Re: Why did early man not encounter a dinosaur since they co-existed ? ...
Free Lunch
in alt.talk.creationism:
Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
that were your goal.
>the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
>reality concerning anything of which they speak. after all, to suppose life comes from
>things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
>ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
>comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
>2 Pet. 2:12
>
>since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, " ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
>Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
>exist alive without Him.
>
>in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
>things. dinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
>some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
>of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
>thousand years.
>
>interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
>threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. a fair question. the Bible gives the location of the
>Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
>us today. we know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
>Mt. 5:45
>
>there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
>and civilization began. the dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
>ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
>
>( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
>on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
>
>the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
>hope. their idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
>space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come about in his 2
>hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
>as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
>and writing things down on clay.
>
>the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. the earliest writings on clay are
>dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
>all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. the Atheists need Africa as their starting
>point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
>bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
>really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
>note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. their foundation begins on the
>second floor.
>
>a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
>a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage. can be suppose for
>a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
>the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
>he's accustomed to ?
>
>" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
>that are accustomed to do evil. " Jer. 13:23
>
>" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
>out of that which fills the heart. " Mt. 12:34
ilbe...@gmail.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
back in my files and take a look for you.
Dan Listermann
"IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bdc48abc-d5fe-447f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
future.
Free Lunch
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
No, man did not exist with dinosaurs. The evidence about that is clear.
You may be thinking of a fraud in Texas perpetrated by some science
denying creationists.
Father Haskell
wrote:
Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?
Jimbo
>
> - Show quoted text -
They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
hatted Gnomes. Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage. :D
raven1
>Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
>Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
>back in my files and take a look for you.
You seem determined to maintain your status as the dumbest, most
ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?
Christopher A. Lee
wrote:
>>
>> Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
>hatted Gnomes. Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage. :D
Actually they were under the bridge.
Devils Advocaat
Now lets see, what would convince me that humans and dinosaurs co-
existed?
I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
correctly.
Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
recent, rather than prehistoric.
Other than the above, don't ask me to accept the unsupported claims of
various individuals who have an alternative agenda.
Dan Listermann
"Devils Advocaat" <mank...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:55a032a6-5ec5-4575...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
But you don't seem to understand "alternative agenda." Because it is
alternative, it must be far more correct that conventional, right?
Pastor Kutchie
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:01:36 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
No, he's thinking of The Flintstones.
Father Haskell
> Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> back in my files and take a look for you.
What can I sell you?
Devils Advocaat
> "Devils Advocaat" <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
So are you a big endian or a little endian?
Choose your answer carefully ... :P
Devils Advocaat
I would recommend a lifetime's supply of selenite cheese harvested
from mare crisium.
flak...@aol.com
this load of complete crapola:
> Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> back in my files and take a look for you.
Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
and Man had illicit sex together.
As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
brainwashed creatuionuts?
Quote the Raven1: "Seriously, I've been on Usenet for 13 years, and
you have to
be the dumbest, most ignorant person I've run across in that time"
Father Haskell
I'll throw in the rings of Saturn, no additional cost.
Free Lunch
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Anything. Dave is clearly unable to think critically.
Budikka666
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.
Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.
Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary
Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.
Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.
Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave
Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
Case closed. End of story. End of You.
Budikka
hypa...@comcast.net
If they'd been on an upper deck, the sunlight would have hit
them, turned them to stone and possibly sunk the ship.
Father Haskell
> On Dec 20, 7:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote
> this load of complete crapola:
>
> > Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
> and Man had illicit sex together.
> As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
> brainwashed creatuionuts?
The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.
Ken
According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
versa) ..
It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave
Father Haskell
That was the one that had its brains up its ass?
Dave Fritzinger
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:01:36 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Not only did man exist with dinosaurs, man still does exist with them.
I have one as a pet. He is a grey cockatiel. I also see dozens of
dinosaurs every day. In Hawaii, we have Mynahs, doves, various species
of cardinals, not to mention the native dinosaurs that the above are
displacing.
Free Lunch
<dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
Those dinosaurs certainly. The ones that Richard Kiley spoke about when
John Hammond was throwing his little theme park together, not so much.
