!
>
> Atheists act on their beliefs and pretend to "knowledge" which
> they simply have no evidence for.
And how is this any different from what theists do?
But Fasgnadh deliberately misrepresents the majority of atheists who are
merely non-believers in his gods.
Budikka666
Your LIE about the Russian royal family was dealt with months ago.
The fact that all you have to offer is your mantra of repeating this
same LIE endlessly proves what a dickless piece of trash you are.
End of story. End of you.
Budikka
fasgnadh
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> Budikka666 wrote:
>>>
>>> Unmet challenge #1
>>>
>>> The challenge I offered you in this thread:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/8e03d6bb01bb35c5?hl=en&dmode=source
>>
>>
>> where I challenged you for proof that 12 year old Alexei,
>> terrorised, tortured and murdered, was a 'despot?
>>
>>> only to see you RUN AWAY.
Day 236 and Chickenshit Bukakke is STILL Running from this
unmet challenge:
Day 4 Bukakke is running from this unmet challenge
Day 3 Bukakke is still running from this unmet challenge:
Day 1 Bukakke is still running from this unmet challenge
>>
>> Subject: Bukakke claims the atheist slogan
>> "There is no God" doesn't make any sense!!!! B^D
>> Message-ID: <SrZXm.63911$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
>> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:13:06 GMT
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Unmet challenge #5
>>
Day 2 Bukakke is still running from this unmet challenge
Unmet Challenge #7
> Your LIE about the Russian royal family was dealt with months ago.
I made no lies about the Russian Royal Family, and you have shown no
lies by me at all.
I posted citing a story about the Russian Royal family and you
attacked it declaring that the family including the children,
deserved to be executed because they were 'despots'
" the Russian Royal family with a handful of
children - who were Christians but behaved like despots"
- Bukakke the lying atheist apologist for atheist child killers!
You have never provided any proof for your claim Alexis deserved death
because he was a despot.
You have NEVER provided PROOF for any of your LYING accusations,
you cold hearted, hate-filled murderous atheist bitch!
> The fact that all you have to offer is your mantra of repeating this
You have 7 unmet challenges, you lying bitch, your defence of
murdering innocent children is just one of them.
Youhave never proven any lie by me..
I have documented many lies BY YOU!
Game set match.
You have no credibility to defend..
That is why you repeatedly snip ALL the documented evidence
and post empty abuse, which shows your desperation and your
HYPOCRISY every time you challenge other, weaker minds.
What is most amusing, is that you think
'dickless' is an insult when I have one and you don't!
YOU EVEN LIE IN YOUR INSULTS.. you sad pathetic LOSER!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA
> End of story. End of you.
You have repeated that idiotic slogan chanting numerous times..
clearly it is not and never has been the end.. and again
you simply look foolish, ineffectual and irrelevant. B^]
> Budikka
another atheist trophy of mine:
http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg
Puck Greenman.
Such a pity.
It would be almost worth it, just to see the buggers sweat.
Free Lunch
in alt.talk.creationism:
>Ken wrote:
>> On Dec 22, 4:00 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>
>>> So you think he knows there is no god?
>>
>> No god and no santa, no easter bunny, no tooth fairy, no great
>> pumpkin, no fairy godparents..BUT that doesn't keep Dimwit (and a
>> number of other fundy brainwashies) from trying to "prove" to us that
>> some sky fairy exists when we all know it doesn't
>
>Explain to us agnostics how you *know* that some sky fairy doesn't exist?
I don't claim to know that all gods don't exist, but there is no reason
to accept any of the claims that have been made to date about the gods
that have been posited.
>Atheists act on their beliefs and pretend to "knowledge" which
>they simply have no evidence for.
Since there is no evidence of gods being involved in any way with
humans, what different actions do you expect to be taken?
Puck Greenman.
wrote:
>On Dec 22, 4:00�pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> So you think he knows there is no god?
>
>No god and no santa, no easter bunny, no tooth fairy,
No?
Now about , 5ft 4", teeth like a cheese grater, and minces around,
trying to get his size eights into a pair of size five, stilettos.
Been called "Tooth Faerie, as long as I have known him.
>no great
>pumpkin, no fairy godparents..
There you go again. Two of my kid's, and one of my grand kid's,
godparents, are two of the nicest boys that you could wish to meet.
Mind you, one of them can lift a 5.5 Ltr. diesel lump, above his head.
Well, he could, 30 years ago.
...Puts it down to Bovril, and clean living.
And before any of our gay friends get offended; Be assured, of all the
friends I have, and all I have had, there are only two that I might
set above them, and one of those, is long dead.
Ken
> Explain to us agnostics how you *know* that some sky fairy doesn't exist?
You expect me to prove that something that doesn't exist actually
doesn't exist.
> Atheists act on their beliefs and pretend to "knowledge" which
> they simply have no evidence for.
That's the problem with theists, they think we need to have something
to believe, We just don't believe in your pretend sky fairy
As for no evidence, that's exactly what creationists don't
have..evidence
Father Haskell
>
> Bud, It doesnt matter if EVERY Creationist on this planet as well as
> Mars told a lie ; you still have a future meeting with The Creator ---
If creation is a lie, then there is no creator.
bobsyo...@yahoo.com
truth about.