Jimbo
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:17:47 -0800 (PST), Jimbo <ckdbig...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?- Hide quoted text -
>
> >They refused to get on, along with Unicorns, Elves, Orcs, and pointy-
> >hatted Gnomes. Unfortunately, the Trolls were booked in steerage. :D
>
> Actually they were under the bridge.
LOL! Yep, that's where a troll would be.
Jimbo
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
LOL!
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> On Dec 21, 12:24ï¿œpm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 8:01ï¿œam, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 20, 4:46ï¿œpm, "IlBeBauc...@gmail.com" <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Dec 20, 7:01ï¿œam, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote
> > > > this load of complete crapola:
> >
> > > > > Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. ï¿œHave you heard of
> > > > > Dinosaur Park out west ? ￜ Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > > > > back in my files and take a look for you.
> >
> > > > Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
> > > > and Man had illicit sex together.
> > > > As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
> > > > brainwashed creatuionuts?
> >
> > > The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.
> >
> > According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
> > dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
> > versa) ..
> > It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave
>
> That was the one that had its brains up its ass?
What brains?
--
St. Jackanapes
Father Haskell
> Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > On Dec 21, 8:01 am, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 20, 4:46 pm, "IlBeBauc...@gmail.com" <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 20, 7:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote
> > > > > this load of complete crapola:
>
> > > > > > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > > > > > back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> > > > > Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
> > > > > and Man had illicit sex together.
> > > > > As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
> > > > > brainwashed creatuionuts?
>
> > > > The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.
>
> > > According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
> > > dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
> > > versa) ..
> > > It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave
>
> > That was the one that had its brains up its ass?
>
> What brains?
The brains that marginally separated it from a plant.
Devils Advocaat
> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> back in my files and take a look for you.
Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
on you to provide the evidence.
Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.
Peter
too busy indulging in incest?
Father Haskell
He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.
Lorentz
wrote:
> On Dec 20, 10:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > in alt.talk.creationism:
> Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?
The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.
Father Haskell
Devils Advocaat
Sorry you can't, I sold those to the monks of EE!
Father Haskell
No prob. There's still the rings of Uranus.
Lorentz
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:01:36 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>
> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> >Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> >back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?
He has a highly competitive spirit.
Lorentz
wrote:
> On 20 Dec, 15:01, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> existed?
>
> I guess a fossil bed containing human and dinosaur remains would do
> it, as long as it was properly examined, documented and dated
> correctly.
>
> Or maybe, if it was within the last few thousand years, a preserved
> example of a dinosaur that could be dated and verified as being
> recent, rather than prehistoric.
>
you apart.
Father Haskell
How about a palelolithic cave with remains of a
cooking fire and a pile of dinosaur bones with
barbecue sauce?
haiku jones
Naw, the beast still could have been tens of
millions of years older than the cave men --
guys will eat ANYTHING.
Haiku Jones
Devils Advocaat
Sorry you can't have those either as I am rather attached to them :P
Devils Advocaat
Not exactly evidence as I wouldn't be around to be convinced
afterwards :P
Father Haskell
Cut you a deal on Jupiter's rings, then? Neptune's?
Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
the farthest away? Is there nothing more boring than
Mercury?
Ben Kaufman
Maybe BigFoot is actually an evolved TRex? <g>.
Ben
Ben Kaufman
That could hinge on whether dinosaurs were kosher and that is questionable.
Supposedly, birds are the closet relative to them and some birds, like
chickens, are kosher while others such as raptors are not.
Ben
Ben Kaufman
wrote:
Just carry something indigestible in your pocket and we'll find it in the
dinoturd.
Ben
Father Haskell
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> That could hinge on whether dinosaurs were kosher and that is questionable.
> Supposedly, birds are the closet relative to them and some birds, like
> chickens, are kosher while others such as raptors are not.
So that's why no kosher buzzard at my local butcher's.
They're really not that bad in soup, if you let it simmer
for a couple of days.
SkyEyes
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
Or one of the Cambrian mammal trilobites that [M]Adman claimed
existed, in one of his more notorious talk.origins posts.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net
Darwin123
Our closest neighbor, Selene.