Virgil
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Chickenshit Fasgnadh snipped everything and RAN AWAY, as usual:
>
Day 236 and Chickenshit Fasgnadh is STILL Running from this
unmet challenge:
Fasgnadh's lies snipped to save electrons from being further abused.
Ralph
> On Dec 21, 4:07 pm, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
>> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/creationism-at-1.html
>> An Italian scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a
>> meeting at which scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of
>> strata resulted from the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years
>>
>> Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
>> being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist
>> conspiracy, call them what they are: LIARS.
>>
>> Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
>> scientific evidence for a creation....
>>
>> Budikka
>
> Mars told a lie ; you still have a future meeting with The Creator ---
> decide beforehand. Choose wisely.
Sure Dave, just becasue you have a meeting with your imaginary playmate
doesn't mean a thing to a sane and rational person.
Masked Avenger
poor old Fasnuts is a very confused and angry theist ..... who likes to
claim ...... very loudly and arrogantly ...... that he is really an
Agnostic ....... but he REALLY hates atheists ...... and supports most
theists when he replies to their posts.
The cognitive dissonance that he suffers from is caused mainly from the
fact that he is a Theist but won't admit it ......
An atheist is someone who merely does not believe in a god or gods,
based on the evidence ....... for the same reason that most people don't
believe in Leprechauns or that there is a Teapot orbiting Venus ....
there simply is no evidence to support these things ...... if evidence
is ever presented to show that any of these things do in fact exist,
then most rational people .... atheists included ..... would have to
admit to it.
Poor old Fasnuts problem is amplified because he doesn't quite
understand that even Agnostics are really Atheists ....... it boils down
to this ..... if asked the question " do you believe in a god ?" and you
answer yes, then you are a Theist, if you answer any other way i.e. no,
or I don't know ...... then you don't 'believe' in a god .... ergo you
are an Atheist .... and Fasnuts HATES Atheists ..... the poor old Galah
never stops sqwarking about it ....... he just keeps on repeating the
same tired old crap ....... over and over and over ...... but he doesn't
realise how boring he has become ...... now watch him go into melt
down mode ........ again ....... and tell us all how EVIL Atheists are
..... again ....
--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
Does Schr�dinger's cat have 18 half lives ?
J Roc
> http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/creationism-at-1.html
> An Italian scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a
> meeting at which scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of
> strata resulted from the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years
>
> Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
> being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist
> conspiracy, call them what they are: LIARS.
>
> Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
> scientific evidence for a creation....
>
> Budikka
Budikka,
"Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
scientific evidence for a creation.... "
We do have that evidence, silly, it is the bible :p
along with
the earth is flat and covered by a dome
the sun and stars go around the earth
NASA is an atheistic conspiricy to decieve us
originating from the devil
(ha ha ha!)
J Roc
>
> >http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/12/creationism-at-1.html
> > An Italian scientific society has published ' the proceedings of a
> > meeting at which scientists and philosophers argued, in the words of
> > Science, “that conventional dating methods are wrong, that fossil
> > strata resulted from the Deluge, and that dinosaurs died 40,000 years
> > ago,” not to mention “why evolution is unscientific. '
>
> > Now the next time creationists spew their pathetic trash that they're
> > being prevented from doing science by the evil evolutionist
> > conspiracy, call them what they are: LIARS.
>
> > Meanwhile we're still waiting for the very *first* item of positive
> > scientific evidence for a creation....
>
> > Budikka
>
> positive
> scientific evidence for a creation.... '
> Budikka
>
> notice about 60 major anatomical systems in your own Body that ALL
> work with extraordinary precision / collaboratively along with
> hundreds of other systems and parts....so you can choose to deny God
> having a part in knitting you together in your mothers womb making you
> unlike any other person out of 6,000,000,000 . A slimey pond scum
> Protozoa didnt do it Bud -- thats believing in fairy tales .
Presuppostions origninating from arguments from design and fine tuning
J Roc
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:21:07 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ooooooo...I am scared
Argument for consequence (fear)
J Roc
You mean there is NO santa...sniff sniff
Free Lunch
wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Dave is remarkably skilled at finding erroneous, foolish, and dishonest
arguments.
Ken
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:52:47 -0800 (PST), J Roc <synnj...@gmail.com>
> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
> >Presuppostions origninating from arguments from design and fine tuning
>
> Dave is remarkably skilled at finding erroneous, foolish, and dishonest
> arguments.
Dimwit is equally skilled at avoiding any effort to support his
dumbassed statements, backing up his dumbassed arguments and ignores
any evidence that negates his faith based Xtian ignorance
Puck Greenman.
wrote:
But we always said that he got his arguments out of his arse.
Now he confirms it.
FreeThink
Because life is so awesome a god thingie must have done it? You are so
arrogant that you actually claim to be able to recognize the work of
an omnipotent entity. Ridiculous..
Budikka666
Damn! You kicked my ass. Now I'll have to retreat to a monastery!
LoL!
Budikka
bob young
On 12/23/09 1:36 PM, in article
18CdnVgO36FzMazW...@westnet.com.au, "Seon Ferguson"
<seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Indeed. After sweeping away all of the garbage, what is there left ?
>
Seon
"bob young" <alasp...@netvigator.com> wrote in message
news:C75A817E.25C2C%alasp...@netvigator.com...
Just the >>