Darwin123
wrote:
> On Dec 20, 7:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote
> this load of complete crapola:
>
> > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> and Man had illicit sex together.
Some Creationist will claim that the Dinosaurs were the Son's of
Heaven that mated with the daughters of the Earth in Genesis. And when
this gets into a biology textbook as a "scientific theory," we will
all blame you.
Why you? Because Creationists are not smart enough to be legally
tried.
Father Haskell
I'd have made Selene one of Saturn's moons and
Titan ours.
Ben Kaufman
Cambrian mammal trilobites? Come to think of it I might have seen a wine
recommendation for that. Unfortunately, plate tectonics have relocated the
vineyard under the ocean.
Ben
SkyEyes
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
Yup. He claimed that there were mammal fossils found in Cambrian
strata (which falsifies the ToE, natcherly). When asked *which*
mammal species were represented, Doofus answered "trilobites!"
Brenda
haiku jones
You're kidding? No? Wow...
Mammalian trilobites did not appear until
the late Triassic. I thought that everyone
knew that.
Haiku Jones
Father Haskell
He was probably thinking of tribbles.
Ben Kaufman
That's hilarious yet quite sad if this person is not just playing a jackass
troll.
Ben.
Word Smyth
> Unmet challenge #1
> The challenge I offered you in this thread:http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
> on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.
>
> Unmet challenge #2
> Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
> quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
> Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
> Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
> even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.
>
> Unmet challenge #3
> Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
> this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.
>
> Unmet challenge #4
> Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
> than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.
>
> Unmet challenge #5
> Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
> cannot be added to a genome.
>
> Unmet challenge #6
> Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
> what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
> one species from evolving into another species over time.
>
> Unmet Challenge #7
> Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
> unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
> your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
> when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
> to the contrary
>
> Unmet Challenge #8
> Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
> Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
> LIARS and FRAUDS.
>
> Unmet Challenge #9
> Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
> what its purpose is.
>
> Unmet Challenge #10
> Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
> died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.
>
> Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
> HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
> Chicken Adman
> Chicken Andrew
> Chicken Brother Ted
> Chicken Codebreaker
> Chicken Curtjester1
> Chicken Duke
> Chicken Gabriel
> Chicken I'll Be Bauck
> Chicken Pastor Dave
>
> Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
> find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
> has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
> pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.
>
> Case closed. End of story. End of You.
>
> Budikka
Are you serious? #2 is easy... #3 is even easier... #4 is proving a
negative... #5 never heard of that "creationist claim" ... but
whatever... #6 has more to do with macro vs micro-evolution then
creationism imho... #7 is very highly debatable and requires us to
first define what we mean by "life"... #8 sounds like an athiest hissy
fit... #9 Show me where "now" is and I'll show you where your soul
is :D
#10 Several historians attest to the real physical person named JESUS,
as for proving what he did, kind of hard to do, isn't it? Seeing as it
was a couple thousand years ago... all we have are the eyewitness
written reports attesting to his ascension
You wouldn't last 10 minutes in a serious debate on creation vs
evolution, imho.
haiku jones
...quoth the poster who, you may notice, couldn't actually
*answer* any of the questions.
Perhaps you felt cramped for space? Yes? Here,
take all you need. Use the back of this post if
necessary:
Haiku Jones
Word Smyth
Why waste my time shoveling pearls down some swine's throat? It's like
arguing with a woman, one stands little chance of "winning", as logic
and rationality are thrown out the window. No offence to the fairer
sex ;)
archie dux
Wow. That has to be one of the wordiest admissions
of "Actually, I can't" I've ever seen.
archie
Word Smyth
Perhaps you should read what was written. There was no admission to
any inability on my part. Simply an admission to an unwillingness to
waste time.
Masked Avenger
Alright then ....... let's make it a little easier for you ...... just
answer #2 for the time being ....... you did say it was 'easy' .......
...... unless of course you are just blowing hot air ...........
--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
Does Schr�dinger's cat have 18 half lives ?
haiku jones
I did.
You can't.
You've fooled no one.
You lose.
Bye bye.
Haiku Jones
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> On Jan 3, 5:25ï¿œpm, "St. Jackanapes" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> > Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 21, 12:24ï¿œpm, Ken <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 21, 8:01ï¿œam, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Dec 20, 4:46ï¿œpm, "IlBeBauc...@gmail.com" <flakey...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Dec 20, 7:01ï¿œam, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote
> > > > > > this load of complete crapola:
> >
> > > > > > > Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. ï¿œHave you heard of
> > > > > > > Dinosaur Park out west ? ￜ Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > > > > > > back in my files and take a look for you.
> >
> > > > > > Not only did Dino's and Man live together, its been shown that Dino's
> > > > > > and Man had illicit sex together.
> > > > > > As my proof of this.....where else would have led to our fundy
> > > > > > brainwashed creatuionuts?
> >
> > > > > The dinosaurs weren't that stupid.
> >
> > > > According to the Creationut Handbook of Pseudoscience, only one
> > > > dinosaur species is known to have had sex with early man (and vise
> > > > versa) ..
> > > > It was called the Megasoreass, a distant relative of dimwit dave
> >
> > > That was the one that had its brains up its ass?
> >
> > What brains?
>
> The brains that marginally separated it from a plant.
Oh, the poop plant...
--
St. Jackanapes
Da'Splooge Whisperer
> "IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bdc48abc-d5fe-447f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...> "Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> back in my files and take a look for you."
>
> future.
Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..
--
Never underestimate the power of an enema ... now if we can just talk the
Republicans into a couple hundred of them in Congress ;)
Father Haskell
> > "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:bdc48abc-d5fe-447f...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> > "Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > back in my files and take a look for you."
>
> > Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
> > future.
>
> Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
> saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..
What? They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Lorentz said...
>
> On Dec 20 2009, 11:25ï¿œam, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:01:36 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> >
> > <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. ï¿œHave you heard of
> > >Dinosaur Park out west ? ￜ Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > >back in my files and take a look for you.
> >
> > You seem determined to maintain your status as the dumbest, most
> > ignorant poster in the history of Usenet. Why?
>
> He has a highly competitive spirit.
It has to be someone - at least he's proudly working to be dumber than
anyone else.
--
St. Jackanapes
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> On Jan 4, 1:08ï¿œam, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > On 20 Dec 2009, 15:01, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 20, 8:26ï¿œam, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > > in alt.talk.creationism:
> >
> > > > Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
> > > > is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
> > > > are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
> > > > newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
> >
> > > > You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
> > > > that were your goal.
> >
> > > > >the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
> > > > >reality concerning anything of which they speak. ï¿œafter all, to suppose life comes from
> > > > >things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
> > > > >ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
> > > > >comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
> > > > >2 Pet. 2:12
> >
> > > > >since one of the many names God reveals Himself by is " The Life, ￜ" ( Jn. 14:6 ) no
> > > > >Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
> > > > >exist alive without Him.
> >
> > > > >in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
> > > > >things. ï¿œdinosaur's and man existed together from that time until the Flood... a span of
> > > > >some 6 thousand years. ï¿œthe genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
> > > > >of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
> > > > >thousand years.
> >
> > > > >interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
> > > > >threatened by carnivore dinosaur's. ï¿œa fair question. ï¿œthe Bible gives the location of the
> > > > >Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
> > > > >us today. ï¿œwe know that the grace of God feeds the non elect as well as His elect.
> > > > >Mt. 5:45
> >
> > > > >there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
> > > > >and civilization began. ï¿œthe dinosaur's became part of all of the crude oil buried in the
> > > > >ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
> >
> > > > >( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
> > > > >on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
> >
> > > > >the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
> > > > >hope. ï¿œtheir idea is that man existed as man for some 200,000 years in Africa and in that
> > > > >space of time he never built a city there. ï¿œneither did writing come about in his 2
> > > > >hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. ï¿œbut when we study the area of Mesopotamia
> > > > >as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
> > > > >and writing things down on clay.
> >
> > > > >the Atheists must invent their facts as they go along. ï¿œthe earliest writings on clay are
> > > > >dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
> > > > >all of which are in Mesopotamia, not Africa. ï¿œthe Atheists need Africa as their starting
> > > > >point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
> > > > >bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
> > > > >really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
> > > > >note that they must, of necessity, steer around that. ï¿œtheir foundation begins on the
> > > > >second floor.
> >
> > > > >a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
> > > > >a carnivor skeleton and the bones of a human are inside its rib cage. ï¿œcan be suppose for
> > > > >a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
> > > > >the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
> > > > >he's accustomed to ? ￜ
> >
> > > > >" Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? then may ye also do good,
> > > > >that are accustomed to do evil. " ï¿œJer. 13:23
> >
> > > > >" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
> > > > >out of that which fills the heart. " ï¿œMt. 12:34- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. ï¿œHave you heard of
> > > Dinosaur Park out west ? ￜ Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > > back in my files and take a look for you.
> >
> > Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
> > on you to provide the evidence.
> >
> > Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.
>
> He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.
Yes he was! What he was referring to was Flintstone Village at 3400
Cahuenga Blvd. in West Hollywood, California. Cartooning archaeologists
have spent many years excavating through the amazing historical records
that humans and dinosaurs left during the Hanna-Barbara period.
I'm constantly amazed that I don't see more Creationists citing the
extensive archaeological contributions that have been made from the
years of work by the Hanna-Barbara teams. It makes no sense! Where are
the Ivy League schools following up on Hanna-Barbara's early work?
--
St. Jackanapes
Father Haskell
> Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 4, 1:08 am, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > On 20 Dec 2009, 15:01, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
>
>
> > > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > > > in alt.talk.creationism:
>
> > > > > Joe, why do you waste your time interpreting a book that you cannot show
> > > > > is accurate? Why do you come up with really stupid interpretations that
> > > > > are contrary to observed reality? Why do you post to too many
> > > > > newsgroups? Why can't you answer questions?
>
> > > > > You mock God with the falsehoods you spread. I wouldn't be surprised if
> > > > > that were your goal.
>
> > > > > >the time line of earth history invented by the Atheists do not at all come close to
> > > > > >things not alive by reason of the elements of which they are comprised only shows " the
> > > > > >ignorance that is in them " ( Eph. 4:18 ) and that these have a character of heart
> > > > > >comparable to the " unreasoning animals " God labels them as having.
> > > > > >2 Pet. 2:12
>
> > > > > >Atheistic philosophy can possibly demonstrate how the elements comprising living thing's
> > > > > >exist alive without Him.
>
> > > > > >in the first chapter of Genesis we see that in the same week God created all living
> > > > > >some 6 thousand years. the genealogies of certain men recorded in the Bible give the time
> > > > > >of Creation, and ultimately the life span of the earth and universe as just over 13
> > > > > >thousand years.
>
> > > > > >interestingly enough, one might ask how it could be that Adam and his family weren't life
> > > > > >Garden of Eden by reason of it's the four rivers mentioned, three of which are still with
> > > > > >Mt. 5:45
>
> > > > > >there are no dinosaur fossils found in the area of the four rivers where God placed Adam
> > > > > >ground found today in that region of Mesopotamia.
>
> > > > > >( for all that crude oil to be found on dry land there once had to be massive organic life
> > > > > >on top of the ground quickly buried by a flood, the Flood of Noah )
>
> > > > > >the most ancient cities of man are located in Mesopotamia, not in Africa as the Atheists
> > > > > >space of time he never built a city there. neither did writing come about in his 2
> > > > > >hundred thousand years of existence in Africa. but when we study the area of Mesopotamia
> > > > > >as the birthplace of man since the Garden was there, we find civilized man building cities
> > > > > >and writing things down on clay.
>
> > > > > >dated between 5,200 and 5,500 years old and are found in the oldest civilizations found,
> > > > > >point because monkey bones abound there and its necessary for them to say they found human
> > > > > >bones to ' prove ' there point all the while it's monkey bones... huh, if they really,
> > > > > >really want to prove their point, let them prove how life comes from non living elements.
> > > > > >second floor.
>
> > > > > >a speculation is in order at this point... suppose the typical God hating Atheist digs up
> > > > > >a moment that the God hating Atheist is going to go the way of " The Truth, " another of
> > > > > >the many names of the Living God, or can we rightly suppose he'll default to the only life
> > > > > >he's accustomed to ?
>
>
> > > > > >" You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> > > > back in my files and take a look for you.
>
> > > Surely as you believe that humans and dinosaurs co-existed the onus is
> > > on you to provide the evidence.
>
> > > Referring to a "Dinosaur Park out west" doesn't exactly cut it.
>
> > He was probably thinking of Flintstone Village.
>
> Yes he was! What he was referring to was Flintstone Village at 3400
> Cahuenga Blvd. in West Hollywood, California. Cartooning archaeologists
> have spent many years excavating through the amazing historical records
> that humans and dinosaurs left during the Hanna-Barbara period.
Mr. Slate's gravel quarry, wasn't it? Identified POSITIVELY
by the huge amount of paleolithic Winston butts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqdTBDkUEEQ
> I'm constantly amazed that I don't see more Creationists citing the
> extensive archaeological contributions that have been made from the
> years of work by the Hanna-Barbara teams. It makes no sense! Where are
> the Ivy League schools following up on Hanna-Barbara's early work?
With research tools like the massive Flinstones archive
on YouTube, who the fuck needs those 4-eyed eggheads?
Prints Of Darkness
> Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
Thanks for the heads-up on a new froup to me ... torch a-lit ; )
> Aren't we all when we masturbate pretending to be Big Jim Kirk??
>
> <whacka-whacka-whacka--I need more personal lubricunt!!!--- MOM!>
--
Catholicism is nothing more than a happy-gay *fairy tail* connected
to a *queer monster* known as Theocracy...
https://www.cafepress.com/YbeLIEve
Got Conscience?
Monthy Pyton
>> On Jan 16, 9:08 am, Da'Splooge Whisperer <1...@2.com> wrote:
>>> "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>>> "Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
>>> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
>>> back in my files and take a look for you."
>>
>>> Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
>>> future.
>>
>> Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
>> saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..
>
> What? They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?
I was always a big fan of MPFC but could never make it through that movie for
some reason...I'll have to give it another go for nostagia's sake ...
I'm still waiting for the jesus loves dinosaurs too park to add some dancers
like the Rockettes to the singing Jesus And His Pet Dinosaurs Review, they'll
probably be called the Chrock-ette's ' ; )
--
OPEN a bible and *IT* will CLOSE your mind...
- AunÝie ChrisÝsÝain
- - Book Of Realizations©
Father Haskell
> > Funkle Vic put fort wit...
> >> On Jan 16, 9:08 am, Da'Splooge Whisperer <1...@2.com> wrote:
> >>> "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >>> "Its been shown that Man DID exist with Dinosaurs. Have you heard of
> >>> Dinosaur Park out west ? Do a google. If you cant find it...ill go
> >>> back in my files and take a look for you."
>
> >>> Did that, got nothing regarding humans. You will have to do better in the
> >>> future.
>
> >> Of course they did, the park has an Old Testlclemint Singing Jesus review, I
> >> saw it in Bill Mahers movie "Religulous" so it has to be true ..
>
> > What? They feature "Life of Brian" reenactments now?
>
> I was always a big fan of MPFC but could never make it through that movie for
> some reason...I'll have to give it another go for nostagia's sake ...
Forget the comedy and wry philosophical commentary. The
music alone is worth the ticket.
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...
>
> On Jan 5, 4:13ï¿œpm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 4:08ï¿œpm, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
>
> > Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
> > the farthest away? ï¿œIs there nothing more boring than
> > Mercury?
>
> Our closest neighbor, Selene.
Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
so ago.
--
St. Jackanapes
-------------------------------
Anti-Jesus Forum: http://www.voy.com/20630/
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Prints Of Darkness said...
> >
> > Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> Thanks for the heads-up on a new froup to me ... torch a-lit ; )
>
You're velly welcum.
Father Haskell
> Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...
>
>
>
> > > On Jan 5, 4:08 pm, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
> > > Mercury?
>
> > Our closest neighbor, Selene.
>
> Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
> romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
> so ago.
Especially through binoculars.
St. Jackanapes
In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...
>
> On Jan 4, 4:08ï¿œpm, Lorentz <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 20 2009, 10:47ï¿œam, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 20, 10:01ï¿œam, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > On Dec 20, 8:26ï¿œam, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > > > in alt.talk.creationism:
> > > Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?
> >
> > ￜ ￜ ￜThe dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.
>
> http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg
IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN*
2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
invaders!!!!
--
King Jackanapes - who laughs daily at dead dog fuckers impotent
brothers. Better update your info, gay boy - it's out of date.
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> On Jan 30, 12:43ï¿œam, "St. Jackanapes" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> > Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Darwin123 said...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 5, 4:13ï¿œpm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Jan 5, 4:08ï¿œpm, Devils Advocaat <mankyg...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > > Why did the creator god place all the neat-looking planets
> > > > the farthest away? ï¿œIs there nothing more boring than
> > > > Mercury?
> >
> > > ￜ ￜOur closest neighbor, Selene.
> >
> > Yeah, she's hot and has help light my way through many a night-time
> > romance, but she used to be a lot more impressive some 300,000 years or
> > so ago.
>
> Especially through binoculars.
I love the moon - my parents managed to buy me a refractive
telescope when I was 11. It was only good for looking at the
moon, but what a fucking view! But it was out in front of the
house in a suburban city of a million people. Forget trying to
find even a star. Although I found a use when the older 13 year
old red haired girl across the street agreed to pose naked for
me while I trained my scope on her. It didn't work very well,
but I never told her that because she enjoyed it so much.
But when I was 4 years old my mother told me the secrets of the
Universe and I could never sleep at night after that - to this
day. She told me about how everything had it's place - the
Earth, along with all the other planets orbited around the Sun.
She explained that the sun orbited the around the center of
Milky Way galaxy. And that all of the millions of galaxies just
like the Milky Way were spinning around the center of the
Universe.
My insomnia started after that. I'd spend nights awake trying to
figure out what was outside the Universe. Luckily for me there
have been thousands of men & women a hell of a lot smarter than
I could ever be are working on this question day and night.
And thanks to TV & the Internet I get to read about it all the
time!
-St. Jackanapes
Wombat
Then why did you bother to post in the first place, wasting your oh so
valuable time.
Wombat
Wombat
I really should check the dates of posts before replying. I missed
this thread when it came out.
Wombat
Father Haskell
> In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > > On Dec 20 2009, 10:47 am, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 20, 10:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > > > > in alt.talk.creationism:
> > > > Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?
>
>
> >http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg
>
> IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN*
> 2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
> dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
> only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
> Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
> invaders!!!!
So main course at Henry Fong's China Fun for the last supper
was rats.
St. Jackanapes
Inalt.flame.jesus.christ, Father Haskell said...
>
> On Feb 12, 2:47ï¿œam, "St. Jackanapes" <nob...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> > In alt.flame.jesus.christ, wise Father Haskell said...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 4, 4:08 pm, Lorentz <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 20 2009, 10:47 am, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Dec 20, 10:01 am, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Dec 20, 8:26 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:08:08 -0500, old man joe <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > > > > > > in alt.talk.creationism:
> > > > > Then why in Fuck's Good Name were there no dinosaurs on the ark?
> >
> > > > The dinosaurs that did enter the ark are called arcosaurs.
> >
> > >http://gorightly.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/jesus_and_the_dinosaurs.jpg
> >
> > IT'S TRUE! IT'S TRUE! Now that I've seen the *TRUE* + *PROVEN* ￜ
> > 2000 year old colour French photo of Jesus mid-wifing a
> > dinosaur, I'd say it's proof without any doubt that Jesus is not
> > only an Alien - But he's also a possible genetic relative of the
> > Slithereen - and more ominously - one of the NEW "V"
> > invaders!!!!
>
> So main course at Henry Fong's China Fun for the last supper
> was rats.
Really big rats!
--
St. Jackanapes